Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety of Eslicarbazepine Acetate as Therapy for Patients With Painful Diabetic Neuropathy

Efficacy and Safety of Eslicarbazepine Acetate (BIA 2 093) as Therapy for Patients With Painful Diabetic Neuropathy: a Double-blind, Double-dummy, Randomised, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group, Multicentre Clinical Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00980746
Enrollment
557
Registered
2009-09-21
Start date
2007-11-30
Completion date
2008-11-30
Last updated
2016-06-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Painful Diabetic Neuropathy

Keywords

pain diabetes neuropathy

Brief summary

The primary objective of the study is to assess the efficacy of eslicarbazepine acetate (ESL) as therapy for patients with painful diabetic neuropathy.

Interventions

Eslicarbazepine acetate tablets, scored to allow dose titration during the titration period.

DRUGPlacebo

oral route

Sponsors

Bial - Portela C S.A.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Written informed consent to participate in the study * Men and women aged 18 years or older * Diagnosis of diabetes mellitus Type 1 or 2 * Diagnosis of pain attributed to diabetic neuropathy for more than 1 year prior to enrolment * Stable glycemic control: (total glycated haemoglobin \[HbA1c\] level ≤ 11% at screening) * Cooperation and willingness to complete all aspects of the study * Completion of at least 4 daily diaries during the week preceding randomisation * A minimum average daily pain score of 4 on the Numeric rating pain scale (NRPS) in the last 4 diary entries before randomisation.

Exclusion criteria

* Pain of other origin that might confound the assessment of neuropathic pain of diabetic origin * Significant or unstable medical or psychiatric disorders * Drug or alcohol abuse in the preceding 2 years * Peripheral vascular disease with a history of amputation, except amputation of toes * Severe renal function impairment, as shown by calculated creatinine clearance values \< 30 mL/min at screening * Relevant clinical laboratory abnormalities (e.g., Na+ \<130 mmol/L, alanine (ALT) or aspartate (AST) transaminases \>2.0 times the upper limit of normal, white blood cell count (WBC) \<2,500 cells/mm3) * Previous participation in any study with eslicarbazepine acetate * Pregnancy or breast feeding * History of hypersensitivity to the investigational products or to drugs with a similar chemical structure * History of non-compliance * Likelihood of requiring treatment during the study period with drugs or other interventions not permitted by the clinical study protocol. * Participation in a clinical study within 3 months prior to screening * Any clinically significant concomitant condition, which might influence the assessments or conduct of the trial

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline to Endpoint in Mean Pain, Scored Daily on a on an 11-point (0-10) Numeric Rating Pain Scale (NRPS), Where 0 = no Pain and 10 = Worst Possible Pain17 weeksEndpoint mean pain was defined as the mean of the last 4 available pain scores in the last 7 days of the treatment period. Likewise, baseline mean pain was defined as the mean of the last 4 available pain scores in the last 7 days of the baseline period.

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Date first subject enrolled: 06 Nov 2007 Date last subject completed: 18 Nov 2008 Randomised and treated: 557. Analyzed for efficacy (per-protocol \[PP\]): 403. Analyzed for safety: 557.

Pre-assignment details

During the 2week baseline period,current neuropathic pain drug therapy was discontinued and subjects had to be free of any medication that could affect efficacy(except authorized rescue medication)for 2weeks before start of double-blind study treatment.In case of unbearable pain, this drug-free period could be reduced,but had to be at least 7 days.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
ESL 1200 mg QD
Eslicarbazepine acetate 1200 mg once daily Eslicarbazepine acetate : Eslicarbazepine acetate tablets, scored to allow dose titration during the titration period.
85
ESL 400 mg BD
ESL 400 mg twice daily Eslicarbazepine acetate : Eslicarbazepine acetate tablets, scored to allow dose titration during the titration period.
89
ESL 600 mg BID
Eslicarbazepine 600 mg twice daily Eslicarbazepine acetate : Eslicarbazepine acetate tablets, scored to allow dose titration during the titration period.
95
ESL 800 mg BID
Eslicarbazepine acetate 800 mg twice daily Eslicarbazepine acetate : Eslicarbazepine acetate tablets, scored to allow dose titration during the titration period.
100
ESL 800 mg QD
ESL 800 mg once-daily Eslicarbazepine acetate : Eslicarbazepine acetate tablets, scored to allow dose titration during the titration period.
92
Placebo
Placebo Placebo : oral route
96
Total557

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicESL 1200 mg QDESL 400 mg BDESL 600 mg BIDESL 800 mg BIDESL 800 mg QDPlaceboTotal
Age, Customized
<=18 years
0 participants0 participants0 participants0 participants0 participants0 participants0 participants
Age, Customized
>=65 years
32 participants28 participants34 participants39 participants33 participants31 participants197 participants
Age, Customized
Between 18 and 65 years
53 participants61 participants61 participants61 participants59 participants65 participants360 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
42 Participants48 Participants56 Participants56 Participants50 Participants57 Participants309 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
43 Participants41 Participants39 Participants44 Participants42 Participants39 Participants248 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
11 / 850 / 8923 / 9535 / 1000 / 926 / 96
serious
Total, serious adverse events
7 / 853 / 890 / 954 / 1001 / 920 / 96

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline to Endpoint in Mean Pain, Scored Daily on a on an 11-point (0-10) Numeric Rating Pain Scale (NRPS), Where 0 = no Pain and 10 = Worst Possible Pain

Endpoint mean pain was defined as the mean of the last 4 available pain scores in the last 7 days of the treatment period. Likewise, baseline mean pain was defined as the mean of the last 4 available pain scores in the last 7 days of the baseline period.

Time frame: 17 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
ESL 1200 mg QDChange From Baseline to Endpoint in Mean Pain, Scored Daily on a on an 11-point (0-10) Numeric Rating Pain Scale (NRPS), Where 0 = no Pain and 10 = Worst Possible Pain-1.7546 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2352
ESL 400 mg BDChange From Baseline to Endpoint in Mean Pain, Scored Daily on a on an 11-point (0-10) Numeric Rating Pain Scale (NRPS), Where 0 = no Pain and 10 = Worst Possible Pain-2.2865 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2325
ESL 600 mg BIDChange From Baseline to Endpoint in Mean Pain, Scored Daily on a on an 11-point (0-10) Numeric Rating Pain Scale (NRPS), Where 0 = no Pain and 10 = Worst Possible Pain-1.6746 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2312
ESL 800 mg BIDChange From Baseline to Endpoint in Mean Pain, Scored Daily on a on an 11-point (0-10) Numeric Rating Pain Scale (NRPS), Where 0 = no Pain and 10 = Worst Possible Pain-1.8353 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.226
ESL 800 mg QDChange From Baseline to Endpoint in Mean Pain, Scored Daily on a on an 11-point (0-10) Numeric Rating Pain Scale (NRPS), Where 0 = no Pain and 10 = Worst Possible Pain-1.9829 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2328
PlaceboChange From Baseline to Endpoint in Mean Pain, Scored Daily on a on an 11-point (0-10) Numeric Rating Pain Scale (NRPS), Where 0 = no Pain and 10 = Worst Possible Pain-1.5801 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2311

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026