Skip to content

Clinical Decision Support for Medication Management and Adherence

Improving Quality Through Decision Support for Evidence-Based Pharmacotherapy

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00979225
Enrollment
5000
Registered
2009-09-17
Start date
2009-09-30
Completion date
2012-03-31
Last updated
2012-12-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Asthma, Diabetes Mellitus, Heart Failure, Hypertension, Myocardial Ischemia, Stroke

Keywords

health information technology, clinical decision support, medication management, medication adherence

Brief summary

This three-year, grant funded project will be conducted by the Division of Clinical Informatics in the Department of Community and Family Medicine at Duke University Medical Center. The project seeks to improve care quality and safety in an ambulatory care setting through clinical decision support for evidence-based (EB) pharmacotherapy delivered as point-of-care reports to clinic-based practitioners and as population health-based alerts to care managers. This project will build upon a regional Health Information Exchange (HIE) network created to connect providers serving 37,000 Medicaid beneficiaries from both rural and urban settings in a 5 county region in the Northern Piedmont of North Carolina. This network includes 16 private practices, 3 federally qualified health centers, 5 rural health centers, 3 urgent care facilities, 10 government agencies, 5 hospitals, and 2 cross-disciplinary care management teams. The proposed information system will be based on an emerging standard for decision support and will utilize routinely available claims and scheduling data in order to serve as a replicable model for broader use of decision support for medication management. Increased availability and use of decision support tools for medication management can be expected to reduce medication errors, improve health care quality at an acceptable cost, and augment disease management for patients and populations.

Detailed description

The study will be conducted in accordance with the following four specific aims: Aim 1: Expand the functionality of an existing decision support system in use within a regional HIE network to incorporate EB pharmacotherapy guidelines and to promote medication adherence. Primary care clinicians will receive EB pharmacotherapy suggestions and a patient-specific summary of prescription claims data delivered to the point-of-care via fax. Care managers will receive alerts delivered via email to encourage patients to arrange follow-up clinic appointments because of possible medication non-adherence. Aim 2: Implement and evaluate the impact of the two interventions on adherence to EB pharmacotherapy recommendations among Medicaid patients with high priority conditions as designated by the Institute of Medicine (IOM) in ambulatory care settings through a three-arm randomized controlled trial. Aim 3: Compare resource utilization and assess the economic attractiveness (cost-savings or cost-effectiveness) of the interventions to promote medication adherence and EB pharmacotherapy. Aim 4: Disseminate information regarding the development and impact of the interventions through Web teleconferences, professional meetings, educational lectures, and peer review journals.

Interventions

OTHERMedication Management report

Patients receive medication management reports delivered to their clinic-based caregivers for pharmacotherapy clinical decision support at point-of-care.

OTHERCare manager email notices

Community-based care managers receive email notices if the patient has not seen his/her primary care provider in the past 6 months, has low adherence to medications, and has no scheduled appointment.

Sponsors

Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ)
CollaboratorFED
Northern Piedmont Carolina Community Care Partners
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
North Carolina Division of Medical Assistance
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
North Carolina Office of Rural Health and Community Care
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Duke University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Carolina Access Medicaid patients continuously enrolled for 10 of 12 months prior to August 2009 * Patients assigned to one of 14 participating primary care clinics within the Northern Piedmont Community Care Network * At least one of six IOM priority conditions: hypertension, diabetes mellitus, stroke, ischemic heart disease, heart failure, or persistent asthma

Exclusion criteria

* Patient opted-out

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Rates of aggregate adherence by study group to all applicable pharmacotherapy rules during the study period.Baseline, 12 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Rates of adherence to pharmacotherapy rules for a specific IOM priority condition.Baseline, 12 months
Rates of adherence to applicable pharmacotherapy rules 6 months after an intervention was first initiated or could have been initiated for the control arm.Baseline, 6 months
Rates of adherence by drug class to applicable pharmacotherapy rules 6 months after an intervention was first initiated or could have been initiated for the control arm.Baseline, 6 months
Rates of adherence by IOM condition to applicable pharmacotherapy rules 6 months after an intervention was first initiated or could have been initiated for the control arm.Baseline, 6 months
The proportion of email notices that were followed up by a documented care management encounter within 30 days.12 months
Rates of adherence to pharmacotherapy rules for a specific therapeutic drug classBaseline, 12 months
Resource use and medical costs associated with the interventions and their delivery, as well as direct healthcare costs (inpatient and outpatient).12 months
Provider satisfaction measured using standard usability survey instruments.12 months
Outpatient encounter rates.Baseline, 12 months
Emergency department encounter rates.Baseline, 12 months
Inpatient hospitalization rates.Baseline, 12 months
The proportion of email notices that were followed up by a completed clinic encounter within 60 days.12 months

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026