Skip to content

A Study of Pertuzumab in Combination With Herceptin and Chemotherapy in Participants With HER2-Positive Breast Cancer

A Randomised, Multicentre, Multinational Phase II Study to Evaluate Pertuzumab in Combination With Trastuzumab, Given Either Concomitantly or Sequentially With Standard Anthracycline-based Chemotherapy or Concomitantly With a Non-anthracycline-based Chemotherapy Regimen, as Neoadjuvant Therapy for Patients With Locally Advanced, Inflammatory or Early Stage HER2-positive Breast Cancer

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00976989
Enrollment
225
Registered
2009-09-15
Start date
2009-11-30
Completion date
2016-01-31
Last updated
2017-02-06

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Breast Cancer

Brief summary

This 3 arm study will assess the tolerability, safety and efficacy of 3 neoadjuvant treatment regimens in participants with locally advanced, inflammatory or early stage human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer. Before surgery, participants will be randomized to receive either A) 6 cycles of pertuzumab plus trastuzumab (Herceptin), with 5-fluorouracil/epirubicin/cyclophosphamide (FEC) for cycles 1-3 and docetaxel for cycles 4-6, or B) FEC for cycles 1-3 followed by pertuzumab plus trastuzumab with docetaxel for cycles 4-6, or C) 6 cycles of pertuzumab plus trastuzumab with docetaxel and carboplatin. Pertuzumab will be administered at a loading dose of 840 mg intravenously (iv), then 420 mg iv 3-weekly, trastuzumab at a loading dose of 8 mg/kg iv, then 6 mg/kg iv 3-weekly, docetaxel at 75 mg/m\^2 iv, increased to 100 mg/m\^2 iv 3-weekly, and FEC and carboplatin iv 3-weekly at standard doses. Following surgery participants will receive trastuzumab 6 mg/kg iv 3-weekly for a total of 1 year, as well as adequate chemo-, radio- and hormone therapy. Anticipated time on study treatment is 4-12 months, and target sample size is 200-300.

Interventions

DRUGPertuzumab

840 mg loading dose intravenously (IV), then 420 mg IV 3-weekly.

DRUGTrastuzumab

8 mg/kg loading dose IV, then 6 mg/kg every 3 weeks.

DRUGFEC

5-fluorouracil 500 mg/m\^2, epirubicin 100 mg/m\^2 and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m\^2.

DRUGDocetaxel

75 mg/m\^2 for the first dose; 100 mg/m\^2 if no dose limiting toxicity occurs.

DRUGTCH

Trastuzumab followed by carboplatin at target area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) 6 and docetaxel at a starting dose of 75 mg/m\^2. All treatments were given every three weeks by the IV route.

Sponsors

Hoffmann-La Roche
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* female participants, age \>/=18 years * advanced, inflammatory or early stage unilateral invasive breast cancer * HER2-positive breast cancer * baseline left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) \>/=55%

Exclusion criteria

* metastatic disease (Stage IV) or bilateral breast cancer * previous anticancer therapy or radiotherapy for any malignancy * other malignancy, except for carcinoma in situ of the cervix, or basal cell carcinoma * clinically relevant cardiovascular disease * current chronic treatment with corticosteroids of \>10mg methylprednisolone or equivalent

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Safety: Percentage of Participants With Symptomatic Cardiac Events as Assessed by the InvestigatorFrom baseline up to approximately 3.5 yearsLeft ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) as assessed by the Investigator, including Grade 3, 4 or 5 symptomatic LVSD with symptomatic cardiac events.
Safety: Percentage of Participants With Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Decline During Pre-operative (Neoadjuvant) PeriodFrom baseline up to approximately 18 weeksPercentage of participants with LVEF measures decline of ≥ 10% from baseline and to a value of \<50% during the pre-operative (neoadjuvant) period.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Efficacy: Time to Clinical ResponseUp to 18 weeksTime to clinical response is defined as the time from the date of first dose received to the first date of assessment of clinical response. Clinical response is defined as a response of CR or PR at any time pre-surgery. Per RECIST v1.0 for target lesions and assessed by mammogram or MRI and CBE, CR is disappearance of all target lesions; PR is \>=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions.
Efficacy: Percentage of Participants Achieving Breast Conserving SurgeryAt approximately 18 weeksThis is the percentage of participants who achieved breast conserving surgery out of the intent-to-treat population without inflammatory breast cancer, as these participants received mastectomy irrespective of their response to neoadjuvant (pre-operative) treatment.
Efficacy: Percentage of Participants Without an Overall Survival (OS) EventFrom baseline to end of study up to 5 yearsOverall survival (OS) was defined as the time from randomization to the date of death from any cause. Participants who were alive or lost to follow-up were censored at the last known alive date. Participants with no post-baseline information were censored at the date of randomization plus one day.
Efficacy: Percentage of Participants Without a Disease-Free Survival (DFS) EventFrom baseline to end of study up to 5 yearsThe DFS was defined as the time from the first date of no disease (i.e., date of surgery) to the first documentation of progressive disease (PD) or death. PD was assessed using RECIST v1.0 and MRI and CBE. It was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions with an absolute increase of at least 5 mm or the appearance of one or more new lesions. Any evidence of contralateral disease in situ was not considered as PD. Participants who were withdrawn from the study without documented PD were censored at the date of the last assessment when the participant was known to be disease-free.
Efficacy: Percentage of Participants With Complete Pathological Response (pCR)At surgery, after 18 weeks (6 cycles) of treatmentpCR is defined as the absence of invasive neoplastic cells at microscopic examination of the tumor remnants after surgery following primary systemic therapy. pCR is evaluated after 6 cycles of treatment and surgery or following withdrawal from the study whichever occurs sooner.
Safety: Percentage of Participants With Cardiac Symptoms Associated With Symptomatic Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction (LVSD)From Baseline to end of Neoadjuvant Period (up to 18 weeks), Adjuvant Period (up to 1.5 years), Follow-up Period (up to 3.5 years)Percentage of participants with signs or symptoms of cardiac events.
Safety: Percentage of Participants With Asymptomatic Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) EventsFrom baseline to end of Neoadjuvant Period (up to 18 weeks), Adjuvant Period (up to 1.5 years), Follow-up Period (up to 3.5 years)Percentage of participants with LVEF events without signs or symptoms of cardiac events.
Safety: Maximum Decrease in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) MeasuresFrom baseline up to approximately 3.5 yearsMaximum decrease in LVEF measures is the change from baseline at worst treatment value. LVEF is measured as percentage.
Efficacy: Percentage of Participants Without a Progression-Free Survival (PFS) EventFrom baseline to end of study up to 5 yearsProgression-free survival was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the first documentation of PD or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. PD was assessed using RECIST v1.0 and MRI and CBE. It was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions with an absolute increase of at least 5 mm or the appearance of one or more new lesions. Participants who were withdrawn from the study without documented PD were censored at the date of the last assessment when the participant was known to be free from PD. Participants without post-baseline assessments but known to be alive were censored at the time of randomization plus one day.
Efficacy: Clinical Response RateDuring each 3-week cycle of 6 total cycles: up to 18 weeksTumor response is defined as complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD) or progressive disease (PD) and is identified as per local practice. Clinical response rate is defined as the percentage of participants who achieve a response of CR or PR at any time pre-surgery. Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions and assessed by mammogram or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and clinical breast examination (CBE), CR is disappearance of all target lesions; PR is \>=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions.

Countries

Bosnia and Herzegovina, Brazil, Canada, Croatia, Germany, Greece, Italy, Mexico, New Zealand, Portugal, Romania, Serbia, South Africa, South Korea, Spain, Sweden, Switzerland, Taiwan, The Bahamas, United Kingdom

Participant flow

Recruitment details

This study included 3 periods: Neoadjuvant (pre-operative) period and surgery, adjuvant (post-operative) period and post-treatment follow-up period.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
T+P Concomitant Anthracycline-based Chemotherapy
5-Fluorouracil, epirubicin with cyclophosphamide (FEC), trastuzumab and pertuzumab every three weeks for three cycles, followed by docetaxel, trastuzumab and pertuzumab every three weeks, for three cycles as neoadjuvant therapy. Trastuzumab every three weeks from Cycle 7 up to Cycle 17 as adjuvant therapy post-surgery.
73
T+P Sequential Anthracycline-based Chemotherapy
FEC every three weeks for three cycles, followed by docetaxel, trastuzumab and pertuzumab every three weeks, for three cycles as neoadjuvant therapy. Trastuzumab every three weeks from Cycle 7 up to Cycle 21 as adjuvant therapy post-surgery.
75
T+P Concomitant Non-Anthracycline Chemotherapy
Trastuzumab, carboplatin, docetaxel (TCH) and pertuzumab every three weeks, for six cycles as neoadjuvant therapy. Trastuzumab every three weeks from Cycle 7 up to Cycle 17 as adjuvant therapy post-surgery.
77
Total225

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyDeath5710
Overall StudyFailure to Return210
Overall StudyOther101
Overall StudyRecurrence of Disease010
Overall StudyRefused Treatment435
Overall StudyViolation of Selection Criteria at Entry101

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicT+P Concomitant Anthracycline-based ChemotherapyT+P Sequential Anthracycline-based ChemotherapyT+P Concomitant Non-Anthracycline ChemotherapyTotal
Age, Continuous49.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.41
50.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.7
50.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.58
50.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.86
Gender
Female
73 Participants75 Participants77 Participants225 Participants
Gender
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
72 / 7273 / 7576 / 76
serious
Total, serious adverse events
23 / 7218 / 7531 / 76

Outcome results

Primary

Safety: Percentage of Participants With Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Decline During Pre-operative (Neoadjuvant) Period

Percentage of participants with LVEF measures decline of ≥ 10% from baseline and to a value of \<50% during the pre-operative (neoadjuvant) period.

Time frame: From baseline up to approximately 18 weeks

Population: Safety population included all participants who were randomized and received study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
T+P Concomitant Anthracycline-based ChemotherapySafety: Percentage of Participants With Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Decline During Pre-operative (Neoadjuvant) Period5.6 percentage of participants
T+P Sequential Anthracycline-based ChemotherapySafety: Percentage of Participants With Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Decline During Pre-operative (Neoadjuvant) Period5.3 percentage of participants
T+P Concomitant Non-Anthracycline ChemotherapySafety: Percentage of Participants With Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Decline During Pre-operative (Neoadjuvant) Period3.9 percentage of participants
Primary

Safety: Percentage of Participants With Symptomatic Cardiac Events as Assessed by the Investigator

Left ventricular systolic dysfunction (LVSD) as assessed by the Investigator, including Grade 3, 4 or 5 symptomatic LVSD with symptomatic cardiac events.

Time frame: From baseline up to approximately 3.5 years

Population: Safety population included all participants who were randomized and received study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
T+P Concomitant Anthracycline-based ChemotherapySafety: Percentage of Participants With Symptomatic Cardiac Events as Assessed by the Investigator0 percentage of participants
T+P Sequential Anthracycline-based ChemotherapySafety: Percentage of Participants With Symptomatic Cardiac Events as Assessed by the Investigator2.7 percentage of participants
T+P Concomitant Non-Anthracycline ChemotherapySafety: Percentage of Participants With Symptomatic Cardiac Events as Assessed by the Investigator1.3 percentage of participants
Secondary

Efficacy: Clinical Response Rate

Tumor response is defined as complete response (CR), partial response (PR), stable disease (SD) or progressive disease (PD) and is identified as per local practice. Clinical response rate is defined as the percentage of participants who achieve a response of CR or PR at any time pre-surgery. Per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.0) for target lesions and assessed by mammogram or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and clinical breast examination (CBE), CR is disappearance of all target lesions; PR is \>=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions.

Time frame: During each 3-week cycle of 6 total cycles: up to 18 weeks

Population: ITT population included all participants who were randomized to treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
T+P Concomitant Anthracycline-based ChemotherapyEfficacy: Clinical Response Rate91.8 percentage of participants
T+P Sequential Anthracycline-based ChemotherapyEfficacy: Clinical Response Rate94.7 percentage of participants
T+P Concomitant Non-Anthracycline ChemotherapyEfficacy: Clinical Response Rate89.6 percentage of participants
Secondary

Efficacy: Percentage of Participants Achieving Breast Conserving Surgery

This is the percentage of participants who achieved breast conserving surgery out of the intent-to-treat population without inflammatory breast cancer, as these participants received mastectomy irrespective of their response to neoadjuvant (pre-operative) treatment.

Time frame: At approximately 18 weeks

Population: Number of participants analyzed represents the participants with T2-3 tumors for whom mastectomy was planned.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
T+P Concomitant Anthracycline-based ChemotherapyEfficacy: Percentage of Participants Achieving Breast Conserving Surgery21.7 percentage of participants
T+P Sequential Anthracycline-based ChemotherapyEfficacy: Percentage of Participants Achieving Breast Conserving Surgery16.7 percentage of participants
T+P Concomitant Non-Anthracycline ChemotherapyEfficacy: Percentage of Participants Achieving Breast Conserving Surgery27.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Efficacy: Percentage of Participants With Complete Pathological Response (pCR)

pCR is defined as the absence of invasive neoplastic cells at microscopic examination of the tumor remnants after surgery following primary systemic therapy. pCR is evaluated after 6 cycles of treatment and surgery or following withdrawal from the study whichever occurs sooner.

Time frame: At surgery, after 18 weeks (6 cycles) of treatment

Population: Intent to treat (ITT) population included all participants who were randomized to treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
T+P Concomitant Anthracycline-based ChemotherapyEfficacy: Percentage of Participants With Complete Pathological Response (pCR)61.6 percentage of participants
T+P Sequential Anthracycline-based ChemotherapyEfficacy: Percentage of Participants With Complete Pathological Response (pCR)57.3 percentage of participants
T+P Concomitant Non-Anthracycline ChemotherapyEfficacy: Percentage of Participants With Complete Pathological Response (pCR)66.2 percentage of participants
Secondary

Efficacy: Percentage of Participants Without a Disease-Free Survival (DFS) Event

The DFS was defined as the time from the first date of no disease (i.e., date of surgery) to the first documentation of progressive disease (PD) or death. PD was assessed using RECIST v1.0 and MRI and CBE. It was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions with an absolute increase of at least 5 mm or the appearance of one or more new lesions. Any evidence of contralateral disease in situ was not considered as PD. Participants who were withdrawn from the study without documented PD were censored at the date of the last assessment when the participant was known to be disease-free.

Time frame: From baseline to end of study up to 5 years

Population: ITT population included all participants who were randomized to treatment. Number of participants analyzed is total number of participants evaluable during each period.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
T+P Concomitant Anthracycline-based ChemotherapyEfficacy: Percentage of Participants Without a Disease-Free Survival (DFS) Event85.5 percentage of participants
T+P Sequential Anthracycline-based ChemotherapyEfficacy: Percentage of Participants Without a Disease-Free Survival (DFS) Event88.1 percentage of participants
T+P Concomitant Non-Anthracycline ChemotherapyEfficacy: Percentage of Participants Without a Disease-Free Survival (DFS) Event84.7 percentage of participants
Secondary

Efficacy: Percentage of Participants Without an Overall Survival (OS) Event

Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time from randomization to the date of death from any cause. Participants who were alive or lost to follow-up were censored at the last known alive date. Participants with no post-baseline information were censored at the date of randomization plus one day.

Time frame: From baseline to end of study up to 5 years

Population: ITT population included all participants who were randomized to treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
T+P Concomitant Anthracycline-based ChemotherapyEfficacy: Percentage of Participants Without an Overall Survival (OS) Event93.2 percentage of participants
T+P Sequential Anthracycline-based ChemotherapyEfficacy: Percentage of Participants Without an Overall Survival (OS) Event90.7 percentage of participants
T+P Concomitant Non-Anthracycline ChemotherapyEfficacy: Percentage of Participants Without an Overall Survival (OS) Event87.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Efficacy: Percentage of Participants Without a Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Event

Progression-free survival was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the first documentation of PD or death from any cause, whichever occurred first. PD was assessed using RECIST v1.0 and MRI and CBE. It was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions with an absolute increase of at least 5 mm or the appearance of one or more new lesions. Participants who were withdrawn from the study without documented PD were censored at the date of the last assessment when the participant was known to be free from PD. Participants without post-baseline assessments but known to be alive were censored at the time of randomization plus one day.

Time frame: From baseline to end of study up to 5 years

Population: ITT population included all participants who were randomized to treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
T+P Concomitant Anthracycline-based ChemotherapyEfficacy: Percentage of Participants Without a Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Event86.3 percentage of participants
T+P Sequential Anthracycline-based ChemotherapyEfficacy: Percentage of Participants Without a Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Event85.3 percentage of participants
T+P Concomitant Non-Anthracycline ChemotherapyEfficacy: Percentage of Participants Without a Progression-Free Survival (PFS) Event81.8 percentage of participants
Secondary

Efficacy: Time to Clinical Response

Time to clinical response is defined as the time from the date of first dose received to the first date of assessment of clinical response. Clinical response is defined as a response of CR or PR at any time pre-surgery. Per RECIST v1.0 for target lesions and assessed by mammogram or MRI and CBE, CR is disappearance of all target lesions; PR is \>=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions.

Time frame: Up to 18 weeks

Population: ITT population included all participants who were randomized to treatment.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
T+P Concomitant Anthracycline-based ChemotherapyEfficacy: Time to Clinical Response3.6 weeks
T+P Sequential Anthracycline-based ChemotherapyEfficacy: Time to Clinical Response6.3 weeks
T+P Concomitant Non-Anthracycline ChemotherapyEfficacy: Time to Clinical Response4.9 weeks
Secondary

Safety: Maximum Decrease in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Measures

Maximum decrease in LVEF measures is the change from baseline at worst treatment value. LVEF is measured as percentage.

Time frame: From baseline up to approximately 3.5 years

Population: Safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received treatment. Number of participants analyzed is total number of participants evaluable.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
T+P Concomitant Anthracycline-based ChemotherapySafety: Maximum Decrease in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Measures-6.6 percentage (ejection fraction)Standard Deviation 5.15
T+P Sequential Anthracycline-based ChemotherapySafety: Maximum Decrease in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Measures-8.4 percentage (ejection fraction)Standard Deviation 5.66
T+P Concomitant Non-Anthracycline ChemotherapySafety: Maximum Decrease in Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Measures-7.0 percentage (ejection fraction)Standard Deviation 6.48
Secondary

Safety: Percentage of Participants With Asymptomatic Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) Events

Percentage of participants with LVEF events without signs or symptoms of cardiac events.

Time frame: From baseline to end of Neoadjuvant Period (up to 18 weeks), Adjuvant Period (up to 1.5 years), Follow-up Period (up to 3.5 years)

Population: Safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received treatment. Number of participants analyzed is total number of participants evaluable during each period.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
T+P Concomitant Anthracycline-based ChemotherapySafety: Percentage of Participants With Asymptomatic Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) EventsAdjuvant Period (n= 66, 64, 63)3.0 percentage of participants
T+P Concomitant Anthracycline-based ChemotherapySafety: Percentage of Participants With Asymptomatic Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) EventsNeoadjuvant Period (n=72, 75, 76)5.6 percentage of participants
T+P Concomitant Anthracycline-based ChemotherapySafety: Percentage of Participants With Asymptomatic Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) EventsFollow-up Period (n=21, 18, 23)0 percentage of participants
T+P Sequential Anthracycline-based ChemotherapySafety: Percentage of Participants With Asymptomatic Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) EventsAdjuvant Period (n= 66, 64, 63)0 percentage of participants
T+P Sequential Anthracycline-based ChemotherapySafety: Percentage of Participants With Asymptomatic Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) EventsNeoadjuvant Period (n=72, 75, 76)4.0 percentage of participants
T+P Sequential Anthracycline-based ChemotherapySafety: Percentage of Participants With Asymptomatic Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) EventsFollow-up Period (n=21, 18, 23)11.1 percentage of participants
T+P Concomitant Non-Anthracycline ChemotherapySafety: Percentage of Participants With Asymptomatic Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) EventsNeoadjuvant Period (n=72, 75, 76)2.6 percentage of participants
T+P Concomitant Non-Anthracycline ChemotherapySafety: Percentage of Participants With Asymptomatic Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) EventsFollow-up Period (n=21, 18, 23)4.3 percentage of participants
T+P Concomitant Non-Anthracycline ChemotherapySafety: Percentage of Participants With Asymptomatic Left Ventricular Ejection Fraction (LVEF) EventsAdjuvant Period (n= 66, 64, 63)4.8 percentage of participants
Secondary

Safety: Percentage of Participants With Cardiac Symptoms Associated With Symptomatic Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction (LVSD)

Percentage of participants with signs or symptoms of cardiac events.

Time frame: From Baseline to end of Neoadjuvant Period (up to 18 weeks), Adjuvant Period (up to 1.5 years), Follow-up Period (up to 3.5 years)

Population: Safety analysis population included all randomized participants who received treatment. Number of participants analyzed is total number of participants evaluable during each period.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
T+P Concomitant Anthracycline-based ChemotherapySafety: Percentage of Participants With Cardiac Symptoms Associated With Symptomatic Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction (LVSD)Adjuvant Period (n= 68, 65, 67)0 percentage of participants
T+P Concomitant Anthracycline-based ChemotherapySafety: Percentage of Participants With Cardiac Symptoms Associated With Symptomatic Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction (LVSD)Neoadjuvant Period (n=72, 75, 76)1.4 percentage of participants
T+P Concomitant Anthracycline-based ChemotherapySafety: Percentage of Participants With Cardiac Symptoms Associated With Symptomatic Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction (LVSD)Follow-up Period (n=70, 75, 74)0 percentage of participants
T+P Sequential Anthracycline-based ChemotherapySafety: Percentage of Participants With Cardiac Symptoms Associated With Symptomatic Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction (LVSD)Adjuvant Period (n= 68, 65, 67)0 percentage of participants
T+P Sequential Anthracycline-based ChemotherapySafety: Percentage of Participants With Cardiac Symptoms Associated With Symptomatic Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction (LVSD)Neoadjuvant Period (n=72, 75, 76)2.7 percentage of participants
T+P Sequential Anthracycline-based ChemotherapySafety: Percentage of Participants With Cardiac Symptoms Associated With Symptomatic Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction (LVSD)Follow-up Period (n=70, 75, 74)1.3 percentage of participants
T+P Concomitant Non-Anthracycline ChemotherapySafety: Percentage of Participants With Cardiac Symptoms Associated With Symptomatic Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction (LVSD)Neoadjuvant Period (n=72, 75, 76)0 percentage of participants
T+P Concomitant Non-Anthracycline ChemotherapySafety: Percentage of Participants With Cardiac Symptoms Associated With Symptomatic Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction (LVSD)Follow-up Period (n=70, 75, 74)0 percentage of participants
T+P Concomitant Non-Anthracycline ChemotherapySafety: Percentage of Participants With Cardiac Symptoms Associated With Symptomatic Left Ventricular Systolic Dysfunction (LVSD)Adjuvant Period (n= 68, 65, 67)1.5 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 20, 2026