Skip to content

Paclitaxel, Carboplatin and Vorinostat for the Treatment of Advanced Stage Ovarian Carcinoma

A Phase I/II, Open-Label, Non-Randomized, Pilot Study of Weekly Paclitaxel, Every Four-week Carboplatin and Oral Vorinostat for Patients Newly Diagnosed With Stage III/IV Epithelial Ovarian, Fallopian Tube or Peritoneal Cancer

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00976183
Enrollment
18
Registered
2009-09-14
Start date
2009-10-31
Completion date
2012-10-31
Last updated
2017-04-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Ovarian Neoplasms

Keywords

ovarian cancer, gynecologic oncology, vorinostat, treatment

Brief summary

Since the mortality rates for patients with advanced ovarian carinoma are high, the most likely way to improve progression free and overall survival is with maximal upfront therapy (Morrow & Curtin, 1998). Currently, no triplet regimen has demonstrated compelling superiority. Therefore, the combination of Paclitaxel, Carboplatin, and Vorinostat is intriguing because of their potential synergy, distinct mechanisms of action, and non-overlapping toxicity.

Detailed description

Ovarian cancer is the fifth most common cancer in women, accounting for nearly 15,280 deaths annually in the United States \[1\]. Paclitaxel and Carboplatin are currently the accepted standard of care for first line treatment of ovarian cancer \[2, 3\]. In spite of standard chemotherapy, nearly 70% of patients succumb to this disease. Consequently, studies continue to examine the activity of new agents and dosing regimens to improve disease free intervals and overall survival. There have been recent data suggesting that weekly chemotherapy regimens may significantly benefit cancer patients' prognosis \[4, 5\]. Non-small cell lung cancer patient studies employing weekly regimens have shown comparable response and survival rates to Q3 weekly dosing schedules, with a more favorable toxicity profile \[6, 7\]. Further studies have suggested that weekly Taxane dosing is at least as effective, less toxic, and more convenient than traditional regimens \[4, 8, 9\]. The favorable activity associated with weekly chemotherapy has primarily been studied in recurrent ovarian cancer patients, investigating the efficacy of single and/or combination drug regimens \[10, 11\]. However, there have been some studies involving chemo-naïve patients \[4, 12, 13\]. De Jongh et al. \[4} conducted a randomized I/II ovarian cancer trial with cisplatin and escalating doses of weekly or 4-weekly paclitaxel. The chemo-naïve patients exhibited a 94% overall response rate and 48 month median overall survival, while maintaining manageable toxicity. In a more recent advanced ovarian cancer study, Isonishi et al. compared the impact of paclitaxel and carboplatin administered either tri-weekly (c-TC) or dose dense weekly (dd-TC) with regard to patient progression free survival (PFS) \[14\]. Median PFS for the c-TC patients was 17.1 months and 27.9 months for the dd-TC group. There was also more favorable survival rates in the dose dense patients (83.6%) in comparison to the tri-weekly groups (77.7%) Shen et al. conducted a Chinese study investigating the efficacy of combination weekly Taxol plus Carboplatin compared to Taxol given every three weeks plus Carboplatin in previously untreated ovarian cancer patients \[12\]. While the two regimens had equal efficacy, there was less toxicity observed in the weekly regimen. Additional studies have also indicated that lower doses and shorter infusion times inherent in weekly dosing regimens should mitigate bone marrow myelosuppression and other toxicities associated with standard paclitaxel 3-weekly administration \[13\]. In addition to weekly primary induction chemotherapy regimens, studies involving consolidation or maintenance therapy have been employed in the hopes of improving survival \[15, 16\]. Micha et al. reported significantly better progression free survival results (94 weeks vs. 45 weeks) for an ovarian cancer group who received 12 cycles of paclitaxel consolidation therapy following induction therapy, compared to a similar group who received 3 cycles of paclitaxel consolidation therapy \[16\]. The current pilot study was designed to determine toxicity, progression free survival, and response rate of weekly Taxol; every four-week Carboplatin; and Vorinostat (7 days on, 7 days off 7 days on, 7 days off) given for 6 cycles. Some patients will continue on consolidation therapy, which will consist of Taxol in combination with Vorinostat for an additional 12 cycles. Modifying the dosing schedule of established chemotherapy regimens using weekly chemotherapy administration and consolidation therapy may decrease drug toxicity and maximize efficacy. These benefits are particularly intriguing in patients for whom disease treatment is long-term. Since no triplet regimen has demonstrated compelling superiority, the combination of Taxol, Carboplatin, and Vorinostat is intriguing because of their potential synergy, distinct mechanisms of action, and non-overlapping toxicity.

Interventions

DRUGVorinostat

Vorinostat will start at 200 mg QD on weeks 1 and 3, and escalating to 300 mg QD after safety has been evaluated following 2 cycles of treatment. If safety is acceptable, then the following patients could be treated at 400 mg QD on weeks 1 and 3.

Sponsors

Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Gynecologic Oncology Associates
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Subjects with a histologic or cytologic diagnosis of stage III/IV ovarian cancer, fallopian tube epithelial cancer, or peritoneal cancer who have not received prior chemotherapy or radiotherapy. * Subjects must have the appropriate surgery for their gynecologic cancer. However, subjects may be treated in a neoadjuvant manner, with surgery being performed after chemotherapy cycles 1, 2, or 3. * If neoadjuvant therapy is not administered, subjects must receive their first dose no more than six weeks postoperatively. * Subjects must have adequate bone marrow, renal and hepatic function as defined by WBC \> 3,000 cells/cu ml., platelets \> 100,000/cu.ml., calculated creatinine clearance \> 50 ccs/min., bilirubin \< 1.5 mg/dl, and SGOT \< three times normal. * Karnofsky performance status \> 50%. * Subjects who have signed an institutional review board (IRB) approved informed consent form.

Exclusion criteria

* Subjects with epithelial ovarian cancer of low malignancy potential. * Subjects with septicemia, severe infection, or acute hepatitis. * Subjects with a history of congestive heart failure, angina, or a history of myocardial infarction within the past six months.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Objective Response Rate2 years or 24 monthsClinical response was assessed by clinical, serologic, and radiographic means.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Progression Free Survival (PFS) up to 24 Months2 years or 24 monthsProgression-free survival was defined as the length of time from the date of initial induction chemotherapy until clinical, radiological, or CA-125 progression

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

The recruitment was from one location a private practice. The enrollment started on 01/15/2010. The recruitment was to be a two year time period.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Vorinostat
All study patients will receive the indicated dose of Vorinostat in conjunction with paclitaxel and carboplatin. Vorinostat: Vorinostat will start at 200 mg QD on weeks 1 and 3, and escalating to 300 mg QD after safety has been evaluated following 2 cycles of treatment. If safety is acceptable, then the following patients could be treated at 400 mg QD on weeks 1 and 3. Vorinostat: Vorinostat will be given as a lead-in dose escalation starting at 200 mg QD.
18
Total18

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicVorinostat
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
9 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
9 Participants
Age, Continuous58 years
Region of Enrollment
United States
18 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
18 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
5 / 18
serious
Total, serious adverse events
3 / 18

Outcome results

Primary

Objective Response Rate

Clinical response was assessed by clinical, serologic, and radiographic means.

Time frame: 2 years or 24 months

Population: Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST v1.0)

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
VorinostatObjective Response Rate12 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Progression Free Survival (PFS) up to 24 Months

Progression-free survival was defined as the length of time from the date of initial induction chemotherapy until clinical, radiological, or CA-125 progression

Time frame: 2 years or 24 months

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
VorinostatNumber of Participants With Progression Free Survival (PFS) up to 24 Months18 participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026