Skip to content

Bayesian Dose Adjustment of Immunosuppressants After Lung Transplantation

Evaluation of the Interest of Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Immunosuppressants (Tacrolimus, Mycophenolate Mofetil) Based on Bayesian Estimation During the Three First Years Following Lung Transplantation, in Patients With or Without Cystic Fibrosis

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00975663
Acronym
BASALT
Enrollment
180
Registered
2009-09-11
Start date
2009-09-30
Completion date
2011-02-28
Last updated
2011-04-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Lung and Heart-lung Transplantation

Keywords

Lung transplantation, heart-lung transplantation, therapeutic drug monitoring, tacrolimus, mycophenolate, immunosuppressant, pharmacokinetics

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate in lung or heart-lung transplant patients on tacrolimus and mycophenolate the impact of optimized mofetil (MMF) therapeutic drug monitoring and dose adjustment of both drugs on the incidence of treatment failure over the first three years post-transplantation.

Detailed description

This research will be based on a prospective randomized trial comparing optimized TDM of tacrolimus and MMF to the current strategy of tacrolimus and MMF dose adjustment in lung transplant recipients. The study will focus on the first three years post-transplantation, as treatment failures (including BOS) occur mainly during this post-transplantation period. As the aim of tacrolimus and MMF dose individualization is to avoid over- or underexposure, for the purpose of this study treatment failure will be a composite criterion gathering events which reflect both over- and underexposure to tacrolimus and MMF. Optimized TDM of tacrolimus and MMF based on blood tacrolimus and plasma MPA AUC Bayesian estimation will be compared to current strategies: tacrolimus dose adjustment based on trough levels (C0) and administration of a standard dose of MMF, decreased by the pulmonologist in case of adverse drug reactions or increased in case of inefficacy. The efficacy of optimized strategy vs. current strategies will be mainly evaluated through the incidence of treatment failure.

Interventions

Tacrolimus: daily oral dose divided into 2 doses (morning and evening). MMF: daily dose divided into 2 doses at 12 hour intervals or 3 doses at 8 hour intervals.

Sponsors

University Hospital, Limoges
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Male and female patients aged 18 years or more * CF and non-CF patients receiving single-lung or double-lung or heart-lung transplantation for the first time * Patients on oral tacrolimus and MMF for at least 48 hours at the time of inclusion (administration via a naso-gastric tube possible if necessary) * Patients without progressive chronic pathology jeopardizing short term patient and graft survival * Patients accepting to comply with at least the evaluation visits planned in the investigation center over the first three years post-transplantation (D7, D14, M1, M3, M6, M12, M18, M24, M30, M36) * Patients giving their free and informed written consent to participate in this study * Patients with a health insurance policy or registered under a health insurance program

Exclusion criteria

* Patients aged less than 18 years or patients over 18 years under guardianship * Patients who disagree with this research * Patients with a contra-indication to receiving tacrolimus or MMF * Patients on cyclosporine, sirolimus or everolimus * Patients who have already benefited from a solid organ transplantation in the past (including lung or heart-lung transplantation) * Patients infected by Burkholderia cenocepacia (Burkholderia cepacia genomovar III) * Patients receiving HIV protease inhibitors (major pharmacokinetic interaction with tacrolimus) * Pregnant or breastfeeding women or those of child-bearing age who do not use an efficient contraceptive method * Drug users or patients suffering from neuro-psychiatric disorders preventing them from both proper comprehension of the protocol and reliable consent * Patients already participating in another interventional clinical trial

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Immunosuppressive treatment failureDay 7, day 14, day 21; months 3, 6 and every six months afterwards up to 3 years posttransplantation

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Toxicity scoreDay 7, day 14, day 21; months 3, 6 and every six months afterwards up to 3 years posttransplantation
Benefit/risk ratioDay 7, day 14, day 21; months 3, 6 and every six months afterwards up to 3 years posttransplantation
Efficacy scoreDay 7, day 14, day 21; months 3, 6 and every six months afterwards up to 3 years posttransplantation
Overall cost of patients monitoringDay 7, day 14, day 21; months 3, 6 and every six months afterwards up to 3 years posttransplantation
Pharmacogenetic and proteomic analysisDay 7, day 14, day 21; months 3, 6 and every six months afterwards up to 3 years posttransplantation
Each event composing the composite criterionDay 7, day 14, day 21; months 3, 6 and every six months afterwards up to 3 years posttransplantation

Countries

Belgium, France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026