Skip to content

Effects of Eccentric Training for Patients With Lateral Epicondylalgia

Effects of Eccentric Training for Patients With Lateral Epicondylalgia - a Randomized Controlled Trial

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00975442
Enrollment
42
Registered
2009-09-11
Start date
2005-02-28
Completion date
2005-05-31
Last updated
2009-09-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Tennis Elbow, Epicondylitis, Lateral Humeral

Keywords

Elbow, Tendinitis, Sports Medicine, Athletic injuries

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate eccentric training as an intervention for lateral epicondylalgia (tennis elbow) in a clinical setting.

Interventions

DEVICEForearm band

All subjects were instructed to use the forearm band during all daily activities.

A home training program of eccentric training of the wrist extensors to be carried out daily with 3 sets of 15 repetitions. All subjects were instructed to use the forearm band (Epi Forsa 4061, Rehband, Sweden)

Sponsors

Rehband Sweden
CollaboratorUNKNOWN
Karolinska Institutet
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum

Inclusion criteria

* Positive diagnostic criteria according to Haker (1991): A history of pain around the lateral epicondyle for at least one month. * Pain at palpation of the lateral epicondyle of humerus and positive results in two of the following three pain provocation tests: Middle finger test, resisted extension of the wrist, and Vigorimeter test. Each of these tests is described in detail by Haker (1991)

Exclusion criteria

* Subjects with rheumatoid arthritis * Fibromyalgia * Previous surgery in the elbow region * Neck dysfunction suggesting possible cervical rhizopathy * Entrapment of n.radialis * Patients with ongoing treatment, or previous treatment less than three months before enrolled to the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Diagnostic criteria, whether or not the patient had recovered according to the diagnostic criteria for LE, Haker (1991) at follow up examinations3 wk and 6 wk follow up

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Measurements of pain free functional grip strength using the Martin Vigorimeter test, and maximum pain free isometric extensor strength by using Nicholas Myometer3 wk and 6 wk follow-up

Countries

Sweden

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026