Skip to content

Safety and Efficacy Study of MDV3100 in Patients With Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Who Have Been Previously Treated With Docetaxel-based Chemotherapy

Affirm: A Multinational Phase 3, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Efficacy And Safety Study Of Oral Mdv3100 In Patients With Progressive Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer Previously Treated With Docetaxel Based Chemotherapy

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00974311
Acronym
AFFIRM
Enrollment
1199
Registered
2009-09-10
Start date
2009-09-30
Completion date
2017-11-02
Last updated
2018-12-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer

Keywords

Prostate Cancer, Castration-resistant

Brief summary

This is a phase 3 study to compare the clinical benefit of MDV3100 versus placebo in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer who have been previously treated with docetaxel-based chemotherapy.

Interventions

DRUGEnzalutamide

MDV3100, 160 mg orally per day

DRUGPlacebo

Placebo comparator

Sponsors

Astellas Pharma Inc
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Medivation LLC, a wholly owned subsidiary of Pfizer Inc.
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Pfizer
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
MALE
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Progressive prostate cancer * Medical or surgical castration with testosterone less than 50 ng/dl * One or two prior chemotherapy regimens. At least one chemotherapy regimen must have contained docetaxel * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-2 * Adequate bone marrow, hepatic, and renal function * Able to swallow the study drug and comply with study requirements * Informed consent

Exclusion criteria

* Metastases in the brain or active epidural disease * Another malignancy within the previous 5 years * Clinically significant cardiovascular disease * Gastrointestinal disorder affecting absorption

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall SurvivalDuring study period (up to 101 months)Survival was defined as time from randomization to death due to any cause. The duration of overall survival was right-censored for participants who were lost to follow-up since randomization or not known to have died at the data analysis cut-off date (this included participants who were known to have died after the data analysis cut-off date).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) ProgressionBaseline and at every study visit from Week 13 while on study drug (up to 24 months)Time to PSA progression was defined as time from randomization to PSA progression. Participants who did not reach the endpoint were right censored at their last assessment or for participants with no post-baseline PSA assessment, date of randomization. For participants with PSA declines at Week 13, the PSA progression date was defined as the date that a \>=25% increase and an absolute increase of \>=2 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) above the nadir was documented, which was confirmed by a second consecutive value obtained 3 or more weeks later (required only if PSA progression did not occur at last PSA assessment). For participants with no PSA declines at Week 13, PSA progression date was defined as the date that a \>=25% increase and an absolute increase of \>=2 ng/mL above the baseline was documented, which was confirmed by a second consecutive value 3 or more weeks later (required only if PSA progression did not occur at last PSA assessment).
Percentage of Participants With Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) ResponseDuring DB phase (up to 24 months)Participants were evaluable for PSA response rate if they had a PSA level measured at baseline and at least 1 post-baseline assessment. Both PSA responses of \> 50% and \> 90% were determined. PSA responses required confirmation with a subsequent assessment that was conducted at least 3 weeks later.
Percentage of Participants With Soft-tissue Objective ResponseDuring DB phase (up to 24 months)The best overall soft tissue response as assessed using RECIST v1.1 during the study was summarized using the investigators' response assessments and also the derived response assessments by treatment group. Only participants with measurable soft tissue disease at screening were included in this analysis. Participants with measurable disease at screening are participants who had at least 1 target lesion identified per RECIST v1.1 at screening. Percentage of participants summarizes the number of participants with complete or partial objective response (%). Soft Tissue assessment based on Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 2009; 45:228-247.
European Quality of Life Five-Domain (EQ-5D) ScaleWeek 13EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single utility or index score. Five parameters (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) were assessed on 3-point categorical scale (1= no problems, 2= some/moderate problems and 3= severe problem). Score were transformed and resulted in a total EQ-5D score range of 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state), with higher scores indicating better health and quality of life.
Percentage of Participants With Circulating Tumor Cell (CTC) ConversionBaseline up to 24 monthsCTC conversion was assessed for participants with baseline CTC counts of greater than or equal to (\>=) 5 cells per 7.5 milliliter (mL) of blood. A CTC conversion was defined as a decline in the CTC count to less than (\<) 5 cells per 7.5 mL of blood. In this outcome measure percentage of participants with CTC conversion was reported.
Radiographic Progression-free SurvivalDuring DB phase (up to 24 months)Radiographic progression-free survival was defined as time from randomization to the earliest objective evidence of radiographic progression or death due to any cause. Participants were assessed for objective disease progression at regularly scheduled visits. The consensus guidelines of the Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group 2 were taken into consideration for the determination of disease progression. Radiographic disease progression was defined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) 1.1 for soft tissue disease, or the appearance of two or more new bone lesions on bone scan. Progression at the first scheduled reassessment at Week 13 required a confirmatory scan 6 or more weeks later. Participants who did not reach the endpoint were right censored at their last assessment.
Time to First Skeletal-related EventDuring DB Phase (up to 24 months)The time to first skeletal-related event was defined as time from randomization to the occurrence of the first skeletal-related event. Participants were assessed for skeletal-related events at regularly scheduled visits. A skeletal-related event was defined as radiation therapy or surgery to bone, pathologic bone fracture, spinal cord compression, or change of antineoplastic therapy to treat bone pain. Participants who did not reach the endpoint were right censored at their last assessment.
Percentage of Participants Who Were Responders for Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P)Baseline up to 24 monthsThe FACT-P was a 39-item participant questionnaire which assessed physical well-being (7 items), social/family well-being (7 items), emotional well-being (6 items), functional well-being (7 items), and additional prostate cancer specific concerns (12 items). All items were scored from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). The sum of scores on all 5 domains constitutes the global FACT-P. The global/total FACT-P score ranged from 0 (worst) to 156 (best), higher scores indicate better health status. Responders were those participants who had a 10-point improvement in their total FACT-P score, as compared with baseline, on two consecutive measurements obtained at least 3 weeks apart.
Percentage of Participants With Pain PalliationBaseline up to 24 monthsThe proportion of participants with pain palliation was assessed for participants with a stable and sufficient pain burden at study entry. Pain burden was measured by question #3 of the Brief Pain Inventory (Short Form). This scale measures pain on a 0 to 10 scale with 0 indicating no pain and 10 indicating pain as bad as you can imagine. Pain palliation at Week 13 was determined for the proportion of men with baseline bone metastasis(es) who had baseline pain attributable to the metastasis(es). Palliation was defined as \>=30% reduction in average pain score at Week 13 compared to baseline without a \>=30% increase in analgesic use.

Other

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Any Newly Clinically Significant Abnormal Finding in Electrocardiogram (ECG)Baseline, up to the end of DB phase or unscheduled visit (up to 24 months)Any new post baseline abnormality was defined as any abnormal ECG finding that appeared after baseline assessment which was not seen at the screening or baseline ECG assessment. Where, criteria of abnormality was QTcF interval \> 470 millisecond (msec). Participants were counted once only for a specific abnormality. This outcome measure was planned to be analysed in double blind phase only. Unscheduled visit was performed at any time during the study whenever necessary to assess for or follow-up on AEs, at the participant's request or if deemed necessary by the investigator.
Number of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry)Baseline, up to the safety follow-up visit or unscheduled visit or the initiation of another anti-neoplastic therapy whichever occurred first (up to 101 months)Laboratory parameters included hematological and chemistry parameters. Chemistry parameters included alanine aminotransferase, albumin, alkaline phosphatase, aspartate aminotransferase, bilirubin, calcium, creatine kinase, creatinine, glucose, magnesium, phosphate, potassium and sodium. Hematology parameters included haemoglobin, leukocytes, lymphocytes, neutrophils and platelet. Test abnormalities were graded by National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) version 4.03 as Grade 3= severe and Grade 4= life-threatening or disabling. Only categories with at least 1 participant with abnormality are reported in this outcome measure. Unscheduled visit was performed at any time during the study whenever necessary to assess for or follow-up on AEs, at the participant's request or if deemed necessary by the investigator.
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsBaseline, up to the safety follow-up visit or unscheduled visit or the initiation of another anti-neoplastic therapy whichever occurred first (up to 101 months)Criteria for abnormalities in vital signs included: sitting/supine systolic blood pressure (SBP) values: absolute result greater than (\>) 180 millimeter of mercury (mmHg) and \>40 mmHg increase from baseline (BL) and less than (\<) 90 mmHg and \>30 mmHg decrease from BL; diastolic blood pressure (DBP) values: absolute result \>105 mmHg and \>30 mmHg increase from BL and absolute result \< 50 mmHg and \>20 mmHg decrease from BL; any abnormalities in SBP or DBP; heart rate values: absolute result \> 120 beats per minute (bpm) and \>30 bpm increase from BL and absolute result \< 50 bpm and \>20 bpm decrease from BL or any abnormalities in heart rate. Unscheduled visit was performed at any time during the study whenever necessary to assess for or follow-up on AEs, at the participant's request or if deemed necessary by the investigator.
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)Baseline, up to the safety follow-up visit or unscheduled visit or the initiation of another anti-neoplastic therapy whichever occurred first (up to 101 months)AE: any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAE: AE resulting in any of following outcomes or deemed significant and jeopardized participants or required treatment to prevent other AE outcomes for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. TEAEs were events which occurred between first dose of study drug and up to the safety follow-up visit or the initiation of another anti-neoplastic therapy, whichever occurred first (up to 101 months). AEs included both serious and non-serious AEs. Clinically significant physical examination abnormalities were reported as AEs. Unscheduled visit was performed at any time during the study whenever necessary to assess for or follow-up on AEs, at the participant's request or if deemed necessary by the investigator.

Countries

Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Chile, France, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, Poland, South Africa, Spain, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

A total of 1199 participants were enrolled and randomized for double-blind (DB) phase. Out of which, 159 participants entered the optional open-label extension (OLE) phase.

Pre-assignment details

Participants were randomized 2:1 to receive either Enzalutamide or Placebo in DB phase. All participants who continued in OLE phase, received Enzalutamide.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Enzalutamide
In DB Phase, participants received Enzalutamide capsules 160 mg orally per day. Participants who completed DB Phase, entered in optional OLE Phase and received same treatment until unacceptable toxicity, confirmed disease progression and the participant was scheduled to initiate a new systemic anti-neoplastic therapy, death or withdrawal (median treatment duration was 8.3 months).
800
Placebo
In DB Phase, participants received placebo capsules (for Enzalutamide) orally per day. Participants who completed DB Phase, entered in optional OLE Phase and received Enzalutamide capsules 160 mg orally per day until unacceptable toxicity, confirmed disease progression and the participant was scheduled to initiate a new systemic anti-neoplastic therapy, death or withdrawal (median treatment duration was 3.0 months in DB Phase and 7.7 months in OLE Phase).
399
Total1,199

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
DB Phase (up to 24 Months)Death561298
DB Phase (up to 24 Months)Lost to Follow-up52
DB Phase (up to 24 Months)Other10
DB Phase (up to 24 Months)Study Terminated by Sponsor10842
DB Phase (up to 24 Months)Withdrawal by Subject167
OLE Phase (up to 77 Months)Death1421
OLE Phase (up to 77 Months)Other152
OLE Phase (up to 77 Months)Study Terminated by Sponsor7826
OLE Phase (up to 77 Months)Withdrawal by Subject21

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicEnzalutamideTotalPlacebo
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
568 Participants837 Participants269 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
232 Participants362 Participants130 Participants
Age, Continuous68.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.96
68.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.11
68.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.39
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
32 Participants55 Participants23 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
768 Participants1144 Participants376 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants2 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
5 Participants13 Participants8 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
27 Participants47 Participants20 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
1 Participants1 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
21 Participants25 Participants4 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
745 Participants1111 Participants366 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Argentina
7 Participants10 Participants3 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Australia
60 Participants93 Participants33 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Austria
15 Participants25 Participants10 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Belgium
27 Participants45 Participants18 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
82 Participants107 Participants25 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Chile
6 Participants11 Participants5 Participants
Region of Enrollment
France
193 Participants273 Participants80 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Germany
62 Participants86 Participants24 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Italy
20 Participants30 Participants10 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Netherlands
32 Participants46 Participants14 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Poland
7 Participants11 Participants4 Participants
Region of Enrollment
South Africa
3 Participants6 Participants3 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Spain
23 Participants36 Participants13 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United Kingdom
82 Participants132 Participants50 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
181 Participants288 Participants107 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
800 Participants1199 Participants399 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
784 / 800385 / 39947 / 50
serious
Total, serious adverse events
319 / 800155 / 39925 / 50

Outcome results

Primary

Overall Survival

Survival was defined as time from randomization to death due to any cause. The duration of overall survival was right-censored for participants who were lost to follow-up since randomization or not known to have died at the data analysis cut-off date (this included participants who were known to have died after the data analysis cut-off date).

Time frame: During study period (up to 101 months)

Population: ITT included all participants who were randomized into the study.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
EnzalutamideOverall Survival18.4 Months
PlaceboOverall Survival13.6 Months
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [0.53, 0.75]Log Rank
Secondary

European Quality of Life Five-Domain (EQ-5D) Scale

EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single utility or index score. Five parameters (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) were assessed on 3-point categorical scale (1= no problems, 2= some/moderate problems and 3= severe problem). Score were transformed and resulted in a total EQ-5D score range of 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state), with higher scores indicating better health and quality of life.

Time frame: Week 13

Population: Evaluable ITT included participants who were part of the ITT Population and who were evaluable for EQ-5D.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
EnzalutamideEuropean Quality of Life Five-Domain (EQ-5D) Scale67.2 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.29
PlaceboEuropean Quality of Life Five-Domain (EQ-5D) Scale60.0 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 19.26
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Who Were Responders for Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P)

The FACT-P was a 39-item participant questionnaire which assessed physical well-being (7 items), social/family well-being (7 items), emotional well-being (6 items), functional well-being (7 items), and additional prostate cancer specific concerns (12 items). All items were scored from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). The sum of scores on all 5 domains constitutes the global FACT-P. The global/total FACT-P score ranged from 0 (worst) to 156 (best), higher scores indicate better health status. Responders were those participants who had a 10-point improvement in their total FACT-P score, as compared with baseline, on two consecutive measurements obtained at least 3 weeks apart.

Time frame: Baseline up to 24 months

Population: Evaluable intent to treat (ITT) - all participants who were part of the ITT population and had a global FACT-P score at baseline and at least 1 post-baseline assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
EnzalutamidePercentage of Participants Who Were Responders for Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P)43.2 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants Who Were Responders for Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P)18.3 Percentage of participants
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [18.8, 30.9]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Circulating Tumor Cell (CTC) Conversion

CTC conversion was assessed for participants with baseline CTC counts of greater than or equal to (\>=) 5 cells per 7.5 milliliter (mL) of blood. A CTC conversion was defined as a decline in the CTC count to less than (\<) 5 cells per 7.5 mL of blood. In this outcome measure percentage of participants with CTC conversion was reported.

Time frame: Baseline up to 24 months

Population: CTC evaluable population included participants with a baseline and at least 1 post baseline CTC assessment.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
EnzalutamidePercentage of Participants With Circulating Tumor Cell (CTC) Conversion48 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Circulating Tumor Cell (CTC) Conversion9.7 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Pain Palliation

The proportion of participants with pain palliation was assessed for participants with a stable and sufficient pain burden at study entry. Pain burden was measured by question #3 of the Brief Pain Inventory (Short Form). This scale measures pain on a 0 to 10 scale with 0 indicating no pain and 10 indicating pain as bad as you can imagine. Pain palliation at Week 13 was determined for the proportion of men with baseline bone metastasis(es) who had baseline pain attributable to the metastasis(es). Palliation was defined as \>=30% reduction in average pain score at Week 13 compared to baseline without a \>=30% increase in analgesic use.

Time frame: Baseline up to 24 months

Population: Evaluable ITT Population included participants with metastatic bone disease at baseline; provided answers to Question #3 of the Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form for a minimum of 4 out of 7 days in the baseline run-in period; stable baseline pain; stable analgesic use; and had an average pain score during the baseline run-in period of \>= 4.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
EnzalutamidePercentage of Participants With Pain Palliation44.9 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Pain Palliation6.7 Percentage of participants
p-value: 0.007995% CI: [19.4, 57]Cochran-Mantel-Haenszel
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) Response

Participants were evaluable for PSA response rate if they had a PSA level measured at baseline and at least 1 post-baseline assessment. Both PSA responses of \> 50% and \> 90% were determined. PSA responses required confirmation with a subsequent assessment that was conducted at least 3 weeks later.

Time frame: During DB phase (up to 24 months)

Population: Evaluable ITT population included participants who were part of the ITT Population and had a PSA level measured at baseline and at least 1 post-baseline assessment.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
EnzalutamidePercentage of Participants With Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) ResponseDecline >=50% from baseline54 Percentage of participants
EnzalutamidePercentage of Participants With Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) ResponseDecline >=90% from baseline25 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) ResponseDecline >=50% from baseline2 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) ResponseDecline >=90% from baseline1 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Soft-tissue Objective Response

The best overall soft tissue response as assessed using RECIST v1.1 during the study was summarized using the investigators' response assessments and also the derived response assessments by treatment group. Only participants with measurable soft tissue disease at screening were included in this analysis. Participants with measurable disease at screening are participants who had at least 1 target lesion identified per RECIST v1.1 at screening. Percentage of participants summarizes the number of participants with complete or partial objective response (%). Soft Tissue assessment based on Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 2009; 45:228-247.

Time frame: During DB phase (up to 24 months)

Population: ITT with measurable disease population included participants who were part of the ITT Population and had measurable soft tissue disease at screening, defined by at least 1 target lesion according to RECIST v1.1.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
EnzalutamidePercentage of Participants With Soft-tissue Objective Response29 Percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With Soft-tissue Objective Response4 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Radiographic Progression-free Survival

Radiographic progression-free survival was defined as time from randomization to the earliest objective evidence of radiographic progression or death due to any cause. Participants were assessed for objective disease progression at regularly scheduled visits. The consensus guidelines of the Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group 2 were taken into consideration for the determination of disease progression. Radiographic disease progression was defined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) 1.1 for soft tissue disease, or the appearance of two or more new bone lesions on bone scan. Progression at the first scheduled reassessment at Week 13 required a confirmatory scan 6 or more weeks later. Participants who did not reach the endpoint were right censored at their last assessment.

Time frame: During DB phase (up to 24 months)

Population: ITT included all participants who were randomized into the study.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
EnzalutamideRadiographic Progression-free Survival8.3 Months
PlaceboRadiographic Progression-free Survival2.9 Months
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [0.35, 0.47]Log Rank
Secondary

Time to First Skeletal-related Event

The time to first skeletal-related event was defined as time from randomization to the occurrence of the first skeletal-related event. Participants were assessed for skeletal-related events at regularly scheduled visits. A skeletal-related event was defined as radiation therapy or surgery to bone, pathologic bone fracture, spinal cord compression, or change of antineoplastic therapy to treat bone pain. Participants who did not reach the endpoint were right censored at their last assessment.

Time frame: During DB Phase (up to 24 months)

Population: ITT included all participants who were randomized into the study.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
EnzalutamideTime to First Skeletal-related Event16.7 Months
PlaceboTime to First Skeletal-related Event13.3 Months
p-value: 0.000195% CI: [0.566, 0.835]Log Rank
Secondary

Time to Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) Progression

Time to PSA progression was defined as time from randomization to PSA progression. Participants who did not reach the endpoint were right censored at their last assessment or for participants with no post-baseline PSA assessment, date of randomization. For participants with PSA declines at Week 13, the PSA progression date was defined as the date that a \>=25% increase and an absolute increase of \>=2 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) above the nadir was documented, which was confirmed by a second consecutive value obtained 3 or more weeks later (required only if PSA progression did not occur at last PSA assessment). For participants with no PSA declines at Week 13, PSA progression date was defined as the date that a \>=25% increase and an absolute increase of \>=2 ng/mL above the baseline was documented, which was confirmed by a second consecutive value 3 or more weeks later (required only if PSA progression did not occur at last PSA assessment).

Time frame: Baseline and at every study visit from Week 13 while on study drug (up to 24 months)

Population: ITT included all participants who were randomized into the study.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
EnzalutamideTime to Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) Progression8.3 Months
PlaceboTime to Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) Progression3.0 Months
p-value: <0.000195% CI: [0.204, 0.303]Log Rank
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants With Any Newly Clinically Significant Abnormal Finding in Electrocardiogram (ECG)

Any new post baseline abnormality was defined as any abnormal ECG finding that appeared after baseline assessment which was not seen at the screening or baseline ECG assessment. Where, criteria of abnormality was QTcF interval \> 470 millisecond (msec). Participants were counted once only for a specific abnormality. This outcome measure was planned to be analysed in double blind phase only. Unscheduled visit was performed at any time during the study whenever necessary to assess for or follow-up on AEs, at the participant's request or if deemed necessary by the investigator.

Time frame: Baseline, up to the end of DB phase or unscheduled visit (up to 24 months)

Population: Safety population was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
EnzalutamideNumber of Participants With Any Newly Clinically Significant Abnormal Finding in Electrocardiogram (ECG)28 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Any Newly Clinically Significant Abnormal Finding in Electrocardiogram (ECG)13 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs

Criteria for abnormalities in vital signs included: sitting/supine systolic blood pressure (SBP) values: absolute result greater than (\>) 180 millimeter of mercury (mmHg) and \>40 mmHg increase from baseline (BL) and less than (\<) 90 mmHg and \>30 mmHg decrease from BL; diastolic blood pressure (DBP) values: absolute result \>105 mmHg and \>30 mmHg increase from BL and absolute result \< 50 mmHg and \>20 mmHg decrease from BL; any abnormalities in SBP or DBP; heart rate values: absolute result \> 120 beats per minute (bpm) and \>30 bpm increase from BL and absolute result \< 50 bpm and \>20 bpm decrease from BL or any abnormalities in heart rate. Unscheduled visit was performed at any time during the study whenever necessary to assess for or follow-up on AEs, at the participant's request or if deemed necessary by the investigator.

Time frame: Baseline, up to the safety follow-up visit or unscheduled visit or the initiation of another anti-neoplastic therapy whichever occurred first (up to 101 months)

Population: Safety population was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
EnzalutamideNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsSBP: >180 mmHg and >40 mmHg Increase from BL28 Participants
EnzalutamideNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsSBP: < 90 mmHg and >30 mmHg Decrease from BL13 Participants
EnzalutamideNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsDBP: >105 mmHg and >30 mmHg Increase from BL5 Participants
EnzalutamideNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsDBP: < 50 mmHg and >20 mmHg Decrease from BL13 Participants
EnzalutamideNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsAny abnormalities in SBP or DBP52 Participants
EnzalutamideNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsHeart Rate: > 120 bpm and >30 bpm Increase from BL7 Participants
EnzalutamideNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsHeart Rate: < 50 bpm and >20 bpm Decrease from BL18 Participants
EnzalutamideNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsAny abnormalities in Heart Rate25 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsDBP: >105 mmHg and >30 mmHg Increase from BL2 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsHeart Rate: < 50 bpm and >20 bpm Decrease from BL1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsDBP: < 50 mmHg and >20 mmHg Decrease from BL3 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsAny abnormalities in SBP or DBP16 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsHeart Rate: > 120 bpm and >30 bpm Increase from BL5 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsSBP: >180 mmHg and >40 mmHg Increase from BL7 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsSBP: < 90 mmHg and >30 mmHg Decrease from BL5 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsAny abnormalities in Heart Rate6 Participants
Placebo (DB) /Enzalutamide 160 mg (OLE) PhaseNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsDBP: >105 mmHg and >30 mmHg Increase from BL0 Participants
Placebo (DB) /Enzalutamide 160 mg (OLE) PhaseNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsSBP: < 90 mmHg and >30 mmHg Decrease from BL0 Participants
Placebo (DB) /Enzalutamide 160 mg (OLE) PhaseNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsSBP: >180 mmHg and >40 mmHg Increase from BL1 Participants
Placebo (DB) /Enzalutamide 160 mg (OLE) PhaseNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsDBP: < 50 mmHg and >20 mmHg Decrease from BL1 Participants
Placebo (DB) /Enzalutamide 160 mg (OLE) PhaseNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsHeart Rate: < 50 bpm and >20 bpm Decrease from BL0 Participants
Placebo (DB) /Enzalutamide 160 mg (OLE) PhaseNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsHeart Rate: > 120 bpm and >30 bpm Increase from BL0 Participants
Placebo (DB) /Enzalutamide 160 mg (OLE) PhaseNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsAny abnormalities in SBP or DBP2 Participants
Placebo (DB) /Enzalutamide 160 mg (OLE) PhaseNumber of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital SignsAny abnormalities in Heart Rate0 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry)

Laboratory parameters included hematological and chemistry parameters. Chemistry parameters included alanine aminotransferase, albumin, alkaline phosphatase, aspartate aminotransferase, bilirubin, calcium, creatine kinase, creatinine, glucose, magnesium, phosphate, potassium and sodium. Hematology parameters included haemoglobin, leukocytes, lymphocytes, neutrophils and platelet. Test abnormalities were graded by National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) version 4.03 as Grade 3= severe and Grade 4= life-threatening or disabling. Only categories with at least 1 participant with abnormality are reported in this outcome measure. Unscheduled visit was performed at any time during the study whenever necessary to assess for or follow-up on AEs, at the participant's request or if deemed necessary by the investigator.

Time frame: Baseline, up to the safety follow-up visit or unscheduled visit or the initiation of another anti-neoplastic therapy whichever occurred first (up to 101 months)

Population: Safety population was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
EnzalutamideNumber of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry)Sodium: High0 Participants
EnzalutamideNumber of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry)Creatinine: High0 Participants
EnzalutamideNumber of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry)Aspartate Aminotransferase: High3 Participants
EnzalutamideNumber of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry)Sodium: Low19 Participants
EnzalutamideNumber of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry)Glucose: High17 Participants
EnzalutamideNumber of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry)Platelet; Low4 Participants
EnzalutamideNumber of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry)Potassium: High2 Participants
EnzalutamideNumber of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry)Magnesium: Low0 Participants
EnzalutamideNumber of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry)Leukocytes: Low8 Participants
EnzalutamideNumber of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry)Potassium: Low7 Participants
EnzalutamideNumber of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry)Magnesium: High1 Participants
EnzalutamideNumber of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry)Bilirubin: High2 Participants
EnzalutamideNumber of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry)Phosphate: Low28 Participants
EnzalutamideNumber of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry)Neutrophils: Low10 Participants
EnzalutamideNumber of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry)Hemoglobin: High1 Participants
EnzalutamideNumber of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry)Calcium: Low14 Participants
EnzalutamideNumber of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry)Alkaline Phosphatase: High102 Participants
EnzalutamideNumber of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry)Alanine Aminotransferase:High2 Participants
EnzalutamideNumber of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry)Calcium: High1 Participants
EnzalutamideNumber of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry)Albumin: Low7 Participants
EnzalutamideNumber of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry)Hemoglobin: Low38 Participants
EnzalutamideNumber of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry)Creatine Kinase: High4 Participants
EnzalutamideNumber of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry)Lymphocytes: Low80 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry)Hemoglobin: Low20 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry)Alanine Aminotransferase:High2 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry)Albumin: Low3 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry)Alkaline Phosphatase: High74 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry)Aspartate Aminotransferase: High4 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry)Bilirubin: High0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry)Calcium: Low15 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry)Calcium: High0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry)Creatine Kinase: High2 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry)Creatinine: High2 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry)Glucose: High10 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry)Magnesium: Low1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry)Magnesium: High1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry)Phosphate: Low10 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry)Potassium: Low4 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry)Potassium: High3 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry)Sodium: Low13 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry)Sodium: High1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry)Hemoglobin: High0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry)Leukocytes: Low1 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry)Lymphocytes: Low48 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry)Neutrophils: Low0 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry)Platelet; Low4 Participants
Placebo (DB) /Enzalutamide 160 mg (OLE) PhaseNumber of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry)Lymphocytes: Low5 Participants
Placebo (DB) /Enzalutamide 160 mg (OLE) PhaseNumber of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry)Sodium: Low0 Participants
Placebo (DB) /Enzalutamide 160 mg (OLE) PhaseNumber of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry)Creatine Kinase: High0 Participants
Placebo (DB) /Enzalutamide 160 mg (OLE) PhaseNumber of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry)Albumin: Low0 Participants
Placebo (DB) /Enzalutamide 160 mg (OLE) PhaseNumber of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry)Sodium: High0 Participants
Placebo (DB) /Enzalutamide 160 mg (OLE) PhaseNumber of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry)Calcium: High0 Participants
Placebo (DB) /Enzalutamide 160 mg (OLE) PhaseNumber of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry)Calcium: Low1 Participants
Placebo (DB) /Enzalutamide 160 mg (OLE) PhaseNumber of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry)Hemoglobin: Low4 Participants
Placebo (DB) /Enzalutamide 160 mg (OLE) PhaseNumber of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry)Bilirubin: High0 Participants
Placebo (DB) /Enzalutamide 160 mg (OLE) PhaseNumber of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry)Platelet; Low0 Participants
Placebo (DB) /Enzalutamide 160 mg (OLE) PhaseNumber of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry)Hemoglobin: High0 Participants
Placebo (DB) /Enzalutamide 160 mg (OLE) PhaseNumber of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry)Aspartate Aminotransferase: High1 Participants
Placebo (DB) /Enzalutamide 160 mg (OLE) PhaseNumber of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry)Neutrophils: Low1 Participants
Placebo (DB) /Enzalutamide 160 mg (OLE) PhaseNumber of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry)Magnesium: High0 Participants
Placebo (DB) /Enzalutamide 160 mg (OLE) PhaseNumber of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry)Leukocytes: Low1 Participants
Placebo (DB) /Enzalutamide 160 mg (OLE) PhaseNumber of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry)Phosphate: Low2 Participants
Placebo (DB) /Enzalutamide 160 mg (OLE) PhaseNumber of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry)Magnesium: Low0 Participants
Placebo (DB) /Enzalutamide 160 mg (OLE) PhaseNumber of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry)Alkaline Phosphatase: High3 Participants
Placebo (DB) /Enzalutamide 160 mg (OLE) PhaseNumber of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry)Potassium: Low1 Participants
Placebo (DB) /Enzalutamide 160 mg (OLE) PhaseNumber of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry)Glucose: High1 Participants
Placebo (DB) /Enzalutamide 160 mg (OLE) PhaseNumber of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry)Alanine Aminotransferase:High1 Participants
Placebo (DB) /Enzalutamide 160 mg (OLE) PhaseNumber of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry)Potassium: High0 Participants
Placebo (DB) /Enzalutamide 160 mg (OLE) PhaseNumber of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry)Creatinine: High0 Participants
Other Pre-specified

Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)

AE: any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAE: AE resulting in any of following outcomes or deemed significant and jeopardized participants or required treatment to prevent other AE outcomes for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. TEAEs were events which occurred between first dose of study drug and up to the safety follow-up visit or the initiation of another anti-neoplastic therapy, whichever occurred first (up to 101 months). AEs included both serious and non-serious AEs. Clinically significant physical examination abnormalities were reported as AEs. Unscheduled visit was performed at any time during the study whenever necessary to assess for or follow-up on AEs, at the participant's request or if deemed necessary by the investigator.

Time frame: Baseline, up to the safety follow-up visit or unscheduled visit or the initiation of another anti-neoplastic therapy whichever occurred first (up to 101 months)

Population: Safety population was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
EnzalutamideNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)SAEs319 Participants
EnzalutamideNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)AEs789 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)SAEs155 Participants
PlaceboNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)AEs390 Participants
Placebo (DB) /Enzalutamide 160 mg (OLE) PhaseNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)AEs48 Participants
Placebo (DB) /Enzalutamide 160 mg (OLE) PhaseNumber of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)SAEs25 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 25, 2026