Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer
Conditions
Keywords
Prostate Cancer, Castration-resistant
Brief summary
This is a phase 3 study to compare the clinical benefit of MDV3100 versus placebo in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer who have been previously treated with docetaxel-based chemotherapy.
Interventions
MDV3100, 160 mg orally per day
Placebo comparator
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Progressive prostate cancer * Medical or surgical castration with testosterone less than 50 ng/dl * One or two prior chemotherapy regimens. At least one chemotherapy regimen must have contained docetaxel * Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-2 * Adequate bone marrow, hepatic, and renal function * Able to swallow the study drug and comply with study requirements * Informed consent
Exclusion criteria
* Metastases in the brain or active epidural disease * Another malignancy within the previous 5 years * Clinically significant cardiovascular disease * Gastrointestinal disorder affecting absorption
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Overall Survival | During study period (up to 101 months) | Survival was defined as time from randomization to death due to any cause. The duration of overall survival was right-censored for participants who were lost to follow-up since randomization or not known to have died at the data analysis cut-off date (this included participants who were known to have died after the data analysis cut-off date). |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Time to Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) Progression | Baseline and at every study visit from Week 13 while on study drug (up to 24 months) | Time to PSA progression was defined as time from randomization to PSA progression. Participants who did not reach the endpoint were right censored at their last assessment or for participants with no post-baseline PSA assessment, date of randomization. For participants with PSA declines at Week 13, the PSA progression date was defined as the date that a \>=25% increase and an absolute increase of \>=2 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) above the nadir was documented, which was confirmed by a second consecutive value obtained 3 or more weeks later (required only if PSA progression did not occur at last PSA assessment). For participants with no PSA declines at Week 13, PSA progression date was defined as the date that a \>=25% increase and an absolute increase of \>=2 ng/mL above the baseline was documented, which was confirmed by a second consecutive value 3 or more weeks later (required only if PSA progression did not occur at last PSA assessment). |
| Percentage of Participants With Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) Response | During DB phase (up to 24 months) | Participants were evaluable for PSA response rate if they had a PSA level measured at baseline and at least 1 post-baseline assessment. Both PSA responses of \> 50% and \> 90% were determined. PSA responses required confirmation with a subsequent assessment that was conducted at least 3 weeks later. |
| Percentage of Participants With Soft-tissue Objective Response | During DB phase (up to 24 months) | The best overall soft tissue response as assessed using RECIST v1.1 during the study was summarized using the investigators' response assessments and also the derived response assessments by treatment group. Only participants with measurable soft tissue disease at screening were included in this analysis. Participants with measurable disease at screening are participants who had at least 1 target lesion identified per RECIST v1.1 at screening. Percentage of participants summarizes the number of participants with complete or partial objective response (%). Soft Tissue assessment based on Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 2009; 45:228-247. |
| European Quality of Life Five-Domain (EQ-5D) Scale | Week 13 | EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single utility or index score. Five parameters (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) were assessed on 3-point categorical scale (1= no problems, 2= some/moderate problems and 3= severe problem). Score were transformed and resulted in a total EQ-5D score range of 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state), with higher scores indicating better health and quality of life. |
| Percentage of Participants With Circulating Tumor Cell (CTC) Conversion | Baseline up to 24 months | CTC conversion was assessed for participants with baseline CTC counts of greater than or equal to (\>=) 5 cells per 7.5 milliliter (mL) of blood. A CTC conversion was defined as a decline in the CTC count to less than (\<) 5 cells per 7.5 mL of blood. In this outcome measure percentage of participants with CTC conversion was reported. |
| Radiographic Progression-free Survival | During DB phase (up to 24 months) | Radiographic progression-free survival was defined as time from randomization to the earliest objective evidence of radiographic progression or death due to any cause. Participants were assessed for objective disease progression at regularly scheduled visits. The consensus guidelines of the Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group 2 were taken into consideration for the determination of disease progression. Radiographic disease progression was defined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) 1.1 for soft tissue disease, or the appearance of two or more new bone lesions on bone scan. Progression at the first scheduled reassessment at Week 13 required a confirmatory scan 6 or more weeks later. Participants who did not reach the endpoint were right censored at their last assessment. |
| Time to First Skeletal-related Event | During DB Phase (up to 24 months) | The time to first skeletal-related event was defined as time from randomization to the occurrence of the first skeletal-related event. Participants were assessed for skeletal-related events at regularly scheduled visits. A skeletal-related event was defined as radiation therapy or surgery to bone, pathologic bone fracture, spinal cord compression, or change of antineoplastic therapy to treat bone pain. Participants who did not reach the endpoint were right censored at their last assessment. |
| Percentage of Participants Who Were Responders for Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) | Baseline up to 24 months | The FACT-P was a 39-item participant questionnaire which assessed physical well-being (7 items), social/family well-being (7 items), emotional well-being (6 items), functional well-being (7 items), and additional prostate cancer specific concerns (12 items). All items were scored from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). The sum of scores on all 5 domains constitutes the global FACT-P. The global/total FACT-P score ranged from 0 (worst) to 156 (best), higher scores indicate better health status. Responders were those participants who had a 10-point improvement in their total FACT-P score, as compared with baseline, on two consecutive measurements obtained at least 3 weeks apart. |
| Percentage of Participants With Pain Palliation | Baseline up to 24 months | The proportion of participants with pain palliation was assessed for participants with a stable and sufficient pain burden at study entry. Pain burden was measured by question #3 of the Brief Pain Inventory (Short Form). This scale measures pain on a 0 to 10 scale with 0 indicating no pain and 10 indicating pain as bad as you can imagine. Pain palliation at Week 13 was determined for the proportion of men with baseline bone metastasis(es) who had baseline pain attributable to the metastasis(es). Palliation was defined as \>=30% reduction in average pain score at Week 13 compared to baseline without a \>=30% increase in analgesic use. |
Other
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants With Any Newly Clinically Significant Abnormal Finding in Electrocardiogram (ECG) | Baseline, up to the end of DB phase or unscheduled visit (up to 24 months) | Any new post baseline abnormality was defined as any abnormal ECG finding that appeared after baseline assessment which was not seen at the screening or baseline ECG assessment. Where, criteria of abnormality was QTcF interval \> 470 millisecond (msec). Participants were counted once only for a specific abnormality. This outcome measure was planned to be analysed in double blind phase only. Unscheduled visit was performed at any time during the study whenever necessary to assess for or follow-up on AEs, at the participant's request or if deemed necessary by the investigator. |
| Number of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry) | Baseline, up to the safety follow-up visit or unscheduled visit or the initiation of another anti-neoplastic therapy whichever occurred first (up to 101 months) | Laboratory parameters included hematological and chemistry parameters. Chemistry parameters included alanine aminotransferase, albumin, alkaline phosphatase, aspartate aminotransferase, bilirubin, calcium, creatine kinase, creatinine, glucose, magnesium, phosphate, potassium and sodium. Hematology parameters included haemoglobin, leukocytes, lymphocytes, neutrophils and platelet. Test abnormalities were graded by National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) version 4.03 as Grade 3= severe and Grade 4= life-threatening or disabling. Only categories with at least 1 participant with abnormality are reported in this outcome measure. Unscheduled visit was performed at any time during the study whenever necessary to assess for or follow-up on AEs, at the participant's request or if deemed necessary by the investigator. |
| Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Baseline, up to the safety follow-up visit or unscheduled visit or the initiation of another anti-neoplastic therapy whichever occurred first (up to 101 months) | Criteria for abnormalities in vital signs included: sitting/supine systolic blood pressure (SBP) values: absolute result greater than (\>) 180 millimeter of mercury (mmHg) and \>40 mmHg increase from baseline (BL) and less than (\<) 90 mmHg and \>30 mmHg decrease from BL; diastolic blood pressure (DBP) values: absolute result \>105 mmHg and \>30 mmHg increase from BL and absolute result \< 50 mmHg and \>20 mmHg decrease from BL; any abnormalities in SBP or DBP; heart rate values: absolute result \> 120 beats per minute (bpm) and \>30 bpm increase from BL and absolute result \< 50 bpm and \>20 bpm decrease from BL or any abnormalities in heart rate. Unscheduled visit was performed at any time during the study whenever necessary to assess for or follow-up on AEs, at the participant's request or if deemed necessary by the investigator. |
| Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | Baseline, up to the safety follow-up visit or unscheduled visit or the initiation of another anti-neoplastic therapy whichever occurred first (up to 101 months) | AE: any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAE: AE resulting in any of following outcomes or deemed significant and jeopardized participants or required treatment to prevent other AE outcomes for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. TEAEs were events which occurred between first dose of study drug and up to the safety follow-up visit or the initiation of another anti-neoplastic therapy, whichever occurred first (up to 101 months). AEs included both serious and non-serious AEs. Clinically significant physical examination abnormalities were reported as AEs. Unscheduled visit was performed at any time during the study whenever necessary to assess for or follow-up on AEs, at the participant's request or if deemed necessary by the investigator. |
Countries
Argentina, Australia, Austria, Belgium, Canada, Chile, France, Germany, Italy, Netherlands, Poland, South Africa, Spain, United Kingdom, United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
A total of 1199 participants were enrolled and randomized for double-blind (DB) phase. Out of which, 159 participants entered the optional open-label extension (OLE) phase.
Pre-assignment details
Participants were randomized 2:1 to receive either Enzalutamide or Placebo in DB phase. All participants who continued in OLE phase, received Enzalutamide.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Enzalutamide In DB Phase, participants received Enzalutamide capsules 160 mg orally per day. Participants who completed DB Phase, entered in optional OLE Phase and received same treatment until unacceptable toxicity, confirmed disease progression and the participant was scheduled to initiate a new systemic anti-neoplastic therapy, death or withdrawal (median treatment duration was 8.3 months). | 800 |
| Placebo In DB Phase, participants received placebo capsules (for Enzalutamide) orally per day. Participants who completed DB Phase, entered in optional OLE Phase and received Enzalutamide capsules 160 mg orally per day until unacceptable toxicity, confirmed disease progression and the participant was scheduled to initiate a new systemic anti-neoplastic therapy, death or withdrawal (median treatment duration was 3.0 months in DB Phase and 7.7 months in OLE Phase). | 399 |
| Total | 1,199 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| DB Phase (up to 24 Months) | Death | 561 | 298 |
| DB Phase (up to 24 Months) | Lost to Follow-up | 5 | 2 |
| DB Phase (up to 24 Months) | Other | 1 | 0 |
| DB Phase (up to 24 Months) | Study Terminated by Sponsor | 108 | 42 |
| DB Phase (up to 24 Months) | Withdrawal by Subject | 16 | 7 |
| OLE Phase (up to 77 Months) | Death | 14 | 21 |
| OLE Phase (up to 77 Months) | Other | 15 | 2 |
| OLE Phase (up to 77 Months) | Study Terminated by Sponsor | 78 | 26 |
| OLE Phase (up to 77 Months) | Withdrawal by Subject | 2 | 1 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Enzalutamide | Total | Placebo |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical <=18 years | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Age, Categorical >=65 years | 568 Participants | 837 Participants | 269 Participants |
| Age, Categorical Between 18 and 65 years | 232 Participants | 362 Participants | 130 Participants |
| Age, Continuous | 68.8 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.96 | 68.7 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.11 | 68.6 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.39 |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Hispanic or Latino | 32 Participants | 55 Participants | 23 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Not Hispanic or Latino | 768 Participants | 1144 Participants | 376 Participants |
| Ethnicity (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) American Indian or Alaska Native | 1 Participants | 2 Participants | 1 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Asian | 5 Participants | 13 Participants | 8 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Black or African American | 27 Participants | 47 Participants | 20 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) More than one race | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander | 1 Participants | 1 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) Unknown or Not Reported | 21 Participants | 25 Participants | 4 Participants |
| Race (NIH/OMB) White | 745 Participants | 1111 Participants | 366 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Argentina | 7 Participants | 10 Participants | 3 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Australia | 60 Participants | 93 Participants | 33 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Austria | 15 Participants | 25 Participants | 10 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Belgium | 27 Participants | 45 Participants | 18 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Canada | 82 Participants | 107 Participants | 25 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Chile | 6 Participants | 11 Participants | 5 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment France | 193 Participants | 273 Participants | 80 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Germany | 62 Participants | 86 Participants | 24 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Italy | 20 Participants | 30 Participants | 10 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Netherlands | 32 Participants | 46 Participants | 14 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Poland | 7 Participants | 11 Participants | 4 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment South Africa | 3 Participants | 6 Participants | 3 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment Spain | 23 Participants | 36 Participants | 13 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment United Kingdom | 82 Participants | 132 Participants | 50 Participants |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 181 Participants | 288 Participants | 107 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 800 Participants | 1199 Participants | 399 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk | EG002 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — | — / — | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 784 / 800 | 385 / 399 | 47 / 50 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 319 / 800 | 155 / 399 | 25 / 50 |
Outcome results
Overall Survival
Survival was defined as time from randomization to death due to any cause. The duration of overall survival was right-censored for participants who were lost to follow-up since randomization or not known to have died at the data analysis cut-off date (this included participants who were known to have died after the data analysis cut-off date).
Time frame: During study period (up to 101 months)
Population: ITT included all participants who were randomized into the study.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Enzalutamide | Overall Survival | 18.4 Months |
| Placebo | Overall Survival | 13.6 Months |
European Quality of Life Five-Domain (EQ-5D) Scale
EQ-5D: participant rated questionnaire to assess health-related quality of life in terms of a single utility or index score. Five parameters (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) were assessed on 3-point categorical scale (1= no problems, 2= some/moderate problems and 3= severe problem). Score were transformed and resulted in a total EQ-5D score range of 0 (worst imaginable health state) to 100 (best imaginable health state), with higher scores indicating better health and quality of life.
Time frame: Week 13
Population: Evaluable ITT included participants who were part of the ITT Population and who were evaluable for EQ-5D.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enzalutamide | European Quality of Life Five-Domain (EQ-5D) Scale | 67.2 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.29 |
| Placebo | European Quality of Life Five-Domain (EQ-5D) Scale | 60.0 units on a scale | Standard Deviation 19.26 |
Percentage of Participants Who Were Responders for Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P)
The FACT-P was a 39-item participant questionnaire which assessed physical well-being (7 items), social/family well-being (7 items), emotional well-being (6 items), functional well-being (7 items), and additional prostate cancer specific concerns (12 items). All items were scored from 0 (not at all) to 4 (very much). The sum of scores on all 5 domains constitutes the global FACT-P. The global/total FACT-P score ranged from 0 (worst) to 156 (best), higher scores indicate better health status. Responders were those participants who had a 10-point improvement in their total FACT-P score, as compared with baseline, on two consecutive measurements obtained at least 3 weeks apart.
Time frame: Baseline up to 24 months
Population: Evaluable intent to treat (ITT) - all participants who were part of the ITT population and had a global FACT-P score at baseline and at least 1 post-baseline assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Enzalutamide | Percentage of Participants Who Were Responders for Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) | 43.2 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants Who Were Responders for Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) | 18.3 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Circulating Tumor Cell (CTC) Conversion
CTC conversion was assessed for participants with baseline CTC counts of greater than or equal to (\>=) 5 cells per 7.5 milliliter (mL) of blood. A CTC conversion was defined as a decline in the CTC count to less than (\<) 5 cells per 7.5 mL of blood. In this outcome measure percentage of participants with CTC conversion was reported.
Time frame: Baseline up to 24 months
Population: CTC evaluable population included participants with a baseline and at least 1 post baseline CTC assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Enzalutamide | Percentage of Participants With Circulating Tumor Cell (CTC) Conversion | 48 percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Circulating Tumor Cell (CTC) Conversion | 9.7 percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Pain Palliation
The proportion of participants with pain palliation was assessed for participants with a stable and sufficient pain burden at study entry. Pain burden was measured by question #3 of the Brief Pain Inventory (Short Form). This scale measures pain on a 0 to 10 scale with 0 indicating no pain and 10 indicating pain as bad as you can imagine. Pain palliation at Week 13 was determined for the proportion of men with baseline bone metastasis(es) who had baseline pain attributable to the metastasis(es). Palliation was defined as \>=30% reduction in average pain score at Week 13 compared to baseline without a \>=30% increase in analgesic use.
Time frame: Baseline up to 24 months
Population: Evaluable ITT Population included participants with metastatic bone disease at baseline; provided answers to Question #3 of the Brief Pain Inventory - Short Form for a minimum of 4 out of 7 days in the baseline run-in period; stable baseline pain; stable analgesic use; and had an average pain score during the baseline run-in period of \>= 4.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Enzalutamide | Percentage of Participants With Pain Palliation | 44.9 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Pain Palliation | 6.7 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) Response
Participants were evaluable for PSA response rate if they had a PSA level measured at baseline and at least 1 post-baseline assessment. Both PSA responses of \> 50% and \> 90% were determined. PSA responses required confirmation with a subsequent assessment that was conducted at least 3 weeks later.
Time frame: During DB phase (up to 24 months)
Population: Evaluable ITT population included participants who were part of the ITT Population and had a PSA level measured at baseline and at least 1 post-baseline assessment.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enzalutamide | Percentage of Participants With Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) Response | Decline >=50% from baseline | 54 Percentage of participants |
| Enzalutamide | Percentage of Participants With Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) Response | Decline >=90% from baseline | 25 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) Response | Decline >=50% from baseline | 2 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Prostate Specific Antigen (PSA) Response | Decline >=90% from baseline | 1 Percentage of participants |
Percentage of Participants With Soft-tissue Objective Response
The best overall soft tissue response as assessed using RECIST v1.1 during the study was summarized using the investigators' response assessments and also the derived response assessments by treatment group. Only participants with measurable soft tissue disease at screening were included in this analysis. Participants with measurable disease at screening are participants who had at least 1 target lesion identified per RECIST v1.1 at screening. Percentage of participants summarizes the number of participants with complete or partial objective response (%). Soft Tissue assessment based on Eisenhauer EA, Therasse P, Bogaerts J et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1). Eur J Cancer 2009; 45:228-247.
Time frame: During DB phase (up to 24 months)
Population: ITT with measurable disease population included participants who were part of the ITT Population and had measurable soft tissue disease at screening, defined by at least 1 target lesion according to RECIST v1.1.
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Enzalutamide | Percentage of Participants With Soft-tissue Objective Response | 29 Percentage of participants |
| Placebo | Percentage of Participants With Soft-tissue Objective Response | 4 Percentage of participants |
Radiographic Progression-free Survival
Radiographic progression-free survival was defined as time from randomization to the earliest objective evidence of radiographic progression or death due to any cause. Participants were assessed for objective disease progression at regularly scheduled visits. The consensus guidelines of the Prostate Cancer Clinical Trials Working Group 2 were taken into consideration for the determination of disease progression. Radiographic disease progression was defined by Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumours (RECIST) 1.1 for soft tissue disease, or the appearance of two or more new bone lesions on bone scan. Progression at the first scheduled reassessment at Week 13 required a confirmatory scan 6 or more weeks later. Participants who did not reach the endpoint were right censored at their last assessment.
Time frame: During DB phase (up to 24 months)
Population: ITT included all participants who were randomized into the study.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Enzalutamide | Radiographic Progression-free Survival | 8.3 Months |
| Placebo | Radiographic Progression-free Survival | 2.9 Months |
Time to First Skeletal-related Event
The time to first skeletal-related event was defined as time from randomization to the occurrence of the first skeletal-related event. Participants were assessed for skeletal-related events at regularly scheduled visits. A skeletal-related event was defined as radiation therapy or surgery to bone, pathologic bone fracture, spinal cord compression, or change of antineoplastic therapy to treat bone pain. Participants who did not reach the endpoint were right censored at their last assessment.
Time frame: During DB Phase (up to 24 months)
Population: ITT included all participants who were randomized into the study.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Enzalutamide | Time to First Skeletal-related Event | 16.7 Months |
| Placebo | Time to First Skeletal-related Event | 13.3 Months |
Time to Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) Progression
Time to PSA progression was defined as time from randomization to PSA progression. Participants who did not reach the endpoint were right censored at their last assessment or for participants with no post-baseline PSA assessment, date of randomization. For participants with PSA declines at Week 13, the PSA progression date was defined as the date that a \>=25% increase and an absolute increase of \>=2 nanogram per milliliter (ng/mL) above the nadir was documented, which was confirmed by a second consecutive value obtained 3 or more weeks later (required only if PSA progression did not occur at last PSA assessment). For participants with no PSA declines at Week 13, PSA progression date was defined as the date that a \>=25% increase and an absolute increase of \>=2 ng/mL above the baseline was documented, which was confirmed by a second consecutive value 3 or more weeks later (required only if PSA progression did not occur at last PSA assessment).
Time frame: Baseline and at every study visit from Week 13 while on study drug (up to 24 months)
Population: ITT included all participants who were randomized into the study.
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Enzalutamide | Time to Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) Progression | 8.3 Months |
| Placebo | Time to Prostate-specific Antigen (PSA) Progression | 3.0 Months |
Number of Participants With Any Newly Clinically Significant Abnormal Finding in Electrocardiogram (ECG)
Any new post baseline abnormality was defined as any abnormal ECG finding that appeared after baseline assessment which was not seen at the screening or baseline ECG assessment. Where, criteria of abnormality was QTcF interval \> 470 millisecond (msec). Participants were counted once only for a specific abnormality. This outcome measure was planned to be analysed in double blind phase only. Unscheduled visit was performed at any time during the study whenever necessary to assess for or follow-up on AEs, at the participant's request or if deemed necessary by the investigator.
Time frame: Baseline, up to the end of DB phase or unscheduled visit (up to 24 months)
Population: Safety population was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
| Arm | Measure | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|
| Enzalutamide | Number of Participants With Any Newly Clinically Significant Abnormal Finding in Electrocardiogram (ECG) | 28 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Any Newly Clinically Significant Abnormal Finding in Electrocardiogram (ECG) | 13 Participants |
Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs
Criteria for abnormalities in vital signs included: sitting/supine systolic blood pressure (SBP) values: absolute result greater than (\>) 180 millimeter of mercury (mmHg) and \>40 mmHg increase from baseline (BL) and less than (\<) 90 mmHg and \>30 mmHg decrease from BL; diastolic blood pressure (DBP) values: absolute result \>105 mmHg and \>30 mmHg increase from BL and absolute result \< 50 mmHg and \>20 mmHg decrease from BL; any abnormalities in SBP or DBP; heart rate values: absolute result \> 120 beats per minute (bpm) and \>30 bpm increase from BL and absolute result \< 50 bpm and \>20 bpm decrease from BL or any abnormalities in heart rate. Unscheduled visit was performed at any time during the study whenever necessary to assess for or follow-up on AEs, at the participant's request or if deemed necessary by the investigator.
Time frame: Baseline, up to the safety follow-up visit or unscheduled visit or the initiation of another anti-neoplastic therapy whichever occurred first (up to 101 months)
Population: Safety population was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enzalutamide | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | SBP: >180 mmHg and >40 mmHg Increase from BL | 28 Participants |
| Enzalutamide | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | SBP: < 90 mmHg and >30 mmHg Decrease from BL | 13 Participants |
| Enzalutamide | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | DBP: >105 mmHg and >30 mmHg Increase from BL | 5 Participants |
| Enzalutamide | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | DBP: < 50 mmHg and >20 mmHg Decrease from BL | 13 Participants |
| Enzalutamide | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Any abnormalities in SBP or DBP | 52 Participants |
| Enzalutamide | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Heart Rate: > 120 bpm and >30 bpm Increase from BL | 7 Participants |
| Enzalutamide | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Heart Rate: < 50 bpm and >20 bpm Decrease from BL | 18 Participants |
| Enzalutamide | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Any abnormalities in Heart Rate | 25 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | DBP: >105 mmHg and >30 mmHg Increase from BL | 2 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Heart Rate: < 50 bpm and >20 bpm Decrease from BL | 1 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | DBP: < 50 mmHg and >20 mmHg Decrease from BL | 3 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Any abnormalities in SBP or DBP | 16 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Heart Rate: > 120 bpm and >30 bpm Increase from BL | 5 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | SBP: >180 mmHg and >40 mmHg Increase from BL | 7 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | SBP: < 90 mmHg and >30 mmHg Decrease from BL | 5 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Any abnormalities in Heart Rate | 6 Participants |
| Placebo (DB) /Enzalutamide 160 mg (OLE) Phase | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | DBP: >105 mmHg and >30 mmHg Increase from BL | 0 Participants |
| Placebo (DB) /Enzalutamide 160 mg (OLE) Phase | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | SBP: < 90 mmHg and >30 mmHg Decrease from BL | 0 Participants |
| Placebo (DB) /Enzalutamide 160 mg (OLE) Phase | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | SBP: >180 mmHg and >40 mmHg Increase from BL | 1 Participants |
| Placebo (DB) /Enzalutamide 160 mg (OLE) Phase | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | DBP: < 50 mmHg and >20 mmHg Decrease from BL | 1 Participants |
| Placebo (DB) /Enzalutamide 160 mg (OLE) Phase | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Heart Rate: < 50 bpm and >20 bpm Decrease from BL | 0 Participants |
| Placebo (DB) /Enzalutamide 160 mg (OLE) Phase | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Heart Rate: > 120 bpm and >30 bpm Increase from BL | 0 Participants |
| Placebo (DB) /Enzalutamide 160 mg (OLE) Phase | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Any abnormalities in SBP or DBP | 2 Participants |
| Placebo (DB) /Enzalutamide 160 mg (OLE) Phase | Number of Participants With Clinically Significant Changes in Vital Signs | Any abnormalities in Heart Rate | 0 Participants |
Number of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry)
Laboratory parameters included hematological and chemistry parameters. Chemistry parameters included alanine aminotransferase, albumin, alkaline phosphatase, aspartate aminotransferase, bilirubin, calcium, creatine kinase, creatinine, glucose, magnesium, phosphate, potassium and sodium. Hematology parameters included haemoglobin, leukocytes, lymphocytes, neutrophils and platelet. Test abnormalities were graded by National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) version 4.03 as Grade 3= severe and Grade 4= life-threatening or disabling. Only categories with at least 1 participant with abnormality are reported in this outcome measure. Unscheduled visit was performed at any time during the study whenever necessary to assess for or follow-up on AEs, at the participant's request or if deemed necessary by the investigator.
Time frame: Baseline, up to the safety follow-up visit or unscheduled visit or the initiation of another anti-neoplastic therapy whichever occurred first (up to 101 months)
Population: Safety population was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enzalutamide | Number of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry) | Sodium: High | 0 Participants |
| Enzalutamide | Number of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry) | Creatinine: High | 0 Participants |
| Enzalutamide | Number of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry) | Aspartate Aminotransferase: High | 3 Participants |
| Enzalutamide | Number of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry) | Sodium: Low | 19 Participants |
| Enzalutamide | Number of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry) | Glucose: High | 17 Participants |
| Enzalutamide | Number of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry) | Platelet; Low | 4 Participants |
| Enzalutamide | Number of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry) | Potassium: High | 2 Participants |
| Enzalutamide | Number of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry) | Magnesium: Low | 0 Participants |
| Enzalutamide | Number of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry) | Leukocytes: Low | 8 Participants |
| Enzalutamide | Number of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry) | Potassium: Low | 7 Participants |
| Enzalutamide | Number of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry) | Magnesium: High | 1 Participants |
| Enzalutamide | Number of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry) | Bilirubin: High | 2 Participants |
| Enzalutamide | Number of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry) | Phosphate: Low | 28 Participants |
| Enzalutamide | Number of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry) | Neutrophils: Low | 10 Participants |
| Enzalutamide | Number of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry) | Hemoglobin: High | 1 Participants |
| Enzalutamide | Number of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry) | Calcium: Low | 14 Participants |
| Enzalutamide | Number of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry) | Alkaline Phosphatase: High | 102 Participants |
| Enzalutamide | Number of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry) | Alanine Aminotransferase:High | 2 Participants |
| Enzalutamide | Number of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry) | Calcium: High | 1 Participants |
| Enzalutamide | Number of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry) | Albumin: Low | 7 Participants |
| Enzalutamide | Number of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry) | Hemoglobin: Low | 38 Participants |
| Enzalutamide | Number of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry) | Creatine Kinase: High | 4 Participants |
| Enzalutamide | Number of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry) | Lymphocytes: Low | 80 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry) | Hemoglobin: Low | 20 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry) | Alanine Aminotransferase:High | 2 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry) | Albumin: Low | 3 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry) | Alkaline Phosphatase: High | 74 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry) | Aspartate Aminotransferase: High | 4 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry) | Bilirubin: High | 0 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry) | Calcium: Low | 15 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry) | Calcium: High | 0 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry) | Creatine Kinase: High | 2 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry) | Creatinine: High | 2 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry) | Glucose: High | 10 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry) | Magnesium: Low | 1 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry) | Magnesium: High | 1 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry) | Phosphate: Low | 10 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry) | Potassium: Low | 4 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry) | Potassium: High | 3 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry) | Sodium: Low | 13 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry) | Sodium: High | 1 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry) | Hemoglobin: High | 0 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry) | Leukocytes: Low | 1 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry) | Lymphocytes: Low | 48 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry) | Neutrophils: Low | 0 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry) | Platelet; Low | 4 Participants |
| Placebo (DB) /Enzalutamide 160 mg (OLE) Phase | Number of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry) | Lymphocytes: Low | 5 Participants |
| Placebo (DB) /Enzalutamide 160 mg (OLE) Phase | Number of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry) | Sodium: Low | 0 Participants |
| Placebo (DB) /Enzalutamide 160 mg (OLE) Phase | Number of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry) | Creatine Kinase: High | 0 Participants |
| Placebo (DB) /Enzalutamide 160 mg (OLE) Phase | Number of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry) | Albumin: Low | 0 Participants |
| Placebo (DB) /Enzalutamide 160 mg (OLE) Phase | Number of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry) | Sodium: High | 0 Participants |
| Placebo (DB) /Enzalutamide 160 mg (OLE) Phase | Number of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry) | Calcium: High | 0 Participants |
| Placebo (DB) /Enzalutamide 160 mg (OLE) Phase | Number of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry) | Calcium: Low | 1 Participants |
| Placebo (DB) /Enzalutamide 160 mg (OLE) Phase | Number of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry) | Hemoglobin: Low | 4 Participants |
| Placebo (DB) /Enzalutamide 160 mg (OLE) Phase | Number of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry) | Bilirubin: High | 0 Participants |
| Placebo (DB) /Enzalutamide 160 mg (OLE) Phase | Number of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry) | Platelet; Low | 0 Participants |
| Placebo (DB) /Enzalutamide 160 mg (OLE) Phase | Number of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry) | Hemoglobin: High | 0 Participants |
| Placebo (DB) /Enzalutamide 160 mg (OLE) Phase | Number of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry) | Aspartate Aminotransferase: High | 1 Participants |
| Placebo (DB) /Enzalutamide 160 mg (OLE) Phase | Number of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry) | Neutrophils: Low | 1 Participants |
| Placebo (DB) /Enzalutamide 160 mg (OLE) Phase | Number of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry) | Magnesium: High | 0 Participants |
| Placebo (DB) /Enzalutamide 160 mg (OLE) Phase | Number of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry) | Leukocytes: Low | 1 Participants |
| Placebo (DB) /Enzalutamide 160 mg (OLE) Phase | Number of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry) | Phosphate: Low | 2 Participants |
| Placebo (DB) /Enzalutamide 160 mg (OLE) Phase | Number of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry) | Magnesium: Low | 0 Participants |
| Placebo (DB) /Enzalutamide 160 mg (OLE) Phase | Number of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry) | Alkaline Phosphatase: High | 3 Participants |
| Placebo (DB) /Enzalutamide 160 mg (OLE) Phase | Number of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry) | Potassium: Low | 1 Participants |
| Placebo (DB) /Enzalutamide 160 mg (OLE) Phase | Number of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry) | Glucose: High | 1 Participants |
| Placebo (DB) /Enzalutamide 160 mg (OLE) Phase | Number of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry) | Alanine Aminotransferase:High | 1 Participants |
| Placebo (DB) /Enzalutamide 160 mg (OLE) Phase | Number of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry) | Potassium: High | 0 Participants |
| Placebo (DB) /Enzalutamide 160 mg (OLE) Phase | Number of Participants With Grade 3/4 Post-Baseline Laboratory Toxicity (Hematology and Chemistry) | Creatinine: High | 0 Participants |
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs)
AE: any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. SAE: AE resulting in any of following outcomes or deemed significant and jeopardized participants or required treatment to prevent other AE outcomes for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly. TEAEs were events which occurred between first dose of study drug and up to the safety follow-up visit or the initiation of another anti-neoplastic therapy, whichever occurred first (up to 101 months). AEs included both serious and non-serious AEs. Clinically significant physical examination abnormalities were reported as AEs. Unscheduled visit was performed at any time during the study whenever necessary to assess for or follow-up on AEs, at the participant's request or if deemed necessary by the investigator.
Time frame: Baseline, up to the safety follow-up visit or unscheduled visit or the initiation of another anti-neoplastic therapy whichever occurred first (up to 101 months)
Population: Safety population was defined as all randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enzalutamide | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | SAEs | 319 Participants |
| Enzalutamide | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | AEs | 789 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | SAEs | 155 Participants |
| Placebo | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | AEs | 390 Participants |
| Placebo (DB) /Enzalutamide 160 mg (OLE) Phase | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | AEs | 48 Participants |
| Placebo (DB) /Enzalutamide 160 mg (OLE) Phase | Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) | SAEs | 25 Participants |