Skip to content

Efficacy and Safety Study of Elagolix in Women With Endometriosis

A Phase 2, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of NBI-56418 Sodium in Subjects With Endometriosis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00973973
Enrollment
137
Registered
2009-09-09
Start date
2009-10-12
Completion date
2010-09-22
Last updated
2018-09-26

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Endometriosis, Pain

Keywords

Pelvic Pain,NBI-56418,Endometriosis

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate elagolix (NBI-56418) compared to placebo for its effects on endometriosis related pelvic pain and its safety.

Detailed description

Participants were randomized (1:1) to 150 mg elagolix once daily or placebo once daily for the first 8 weeks of the study. Following 8 weeks of dosing, participants continued in the study for an additional 16 weeks in an open-label phase where all participants still enrolled in the study received 150 mg elagolix once daily. There was no pre-specified primary efficacy end point for this study as there is no single key efficacy outcome measure in this exploratory Phase 2 study. However, the efficacy measures of primary interest included the daily assessment of dysmenorrhea, non-menstrual pelvic pain and dyspareunia on a 4-point scale (0 = none, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, 3 = severe) using an e-Diary.

Interventions

DRUGPlacebo

Matching placebo tablets taken orally once a day

DRUGElagolix

Immediate release (IR) tablets taken orally once a day

Sponsors

AbbVie
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 49 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Be female, aged 18 to 49 years, inclusive. * Have moderate to severe pelvic pain due to endometriosis. * Have a history of regular menstrual cycles. * Have been surgically (laparoscopy or laparotomy) diagnosed with endometriosis within 8 years of the start of screening. * Have a Body Mass Index (BMI) of 18 to 36 kg/m², inclusive. * Agree to use two forms of non-hormonal contraception during the study.

Exclusion criteria

* Are currently receiving gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist, a GnRH antagonist other than NBI-56418, or danazol or have received any of these agents within 6 months of the start of screening. * Are currently receiving subcutaneous medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA-SC) or intramuscular medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA-IM) or have received any of these agents within 3 months of the start of screening. * Are currently using hormonal contraception or other forms of hormonal therapy or received such treatment within the last month. * Have had surgery for endometriosis within the last month. * Have had a hysterectomy or bilateral oophorectomy. * Are using systemic steroids on a chronic or regular basis within 3 months. * Have uterine fibroids ≥ 3 cm in diameter. * Have pelvic pain that is not caused by endometriosis. * Have unstable medical condition or chronic disease. * Have been pregnant within the last six months. * Currently breast feeding.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Dysmenorrhea Score During the Double-blind Treatment PhaseBaseline and Weeks 4 and 8Participants assessed dysmenorrhea (pain during menstruation) and its impact on their daily activities at approximately the same time each day of their period in an electronic diary (e-Diary) according to the following response options: * 0 = No discomfort * 1 = Mild discomfort but I was easily able to do the things I usually do * 2 = Moderate discomfort or pain that made it difficult to do some of the things I usually do * 3 = Severe pain that made it difficult to do the things I usually do. The monthly mean dysmenorrhea score is the average of the daily values reported during the 4 weeks prior to each visit.
Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Dysmenorrhea Score During the Open-label and Posttreatment PhasesBaseline and Weeks 12, 16, 20, 24, and 30 (6 weeks posttreatment)Participants assessed dysmenorrhea (pain during menstruation) and its impact on their daily activities at approximately the same time each day of their period in an electronic diary (e-Diary) according to the following response options: * 0 = No discomfort * 1 = Mild discomfort but I was easily able to do the things I usually do * 2 = Moderate discomfort or pain that made it difficult to do some of the things I usually do * 3 = Severe pain that made it difficult to do the things I usually do. The monthly mean dysmenorrhea score is the average of the daily values reported during the 4 weeks prior to each visit, except for the week 30 value which is based on 6 weeks of data.
Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Score During the Double-Blind Treatment PhaseBaseline and weeks 4 and 8Participants assessed their pelvic pain not related to menses and its impact on their daily activities at approximately the same time each day they were not having their period in an e-Diary according to the following response options: * 0 = No discomfort * 1 = Mild discomfort but I was easily able to do the things I usually do * 2 = Moderate discomfort or pain that made it difficult to do some of the things I usually do * 3 = Severe pain that made it difficult to do the things I usually do. The monthly mean non-menstrual pelvic pain score is the average of the daily values reported during the 4 weeks prior to each visit.
Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Score During the Open-label and Posttreatment PhasesBaseline and Weeks 12, 16, 20, 24, and 30 (6 weeks posttreatment)Participants assessed their pelvic pain not related to menses and its impact on their daily activities at approximately the same time each day they were not having their period in an e-Diary according to the following response options: * 0 = No discomfort * 1 = Mild discomfort but I was easily able to do the things I usually do * 2 = Moderate discomfort or pain that made it difficult to do some of the things I usually do * 3 = Severe pain that made it difficult to do the things I usually do. The monthly mean non-menstrual pelvic pain score is the average of the daily values reported during the 4 weeks prior to each visit, except for the week 30 value which is based on 6 weeks of data.
Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Cumulative Pain Score During the Double-Blind Treatment PhaseBaseline and weeks 4 and 8Participants assessed dysmenorrhea or non-menstrual pelvic pain at approximately the same time each day in an e-Diary according to the following: * 0 = No discomfort * 1 = Mild discomfort but I was easily able to do the things I usually do * 2 = Moderate discomfort or pain that made it difficult to do some of the things I usually do * 3 = Severe pain that made it difficult to do the things I usually do. The monthly mean cumulative pain score is the average of the daily values for all days (menstrual and non-menstrual) reported during the 4 weeks prior to each visit.
Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Cumulative Pain Score During the Open-label and Posttreatment PhasesBaseline and Weeks 12, 16, 20, 24, and 30 (6 weeks posttreatment)Participants assessed dysmenorrhea or non-menstrual pelvic pain at approximately the same time each day in an e-Diary according to the following: * 0: No discomfort * 1: Mild discomfort, I was easily able to do the things I usually do * 2: Moderate discomfort or pain making it difficult to do some of the things I usually do * 3: Severe pain making it difficult to do the things I usually do The monthly mean cumulative pain score is the average of the daily values for all days (menstrual and non-menstrual) reported during the 4 weeks prior to each visit, except for the week 30 value which is based on 6 weeks of data.
Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Dyspareunia Score During the Double-Blind Treatment PhaseBaseline and weeks 4 and 8Participants assessed their dyspareunia (pain during sexual intercourse) at approximately the same time every day in an e-Diary according to the following response options: * 0 = Absent; No discomfort during sexual intercourse * 1 = Mild; I was able to tolerate the discomfort during sexual intercourse * 2 = Moderate; Intercourse was interrupted due to pain * 3 = Severe; I avoided intercourse because of pain * Does not apply; I was not sexually active for reasons other than my endometriosis or did not have sexual intercourse The monthly mean dyspareunia score is the average of the daily values reported during the 4 weeks prior to each visit. Responses of does not apply were not included in the calculations.
Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Dyspareunia Score During the Open-label and Posttreatment PhasesBaseline and Weeks 12, 16, 20, 24, and 30 (6 weeks posttreatment)Participants assessed their dyspareunia (pain during sexual intercourse) at approximately the same time every day in an e-Diary according to the following response options: * 0: Absent; No discomfort during sexual intercourse * 1: Mild; I was able to tolerate the discomfort during sexual intercourse * 2: Moderate; Intercourse was interrupted due to pain * 3: Severe; I avoided intercourse because of pain * Does not apply; I was not sexually active for reasons other than my endometriosis or did not have sexual intercourse The monthly mean dyspareunia score is the average of the daily values reported during the 4 weeks prior to each visit, except for week 30 which is based on 6 weeks of data. Responses of does not apply were not included in the calculations.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Narcotic Analgesic Use During the Double-Blind Treatment PhaseBaseline and Weeks 4 and 8The daily use of endometriosis analgesics was reported by participants daily using the e-Diary. Participants reported whether the medication was over-the-counter (OTC) or prescription, and, if prescription, whether the medication was a narcotic. The percentage of days of narcotic analgesic use is defined as the number of days in the 4 weeks prior to each study visit that the participant reported the use of a narcotic analgesic, divided by the number of study days in the interval that the participant provided an e-Diary report regarding the use of endometriosis analgesics (including a response of none).
Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Narcotic Analgesic Use During the Open-Label and Posttreatment PhasesBaseline and Weeks 12, 16, 20, 24, and 30 (6 weeks posttreatment)The daily use of endometriosis analgesics was reported by participants daily using the e-Diary. Participants reported whether the medication was over-the-counter (OTC) or prescription, and, if prescription, whether the medication was a narcotic. The percentage of days of narcotic analgesic use is defined as the number of days in the 4 weeks prior to each study visit (except for week 30 which is based on 6 weeks of data) that the participant reported the use of a narcotic analgesic, divided by the number of study days in the interval that the participant provided an e-Diary report regarding the use of endometriosis analgesics (including a response of none).
Change From Baseline to the End of the Double-blind Treatment Phase in Composite Pelvic Signs and Symptoms Score (CPSSS) Total Score and Component ScoresBaseline and Week 8The CPSSS consists of 5 components that address dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, non-menstrual pelvic pain, pelvic tenderness, and pelvic induration. Each component was scored on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe). Dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, and non-menstrual pelvic pain scores are based on the participant's assessment of symptoms during the past 28 days; pelvic tenderness and induration were assessed by the investigator based on findings associated with a pelvic examination. The total CPSSS has a maximum possible value of 15 (total score range: 0 to 15, where a lower score indicates less signs and symptoms of endometriosis or better functioning). Individual component scores range from 0 (absent) to 3 (severe).
Change From Baseline to the End of the Open-label Treatment Phase in Composite Pelvic Signs and Symptoms Score (CPSSS) Total Score and Component ScoresBaseline and week 24The CPSSS consists of 5 components that address dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, non-menstrual pelvic pain, pelvic tenderness, and pelvic induration. Each component was scored on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe). Dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, and non-menstrual pelvic pain scores are based on the participant's assessment of symptoms during the past 28 days; pelvic tenderness and induration were assessed by the investigator based on findings associated with a pelvic examination. The total CPSSS has a maximum possible value of 15 (total score range: 0 to 15, where a lower score indicates less signs and symptoms of endometriosis or better functioning). Individual component scores range from 0 (absent) to 3 (severe).
Patient Global Impression of Change During the Double-blind Treatment PhaseWeeks 4 and 8The Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) is a questionnaire-based assessment of the change in endometriosis pain since the initiation of study drug. The participant was asked to select from one of seven response categories: 1. Very Much Improved 2. Much Improved 3. Minimally Improved 4. Not Changed 5. Minimally Worse 6. Much Worse 7. Very Much Worse
Patient Global Impression of Change During the Open-Label and Posttreatment PhasesWeeks 12, 16, 20, 24, and 30 (6 weeks posttreatment)The Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) is a questionnaire-based assessment of the change in endometriosis pain since the initiation of study drug. The participant was asked to select from one of seven response categories: 1. Very Much Improved 2. Much Improved 3. Minimally Improved 4. Not Changed 5. Minimally Worse 6. Much Worse 7. Very Much Worse
Percentage of Participants With a Response in Monthly Mean Dysmenorrhea Score at Week 8Baseline and Week 8Participants assessed dysmenorrhea (pain during menstruation) and its impact on their daily activities at approximately the same time each day of their period in an e-Diary according to the following response options: * 0: No discomfort * 1: Mild discomfort but I was easily able to do the things I usually do * 2: Moderate discomfort or pain that made it difficult to do some of the things I usually do * 3: Severe pain that made it difficult to do the things I usually do. The monthly mean dysmenorrhea score is the average of the daily values reported during the 4 weeks prior to each time point. Response was defined as the percentage of participants with a percent decrease from baseline in the week 8 monthly mean score that was greater than or equal to each specified threshold value (10% through 90% in steps of 10%).
Percentage of Participants With a PGIC Response of Much Improved or Very Much Improved During the Open-label Treatment PhaseWeeks 12, 16, 20, 24, and 30 (6 weeks posttreatment)The Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) is a questionnaire-based assessment of the change in endometriosis pain since the initiation of study drug. The participant was asked to select from one of seven response categories: 1. Very Much Improved 2. Much Improved 3. Minimally Improved 4. Not Changed 5. Minimally Worse 6. Much Worse 7. Very Much Worse
Change From Baseline to the End of the Double-blind Treatment Phase in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5)Baseline and week 8The EHP-5 is an instrument to measure health-related quality of life in women with endometriosis. The EHP-5 consists of two parts: * A core questionnaire consisting of five questions that measure the impact of endometriosis in areas of pain, control and powerlessness, emotional well-being, social support, and self-image with five response categories for each item (Never, Rarely, Sometimes, Often, Always) * A supplemental questionnaire consisting of six additional questions which assess the impact of endometriosis on the areas of work, relationship with children, sexual intercourse, feelings about the medical profession, treatment, and infertility with the same five response categories plus an additional response category of Not Relevant which was not scored. The scores associated with each possible outcome category are as follows: never (0), rarely (25), sometimes (50), often (75), and always (100). A negative change from baseline score indicates improvement in quality of life.
Change From Baseline to the End of the Open-label Treatment Phase in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5)Baseline and week 24The EHP-5 is an instrument to measure health-related quality of life in women with endometriosis. The EHP-5 consists of two parts: * A core questionnaire consisting of five questions that measure the impact of endometriosis on areas of pain, control and powerlessness, emotional well-being, social support, and self-image with five response categories for each item (Never, Rarely, Sometimes, Often, Always) * A supplemental questionnaire consisting of six additional questions which assess the impact of endometriosis on areas of work, relationship with children, sexual intercourse, feelings about the medical profession, treatment, and infertility with the same five response categories plus an additional response category of Not Relevant which was not scored. The scores associated with each possible outcome category are as follows: never (0), rarely (25), sometimes (50), often (75), and always (100). A negative change from baseline score indicates improvement in quality of life.
Percentage of Days With Uterine Bleeding During the Double- Blind Treatment PhaseScreening (8 weeks prior to day 1) and the double-blind treatment phase (Weeks 1-8)Uterine bleeding was reported daily by participants during the study using the e-Diary. The percentage of days a participant reported any bleeding was calculated as the total number of days the participant reported any bleeding ( light, moderate, or heavy) divided by the total number of days the participant had a non-missing e-Diary report of vaginal bleeding in the phase.
Number of Days to First Posttreatment MensesFrom last day of study drug up to 6 weeks after the last dose.Defined as the number of days from the last dose of study drug until the start date of the first post-treatment menses.
Percentage of Participants With a PGIC Response of Much Improved or Very Much Improved During the Double-blind Treatment PhaseWeeks 4 and 8The Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) is a questionnaire-based assessment of the change in endometriosis pain since the initiation of study drug. The participant was asked to select from one of seven response categories: 1. Very Much Improved 2. Much Improved 3. Minimally Improved 4. Not Changed 5. Minimally Worse 6. Much Worse 7. Very Much Worse
Percentage of Participants With a Response in Monthly Mean Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Score at Week 8Baseline and Week 8Participants assessed their pelvic pain not related to menses and its impact on their daily activities at approximately the same time each day they were not having their period in an e-Diary according to the following response options: * 0 = No discomfort * 1 = Mild discomfort but I was easily able to do the things I usually do * 2 = Moderate discomfort or pain that made it difficult to do some of the things I usually do * 3 = Severe pain that made it difficult to do the things I usually do. The monthly mean non-menstrual pelvic pain score is the average of the daily values reported during the 4 weeks prior to each time point. Response is defined as the percentage of participants with a percent decrease from baseline in the week 8 monthly mean score that was greater than or equal to each specified threshold value (10% through 90% in steps of 10%).
Percentage of Participants With a Response in Monthly Mean Cumulative Pain Score at Week 8Baseline and Week 8Participants assessed dysmenorrhea or non-menstrual pelvic pain at approximately the same time every day in an e-Diary according to the following: * 0 = No discomfort * 1 = Mild discomfort * 2 = Moderate discomfort or pain * 3 = Severe pain The monthly mean cumulative pain score is the average of the daily values for all days (menstrual and non-menstrual) in the 4 weeks prior to each time point. Response is the percentage of participants with a percent decrease from baseline in the week 8 monthly mean score that was greater than or equal to each specified threshold value (10% through 90% in steps of 10%).
Percentage of Participants With a Response in Monthly Mean Dyspareunia Score at Week 8Baseline and Week 8Participants assessed their dyspareunia (pain during sexual intercourse) at approximately the same time every day in an e-Diary according to the following response options: * 0 = Absent; No discomfort during sexual intercourse * 1 = Mild; I was able to tolerate the discomfort during sexual intercourse * 2 = Moderate; Intercourse was interrupted due to pain * 3 = Severe; I avoided intercourse because of pain * Does not apply; I was not sexually active for reasons other than my endometriosis or did not have sexual intercourse The monthly mean dyspareunia score is the average of the daily values reported during the 4 weeks prior to each time point. Response is defined as the percentage of participants with a percent decrease from baseline in the week 8 monthly mean score that was greater than or equal to each specified threshold value (10% through 90% in steps of 10%).
Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Any Analgesic Use During the Double-Blind Treatment PhaseBaseline and Weeks 4 and 8The daily use of endometriosis analgesics was reported by participants daily using the e-Diary. Participants reported whether the medication was over-the-counter (OTC) or prescription, and, if prescription, whether the medication was a narcotic. The percentage of days of any analgesic use is defined as the number of days in the 4 weeks prior to each study visit that the participant reported the use of an analgesic, divided by the number of study days in the interval that the participant provided an e-Diary report regarding the use of endometriosis analgesics (including a response of none).
Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Any Analgesic Use During the Open-Label and Posttreatment PhasesBaseline and Weeks 12, 16, 20, 24, and 30 (6 weeks posttreatment)The daily use of endometriosis analgesics was reported by participants daily using the e-Diary. Participants reported whether the medication was over-the-counter (OTC) or prescription, and, if prescription, whether the medication was a narcotic. The percentage of days of any analgesic use is defined as the number of days in the 4 weeks prior to each study visit (except for week 30 which is based on 6 weeks of data) that the participant reported the use of an analgesic, divided by the number of study days in the interval that the participant provided an e-Diary report regarding the use of endometriosis analgesics (including a response of none).
Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Prescription Analgesic Use During the Double-Blind Treatment PhaseBaseline and Weeks 4 and 8The daily use of endometriosis analgesics was reported by participants daily using the e-Diary. Participants reported whether the medication was over-the-counter (OTC) or prescription, and, if prescription, whether the medication was a narcotic. The percentage of days of prescription analgesic use is defined as the number of days in the 4 weeks prior to each study visit that the participant reported the use of a prescription analgesic, divided by the number of study days in the interval that the participant provided an e-Diary report regarding the use of endometriosis analgesics (including a response of none).
Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Prescription Analgesic Use During the Open-Label and Posttreatment PhasesBaseline and Weeks 12, 16, 20, 24, and 30 (6 weeks posttreatment)The daily use of endometriosis analgesics was reported by participants daily using the e-Diary. Participants reported whether the medication was over-the-counter (OTC) or prescription, and, if prescription, whether the medication was a narcotic. The percentage of days of prescription analgesic use is defined as the number of days in the 4 weeks prior to each study visit (except for week 30 which is based on 6 weeks of data) that the participant reported the use of a prescription analgesic, divided by the number of study days in the interval that the participant provided an e-Diary report regarding the use of endometriosis analgesics (including a response of none).

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Participants were enrolled at 37 centers in the United States.

Pre-assignment details

The study consisted of up to 8 weeks of screening with data collection to establish baseline pain, an 8-week double-blind placebo-controlled treatment period, a 16-week open-label treatment period with all patients receiving elagolix 150 mg once per day, and a 6-week posttreatment follow-up period.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Participants received placebo orally once a day for 8 weeks during the double-blind treatment period and switched to receive 150 mg elagolix for 16 weeks during the open-label treatment period.
69
Elagolix 150 mg
Participants received 150 mg elagolix orally once a day for 8 weeks during the double-blind treatment period and continued to receive 150 mg elagolix for 16 additional weeks during the open-label treatment period.
68
Total137

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Double-blind Treatment Phase (Weeks 1-8)Adverse Event13
Double-blind Treatment Phase (Weeks 1-8)Lack of Efficacy10
Double-blind Treatment Phase (Weeks 1-8)Lost to Follow-up11
Double-blind Treatment Phase (Weeks 1-8)Protocol Deviation10
Double-blind Treatment Phase (Weeks 1-8)Sponsor/Investigator Decision11
Double-blind Treatment Phase (Weeks 1-8)Withdrawal by Subject13
Open-label Treatment Phase (Weeks 8-24)Adverse Event12
Open-label Treatment Phase (Weeks 8-24)Lost to Follow-up10
Open-label Treatment Phase (Weeks 8-24)Noncompliance10
Open-label Treatment Phase (Weeks 8-24)Protocol Deviation10
Open-label Treatment Phase (Weeks 8-24)Sponsor/Investigator Decision10
Open-label Treatment Phase (Weeks 8-24)Withdrawal by Subject13

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicElagolix 150 mgTotalPlacebo
Age, Continuous32.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.7
32.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.6
33.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.9
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
American Indian or Alaska Native
2 Participants2 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Black
6 Participants13 Participants7 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Hispanic
5 Participants10 Participants5 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White
55 Participants112 Participants57 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
68 Participants137 Participants69 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 690 / 131
other
Total, other adverse events
13 / 6949 / 131
serious
Total, serious adverse events
3 / 691 / 131

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Cumulative Pain Score During the Double-Blind Treatment Phase

Participants assessed dysmenorrhea or non-menstrual pelvic pain at approximately the same time each day in an e-Diary according to the following: * 0 = No discomfort * 1 = Mild discomfort but I was easily able to do the things I usually do * 2 = Moderate discomfort or pain that made it difficult to do some of the things I usually do * 3 = Severe pain that made it difficult to do the things I usually do. The monthly mean cumulative pain score is the average of the daily values for all days (menstrual and non-menstrual) reported during the 4 weeks prior to each visit.

Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4 and 8

Population: All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 10 evaluable e-Diary reports during the double-blind period (intent-to-treat population). The analysis includes participants with non-missing data at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Cumulative Pain Score During the Double-Blind Treatment PhaseWeek 4-0.11 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.058
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Cumulative Pain Score During the Double-Blind Treatment PhaseWeek 8-0.21 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.07
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Cumulative Pain Score During the Double-Blind Treatment PhaseWeek 4-0.32 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.058
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Cumulative Pain Score During the Double-Blind Treatment PhaseWeek 8-0.55 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.07
Comparison: Comparison of change from baseline at week 4p-value: 0.008995% CI: [-0.38, -0.06]ANCOVA
Comparison: Comparison of change from baseline at week 8p-value: 0.001195% CI: [-0.53, -0.14]ANCOVA
Primary

Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Cumulative Pain Score During the Open-label and Posttreatment Phases

Participants assessed dysmenorrhea or non-menstrual pelvic pain at approximately the same time each day in an e-Diary according to the following: * 0: No discomfort * 1: Mild discomfort, I was easily able to do the things I usually do * 2: Moderate discomfort or pain making it difficult to do some of the things I usually do * 3: Severe pain making it difficult to do the things I usually do The monthly mean cumulative pain score is the average of the daily values for all days (menstrual and non-menstrual) reported during the 4 weeks prior to each visit, except for the week 30 value which is based on 6 weeks of data.

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 12, 16, 20, 24, and 30 (6 weeks posttreatment)

Population: All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 10 evaluable e-Diary reports during the double-blind period (intent-to-treat population) with data on or after Week 12. The analysis includes participants with non-missing data at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Cumulative Pain Score During the Open-label and Posttreatment PhasesWeek 30-0.374 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.095
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Cumulative Pain Score During the Open-label and Posttreatment PhasesWeek 12-0.433 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.082
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Cumulative Pain Score During the Open-label and Posttreatment PhasesWeek 16-0.530 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.072
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Cumulative Pain Score During the Open-label and Posttreatment PhasesWeek 20-0.615 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.085
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Cumulative Pain Score During the Open-label and Posttreatment PhasesWeek 24-0.655 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.088
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Cumulative Pain Score During the Open-label and Posttreatment PhasesWeek 24-0.878 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.082
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Cumulative Pain Score During the Open-label and Posttreatment PhasesWeek 20-0.798 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.081
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Cumulative Pain Score During the Open-label and Posttreatment PhasesWeek 12-0.781 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.07
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Cumulative Pain Score During the Open-label and Posttreatment PhasesWeek 30-0.666 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.085
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Cumulative Pain Score During the Open-label and Posttreatment PhasesWeek 16-0.793 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.083
Primary

Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Dysmenorrhea Score During the Double-blind Treatment Phase

Participants assessed dysmenorrhea (pain during menstruation) and its impact on their daily activities at approximately the same time each day of their period in an electronic diary (e-Diary) according to the following response options: * 0 = No discomfort * 1 = Mild discomfort but I was easily able to do the things I usually do * 2 = Moderate discomfort or pain that made it difficult to do some of the things I usually do * 3 = Severe pain that made it difficult to do the things I usually do. The monthly mean dysmenorrhea score is the average of the daily values reported during the 4 weeks prior to each visit.

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4 and 8

Population: All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 10 evaluable e-Diary reports during the double-blind period (intent-to-treat population). The analysis includes participants with non-missing data at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Dysmenorrhea Score During the Double-blind Treatment PhaseWeek 4-0.24 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.076
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Dysmenorrhea Score During the Double-blind Treatment PhaseWeek 8-0.37 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.107
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Dysmenorrhea Score During the Double-blind Treatment PhaseWeek 4-0.49 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.076
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Dysmenorrhea Score During the Double-blind Treatment PhaseWeek 8-1.13 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.107
Comparison: Comparison of Change from Baseline at Week 4p-value: 0.026295% CI: [-0.45, -0.03]ANCOVA
Comparison: Comparison of change from baseline at week 8p-value: <0.000195% CI: [-1.06, -0.46]ANCOVA
Primary

Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Dysmenorrhea Score During the Open-label and Posttreatment Phases

Participants assessed dysmenorrhea (pain during menstruation) and its impact on their daily activities at approximately the same time each day of their period in an electronic diary (e-Diary) according to the following response options: * 0 = No discomfort * 1 = Mild discomfort but I was easily able to do the things I usually do * 2 = Moderate discomfort or pain that made it difficult to do some of the things I usually do * 3 = Severe pain that made it difficult to do the things I usually do. The monthly mean dysmenorrhea score is the average of the daily values reported during the 4 weeks prior to each visit, except for the week 30 value which is based on 6 weeks of data.

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 12, 16, 20, 24, and 30 (6 weeks posttreatment)

Population: All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 10 evaluable e-Diary reports during the double-blind period (intent-to-treat population) with data on or after Week 12. The analysis includes participants with non-missing data at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Dysmenorrhea Score During the Open-label and Posttreatment PhasesWeek 16-1.325 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.112
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Dysmenorrhea Score During the Open-label and Posttreatment PhasesWeek 24-1.282 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.118
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Dysmenorrhea Score During the Open-label and Posttreatment PhasesWeek 20-1.026 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.119
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Dysmenorrhea Score During the Open-label and Posttreatment PhasesWeek 30-0.547 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.104
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Dysmenorrhea Score During the Open-label and Posttreatment PhasesWeek 12-0.768 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.118
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Dysmenorrhea Score During the Open-label and Posttreatment PhasesWeek 30-0.534 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.102
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Dysmenorrhea Score During the Open-label and Posttreatment PhasesWeek 12-1.060 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.13
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Dysmenorrhea Score During the Open-label and Posttreatment PhasesWeek 16-1.022 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.137
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Dysmenorrhea Score During the Open-label and Posttreatment PhasesWeek 20-0.991 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.121
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Dysmenorrhea Score During the Open-label and Posttreatment PhasesWeek 24-1.372 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.132
Primary

Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Dyspareunia Score During the Double-Blind Treatment Phase

Participants assessed their dyspareunia (pain during sexual intercourse) at approximately the same time every day in an e-Diary according to the following response options: * 0 = Absent; No discomfort during sexual intercourse * 1 = Mild; I was able to tolerate the discomfort during sexual intercourse * 2 = Moderate; Intercourse was interrupted due to pain * 3 = Severe; I avoided intercourse because of pain * Does not apply; I was not sexually active for reasons other than my endometriosis or did not have sexual intercourse The monthly mean dyspareunia score is the average of the daily values reported during the 4 weeks prior to each visit. Responses of does not apply were not included in the calculations.

Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4 and 8

Population: All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 10 evaluable e-Diary reports during the double-blind period (intent-to-treat population) with non-missing data at each time point. If a participant's responses were all does not apply for that month the score was treated as missing.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Dyspareunia Score During the Double-Blind Treatment PhaseWeek 4-0.07 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.087
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Dyspareunia Score During the Double-Blind Treatment PhaseWeek 8-0.23 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.095
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Dyspareunia Score During the Double-Blind Treatment PhaseWeek 4-0.34 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.091
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Dyspareunia Score During the Double-Blind Treatment PhaseWeek 8-0.61 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.098
Comparison: Comparison of change form baseline at week 4p-value: 0.03695% CI: [-0.52, -0.02]ANCOVA
Comparison: Comparison of change from baseline at week 8p-value: 0.00795% CI: [-0.65, -0.11]ANCOVA
Primary

Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Dyspareunia Score During the Open-label and Posttreatment Phases

Participants assessed their dyspareunia (pain during sexual intercourse) at approximately the same time every day in an e-Diary according to the following response options: * 0: Absent; No discomfort during sexual intercourse * 1: Mild; I was able to tolerate the discomfort during sexual intercourse * 2: Moderate; Intercourse was interrupted due to pain * 3: Severe; I avoided intercourse because of pain * Does not apply; I was not sexually active for reasons other than my endometriosis or did not have sexual intercourse The monthly mean dyspareunia score is the average of the daily values reported during the 4 weeks prior to each visit, except for week 30 which is based on 6 weeks of data. Responses of does not apply were not included in the calculations.

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 12, 16, 20, 24, and 30 (6 weeks posttreatment)

Population: Randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 10 evaluable e-Diary reports during the double-blind period (intent-to-treat population) with data on or after Week 12 and non-missing data at each time point. If a participant's responses were all does not apply for that month the score was treated as missing.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Dyspareunia Score During the Open-label and Posttreatment PhasesWeek 16-0.453 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.114
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Dyspareunia Score During the Open-label and Posttreatment PhasesWeek 24-0.633 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.155
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Dyspareunia Score During the Open-label and Posttreatment PhasesWeek 20-0.492 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.135
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Dyspareunia Score During the Open-label and Posttreatment PhasesWeek 30-0.300 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.118
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Dyspareunia Score During the Open-label and Posttreatment PhasesWeek 12-0.334 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.125
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Dyspareunia Score During the Open-label and Posttreatment PhasesWeek 30-0.730 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.118
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Dyspareunia Score During the Open-label and Posttreatment PhasesWeek 12-0.696 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.112
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Dyspareunia Score During the Open-label and Posttreatment PhasesWeek 16-0.738 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.124
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Dyspareunia Score During the Open-label and Posttreatment PhasesWeek 20-0.778 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.121
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Dyspareunia Score During the Open-label and Posttreatment PhasesWeek 24-0.789 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.115
Primary

Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Score During the Double-Blind Treatment Phase

Participants assessed their pelvic pain not related to menses and its impact on their daily activities at approximately the same time each day they were not having their period in an e-Diary according to the following response options: * 0 = No discomfort * 1 = Mild discomfort but I was easily able to do the things I usually do * 2 = Moderate discomfort or pain that made it difficult to do some of the things I usually do * 3 = Severe pain that made it difficult to do the things I usually do. The monthly mean non-menstrual pelvic pain score is the average of the daily values reported during the 4 weeks prior to each visit.

Time frame: Baseline and weeks 4 and 8

Population: All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 10 evaluable e-Diary reports during the double-blind period (intent-to-treat population). The analysis includes participants with non-missing data at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Score During the Double-Blind Treatment PhaseWeek 4-0.05 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.061
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Score During the Double-Blind Treatment PhaseWeek 8-0.19 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.071
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Score During the Double-Blind Treatment PhaseWeek 4-0.26 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.061
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Score During the Double-Blind Treatment PhaseWeek 8-0.47 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.071
Comparison: Comparison of change from baseline at week 4p-value: 0.016395% CI: [-0.38, -0.04]ANCOVA
Comparison: Comparison of change from baseline at week 8p-value: 0.006695% CI: [-0.48, -0.08]ANCOVA
Primary

Change From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Score During the Open-label and Posttreatment Phases

Participants assessed their pelvic pain not related to menses and its impact on their daily activities at approximately the same time each day they were not having their period in an e-Diary according to the following response options: * 0 = No discomfort * 1 = Mild discomfort but I was easily able to do the things I usually do * 2 = Moderate discomfort or pain that made it difficult to do some of the things I usually do * 3 = Severe pain that made it difficult to do the things I usually do. The monthly mean non-menstrual pelvic pain score is the average of the daily values reported during the 4 weeks prior to each visit, except for the week 30 value which is based on 6 weeks of data.

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 12, 16, 20, 24, and 30 (6 weeks posttreatment)

Population: All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 10 evaluable e-Diary reports during the double-blind period (intent-to-treat population) with data on or after Week 12. The analysis includes participants with non-missing data at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Score During the Open-label and Posttreatment PhasesWeek 30-0.326 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.104
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Score During the Open-label and Posttreatment PhasesWeek 16-0.422 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.078
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Score During the Open-label and Posttreatment PhasesWeek 12-0.355 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.087
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Score During the Open-label and Posttreatment PhasesWeek 20-0.524 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.09
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Score During the Open-label and Posttreatment PhasesWeek 24-0.543 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.092
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Score During the Open-label and Posttreatment PhasesWeek 24-0.801 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.082
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Score During the Open-label and Posttreatment PhasesWeek 20-0.759 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.082
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Score During the Open-label and Posttreatment PhasesWeek 30-0.689 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.085
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Score During the Open-label and Posttreatment PhasesWeek 12-0.727 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.072
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline in the Monthly Mean Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Score During the Open-label and Posttreatment PhasesWeek 16-0.763 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.079
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Any Analgesic Use During the Double-Blind Treatment Phase

The daily use of endometriosis analgesics was reported by participants daily using the e-Diary. Participants reported whether the medication was over-the-counter (OTC) or prescription, and, if prescription, whether the medication was a narcotic. The percentage of days of any analgesic use is defined as the number of days in the 4 weeks prior to each study visit that the participant reported the use of an analgesic, divided by the number of study days in the interval that the participant provided an e-Diary report regarding the use of endometriosis analgesics (including a response of none).

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4 and 8

Population: All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 10 evaluable e-Diary reports during the double-blind period (intent-to-treat population). The analysis includes participants with non-missing data at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Any Analgesic Use During the Double-Blind Treatment PhaseWeek 4-5.78 percentage of daysStandard Error 2.782
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Any Analgesic Use During the Double-Blind Treatment PhaseWeek 8-9.19 percentage of daysStandard Error 2.763
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Any Analgesic Use During the Double-Blind Treatment PhaseWeek 4-15.62 percentage of daysStandard Error 2.782
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Any Analgesic Use During the Double-Blind Treatment PhaseWeek 8-21.63 percentage of daysStandard Error 2.763
Comparison: Comparison of change from baseline at week 4p-value: 0.013795% CI: [-17.63, -2.05]ANCOVA
Comparison: Comparison of change from baseline at week 8p-value: 0.001995% CI: [-20.19, -4.7]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Any Analgesic Use During the Open-Label and Posttreatment Phases

The daily use of endometriosis analgesics was reported by participants daily using the e-Diary. Participants reported whether the medication was over-the-counter (OTC) or prescription, and, if prescription, whether the medication was a narcotic. The percentage of days of any analgesic use is defined as the number of days in the 4 weeks prior to each study visit (except for week 30 which is based on 6 weeks of data) that the participant reported the use of an analgesic, divided by the number of study days in the interval that the participant provided an e-Diary report regarding the use of endometriosis analgesics (including a response of none).

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 12, 16, 20, 24, and 30 (6 weeks posttreatment)

Population: All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 10 evaluable e-Diary reports during the double-blind period (intent-to-treat population) with data on or after Week 12. The analysis includes participants with non-missing data at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Any Analgesic Use During the Open-Label and Posttreatment PhasesWeek 16-18.34 percentage of daysStandard Error 3.33
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Any Analgesic Use During the Open-Label and Posttreatment PhasesWeek 24-20.63 percentage of daysStandard Error 4.17
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Any Analgesic Use During the Open-Label and Posttreatment PhasesWeek 12-14.91 percentage of daysStandard Error 3.76
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Any Analgesic Use During the Open-Label and Posttreatment PhasesWeek 30-11.64 percentage of daysStandard Error 4.18
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Any Analgesic Use During the Open-Label and Posttreatment PhasesWeek 20-19.82 percentage of daysStandard Error 4.05
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Any Analgesic Use During the Open-Label and Posttreatment PhasesWeek 30-21.83 percentage of daysStandard Error 4.3
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Any Analgesic Use During the Open-Label and Posttreatment PhasesWeek 12-27.70 percentage of daysStandard Error 3.49
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Any Analgesic Use During the Open-Label and Posttreatment PhasesWeek 16-26.27 percentage of daysStandard Error 3.71
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Any Analgesic Use During the Open-Label and Posttreatment PhasesWeek 20-26.35 percentage of daysStandard Error 4.27
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Any Analgesic Use During the Open-Label and Posttreatment PhasesWeek 24-29.21 percentage of daysStandard Error 4.23
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Narcotic Analgesic Use During the Double-Blind Treatment Phase

The daily use of endometriosis analgesics was reported by participants daily using the e-Diary. Participants reported whether the medication was over-the-counter (OTC) or prescription, and, if prescription, whether the medication was a narcotic. The percentage of days of narcotic analgesic use is defined as the number of days in the 4 weeks prior to each study visit that the participant reported the use of a narcotic analgesic, divided by the number of study days in the interval that the participant provided an e-Diary report regarding the use of endometriosis analgesics (including a response of none).

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4 and 8

Population: All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 10 evaluable e-Diary reports during the double-blind period (intent-to-treat population). The analysis includes participants with non-missing data at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Narcotic Analgesic Use During the Double-Blind Treatment PhaseWeek 4-0.51 percentage of daysStandard Error 1.287
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Narcotic Analgesic Use During the Double-Blind Treatment PhaseWeek 8-1.19 percentage of daysStandard Error 1.369
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Narcotic Analgesic Use During the Double-Blind Treatment PhaseWeek 8-4.71 percentage of daysStandard Error 1.369
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Narcotic Analgesic Use During the Double-Blind Treatment PhaseWeek 4-3.63 percentage of daysStandard Error 1.287
Comparison: Comparison of change from baseline at week 4p-value: 0.089395% CI: [-6.72, 0.49]ANCOVA
Comparison: Comparison of change from baseline at week 8p-value: 0.07295% CI: [-7.35, 0.32]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Narcotic Analgesic Use During the Open-Label and Posttreatment Phases

The daily use of endometriosis analgesics was reported by participants daily using the e-Diary. Participants reported whether the medication was over-the-counter (OTC) or prescription, and, if prescription, whether the medication was a narcotic. The percentage of days of narcotic analgesic use is defined as the number of days in the 4 weeks prior to each study visit (except for week 30 which is based on 6 weeks of data) that the participant reported the use of a narcotic analgesic, divided by the number of study days in the interval that the participant provided an e-Diary report regarding the use of endometriosis analgesics (including a response of none).

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 12, 16, 20, 24, and 30 (6 weeks posttreatment)

Population: All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 10 evaluable e-Diary reports during the double-blind period (intent-to-treat population) with data on or after Week 12. The analysis includes participants with non-missing data at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Narcotic Analgesic Use During the Open-Label and Posttreatment PhasesWeek 300.75 percentage of daysStandard Error 2.73
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Narcotic Analgesic Use During the Open-Label and Posttreatment PhasesWeek 20-2.79 percentage of daysStandard Error 2.24
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Narcotic Analgesic Use During the Open-Label and Posttreatment PhasesWeek 16-4.03 percentage of daysStandard Error 1.76
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Narcotic Analgesic Use During the Open-Label and Posttreatment PhasesWeek 24-3.12 percentage of daysStandard Error 2.2
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Narcotic Analgesic Use During the Open-Label and Posttreatment PhasesWeek 12-1.91 percentage of daysStandard Error 2.16
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Narcotic Analgesic Use During the Open-Label and Posttreatment PhasesWeek 24-3.92 percentage of daysStandard Error 1.68
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Narcotic Analgesic Use During the Open-Label and Posttreatment PhasesWeek 12-4.79 percentage of daysStandard Error 1.25
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Narcotic Analgesic Use During the Open-Label and Posttreatment PhasesWeek 30-3.56 percentage of daysStandard Error 1.69
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Narcotic Analgesic Use During the Open-Label and Posttreatment PhasesWeek 16-3.64 percentage of daysStandard Error 1.27
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Narcotic Analgesic Use During the Open-Label and Posttreatment PhasesWeek 20-5.41 percentage of daysStandard Error 1.64
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Prescription Analgesic Use During the Double-Blind Treatment Phase

The daily use of endometriosis analgesics was reported by participants daily using the e-Diary. Participants reported whether the medication was over-the-counter (OTC) or prescription, and, if prescription, whether the medication was a narcotic. The percentage of days of prescription analgesic use is defined as the number of days in the 4 weeks prior to each study visit that the participant reported the use of a prescription analgesic, divided by the number of study days in the interval that the participant provided an e-Diary report regarding the use of endometriosis analgesics (including a response of none).

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 4 and 8

Population: All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 10 evaluable e-Diary reports during the double-blind period (intent-to-treat population). The analysis includes participants with non-missing data at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Prescription Analgesic Use During the Double-Blind Treatment PhaseWeek 40.92 percentage of daysStandard Error 1.929
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Prescription Analgesic Use During the Double-Blind Treatment PhaseWeek 8-0.82 percentage of daysStandard Error 1.802
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Prescription Analgesic Use During the Double-Blind Treatment PhaseWeek 8-7.16 percentage of daysStandard Error 1.802
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Prescription Analgesic Use During the Double-Blind Treatment PhaseWeek 4-5.29 percentage of daysStandard Error 1.929
Comparison: Comparison of change from baseline at week 4p-value: 0.024495% CI: [-11.61, -0.81]ANCOVA
Comparison: Comparison of change from baseline at week 8p-value: 0.014195% CI: [-11.39, -1.3]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Prescription Analgesic Use During the Open-Label and Posttreatment Phases

The daily use of endometriosis analgesics was reported by participants daily using the e-Diary. Participants reported whether the medication was over-the-counter (OTC) or prescription, and, if prescription, whether the medication was a narcotic. The percentage of days of prescription analgesic use is defined as the number of days in the 4 weeks prior to each study visit (except for week 30 which is based on 6 weeks of data) that the participant reported the use of a prescription analgesic, divided by the number of study days in the interval that the participant provided an e-Diary report regarding the use of endometriosis analgesics (including a response of none).

Time frame: Baseline and Weeks 12, 16, 20, 24, and 30 (6 weeks posttreatment)

Population: All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 10 evaluable e-Diary reports during the double-blind period (intent-to-treat population) with data on or after Week 12. The analysis includes participants with non-missing data at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Prescription Analgesic Use During the Open-Label and Posttreatment PhasesWeek 12-2.34 percentage of daysStandard Error 2.7
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Prescription Analgesic Use During the Open-Label and Posttreatment PhasesWeek 20-5.21 percentage of daysStandard Error 2.78
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Prescription Analgesic Use During the Open-Label and Posttreatment PhasesWeek 16-5.52 percentage of daysStandard Error 2.26
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Prescription Analgesic Use During the Open-Label and Posttreatment PhasesWeek 24-5.89 percentage of daysStandard Error 2.56
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Prescription Analgesic Use During the Open-Label and Posttreatment PhasesWeek 30-0.72 percentage of daysStandard Error 3.07
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Prescription Analgesic Use During the Open-Label and Posttreatment PhasesWeek 16-7.52 percentage of daysStandard Error 1.67
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Prescription Analgesic Use During the Open-Label and Posttreatment PhasesWeek 20-6.06 percentage of daysStandard Error 2.31
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Prescription Analgesic Use During the Open-Label and Posttreatment PhasesWeek 30-6.06 percentage of daysStandard Error 2.26
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Prescription Analgesic Use During the Open-Label and Posttreatment PhasesWeek 12-8.53 percentage of daysStandard Error 1.66
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline in the Percentage of Days of Prescription Analgesic Use During the Open-Label and Posttreatment PhasesWeek 24-7.83 percentage of daysStandard Error 1.89
Secondary

Change From Baseline to the End of the Double-blind Treatment Phase in Composite Pelvic Signs and Symptoms Score (CPSSS) Total Score and Component Scores

The CPSSS consists of 5 components that address dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, non-menstrual pelvic pain, pelvic tenderness, and pelvic induration. Each component was scored on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe). Dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, and non-menstrual pelvic pain scores are based on the participant's assessment of symptoms during the past 28 days; pelvic tenderness and induration were assessed by the investigator based on findings associated with a pelvic examination. The total CPSSS has a maximum possible value of 15 (total score range: 0 to 15, where a lower score indicates less signs and symptoms of endometriosis or better functioning). Individual component scores range from 0 (absent) to 3 (severe).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 8

Population: All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 10 evaluable e-Diary reports during the double-blind period (intent-to-treat population). The analysis includes participants with non-missing data at baseline and week 8.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to the End of the Double-blind Treatment Phase in Composite Pelvic Signs and Symptoms Score (CPSSS) Total Score and Component ScoresDysmenorrhea Component-0.39 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.127
PlaceboChange From Baseline to the End of the Double-blind Treatment Phase in Composite Pelvic Signs and Symptoms Score (CPSSS) Total Score and Component ScoresDyspareunia Component-0.46 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.123
PlaceboChange From Baseline to the End of the Double-blind Treatment Phase in Composite Pelvic Signs and Symptoms Score (CPSSS) Total Score and Component ScoresTotal Score-2.19 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.359
PlaceboChange From Baseline to the End of the Double-blind Treatment Phase in Composite Pelvic Signs and Symptoms Score (CPSSS) Total Score and Component ScoresNon-menstrual Pelvic Pain Component-0.54 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.101
PlaceboChange From Baseline to the End of the Double-blind Treatment Phase in Composite Pelvic Signs and Symptoms Score (CPSSS) Total Score and Component ScoresPelvic Tenderness Component-0.41 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.102
PlaceboChange From Baseline to the End of the Double-blind Treatment Phase in Composite Pelvic Signs and Symptoms Score (CPSSS) Total Score and Component ScoresPelvic Induration Component-0.38 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.089
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline to the End of the Double-blind Treatment Phase in Composite Pelvic Signs and Symptoms Score (CPSSS) Total Score and Component ScoresTotal Score-4.45 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.356
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline to the End of the Double-blind Treatment Phase in Composite Pelvic Signs and Symptoms Score (CPSSS) Total Score and Component ScoresDysmenorrhea Component-1.44 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.127
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline to the End of the Double-blind Treatment Phase in Composite Pelvic Signs and Symptoms Score (CPSSS) Total Score and Component ScoresPelvic Tenderness Component-0.80 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.101
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline to the End of the Double-blind Treatment Phase in Composite Pelvic Signs and Symptoms Score (CPSSS) Total Score and Component ScoresDyspareunia Component-0.74 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.121
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline to the End of the Double-blind Treatment Phase in Composite Pelvic Signs and Symptoms Score (CPSSS) Total Score and Component ScoresPelvic Induration Component-0.66 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.088
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline to the End of the Double-blind Treatment Phase in Composite Pelvic Signs and Symptoms Score (CPSSS) Total Score and Component ScoresNon-menstrual Pelvic Pain Component-0.90 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.101
Comparison: Comparison of the change from baseline in CPSSS total scorep-value: <0.000195% CI: [-3.26, -1.26]ANCOVA
Comparison: Comparison of change from baseline in CPSSS component of dysmenorrhea scorep-value: <0.000195% CI: [-1.41, -0.69]ANCOVA
Comparison: Comparison of change from baseline in CPSSS component of non-menstrual pelvic pain scorep-value: 0.013995% CI: [-0.64, -0.07]ANCOVA
Comparison: Comparison of change from baseline in CPSSS component of dyspareunia scorep-value: 0.105295% CI: [-0.63, 0.06]ANCOVA
Comparison: Comparison of change from baseline in CPSSS component of pelvic tenderness scorep-value: 0.008195% CI: [-0.67, -0.1]ANCOVA
Comparison: Comparison of change from baseline in CPSSS component of induration scorep-value: 0.02495% CI: [-0.53, -0.04]ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline to the End of the Double-blind Treatment Phase in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5)

The EHP-5 is an instrument to measure health-related quality of life in women with endometriosis. The EHP-5 consists of two parts: * A core questionnaire consisting of five questions that measure the impact of endometriosis in areas of pain, control and powerlessness, emotional well-being, social support, and self-image with five response categories for each item (Never, Rarely, Sometimes, Often, Always) * A supplemental questionnaire consisting of six additional questions which assess the impact of endometriosis on the areas of work, relationship with children, sexual intercourse, feelings about the medical profession, treatment, and infertility with the same five response categories plus an additional response category of Not Relevant which was not scored. The scores associated with each possible outcome category are as follows: never (0), rarely (25), sometimes (50), often (75), and always (100). A negative change from baseline score indicates improvement in quality of life.

Time frame: Baseline and week 8

Population: All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 10 evaluable e-Diary reports during the double-blind period (intent-to-treat population). The analysis includes participants with non-missing data at baseline and week 8 for each question.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to the End of the Double-blind Treatment Phase in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5)Emotional Well-being-10.3 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.9
PlaceboChange From Baseline to the End of the Double-blind Treatment Phase in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5)Relationship with Children-19.0 units on a scaleStandard Error 4.8
PlaceboChange From Baseline to the End of the Double-blind Treatment Phase in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5)Social Support-13.1 units on a scaleStandard Error 3.5
PlaceboChange From Baseline to the End of the Double-blind Treatment Phase in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5)Sexual Intercourse-14.3 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.9
PlaceboChange From Baseline to the End of the Double-blind Treatment Phase in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5)Pain-12.3 units on a scaleStandard Error 3.2
PlaceboChange From Baseline to the End of the Double-blind Treatment Phase in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5)Medical Profession-9.5 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.9
PlaceboChange From Baseline to the End of the Double-blind Treatment Phase in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5)Self-image-7.1 units on a scaleStandard Error 3.3
PlaceboChange From Baseline to the End of the Double-blind Treatment Phase in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5)Frustration with Treatment-20.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 5.1
PlaceboChange From Baseline to the End of the Double-blind Treatment Phase in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5)Work-13.0 units on a scaleStandard Error 3.4
PlaceboChange From Baseline to the End of the Double-blind Treatment Phase in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5)Concerns with Infertility-10.6 units on a scaleStandard Error 3.6
PlaceboChange From Baseline to the End of the Double-blind Treatment Phase in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5)Control and Powerlessness-12.7 units on a scaleStandard Error 3.2
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline to the End of the Double-blind Treatment Phase in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5)Concerns with Infertility-14.1 units on a scaleStandard Error 3.3
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline to the End of the Double-blind Treatment Phase in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5)Control and Powerlessness-35.3 units on a scaleStandard Error 3.7
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline to the End of the Double-blind Treatment Phase in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5)Emotional Well-being-17.1 units on a scaleStandard Error 3.1
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline to the End of the Double-blind Treatment Phase in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5)Pain-29.0 units on a scaleStandard Error 3
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline to the End of the Double-blind Treatment Phase in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5)Social Support-27.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 3.9
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline to the End of the Double-blind Treatment Phase in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5)Self-image-23.4 units on a scaleStandard Error 3.5
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline to the End of the Double-blind Treatment Phase in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5)Work-26.4 units on a scaleStandard Error 3.4
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline to the End of the Double-blind Treatment Phase in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5)Relationship with Children-31.5 units on a scaleStandard Error 5.5
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline to the End of the Double-blind Treatment Phase in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5)Sexual Intercourse-22.6 units on a scaleStandard Error 3.8
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline to the End of the Double-blind Treatment Phase in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5)Medical Profession-11.5 units on a scaleStandard Error 3.3
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline to the End of the Double-blind Treatment Phase in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5)Frustration with Treatment-36.5 units on a scaleStandard Error 4.6
Secondary

Change From Baseline to the End of the Open-label Treatment Phase in Composite Pelvic Signs and Symptoms Score (CPSSS) Total Score and Component Scores

The CPSSS consists of 5 components that address dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, non-menstrual pelvic pain, pelvic tenderness, and pelvic induration. Each component was scored on a scale of 0 to 3 (0 = absent, 1 = mild, 2 = moderate, and 3 = severe). Dysmenorrhea, dyspareunia, and non-menstrual pelvic pain scores are based on the participant's assessment of symptoms during the past 28 days; pelvic tenderness and induration were assessed by the investigator based on findings associated with a pelvic examination. The total CPSSS has a maximum possible value of 15 (total score range: 0 to 15, where a lower score indicates less signs and symptoms of endometriosis or better functioning). Individual component scores range from 0 (absent) to 3 (severe).

Time frame: Baseline and week 24

Population: All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 10 evaluable e-Diary reports during the double-blind period (intent-to-treat population) with data on or after Week 24. The analysis includes participants with non-missing data for each component at baseline and week 24.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to the End of the Open-label Treatment Phase in Composite Pelvic Signs and Symptoms Score (CPSSS) Total Score and Component ScoresNon-menstrual Pelvic Pain Component-1.000 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.128
PlaceboChange From Baseline to the End of the Open-label Treatment Phase in Composite Pelvic Signs and Symptoms Score (CPSSS) Total Score and Component ScoresPelvic Tenderness Component-1.000 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.12
PlaceboChange From Baseline to the End of the Open-label Treatment Phase in Composite Pelvic Signs and Symptoms Score (CPSSS) Total Score and Component ScoresDyspareunia Component-1.12 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.17
PlaceboChange From Baseline to the End of the Open-label Treatment Phase in Composite Pelvic Signs and Symptoms Score (CPSSS) Total Score and Component ScoresDysmenorrhea Component-1.544 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.175
PlaceboChange From Baseline to the End of the Open-label Treatment Phase in Composite Pelvic Signs and Symptoms Score (CPSSS) Total Score and Component ScoresPelvic Induration Component-0.964 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.142
PlaceboChange From Baseline to the End of the Open-label Treatment Phase in Composite Pelvic Signs and Symptoms Score (CPSSS) Total Score and Component ScoresTotal Score-5.571 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.451
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline to the End of the Open-label Treatment Phase in Composite Pelvic Signs and Symptoms Score (CPSSS) Total Score and Component ScoresPelvic Induration Component-0.807 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.121
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline to the End of the Open-label Treatment Phase in Composite Pelvic Signs and Symptoms Score (CPSSS) Total Score and Component ScoresTotal Score-5.404 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.384
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline to the End of the Open-label Treatment Phase in Composite Pelvic Signs and Symptoms Score (CPSSS) Total Score and Component ScoresDysmenorrhea Component-1.386 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.175
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline to the End of the Open-label Treatment Phase in Composite Pelvic Signs and Symptoms Score (CPSSS) Total Score and Component ScoresNon-menstrual Pelvic Pain Component-1.211 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.127
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline to the End of the Open-label Treatment Phase in Composite Pelvic Signs and Symptoms Score (CPSSS) Total Score and Component ScoresPelvic Tenderness Component-1.175 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.112
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline to the End of the Open-label Treatment Phase in Composite Pelvic Signs and Symptoms Score (CPSSS) Total Score and Component ScoresDyspareunia Component-0.77 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.16
Secondary

Change From Baseline to the End of the Open-label Treatment Phase in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5)

The EHP-5 is an instrument to measure health-related quality of life in women with endometriosis. The EHP-5 consists of two parts: * A core questionnaire consisting of five questions that measure the impact of endometriosis on areas of pain, control and powerlessness, emotional well-being, social support, and self-image with five response categories for each item (Never, Rarely, Sometimes, Often, Always) * A supplemental questionnaire consisting of six additional questions which assess the impact of endometriosis on areas of work, relationship with children, sexual intercourse, feelings about the medical profession, treatment, and infertility with the same five response categories plus an additional response category of Not Relevant which was not scored. The scores associated with each possible outcome category are as follows: never (0), rarely (25), sometimes (50), often (75), and always (100). A negative change from baseline score indicates improvement in quality of life.

Time frame: Baseline and week 24

Population: All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 10 evaluable e-Diary reports during the double-blind period (intent-to-treat population) with data on or after Week 12. The analysis includes participants with non-missing data at baseline and week 24 for each question.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline to the End of the Open-label Treatment Phase in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5)Social Support-29.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 4.5
PlaceboChange From Baseline to the End of the Open-label Treatment Phase in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5)Relationship with Children-39.6 units on a scaleStandard Error 5.4
PlaceboChange From Baseline to the End of the Open-label Treatment Phase in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5)Emotional Well-being-22.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 4
PlaceboChange From Baseline to the End of the Open-label Treatment Phase in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5)Sexual Intercourse-30.1 units on a scaleStandard Error 3.9
PlaceboChange From Baseline to the End of the Open-label Treatment Phase in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5)Self-image-20.6 units on a scaleStandard Error 4.3
PlaceboChange From Baseline to the End of the Open-label Treatment Phase in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5)Medical Profession-16.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 4.5
PlaceboChange From Baseline to the End of the Open-label Treatment Phase in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5)Control and Powerlessness-35.1 units on a scaleStandard Error 4.3
PlaceboChange From Baseline to the End of the Open-label Treatment Phase in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5)Frustration with Treatment-40.1 units on a scaleStandard Error 5.5
PlaceboChange From Baseline to the End of the Open-label Treatment Phase in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5)Work-27.6 units on a scaleStandard Error 4.4
PlaceboChange From Baseline to the End of the Open-label Treatment Phase in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5)Concerns with Infertility-20.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 5
PlaceboChange From Baseline to the End of the Open-label Treatment Phase in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5)Pain-30.3 units on a scaleStandard Error 3.9
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline to the End of the Open-label Treatment Phase in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5)Concerns with Infertility-22.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 3.8
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline to the End of the Open-label Treatment Phase in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5)Pain-36.4 units on a scaleStandard Error 2.9
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline to the End of the Open-label Treatment Phase in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5)Control and Powerlessness-39.5 units on a scaleStandard Error 3.5
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline to the End of the Open-label Treatment Phase in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5)Emotional Well-being-23.7 units on a scaleStandard Error 3.3
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline to the End of the Open-label Treatment Phase in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5)Social Support-37.7 units on a scaleStandard Error 4.1
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline to the End of the Open-label Treatment Phase in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5)Self-image-25.9 units on a scaleStandard Error 3.9
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline to the End of the Open-label Treatment Phase in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5)Work-37.0 units on a scaleStandard Error 3.1
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline to the End of the Open-label Treatment Phase in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5)Relationship with Children-40.0 units on a scaleStandard Error 4.2
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline to the End of the Open-label Treatment Phase in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5)Sexual Intercourse-27.2 units on a scaleStandard Error 4
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline to the End of the Open-label Treatment Phase in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5)Medical Profession-19.6 units on a scaleStandard Error 3.9
Elagolix 150 mgChange From Baseline to the End of the Open-label Treatment Phase in Endometriosis Health Profile-5 (EHP-5)Frustration with Treatment-40.6 units on a scaleStandard Error 4.4
Secondary

Number of Days to First Posttreatment Menses

Defined as the number of days from the last dose of study drug until the start date of the first post-treatment menses.

Time frame: From last day of study drug up to 6 weeks after the last dose.

Population: Participants who received at least one dose of randomized, double-blind study drug (safety analysis set) with non-missing post-treatment data.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
PlaceboNumber of Days to First Posttreatment Menses22.0 days
Elagolix 150 mgNumber of Days to First Posttreatment Menses25.0 days
Secondary

Patient Global Impression of Change During the Double-blind Treatment Phase

The Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) is a questionnaire-based assessment of the change in endometriosis pain since the initiation of study drug. The participant was asked to select from one of seven response categories: 1. Very Much Improved 2. Much Improved 3. Minimally Improved 4. Not Changed 5. Minimally Worse 6. Much Worse 7. Very Much Worse

Time frame: Weeks 4 and 8

Population: All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 10 evaluable e-Diary reports during the double-blind period (intent-to-treat population). The analysis includes participants with non-missing data at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPatient Global Impression of Change During the Double-blind Treatment PhaseWeek 43.6 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.16
PlaceboPatient Global Impression of Change During the Double-blind Treatment PhaseWeek 83.4 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.18
Elagolix 150 mgPatient Global Impression of Change During the Double-blind Treatment PhaseWeek 82.4 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.18
Elagolix 150 mgPatient Global Impression of Change During the Double-blind Treatment PhaseWeek 42.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.16
Comparison: Comparison of Patient Global Impression of Change at week 4p-value: 0.001295% CI: [-1.2, -0.3]ANOVA
Comparison: Comparison of Patient Global Impression of Change at week 8p-value: 0.000295% CI: [-1.5, -0.5]ANOVA
Secondary

Patient Global Impression of Change During the Open-Label and Posttreatment Phases

The Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) is a questionnaire-based assessment of the change in endometriosis pain since the initiation of study drug. The participant was asked to select from one of seven response categories: 1. Very Much Improved 2. Much Improved 3. Minimally Improved 4. Not Changed 5. Minimally Worse 6. Much Worse 7. Very Much Worse

Time frame: Weeks 12, 16, 20, 24, and 30 (6 weeks posttreatment)

Population: All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 10 evaluable e-Diary reports during the double-blind period (intent-to-treat population) with data on or after Week 12. The analysis includes participants with non-missing data at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPatient Global Impression of Change During the Open-Label and Posttreatment PhasesWeek 302.4 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
PlaceboPatient Global Impression of Change During the Open-Label and Posttreatment PhasesWeek 202.2 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
PlaceboPatient Global Impression of Change During the Open-Label and Posttreatment PhasesWeek 162.4 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
PlaceboPatient Global Impression of Change During the Open-Label and Posttreatment PhasesWeek 242.0 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
PlaceboPatient Global Impression of Change During the Open-Label and Posttreatment PhasesWeek 122.5 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
Elagolix 150 mgPatient Global Impression of Change During the Open-Label and Posttreatment PhasesWeek 241.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
Elagolix 150 mgPatient Global Impression of Change During the Open-Label and Posttreatment PhasesWeek 302.2 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.2
Elagolix 150 mgPatient Global Impression of Change During the Open-Label and Posttreatment PhasesWeek 122.0 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
Elagolix 150 mgPatient Global Impression of Change During the Open-Label and Posttreatment PhasesWeek 161.8 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
Elagolix 150 mgPatient Global Impression of Change During the Open-Label and Posttreatment PhasesWeek 202.0 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.1
Secondary

Percentage of Days With Uterine Bleeding During the Double- Blind Treatment Phase

Uterine bleeding was reported daily by participants during the study using the e-Diary. The percentage of days a participant reported any bleeding was calculated as the total number of days the participant reported any bleeding ( light, moderate, or heavy) divided by the total number of days the participant had a non-missing e-Diary report of vaginal bleeding in the phase.

Time frame: Screening (8 weeks prior to day 1) and the double-blind treatment phase (Weeks 1-8)

Population: Participants who received at least one dose of randomized, double-blind study drug (safety analysis set) with non-missing data.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboPercentage of Days With Uterine Bleeding During the Double- Blind Treatment PhaseScreening24.29 percentage of daysStandard Error 0.96
PlaceboPercentage of Days With Uterine Bleeding During the Double- Blind Treatment PhaseDouble-Blind Treatment Phase (Weeks 1-8)23.91 percentage of daysStandard Error 1.62
Elagolix 150 mgPercentage of Days With Uterine Bleeding During the Double- Blind Treatment PhaseScreening22.98 percentage of daysStandard Error 1.12
Elagolix 150 mgPercentage of Days With Uterine Bleeding During the Double- Blind Treatment PhaseDouble-Blind Treatment Phase (Weeks 1-8)14.00 percentage of daysStandard Error 1.03
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With a PGIC Response of Much Improved or Very Much Improved During the Double-blind Treatment Phase

The Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) is a questionnaire-based assessment of the change in endometriosis pain since the initiation of study drug. The participant was asked to select from one of seven response categories: 1. Very Much Improved 2. Much Improved 3. Minimally Improved 4. Not Changed 5. Minimally Worse 6. Much Worse 7. Very Much Worse

Time frame: Weeks 4 and 8

Population: All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 10 evaluable e-Diary reports during the double-blind period (intent-to-treat population). The analysis includes participants with non-missing data at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With a PGIC Response of Much Improved or Very Much Improved During the Double-blind Treatment PhaseWeek 830.2 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With a PGIC Response of Much Improved or Very Much Improved During the Double-blind Treatment PhaseWeek 418.5 percentage of participants
Elagolix 150 mgPercentage of Participants With a PGIC Response of Much Improved or Very Much Improved During the Double-blind Treatment PhaseWeek 860.3 percentage of participants
Elagolix 150 mgPercentage of Participants With a PGIC Response of Much Improved or Very Much Improved During the Double-blind Treatment PhaseWeek 437.9 percentage of participants
Comparison: Comparison of response rates at week 4p-value: 0.013695% CI: [4.4, 34.4]Pearson chi-squared
Comparison: Comparison of response rates at week 8p-value: 0.000795% CI: [13.6, 46.7]Pearson chi-squared
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With a PGIC Response of Much Improved or Very Much Improved During the Open-label Treatment Phase

The Patient Global Impression of Change (PGIC) is a questionnaire-based assessment of the change in endometriosis pain since the initiation of study drug. The participant was asked to select from one of seven response categories: 1. Very Much Improved 2. Much Improved 3. Minimally Improved 4. Not Changed 5. Minimally Worse 6. Much Worse 7. Very Much Worse

Time frame: Weeks 12, 16, 20, 24, and 30 (6 weeks posttreatment)

Population: All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 10 evaluable e-Diary reports during the double-blind period (intent-to-treat population) with data on or after Week 12. The analysis includes participants with non-missing data at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With a PGIC Response of Much Improved or Very Much Improved During the Open-label Treatment PhaseWeek 2071.9 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With a PGIC Response of Much Improved or Very Much Improved During the Open-label Treatment PhaseWeek 2473.7 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With a PGIC Response of Much Improved or Very Much Improved During the Open-label Treatment PhaseWeek 3069.1 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With a PGIC Response of Much Improved or Very Much Improved During the Open-label Treatment PhaseWeek 1661.7 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With a PGIC Response of Much Improved or Very Much Improved During the Open-label Treatment PhaseWeek 1259.0 percentage of participants
Elagolix 150 mgPercentage of Participants With a PGIC Response of Much Improved or Very Much Improved During the Open-label Treatment PhaseWeek 1676.3 percentage of participants
Elagolix 150 mgPercentage of Participants With a PGIC Response of Much Improved or Very Much Improved During the Open-label Treatment PhaseWeek 1276.3 percentage of participants
Elagolix 150 mgPercentage of Participants With a PGIC Response of Much Improved or Very Much Improved During the Open-label Treatment PhaseWeek 2071.9 percentage of participants
Elagolix 150 mgPercentage of Participants With a PGIC Response of Much Improved or Very Much Improved During the Open-label Treatment PhaseWeek 3073.6 percentage of participants
Elagolix 150 mgPercentage of Participants With a PGIC Response of Much Improved or Very Much Improved During the Open-label Treatment PhaseWeek 2486.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With a Response in Monthly Mean Cumulative Pain Score at Week 8

Participants assessed dysmenorrhea or non-menstrual pelvic pain at approximately the same time every day in an e-Diary according to the following: * 0 = No discomfort * 1 = Mild discomfort * 2 = Moderate discomfort or pain * 3 = Severe pain The monthly mean cumulative pain score is the average of the daily values for all days (menstrual and non-menstrual) in the 4 weeks prior to each time point. Response is the percentage of participants with a percent decrease from baseline in the week 8 monthly mean score that was greater than or equal to each specified threshold value (10% through 90% in steps of 10%).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 8

Population: All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 10 evaluable e-Diary reports during the double-blind period (intent-to-treat population) with non-missing data at baseline and week 8.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With a Response in Monthly Mean Cumulative Pain Score at Week 820% Reduction40.6 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With a Response in Monthly Mean Cumulative Pain Score at Week 860% Reduction15.6 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With a Response in Monthly Mean Cumulative Pain Score at Week 840% Reduction23.4 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With a Response in Monthly Mean Cumulative Pain Score at Week 870% Reduction7.8 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With a Response in Monthly Mean Cumulative Pain Score at Week 830% Reduction37.5 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With a Response in Monthly Mean Cumulative Pain Score at Week 880% Reduction3.1 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With a Response in Monthly Mean Cumulative Pain Score at Week 850% Reduction20.3 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With a Response in Monthly Mean Cumulative Pain Score at Week 890% Reduction0.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With a Response in Monthly Mean Cumulative Pain Score at Week 810% Reduction51.6 percentage of participants
Elagolix 150 mgPercentage of Participants With a Response in Monthly Mean Cumulative Pain Score at Week 890% Reduction9.4 percentage of participants
Elagolix 150 mgPercentage of Participants With a Response in Monthly Mean Cumulative Pain Score at Week 810% Reduction76.6 percentage of participants
Elagolix 150 mgPercentage of Participants With a Response in Monthly Mean Cumulative Pain Score at Week 820% Reduction70.3 percentage of participants
Elagolix 150 mgPercentage of Participants With a Response in Monthly Mean Cumulative Pain Score at Week 830% Reduction59.4 percentage of participants
Elagolix 150 mgPercentage of Participants With a Response in Monthly Mean Cumulative Pain Score at Week 840% Reduction46.9 percentage of participants
Elagolix 150 mgPercentage of Participants With a Response in Monthly Mean Cumulative Pain Score at Week 850% Reduction37.5 percentage of participants
Elagolix 150 mgPercentage of Participants With a Response in Monthly Mean Cumulative Pain Score at Week 860% Reduction26.6 percentage of participants
Elagolix 150 mgPercentage of Participants With a Response in Monthly Mean Cumulative Pain Score at Week 870% Reduction18.8 percentage of participants
Elagolix 150 mgPercentage of Participants With a Response in Monthly Mean Cumulative Pain Score at Week 880% Reduction9.4 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With a Response in Monthly Mean Dysmenorrhea Score at Week 8

Participants assessed dysmenorrhea (pain during menstruation) and its impact on their daily activities at approximately the same time each day of their period in an e-Diary according to the following response options: * 0: No discomfort * 1: Mild discomfort but I was easily able to do the things I usually do * 2: Moderate discomfort or pain that made it difficult to do some of the things I usually do * 3: Severe pain that made it difficult to do the things I usually do. The monthly mean dysmenorrhea score is the average of the daily values reported during the 4 weeks prior to each time point. Response was defined as the percentage of participants with a percent decrease from baseline in the week 8 monthly mean score that was greater than or equal to each specified threshold value (10% through 90% in steps of 10%).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 8

Population: All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 10 evaluable e-Diary reports during the double-blind period (intent-to-treat population) with non-missing data at baseline and week 8.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With a Response in Monthly Mean Dysmenorrhea Score at Week 820% Reduction43.8 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With a Response in Monthly Mean Dysmenorrhea Score at Week 860% Reduction9.4 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With a Response in Monthly Mean Dysmenorrhea Score at Week 840% Reduction25.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With a Response in Monthly Mean Dysmenorrhea Score at Week 870% Reduction4.7 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With a Response in Monthly Mean Dysmenorrhea Score at Week 830% Reduction32.8 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With a Response in Monthly Mean Dysmenorrhea Score at Week 880% Reduction3.1 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With a Response in Monthly Mean Dysmenorrhea Score at Week 850% Reduction15.6 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With a Response in Monthly Mean Dysmenorrhea Score at Week 890% Reduction3.1 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With a Response in Monthly Mean Dysmenorrhea Score at Week 810% Reduction56.3 percentage of participants
Elagolix 150 mgPercentage of Participants With a Response in Monthly Mean Dysmenorrhea Score at Week 890% Reduction43.8 percentage of participants
Elagolix 150 mgPercentage of Participants With a Response in Monthly Mean Dysmenorrhea Score at Week 810% Reduction68.8 percentage of participants
Elagolix 150 mgPercentage of Participants With a Response in Monthly Mean Dysmenorrhea Score at Week 820% Reduction68.8 percentage of participants
Elagolix 150 mgPercentage of Participants With a Response in Monthly Mean Dysmenorrhea Score at Week 830% Reduction62.5 percentage of participants
Elagolix 150 mgPercentage of Participants With a Response in Monthly Mean Dysmenorrhea Score at Week 840% Reduction59.4 percentage of participants
Elagolix 150 mgPercentage of Participants With a Response in Monthly Mean Dysmenorrhea Score at Week 850% Reduction54.7 percentage of participants
Elagolix 150 mgPercentage of Participants With a Response in Monthly Mean Dysmenorrhea Score at Week 860% Reduction51.6 percentage of participants
Elagolix 150 mgPercentage of Participants With a Response in Monthly Mean Dysmenorrhea Score at Week 870% Reduction46.9 percentage of participants
Elagolix 150 mgPercentage of Participants With a Response in Monthly Mean Dysmenorrhea Score at Week 880% Reduction43.8 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With a Response in Monthly Mean Dyspareunia Score at Week 8

Participants assessed their dyspareunia (pain during sexual intercourse) at approximately the same time every day in an e-Diary according to the following response options: * 0 = Absent; No discomfort during sexual intercourse * 1 = Mild; I was able to tolerate the discomfort during sexual intercourse * 2 = Moderate; Intercourse was interrupted due to pain * 3 = Severe; I avoided intercourse because of pain * Does not apply; I was not sexually active for reasons other than my endometriosis or did not have sexual intercourse The monthly mean dyspareunia score is the average of the daily values reported during the 4 weeks prior to each time point. Response is defined as the percentage of participants with a percent decrease from baseline in the week 8 monthly mean score that was greater than or equal to each specified threshold value (10% through 90% in steps of 10%).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 8

Population: All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 10 evaluable e-Diary reports during the double-blind period (intent-to-treat population) with non-missing data at baseline and week 8. If a participant's responses were all does not apply for that month the score was treated as missing.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With a Response in Monthly Mean Dyspareunia Score at Week 870% Reduction19.1 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With a Response in Monthly Mean Dyspareunia Score at Week 840% Reduction27.7 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With a Response in Monthly Mean Dyspareunia Score at Week 810% Reduction44.7 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With a Response in Monthly Mean Dyspareunia Score at Week 850% Reduction23.4 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With a Response in Monthly Mean Dyspareunia Score at Week 890% Reduction12.8 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With a Response in Monthly Mean Dyspareunia Score at Week 860% Reduction19.1 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With a Response in Monthly Mean Dyspareunia Score at Week 820% Reduction38.3 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With a Response in Monthly Mean Dyspareunia Score at Week 830% Reduction34.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With a Response in Monthly Mean Dyspareunia Score at Week 880% Reduction17.0 percentage of participants
Elagolix 150 mgPercentage of Participants With a Response in Monthly Mean Dyspareunia Score at Week 830% Reduction57.8 percentage of participants
Elagolix 150 mgPercentage of Participants With a Response in Monthly Mean Dyspareunia Score at Week 820% Reduction64.4 percentage of participants
Elagolix 150 mgPercentage of Participants With a Response in Monthly Mean Dyspareunia Score at Week 890% Reduction20.0 percentage of participants
Elagolix 150 mgPercentage of Participants With a Response in Monthly Mean Dyspareunia Score at Week 810% Reduction73.3 percentage of participants
Elagolix 150 mgPercentage of Participants With a Response in Monthly Mean Dyspareunia Score at Week 880% Reduction22.2 percentage of participants
Elagolix 150 mgPercentage of Participants With a Response in Monthly Mean Dyspareunia Score at Week 840% Reduction53.3 percentage of participants
Elagolix 150 mgPercentage of Participants With a Response in Monthly Mean Dyspareunia Score at Week 850% Reduction48.9 percentage of participants
Elagolix 150 mgPercentage of Participants With a Response in Monthly Mean Dyspareunia Score at Week 860% Reduction37.8 percentage of participants
Elagolix 150 mgPercentage of Participants With a Response in Monthly Mean Dyspareunia Score at Week 870% Reduction31.1 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With a Response in Monthly Mean Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Score at Week 8

Participants assessed their pelvic pain not related to menses and its impact on their daily activities at approximately the same time each day they were not having their period in an e-Diary according to the following response options: * 0 = No discomfort * 1 = Mild discomfort but I was easily able to do the things I usually do * 2 = Moderate discomfort or pain that made it difficult to do some of the things I usually do * 3 = Severe pain that made it difficult to do the things I usually do. The monthly mean non-menstrual pelvic pain score is the average of the daily values reported during the 4 weeks prior to each time point. Response is defined as the percentage of participants with a percent decrease from baseline in the week 8 monthly mean score that was greater than or equal to each specified threshold value (10% through 90% in steps of 10%).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 8

Population: All randomized participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug and had at least 10 evaluable e-Diary reports during the double-blind period (intent-to-treat population) with non-missing data at baseline and week 8.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With a Response in Monthly Mean Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Score at Week 820% Reduction40.6 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With a Response in Monthly Mean Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Score at Week 860% Reduction20.3 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With a Response in Monthly Mean Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Score at Week 840% Reduction25.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With a Response in Monthly Mean Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Score at Week 870% Reduction14.1 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With a Response in Monthly Mean Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Score at Week 810% Reduction51.6 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With a Response in Monthly Mean Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Score at Week 880% Reduction9.4 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With a Response in Monthly Mean Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Score at Week 850% Reduction25.0 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With a Response in Monthly Mean Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Score at Week 890% Reduction4.7 percentage of participants
PlaceboPercentage of Participants With a Response in Monthly Mean Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Score at Week 830% Reduction32.8 percentage of participants
Elagolix 150 mgPercentage of Participants With a Response in Monthly Mean Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Score at Week 890% Reduction7.8 percentage of participants
Elagolix 150 mgPercentage of Participants With a Response in Monthly Mean Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Score at Week 810% Reduction79.7 percentage of participants
Elagolix 150 mgPercentage of Participants With a Response in Monthly Mean Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Score at Week 820% Reduction68.8 percentage of participants
Elagolix 150 mgPercentage of Participants With a Response in Monthly Mean Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Score at Week 830% Reduction62.5 percentage of participants
Elagolix 150 mgPercentage of Participants With a Response in Monthly Mean Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Score at Week 840% Reduction51.6 percentage of participants
Elagolix 150 mgPercentage of Participants With a Response in Monthly Mean Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Score at Week 850% Reduction32.8 percentage of participants
Elagolix 150 mgPercentage of Participants With a Response in Monthly Mean Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Score at Week 860% Reduction26.6 percentage of participants
Elagolix 150 mgPercentage of Participants With a Response in Monthly Mean Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Score at Week 870% Reduction21.9 percentage of participants
Elagolix 150 mgPercentage of Participants With a Response in Monthly Mean Non-menstrual Pelvic Pain Score at Week 880% Reduction10.9 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026