Skip to content

Montelukast in Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis - Spring 2001 Study (0476-235)

A Multi-Center, Double-blind, Randomized, Parallel-Group Study Investigating the Effect of Montelukast in Patients With Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis-Spring 2001 Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00972738
Enrollment
1214
Registered
2009-09-07
Start date
2001-04-30
Completion date
2001-07-31
Last updated
2022-02-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis

Brief summary

This study will assess the treatment effect of montelukast versus placebo over a 2 week period in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis. Loratadine is included in the study as an active comparator.

Interventions

DRUGmontelukast sodium

Montelukast 10-mg tablet orally once daily at bedtime for 2 weeks.

Loratadine 10-mg tablet orally once daily at bedtime for 2 weeks.

DRUGComparator: Placebo

placebo tablet orally once daily at bedtime for 2 weeks

Sponsors

Organon and Co
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
15 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patient has a documented history of season allergic rhinitis symptoms that flare up during the study season * Patient is a nonsmoker * Patient is in good general health

Exclusion criteria

* Patient is hospitalized * Patient is a woman who is \<8 weeks postpartum or is breast-feeding * Patient has had major surgery in the past 4 weeks * Patient intends to move or vacation away during the study * Patient is a current or past abuser of alcohol or illicit drugs

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Change From Baseline in Daytime Nasal Symptoms Score Over the 2-week Treatment PeriodBaseline and over the 2-week treatment periodMean change from baseline in Daytime Nasal Symptoms. Patients were asked to rate each of the 4 nasal symptoms of Congestion, Rhinorrhea, Itching, and Sneezing daily on a 4-point scale \[Score 0 (best) to 3 (worst)\]. The average of the 4 individual nasal symptoms scores was reported as the Daytime Nasal Symptoms Score.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Change From Baseline in Nighttime Symptoms Score Over the 2-week Treatment PeriodBaseline and over the 2-week treatment periodMean change from baseline in Nighttime Symptoms Score. Patients were asked to rate each symptoms of Nasal Congestion Upon Awakening, Difficulty Going to Sleep, and Nighttime Awakenings daily on a 4-point \[Scale 0 (best) to 3 (worst)\]. The average of the individual symptoms scores was reported as the Nighttime Symptoms Score.
Mean Change From Baseline in Daytime Eye Symptoms Score Over the 2-week Treatment PeriodBaseline and over the 2-week treatment periodMean change from baseline in Daytime Eye Symptoms scores. Patients were asked to rate each of the 4 eye symptoms of tearing, itchy, red, and puffy eyes daily on a 4-point scale \[0 (best) to 3 (worst)\]. The average of the 4 individual eye symptoms scores was reported as the Daytime Eye Symptoms Score.
Patient's Global Evaluation of Allergic Rhinitis at the End of the 2-week Treatment PeriodEnd of the 2-week treatment periodAn evaluation by the patient, administered at the last visit (or upon discontinuation) using a 7-point scale \[Score 0 (very much better) to 6 (very much worse)\], of the change in symptoms as compared to the beginning of the study.
Physician's Global Evaluation of Allergic Rhinitis at the End of the 2-week Treatment PeriodEnd of the 2-week treatment periodAn evaluation by the physician, administered at the last visit (or upon discontinuation) using a 7-point scale \[Score 0 (very much better) to 6 (very much worse)\], of the change in symptoms as compared to the beginning of the study.
Mean Change From Baseline in Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality-of-Life Score After the 2-week Treatment PeriodBaseline and at the end of 2-week treatment periodPatients completed a validated, self-administered Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality-of-Life Questionnaire, which included 28 questions on a 7-point scale \[Score 0 (best) to 6 (worst)\], across 7 domains: activities, sleep, non-nose/eye symptoms, practical problems, nasal symptoms, eye symptoms, and emotional. The individual domain scores were calculated as the average values of all scores within a domain, then the scores for the 7 domains were averaged for the overall score.

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Thirty-two study sites in Canada and the United States. Primary Therapy Period: Apr-2001 to Jul-2001.

Pre-assignment details

Patients who required certain medications as described in the protocol and those who did not meet a minimum predefined level of combined daytime nasal symptoms score during the run-in period were excluded from randomization.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Montelukast 10 mg
Montelukast 10 mg film-coated tablet and loratadine matching-image placebo tablet orally once daily at bedtime for 2 weeks.
522
Loratadine 10 mg
Loratadine 10 mg compressed tablet and montelukast matching-image placebo tablet orally once daily at bedtime for 2 weeks.
171
Placebo
Montelukast matching-image placebo tablet and loratadine matching-image placebo tablet orally once daily at bedtime for 2 weeks.
521
Total1,214

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyAdverse Event718
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy5111
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up101
Overall StudyMoved001
Overall StudyOther121
Overall StudyProtocol Violation213
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject514

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboTotalMontelukast 10 mgLoratadine 10 mg
Age, Continuous35.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.61
35.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.2
35.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.93
34.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.73
Daytime Eye Symptoms score1.53 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.81
1.51 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.79
1.49 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.77
1.48 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.79
Daytime Nasal Symptoms score2.14 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.43
2.12 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.43
2.10 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.43
2.15 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.45
Nighttime Symptoms score1.47 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.65
1.49 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.65
1.51 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.65
1.49 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.64
Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality-of-Life score3.29 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.01
3.25 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.03
3.22 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.06
3.24 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.97
Sex: Female, Male
Female
338 Participants764 Participants326 Participants100 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
183 Participants450 Participants196 Participants71 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 5220 / 1710 / 521
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 5220 / 1710 / 521

Outcome results

Primary

Mean Change From Baseline in Daytime Nasal Symptoms Score Over the 2-week Treatment Period

Mean change from baseline in Daytime Nasal Symptoms. Patients were asked to rate each of the 4 nasal symptoms of Congestion, Rhinorrhea, Itching, and Sneezing daily on a 4-point scale \[Score 0 (best) to 3 (worst)\]. The average of the 4 individual nasal symptoms scores was reported as the Daytime Nasal Symptoms Score.

Time frame: Baseline and over the 2-week treatment period

Population: The primary efficacy analyses were based on intention-to-treat (all-patients-treated) principle, i.e., all patients who had a baseline and at least one posttreatment measurement were included.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Montelukast 10 mgMean Change From Baseline in Daytime Nasal Symptoms Score Over the 2-week Treatment Period-0.38 Scores on a scale
Loratadine 10 mgMean Change From Baseline in Daytime Nasal Symptoms Score Over the 2-week Treatment Period-0.47 Scores on a scale
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Daytime Nasal Symptoms Score Over the 2-week Treatment Period-0.29 Scores on a scale
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Daytime Eye Symptoms Score Over the 2-week Treatment Period

Mean change from baseline in Daytime Eye Symptoms scores. Patients were asked to rate each of the 4 eye symptoms of tearing, itchy, red, and puffy eyes daily on a 4-point scale \[0 (best) to 3 (worst)\]. The average of the 4 individual eye symptoms scores was reported as the Daytime Eye Symptoms Score.

Time frame: Baseline and over the 2-week treatment period

Population: The primary efficacy analyses were based on intention-to-treat (all-patients-treated) principle, i.e., all patients who had a baseline and at least one posttreatment measurement were included.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Montelukast 10 mgMean Change From Baseline in Daytime Eye Symptoms Score Over the 2-week Treatment Period-0.28 Scores on a scale
Loratadine 10 mgMean Change From Baseline in Daytime Eye Symptoms Score Over the 2-week Treatment Period-0.40 Scores on a scale
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Daytime Eye Symptoms Score Over the 2-week Treatment Period-0.21 Scores on a scale
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Nighttime Symptoms Score Over the 2-week Treatment Period

Mean change from baseline in Nighttime Symptoms Score. Patients were asked to rate each symptoms of Nasal Congestion Upon Awakening, Difficulty Going to Sleep, and Nighttime Awakenings daily on a 4-point \[Scale 0 (best) to 3 (worst)\]. The average of the individual symptoms scores was reported as the Nighttime Symptoms Score.

Time frame: Baseline and over the 2-week treatment period

Population: The primary efficacy analyses were based on intention-to-treat (all-patients-treated) principle, i.e., all patients who had a baseline and at least one posttreatment measurement were included.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Montelukast 10 mgMean Change From Baseline in Nighttime Symptoms Score Over the 2-week Treatment Period-0.28 Scores on a scale
Loratadine 10 mgMean Change From Baseline in Nighttime Symptoms Score Over the 2-week Treatment Period-0.28 Scores on a scale
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Nighttime Symptoms Score Over the 2-week Treatment Period-0.20 Scores on a scale
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality-of-Life Score After the 2-week Treatment Period

Patients completed a validated, self-administered Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality-of-Life Questionnaire, which included 28 questions on a 7-point scale \[Score 0 (best) to 6 (worst)\], across 7 domains: activities, sleep, non-nose/eye symptoms, practical problems, nasal symptoms, eye symptoms, and emotional. The individual domain scores were calculated as the average values of all scores within a domain, then the scores for the 7 domains were averaged for the overall score.

Time frame: Baseline and at the end of 2-week treatment period

Population: The primary efficacy analyses were based on the intention-to-treat (all-patients-treated) principle, i.e., all patients who had a baseline and a week 2 measurement were included. No missing values were imputed.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Montelukast 10 mgMean Change From Baseline in Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality-of-Life Score After the 2-week Treatment Period-0.90 Scores on a scale
Loratadine 10 mgMean Change From Baseline in Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality-of-Life Score After the 2-week Treatment Period-0.98 Scores on a scale
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality-of-Life Score After the 2-week Treatment Period-0.66 Scores on a scale
Secondary

Patient's Global Evaluation of Allergic Rhinitis at the End of the 2-week Treatment Period

An evaluation by the patient, administered at the last visit (or upon discontinuation) using a 7-point scale \[Score 0 (very much better) to 6 (very much worse)\], of the change in symptoms as compared to the beginning of the study.

Time frame: End of the 2-week treatment period

Population: The primary efficacy analyses were based on the intention-to-treat (all-patients-treated) principle. Since only 1 measurement was obtained during the treatment period, no missing values were imputed.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Montelukast 10 mgPatient's Global Evaluation of Allergic Rhinitis at the End of the 2-week Treatment Period2.18 Scores on a scale
Loratadine 10 mgPatient's Global Evaluation of Allergic Rhinitis at the End of the 2-week Treatment Period2.19 Scores on a scale
PlaceboPatient's Global Evaluation of Allergic Rhinitis at the End of the 2-week Treatment Period2.49 Scores on a scale
Secondary

Physician's Global Evaluation of Allergic Rhinitis at the End of the 2-week Treatment Period

An evaluation by the physician, administered at the last visit (or upon discontinuation) using a 7-point scale \[Score 0 (very much better) to 6 (very much worse)\], of the change in symptoms as compared to the beginning of the study.

Time frame: End of the 2-week treatment period

Population: The primary efficacy analyses were based on the intention-to-treat (all-patients-treated) principle. Since only 1 measurement was obtained during the treatment period, no missing values were imputed.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
Montelukast 10 mgPhysician's Global Evaluation of Allergic Rhinitis at the End of the 2-week Treatment Period2.18 Scores on a scale
Loratadine 10 mgPhysician's Global Evaluation of Allergic Rhinitis at the End of the 2-week Treatment Period2.16 Scores on a scale
PlaceboPhysician's Global Evaluation of Allergic Rhinitis at the End of the 2-week Treatment Period2.41 Scores on a scale

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026