Skip to content

Laparoscopic Versus Transabdominal Ultrasound in Morbidly Obese Patients

Comparison of Laparoscopic Ultrasound to Transabdominal Ultrasound for the Detection of Gallbladder Pathology in the Bariatric Surgical Population.

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00971750
Enrollment
253
Registered
2009-09-04
Start date
2003-10-31
Completion date
2011-10-31
Last updated
2012-07-11

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Cholelithiasis, Laparoscopic Gastric Bypass, Ultrasonography

Keywords

ultrasonography, gallbladder, cholelithiasis, laparoscopic, gastric bypass, obesity, bariatric surgery

Brief summary

The objective of this study is to prospectively compare laparoscopic ultrasound to transabdominal ultrasound for the detection of gallbladder pathology in obese patients presenting for laparoscopic gastric bypass. We hypothesize that laparoscopic ultrasound will be more sensitive and specific for cholelithiasis than transabdominal ultrasound in morbidly obese patients.

Detailed description

Asymptomatic cholelithiasis is a prevalent condition in obese patients presenting for bariatric surgery. Transabdominal ultrasound (TAU) remains the gold standard for detection of cholelithiasis. The sensitivity and specificity of transabdominal ultrasound for cholelithiasis reported in literature is between 88-97% and 97-99%, respectively. The ability to detect cholelithiasis with TAU in the obese population may be inhibited due to the presence of increased subcutaneous and visceral fat. Laparoscopic ultrasound (LU) has the potential to overcome these technical challenges. In an era of minimally invasive bariatric surgery, it has been suggested that routine preoperative ultrasound TAU be performed for the detection of cholelithiasis since intraoperative palpation is not feasible. We hypothesize that laparoscopic ultrasound will be more sensitive and specific for cholelithiasis than transabdominal ultrasound in morbidly obese patients.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Gundersen Lutheran Health System
CollaboratorOTHER
Gundersen Lutheran Medical Foundation
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
CASE_ONLY
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Morbidly obese patients undergoing elective laparoscopic roux-en-Y gastric bypass

Exclusion criteria

* Prior history of gallbladder surgery

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Cholelithiasis on Transabdominal Ultrasound Versus Laparoscopic Ultrasound.transabdominal measurements within 30 days prior to surgery; laparoscopic ultrasound measurements are completed intraoperativelyNumber of patients with cholelithiasis.
Polyps on Transabdominal and Laparoscopic Ultrasound6 yearsNumber of patients with polyps.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Common Bile Duct (CBD) Diameter Measured by Transabdominal Ultrasound Versus Laparoscopic Ultrasound.transabdominal measurements will be done within 30 days prior to surgery; laparoscopic ultrasound measurements are completed intraoperativelyMean CBD diameter.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Ultrasound Study Group
Patients with no history of gallbladder surgery who are undergoing elective laparoscopic roux-en-Y gastric bypass that have consented to undergo a preoperative transabdominal ultrasound in addition to routine preoperative assessment for surgery.
253
Total253

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicUltrasound Study Group
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
2 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
251 Participants
Age Continuous43.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.2
Region of Enrollment
United States
253 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
192 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
61 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 253
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 253

Outcome results

Primary

Cholelithiasis on Transabdominal Ultrasound Versus Laparoscopic Ultrasound.

Number of patients with cholelithiasis.

Time frame: transabdominal measurements within 30 days prior to surgery; laparoscopic ultrasound measurements are completed intraoperatively

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Transabdominal UltrasoundCholelithiasis on Transabdominal Ultrasound Versus Laparoscopic Ultrasound.61 participants
Laparoscopic UltrasoundCholelithiasis on Transabdominal Ultrasound Versus Laparoscopic Ultrasound.60 participants
p-value: 0.763Chi-squared
Primary

Polyps on Transabdominal and Laparoscopic Ultrasound

Number of patients with polyps.

Time frame: 6 years

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Transabdominal UltrasoundPolyps on Transabdominal and Laparoscopic Ultrasound6 participants
Laparoscopic UltrasoundPolyps on Transabdominal and Laparoscopic Ultrasound41 participants
p-value: <0.001Chi-squared
Secondary

Common Bile Duct (CBD) Diameter Measured by Transabdominal Ultrasound Versus Laparoscopic Ultrasound.

Mean CBD diameter.

Time frame: transabdominal measurements will be done within 30 days prior to surgery; laparoscopic ultrasound measurements are completed intraoperatively

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Transabdominal UltrasoundCommon Bile Duct (CBD) Diameter Measured by Transabdominal Ultrasound Versus Laparoscopic Ultrasound.4.0 millimetersStandard Deviation 1.28
Laparoscopic UltrasoundCommon Bile Duct (CBD) Diameter Measured by Transabdominal Ultrasound Versus Laparoscopic Ultrasound.3.7 millimetersStandard Deviation 1.37

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026