Skip to content

Low Vision Study Comparing EV Training vs. CCTV for AMD Rehabilitation

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Eccentric Viewing Training vs. Closed Circuit Television Use for Visual Rehabilitation From Age-Related Macular Degeneration

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00971464
Acronym
AMD
Enrollment
10
Registered
2009-09-03
Start date
2009-09-30
Completion date
2011-09-30
Last updated
2012-09-10

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

AMD

Keywords

AMD, EV, CCTV, Reading, vision

Brief summary

Patients with advanced Age-Related Macular Degeneration will be randomized into one of two treatment groups. One group will receive eccentric view (EV) training while the other a closed circuit television (CCTV) training for 6 weeks. Reading speed and accuracy will be assessed pre- and post- treatment to determine if one treatment is superior to the other.

Detailed description

Age-related macular degeneration is the single most common cause of visual impairment in Canada, affecting people over the age of 55 years. It causes loss of central, detailed vision, resulting in difficulty with fine vision tasks, such as reading and writing. At present there is no fully effective prevention or treatment for this condition, but people do benefit from visual rehabilitation. Two of the most common rehabilitation techniques are eccentric viewing training and an electronic magnification system called a Closed circuit television (CCTV). In eccentric viewing training the person is taught to use his or her remaining side vision, instead of central vision. The CCTV provides high levels of magnification to compensate for the loss of detail vision. The purpose of this randomized clinical trial is to compare the effectiveness of these two interventions. In the study people will be randomly assigned to either receiving eccentric viewing training or a CCTV. This will happen after they have received basic, optical low vision services and training through the CNIB. We will assess their performance with either the CCTV or EV training with a variety of reading tasks and questionnaires. The results will give evidence for how it is most beneficial to use resources and as such will be very important in future planning of low vision services. Hypothesis: Eccentric Viewing Training will improve reading speed over CCTV by at least 10 words per minute in patients with advanced AMD.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALeccentric viewing (EV) training

Eccentric viewing training for 6 weeks, minimum two 10 minutes per day.

DEVICEClosed circuit television (CCTV)

A CCTV is an electro-optical device mainly used for reading.

Sponsors

London Health Sciences Centre Research Institute OR Lawson Research Institute of St. Joseph's
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
50 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* First time AMD patient sent to CNIB for visual rehabilitation * Macular Degeneration reducing visual acuity (VA) to between 20/160 and 20/400 (ETDRS scale) * Over the age of 50 years * English as the first language and able to read

Exclusion criteria

* Expected anti-VEGF or Visudyne treatment over the course of the study * Individuals who do not have reading as a life goal * Mental cognition that makes learning the specific rehabilitation tasks unlikely (determined by mini-mental state exam) * Any other ocular pathology that can reduce central vision including cornea decompensation (scar or thickness), cataract (grade III or more for each type of cataract), vitritis (2+ or more) or advanced glaucoma (C/D ratio of \>0.7)

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The primary outcome measures reading speed for 1.3M print (in correct words per minute).6 weeks intervention

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
2. Reading speed and accuracy for 1M6 weeks intervention
3. Reading performance tests.6 week's intervention
The secondary outcomes measures 1. Reading accuracy for 1.3M;6 weeks intervention
5. VFQ-25 plus 2 extra questions).6 week's intervention
6. Geriatric depression scale6 week
4. Reading Behavior Inventory6 week's intervention

Countries

Canada

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026