Skip to content

Study About Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Non Cutaneous Peripheral T Cell Lymphoma

Multicentric Study About Treatment of High Grade Peripheral T Cell Lymphoma in Adults. LTP Study Comparison Between VIP ABVD Versus CHOP

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00970385
Acronym
LTP
Enrollment
95
Registered
2009-09-02
Start date
1995-01-31
Completion date
2008-09-30
Last updated
2009-09-09

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Peripheral T Cell Lymphoma

Brief summary

This is a multicenter randomized trial evaluating induction treatment with VIP-reinforced-ABVD (VIP-rABVD) versus CHOP/21 in patients with newly diagnosed peripheral T cell lymphoma.

Detailed description

Induction therapy: ARM 1: 6 Chemotherapy courses = 3 VIP alternated with 3 ABVD ARM 2: 8 Chemotherapy courses = CHOP every 21 days Consolidation therapy: For all patients if CR = radiotherapy 40GY / 5X1,8 GY per week

Interventions

DRUGVIP/ABVD

VIP regimen: * etoposide 100 mg/m2/D IV from D1 to D3 * ifosfamide 1000 mg/m2/D from D1 to D5 * cisplatinum 20 mg/m2/D as a continuous infusion from D1 to D5 ABVD regimen: * doxorubicin50 mg/m2/D on D1 and D14 * bleomycin 10 mg/m2/D * vinblastine 10 mg/m2/D * dacarbazine 375 mg/m2/D

DRUGCHOP21

CHOP regimen: * cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) day 1 * doxorubicin 50 mg/m2 IV day 1 * vincristine 1,4 mg/m2 (maximum 2 mg) day 1 * prednisone 100 mg/m2/D from D1 to D5.

RADIATIONRadiotherapy consolidation

The treatment of Ann-Arbor stage I/II and stage III/IV patients with an initial bulky tumor (diameter ≥ 5 cm) was systematically completed by an irradiation plan. Forty grays were delivered (1,8 gray/day) over four weeks on the involved field.

Sponsors

French Innovative Leukemia Organisation
CollaboratorOTHER
University Hospital, Grenoble
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* newly diagnosed untreated PTCL * age 18 and 70 years * performance status ≤ 2 * Ann Arbor stage I to IV * normal cardiac ventricular ejection fraction over 50% * normal hepatic function (asat, ALAT, PAL \< 2.5 ULN)

Exclusion criteria

* cutaneous form of PTCL * previous treatment * age \< 18 and \> 70 * performance status \> 2 * abnormal cardiac or hepatic functions * HIV-, HCV- or HBV- positivity

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Comparison between EFS rate of CHOP/21 versus VIP-rABVD in newly diagnosed PTCL.2 years

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Overall survival (OS)6 years
response rate at the end of the treatment6-8 months
progression free survival (PFS)6 years
hematotoxicity6 months

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026