Skip to content

BI 6727 (Volasertib) in Combination With Cisplatin or Carboplatin in Patients With Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumour

A Phase I Dose Escalation Trial of BI 6727 in Combination With Cisplatin or Carboplatin in Patients With Advanced or Metastatic Solid Tumors

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00969761
Enrollment
61
Registered
2009-09-01
Start date
2009-08-31
Completion date
2012-02-29
Last updated
2019-01-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Neoplasms

Brief summary

The primary objective of this trial is to identify the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of BI 6727 therapy in terms of drug-related adverse events when combined with a platinum therapy (cisplatin or carboplatin). Secondary objectives are the collection of overall safety and antitumour efficacy data and the determination of the pharmacokinetic profile of BI 6727 combination treatment with cisplatin and carboplatin.

Interventions

DRUGBI-6727

Low to high dose (administered every 3 weeks). Depending on the toxicities observed, intermediary dose levels may be added

low to high dose

Sponsors

Boehringer Ingelheim
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Patients with confirmed diagnosis of advanced, non resectable and / or metastatic solid tumours, who have failed conventional treatment, or for whom no therapy of proven efficacy exists, or who are not amenable to established forms of treatment 2. Indication for a treatment with platinum therapy as judged by the investigator 3. Age 18 years or older 4. Written informed consent consistent with ICH-GCP and local legislation 5. ECOG performance score lower or equal 2 6. Recovery from CTCAE Grade 2 - 4 therapy-related toxicities from previous systemic anti-cancer therapies or radiotherapies (except alopecia grade 2)

Exclusion criteria

1. Serious illness or concomitant non-oncological disease considered by the investigator to be incompatible with the protocol 2. Pregnancy or breastfeeding 3. Active infectious disease or known chronic Hepatitis B/Hepatitis C infection and HIV I/II 4. Clinical evidence of symptomatic progressive brain or leptomeningeal disease during the past 6 months 5. Second malignancy currently requiring another anti-cancer therapy 6. ANC less than 1500 / mm3 7. Platelet count less than 100 000 / mm3 8. Bilirubin greater than 1.5 mg / dl (\> 26 micromol / L, SI unit equivalent) (except Gilbert's syndrome) 9. Aspartate amino transferase (AST) and / or alanine amino transferase (ALT) greater than 2.5 times the upper limit of normal (if related to liver metastases greater than five times the upper limit of normal) 10. Serum creatinine greater than 1.5 mg / dl (\> 132 micromol / L, SI unit equivalent) or creatinine clearance \<70ml/min (as calculated according to Cockcroft-Gault formula for GFR estimate) 11. Known history of relevant QT-prolongation, e.g. long QT-syndrome 12. Pre-existing clinically relevant hearing loss 13. Women and men who are sexually active and unwilling to use a medically acceptable method of contraception 14. Treatment with other investigational drugs or participation in another clinical interventional trial within the past four weeks before start of therapy or concomitantly with this trial 15. Systemic anti-cancer therapy or radiotherapy within the past four weeks before start of therapy or concomitantly with this trial. This restriction does not apply to steroids and bisphosphonates. 16. Patients unable to comply with the protocol 17. Active alcohol or drug abuse

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Maximum Tolerated Dose3 weeksThe maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was defined as the highest dose studied for which the incidence of DLT was less than 33% (i.e. 1/6 patients) during the first cycle, for Volasertib in combination with cisplatin or carboplatin. 0=not maximum tolerated dose, 1=was maximum tolerated dose.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Objective Response RateFrom first intake of trial drug to last intake of trial drug plus 21 days, up to 441 daysObjective response was defined as the proportion of participants having at least a best response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) determined based on RECIST criteria, version 1.0 (V1.0). Tumour response was documented using appropriate techniques
Duration of Objective ResponseFrom first intake of trial drug to last intake of trial drug plus 21 days, up to 441 daysDuration of objective response was defined as the time from first documented confirmed complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) to first evidence of progressive disease (PD) or death from any cause, whichever occurred first, determined based on RECIST V1.0 criteria. Tumour response was documented using appropriate techniques
Best Overall ResponseFrom first intake of trial drug to last intake of trial drug plus 21 days, up to 441 daysBest overall response was defined as the best response obtained since the start of study treatment until disease progression, determined based on RECIST V1.0 criteria.
Disease Control RateFrom first intake of trial drug to last intake of trial drug plus 21 days, up to 441 daysPercentage of participants with confirmed disease control, defined as the proportion of patients with a best overall response of at least stable disease (SD), determined based on RECIST V1.0 criteria.
Duration of Disease ControlFrom first intake of trial drug to last intake of trial drug plus 21 days, up to 441 daysDuration of Disease control was defined as the time from the start of study treatment to the time of disease progression or death, whichever occurred first.
Progression-free SurvivalFrom first intake of trial drug to last intake of trial drug plus 21 days, up to 441 daysProgression-free survival based on RECIST V1.0 criteria was defined as the time from start of treatment to the date of evidence of progressive disease (PD) or death from any cause, whichever occurred first.
Incidence and Intensity of Adverse Events According to CTCAE Version 3.0From first intake of trial drug to last intake of trial drug plus 21 days, up to 441 daysIncidence and intensity of adverse events according to common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) version 3.0
Percentage of Participants With Serious Adverse EventsFrom first intake of trial drug to last intake of trial drug plus 21 days, up to 441 daysPercentage of participants with serious adverse events (AEs)
Percentage of Participants With Significant Adverse EventsFrom first intake of trial drug to last intake of trial drug plus 21 days, up to 441 daysPercentage of participants with significant adverse events (AEs): dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as significant AE. DLTs (i.e. significant AEs) per protocol were: * drug related CTCAE grade 3 or 4 non haematological toxicity (except vomiting or diarrhoea responding to supportive treatment and ototoxicity) * drug related CTCAE grade 4 neutropenia for seven or more days and / or complicated by infection * drug related CTCAE Grade 4 thrombocytopenia * drug related febrile neutropenia grade 3 (ANC\<1000/mm³ and fever≥ 38.5°C)
Total Plasma Clearance After Intravascular Administration (CL)1 hour (h) 35 minutes (min) before start of volasertib infusion and 1h, 2h, 8h, 24h, 48h, 168h and 336h after start of volasertib infusionTotal plasma clearance after intravascular administration (CL) of Volasertib in combination with cisplatin or carboplatin during treatment cycle 1.
Apparent Volume of Distribution at Steady State Following Intravascular Administration (Vss)1 hour (h) 35 minutes (min) before start of volasertib infusion and 1h, 2h, 8h, 24h, 48h, 168h and 336h after start of volasertib infusionApparent volume of distribution at steady state following intravascular administration (Vss) of Volasertib in combination with cisplatin or carboplatin during treatment cycle 1.
Percentage of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities3 weeksPercentage of participants with dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) during the first treatment cycle.
Change From Baseline in NeutrophilsBaseline and from first intake of trial drug to last intake of trial drug plus 21 days, up to 441 daysChange from baseline in neutrophils with the maximum value on treatment
Change From Baseline in PlateletsBaseline and from first intake of trial drug to last intake of trial drug plus 21 days, up to 441 daysChange from baseline in platelets with the maximum value on treatment
Frequency of Participants (%) With Possible Clinically Significant Abnormalities for NeutrophilsFrom first intake of trial drug to last intake of trial drug plus 21 days, up to 441 daysFrequency of participants (%) with possible clinically significant abnormalities for neutrophils: : defined as neutrophils \>=CTCAE grade 2 (CTCAE v3.0), with worsening from baseline. The CTCAE scale measures the severity of adverse events which goes from 1 (mild AE) to 5 (death related AE).
Frequency of Participants (%) With Possible Clinically Significant Abnormalities for PlateletsFrom first intake of trial drug to last intake of trial drug plus 21 days, up to 441 daysFrequency of participants (%) with possible clinically significant abnormalities for platelets : defined as platelets \>=CTCAE grade 2 (based on CTCAE v3.0), with worsening from baseline. The CTCAE scale measures the severity of adverse events which goes from 1 (mild AE) to 5 (death related AE).
Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Last Value on TreatmentFrom first intake of trial drug to last intake of trial drug plus 21 days, up to 441 daysPercentage of participants with transitions relative to the baseline CTC grade (version 3) for platelets based on last value on treatment. Common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) grade on treatment for platelets (CTC version 3). The CTCAE scale measures the severity of adverse events which goes from 1 (mild AE) to 5 (death related AE).
Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Last Value on TreatmentFrom first intake of trial drug to last intake of trial drug plus 21 days, up to 441 daysPercentage of participants with transitions relative to the baseline CTC grade (version 3) for neutrophils based on last value on treatment. Common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) grade on treatment for neutrophils (CTC version 3). The CTCAE scale measures the severity of adverse events which goes from 1 (mild AE) to 5 (death related AE)
Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Worst Value on TreatmentFrom first intake of trial drug to last intake of trial drug plus 21 days, up to 441 daysPercentage of participants with transitions relative to the baseline CTC grade (version 3) for platelets based on worst value on treatment. Worst Common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) grade on treatment for platelets (CTC version 3). The CTCAE scale measures the severity of adverse events which goes from 1 (mild AE) to 5 (death related AE).
Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Worst Value on TreatmentFrom first intake of trial drug to last intake of trial drug plus 21 days, up to 441 daysPercentage of participants with transitions relative to the baseline CTC grade (version 3) for neutrophils based on worst value on treatment. Worst Common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) grade on treatment for neutrophils (CTC version 3). The CTCAE scale measures the severity of adverse events which goes from 1 (mild AE) to 5 (death related AE)
Worst CTCAE Grade on Treatment for PlateletsFrom first intake of trial drug to last intake of trial drug plus 21 days, up to 441 daysWorst Common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) grade on treatment for platelets (CTC version 3). The CTCAE scale measures the severity of adverse events which goes from 1 (mild AE) to 5 (death related AE).
Worst CTCAE Grade on Treatment for NeutrophilsFrom first intake of trial drug to last intake of trial drug plus 21 days, up to 441 daysWorst Common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) grade on treatment for neutrophils (CTC version 3). The CTCAE scale measures the severity of adverse events which goes from 1 (mild AE) to 5 (death related AE).
Change From Baseline in Pulse RateBaseline and from first intake of trial drug to last intake of trial drug plus 21 days, up to 441 daysChange from baseline in pulse rate at last value on treatment

Countries

Belgium

Participant flow

Recruitment details

An open-label, parallel group, 3+3 dose escalation trial Volasertib and cisplatin or carboplatin combination therapy was given on Day 1 of up to 6, 3-week cycles.

Pre-assignment details

For the carboplatin arm, the target doses were calculated using the Calvert formula to achieve AUC 4, AUC 5 and AUC 6. Calvert formula: Dose (mg) = target AUC x (glomerular filtration rate (GFR) + 25); GFR = (140 - age \[years\]) x (actual weight \[kg\])/(72 x serum creatinine \[mg/dL\]). Multiply by another factor of 0.85 if female).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
V200+Cis75
Patients received 200mg Volasertib (V200) administered by intravenous infusion over 2 hours at day 1 of each treatment cycle, plus 75mg/m2 cisplatin (Cis) administered by intravenous infusion over 1 hour at day 1 of each treatment cycle.
3
V300+Cis75
Patients received 300mg Volasertib (V300) administered by intravenous infusion over 2 hours at day 1 of each treatment cycle, plus 75mg/m2 cisplatin (Cis) administered by intravenous infusion over 1 hour at day 1 of each treatment cycle.
3
V300+Cis100
Patients received 300mg Volasertib (V300) administered by intravenous infusion over 2 hours at day 1 of each treatment cycle, plus 100mg/m2 cisplatin (Cis) administered by intravenous infusion over 1 hour at day 1 of each treatment cycle.
12
V350+Cis75
Patients received 350mg Volasertib (V350) administered by intravenous infusion over 2 hours at day 1 of each treatment cycle, plus 75mg/m2 cisplatin (Cis) administered by intravenous infusion over 1 hour at day 1 of each treatment cycle.
6
V100+Car4
Patients received 100mg Volasertib (V100) administered by intravenous infusion over 2 hours at day 1 of each treatment cycle, plus AUC4 (area under the curve of 4) carboplatin (Car) administered by intravenous infusion over 1 hour at day 1 of each treatment cycle.
3
V100+Car5
Patients received 100mg Volasertib (V100) administered by intravenous infusion over 2 hours at day 1 of each treatment cycle, plus AUC5 (area under the curve of 5) carboplatin (Car) administered by intravenous infusion over 1 hour at day 1 of each treatment cycle.
3
V200+Car5
Patients received 200mg Volasertib (V200) administered by intravenous infusion over 2 hours at day 1 of each treatment cycle, plus AUC5 (area under the curve of 5) carboplatin (Car) administered by intravenous infusion over 1 hour at day 1 of each treatment cycle.
3
V300+Car5
Patients received 300mg Volasertib (V300) administered by intravenous infusion over 2 hours at day 1 of each treatment cycle, plus AUC5 (area under the curve of 5) carboplatin (Car) administered by intravenous infusion over 1 hour at day 1 of each treatment cycle.
6
V300+Car6
Patients received 300mg Volasertib (V300) administered by intravenous infusion over 2 hours at day 1 of each treatment cycle, plus AUC6 (area under the curve of 6) carboplatin (Car) administered by intravenous infusion over 1 hour at day 1 of each treatment cycle.
13
V350+Car5
Patients received 350mg Volasertib (V350) administered by intravenous infusion over 2 hours at day 1 of each treatment cycle, plus AUC5 (area under the curve of 5) carboplatin (Car) administered by intravenous infusion over 1 hour at day 1 of each treatment cycle.
3
V100+Cis60
Patients received 100mg Volasertib (V100) administered by intravenous infusion over 2 hours at day 1 of each treatment cycle, plus 60mg/m2 cisplatin (Cis) administered by intravenous infusion over 1 hour at day 1 of each treatment cycle.
3
V100+Cis75
Patients received 100mg Volasertib (V100) administered by intravenous infusion over 2 hours at day 1 of each treatment cycle, plus 75mg/m2 cisplatin (Cis) administered by intravenous infusion over 1 hour at day 1 of each treatment cycle.
3
Total61

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003FG004FG005FG006FG007FG008FG009FG010FG011
Discont. Before Start of Treat. Cycle 2Dose Limiting Toxicity (DLT)001000000000
Discont. Before Start of Treat. Cycle 2Other adverse events001000000000
Discont. Before Start of Treat. Cycle 2Progressive Disease100100001100
Discont. Before Start of Treat. Cycle 2Withdrawal by Subject000000001000
Treated in and Beyond Treat. Cycle 2Other adverse events000210002000
Treated in and Beyond Treat. Cycle 2Progressive disease2310323369233

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicV200+Cis75V300+Cis75V300+Cis100V350+Cis75V100+Car4V100+Car5V200+Car5V300+Car5V300+Car6V350+Car5V100+Cis60V100+Cis75Total
Age, Continuous40.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.51
55.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.53
52.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 16.67
60.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.53
56.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.72
54.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.57
58.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.75
66.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.07
51.8 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.03
58.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.66
45.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 19.16
58.3 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.37
54.7 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.08
Sex: Female, Male
Female
3 Participants2 Participants3 Participants2 Participants1 Participants1 Participants1 Participants2 Participants6 Participants2 Participants2 Participants2 Participants27 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants1 Participants9 Participants4 Participants2 Participants2 Participants2 Participants4 Participants7 Participants1 Participants1 Participants1 Participants34 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
EG004
affected / at risk
EG005
affected / at risk
EG006
affected / at risk
EG007
affected / at risk
EG008
affected / at risk
EG009
affected / at risk
EG010
affected / at risk
EG011
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
3 / 33 / 312 / 126 / 63 / 33 / 33 / 36 / 613 / 133 / 33 / 33 / 3
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 31 / 36 / 123 / 61 / 30 / 31 / 31 / 66 / 132 / 32 / 31 / 3

Outcome results

Primary

Maximum Tolerated Dose

The maximum tolerated dose (MTD) was defined as the highest dose studied for which the incidence of DLT was less than 33% (i.e. 1/6 patients) during the first cycle, for Volasertib in combination with cisplatin or carboplatin. 0=not maximum tolerated dose, 1=was maximum tolerated dose.

Time frame: 3 weeks

Population: Treated set

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
V100+Cis60Maximum Tolerated Dose0 Units on a scale
V100+Cis75Maximum Tolerated Dose0 Units on a scale
V200+Cis75Maximum Tolerated Dose0 Units on a scale
V300+Cis75Maximum Tolerated Dose0 Units on a scale
V300+Cis100Maximum Tolerated Dose1 Units on a scale
V350+Cis75Maximum Tolerated Dose0 Units on a scale
V100+Car4Maximum Tolerated Dose0 Units on a scale
V100+Car5Maximum Tolerated Dose0 Units on a scale
V200+Car5Maximum Tolerated Dose0 Units on a scale
V300+Car5Maximum Tolerated Dose0 Units on a scale
V300+Car6Maximum Tolerated Dose1 Units on a scale
V350+Car5Maximum Tolerated Dose0 Units on a scale
Secondary

Apparent Volume of Distribution at Steady State Following Intravascular Administration (Vss)

Apparent volume of distribution at steady state following intravascular administration (Vss) of Volasertib in combination with cisplatin or carboplatin during treatment cycle 1.

Time frame: 1 hour (h) 35 minutes (min) before start of volasertib infusion and 1h, 2h, 8h, 24h, 48h, 168h and 336h after start of volasertib infusion

Population: PK set

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
V100+Cis60Apparent Volume of Distribution at Steady State Following Intravascular Administration (Vss)6580 LitresGeometric Coefficient of Variation 66.9
V100+Cis75Apparent Volume of Distribution at Steady State Following Intravascular Administration (Vss)11100 LitresGeometric Coefficient of Variation 20.1
V200+Cis75Apparent Volume of Distribution at Steady State Following Intravascular Administration (Vss)5570 LitresGeometric Coefficient of Variation 18.9
V300+Cis75Apparent Volume of Distribution at Steady State Following Intravascular Administration (Vss)7140 LitresGeometric Coefficient of Variation 42.5
V300+Cis100Apparent Volume of Distribution at Steady State Following Intravascular Administration (Vss)5880 LitresGeometric Coefficient of Variation 67.6
V350+Cis75Apparent Volume of Distribution at Steady State Following Intravascular Administration (Vss)7270 LitresGeometric Coefficient of Variation 41.5
V100+Car4Apparent Volume of Distribution at Steady State Following Intravascular Administration (Vss)8810 LitresGeometric Coefficient of Variation 38.7
V100+Car5Apparent Volume of Distribution at Steady State Following Intravascular Administration (Vss)9960 LitresGeometric Coefficient of Variation 44.7
V200+Car5Apparent Volume of Distribution at Steady State Following Intravascular Administration (Vss)8950 LitresGeometric Coefficient of Variation 36.9
V300+Car5Apparent Volume of Distribution at Steady State Following Intravascular Administration (Vss)8270 LitresGeometric Coefficient of Variation 42.2
V300+Car6Apparent Volume of Distribution at Steady State Following Intravascular Administration (Vss)7440 LitresGeometric Coefficient of Variation 31.9
V350+Car5Apparent Volume of Distribution at Steady State Following Intravascular Administration (Vss)3640 LitresGeometric Coefficient of Variation 35.9
Secondary

Best Overall Response

Best overall response was defined as the best response obtained since the start of study treatment until disease progression, determined based on RECIST V1.0 criteria.

Time frame: From first intake of trial drug to last intake of trial drug plus 21 days, up to 441 days

Population: Treated set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
V100+Cis60Best Overall ResponseProgressive disease33.3 Percentage of participants
V100+Cis60Best Overall ResponseComplete response0.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Cis60Best Overall ResponseNo post-baseline tumour assessment0.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Cis60Best Overall ResponseNon evaluable0.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Cis60Best Overall ResponsePartial response0.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Cis60Best Overall ResponseStable disease66.7 Percentage of participants
V100+Cis75Best Overall ResponseNo post-baseline tumour assessment0.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Cis75Best Overall ResponseNon evaluable0.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Cis75Best Overall ResponseComplete response0.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Cis75Best Overall ResponseStable disease66.7 Percentage of participants
V100+Cis75Best Overall ResponsePartial response33.3 Percentage of participants
V100+Cis75Best Overall ResponseProgressive disease0.0 Percentage of participants
V200+Cis75Best Overall ResponseStable disease33.3 Percentage of participants
V200+Cis75Best Overall ResponseNon evaluable0.0 Percentage of participants
V200+Cis75Best Overall ResponsePartial response0.0 Percentage of participants
V200+Cis75Best Overall ResponseComplete response0.0 Percentage of participants
V200+Cis75Best Overall ResponseNo post-baseline tumour assessment33.3 Percentage of participants
V200+Cis75Best Overall ResponseProgressive disease33.3 Percentage of participants
V300+Cis75Best Overall ResponseComplete response0.0 Percentage of participants
V300+Cis75Best Overall ResponseNo post-baseline tumour assessment0.0 Percentage of participants
V300+Cis75Best Overall ResponsePartial response33.3 Percentage of participants
V300+Cis75Best Overall ResponseNon evaluable0.0 Percentage of participants
V300+Cis75Best Overall ResponseStable disease33.3 Percentage of participants
V300+Cis75Best Overall ResponseProgressive disease33.3 Percentage of participants
V300+Cis100Best Overall ResponsePartial response0.0 Percentage of participants
V300+Cis100Best Overall ResponseNo post-baseline tumour assessment16.7 Percentage of participants
V300+Cis100Best Overall ResponseComplete response0.0 Percentage of participants
V300+Cis100Best Overall ResponseStable disease25.0 Percentage of participants
V300+Cis100Best Overall ResponseNon evaluable0.0 Percentage of participants
V300+Cis100Best Overall ResponseProgressive disease58.3 Percentage of participants
V350+Cis75Best Overall ResponseNon evaluable0.0 Percentage of participants
V350+Cis75Best Overall ResponseComplete response0.0 Percentage of participants
V350+Cis75Best Overall ResponsePartial response0.0 Percentage of participants
V350+Cis75Best Overall ResponseStable disease33.3 Percentage of participants
V350+Cis75Best Overall ResponseProgressive disease50.0 Percentage of participants
V350+Cis75Best Overall ResponseNo post-baseline tumour assessment16.7 Percentage of participants
V100+Car4Best Overall ResponseComplete response0.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Car4Best Overall ResponsePartial response0.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Car4Best Overall ResponseNon evaluable0.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Car4Best Overall ResponseProgressive disease66.7 Percentage of participants
V100+Car4Best Overall ResponseStable disease33.3 Percentage of participants
V100+Car4Best Overall ResponseNo post-baseline tumour assessment0.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Car5Best Overall ResponseNon evaluable0.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Car5Best Overall ResponseStable disease33.3 Percentage of participants
V100+Car5Best Overall ResponseNo post-baseline tumour assessment0.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Car5Best Overall ResponsePartial response0.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Car5Best Overall ResponseProgressive disease66.7 Percentage of participants
V100+Car5Best Overall ResponseComplete response0.0 Percentage of participants
V200+Car5Best Overall ResponseComplete response0.0 Percentage of participants
V200+Car5Best Overall ResponseNon evaluable0.0 Percentage of participants
V200+Car5Best Overall ResponseNo post-baseline tumour assessment0.0 Percentage of participants
V200+Car5Best Overall ResponseProgressive disease100.0 Percentage of participants
V200+Car5Best Overall ResponseStable disease0.0 Percentage of participants
V200+Car5Best Overall ResponsePartial response0.0 Percentage of participants
V300+Car5Best Overall ResponseStable disease33.3 Percentage of participants
V300+Car5Best Overall ResponseProgressive disease33.3 Percentage of participants
V300+Car5Best Overall ResponsePartial response16.7 Percentage of participants
V300+Car5Best Overall ResponseNon evaluable16.7 Percentage of participants
V300+Car5Best Overall ResponseComplete response0.0 Percentage of participants
V300+Car5Best Overall ResponseNo post-baseline tumour assessment0.0 Percentage of participants
V300+Car6Best Overall ResponseComplete response0.0 Percentage of participants
V300+Car6Best Overall ResponseStable disease7.7 Percentage of participants
V300+Car6Best Overall ResponsePartial response7.7 Percentage of participants
V300+Car6Best Overall ResponseProgressive disease61.5 Percentage of participants
V300+Car6Best Overall ResponseNo post-baseline tumour assessment23.1 Percentage of participants
V300+Car6Best Overall ResponseNon evaluable0.0 Percentage of participants
V350+Car5Best Overall ResponseStable disease33.3 Percentage of participants
V350+Car5Best Overall ResponseNon evaluable0.0 Percentage of participants
V350+Car5Best Overall ResponseComplete response0.0 Percentage of participants
V350+Car5Best Overall ResponsePartial response0.0 Percentage of participants
V350+Car5Best Overall ResponseProgressive disease33.3 Percentage of participants
V350+Car5Best Overall ResponseNo post-baseline tumour assessment33.3 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Neutrophils

Change from baseline in neutrophils with the maximum value on treatment

Time frame: Baseline and from first intake of trial drug to last intake of trial drug plus 21 days, up to 441 days

Population: Treated set

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
V100+Cis60Change From Baseline in Neutrophils7.6 10^9 cells /LStandard Deviation 7.3
V100+Cis75Change From Baseline in Neutrophils3.3 10^9 cells /LStandard Deviation 1.9
V200+Cis75Change From Baseline in Neutrophils3.4 10^9 cells /LStandard Deviation 2.3
V300+Cis75Change From Baseline in Neutrophils3.0 10^9 cells /LStandard Deviation 2.6
V300+Cis100Change From Baseline in Neutrophils6.0 10^9 cells /LStandard Deviation 4.3
V350+Cis75Change From Baseline in Neutrophils5.2 10^9 cells /LStandard Deviation 6.5
V100+Car4Change From Baseline in Neutrophils2.1 10^9 cells /LStandard Deviation 3.1
V100+Car5Change From Baseline in Neutrophils6.8 10^9 cells /LStandard Deviation 8.2
V200+Car5Change From Baseline in Neutrophils3.6 10^9 cells /LStandard Deviation 2.7
V300+Car5Change From Baseline in Neutrophils5.9 10^9 cells /LStandard Deviation 6.9
V300+Car6Change From Baseline in Neutrophils5.5 10^9 cells /LStandard Deviation 2.4
V350+Car5Change From Baseline in Neutrophils4.7 10^9 cells /LStandard Deviation 2.8
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Platelets

Change from baseline in platelets with the maximum value on treatment

Time frame: Baseline and from first intake of trial drug to last intake of trial drug plus 21 days, up to 441 days

Population: Treated set

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
V100+Cis60Change From Baseline in Platelets57 10^9 cells /LStandard Deviation 48
V100+Cis75Change From Baseline in Platelets65 10^9 cells /LStandard Deviation 78
V200+Cis75Change From Baseline in Platelets96 10^9 cells /LStandard Deviation 94
V300+Cis75Change From Baseline in Platelets71 10^9 cells /LStandard Deviation 58
V300+Cis100Change From Baseline in Platelets67 10^9 cells /LStandard Deviation 58
V350+Cis75Change From Baseline in Platelets89 10^9 cells /LStandard Deviation 95
V100+Car4Change From Baseline in Platelets186 10^9 cells /LStandard Deviation 96
V100+Car5Change From Baseline in Platelets50 10^9 cells /LStandard Deviation 38
V200+Car5Change From Baseline in Platelets49 10^9 cells /LStandard Deviation 65
V300+Car5Change From Baseline in Platelets39 10^9 cells /LStandard Deviation 20
V300+Car6Change From Baseline in Platelets73 10^9 cells /LStandard Deviation 58
V350+Car5Change From Baseline in Platelets104 10^9 cells /LStandard Deviation 53
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Pulse Rate

Change from baseline in pulse rate at last value on treatment

Time frame: Baseline and from first intake of trial drug to last intake of trial drug plus 21 days, up to 441 days

Population: Treated set

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
V100+Cis60Change From Baseline in Pulse Rate10.0 bpmStandard Deviation 10
V100+Cis75Change From Baseline in Pulse Rate23.3 bpmStandard Deviation 15.01
V200+Cis75Change From Baseline in Pulse Rate6.7 bpmStandard Deviation 17.24
V300+Cis75Change From Baseline in Pulse Rate-11.7 bpmStandard Deviation 14.29
V300+Cis100Change From Baseline in Pulse Rate10.3 bpmStandard Deviation 14.35
V350+Cis75Change From Baseline in Pulse Rate5.2 bpmStandard Deviation 10.34
V100+Car4Change From Baseline in Pulse Rate3.7 bpmStandard Deviation 26.5
V100+Car5Change From Baseline in Pulse Rate0.7 bpmStandard Deviation 7.37
V200+Car5Change From Baseline in Pulse Rate12.0 bpmStandard Deviation 7.55
V300+Car5Change From Baseline in Pulse Rate5.7 bpmStandard Deviation 10.61
V300+Car6Change From Baseline in Pulse Rate14.4 bpmStandard Deviation 10.97
V350+Car5Change From Baseline in Pulse Rate-21.7 bpmStandard Deviation 17.79
Secondary

Disease Control Rate

Percentage of participants with confirmed disease control, defined as the proportion of patients with a best overall response of at least stable disease (SD), determined based on RECIST V1.0 criteria.

Time frame: From first intake of trial drug to last intake of trial drug plus 21 days, up to 441 days

Population: Treated set

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
V100+Cis60Disease Control Rate66.7 Percentage of participants
V100+Cis75Disease Control Rate100.0 Percentage of participants
V200+Cis75Disease Control Rate33.3 Percentage of participants
V300+Cis75Disease Control Rate66.7 Percentage of participants
V300+Cis100Disease Control Rate25.0 Percentage of participants
V350+Cis75Disease Control Rate33.3 Percentage of participants
V100+Car4Disease Control Rate33.3 Percentage of participants
V100+Car5Disease Control Rate33.3 Percentage of participants
V200+Car5Disease Control Rate0.0 Percentage of participants
V300+Car5Disease Control Rate50.0 Percentage of participants
V300+Car6Disease Control Rate15.4 Percentage of participants
V350+Car5Disease Control Rate33.3 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Duration of Disease Control

Duration of Disease control was defined as the time from the start of study treatment to the time of disease progression or death, whichever occurred first.

Time frame: From first intake of trial drug to last intake of trial drug plus 21 days, up to 441 days

Population: Treated set restricted to participants with confirmed disease control.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)Dispersion
V100+Cis60Duration of Disease Control196.5 DaysStandard Deviation 103.94
V100+Cis75Duration of Disease Control309.0 DaysStandard Deviation 105.93
V200+Cis75Duration of Disease Control264.0 Days
V300+Cis75Duration of Disease Control268.0 DaysStandard Deviation 237.59
V300+Cis100Duration of Disease Control155.0 DaysStandard Deviation 49.36
V350+Cis75Duration of Disease Control103.5 DaysStandard Deviation 9.19
V100+Car4Duration of Disease Control135.0 Days
V100+Car5Duration of Disease Control229.0 Days
V300+Car5Duration of Disease Control234.0 DaysStandard Deviation 115.99
V300+Car6Duration of Disease Control190.5 DaysStandard Deviation 74.25
V350+Car5Duration of Disease Control126.0 Days
Secondary

Duration of Objective Response

Duration of objective response was defined as the time from first documented confirmed complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) to first evidence of progressive disease (PD) or death from any cause, whichever occurred first, determined based on RECIST V1.0 criteria. Tumour response was documented using appropriate techniques

Time frame: From first intake of trial drug to last intake of trial drug plus 21 days, up to 441 days

Population: Treated set restricted to participants with confirmed objective response.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
V100+Cis75Duration of Objective Response298 Days
V300+Cis75Duration of Objective Response359 Days
V300+Car5Duration of Objective Response282 Days
V300+Car6Duration of Objective Response207 Days
Secondary

Frequency of Participants (%) With Possible Clinically Significant Abnormalities for Neutrophils

Frequency of participants (%) with possible clinically significant abnormalities for neutrophils: : defined as neutrophils \>=CTCAE grade 2 (CTCAE v3.0), with worsening from baseline. The CTCAE scale measures the severity of adverse events which goes from 1 (mild AE) to 5 (death related AE).

Time frame: From first intake of trial drug to last intake of trial drug plus 21 days, up to 441 days

Population: Treated set

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
V100+Cis60Frequency of Participants (%) With Possible Clinically Significant Abnormalities for Neutrophils33.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Cis75Frequency of Participants (%) With Possible Clinically Significant Abnormalities for Neutrophils100.0 Percentage of participants
V200+Cis75Frequency of Participants (%) With Possible Clinically Significant Abnormalities for Neutrophils0.0 Percentage of participants
V300+Cis75Frequency of Participants (%) With Possible Clinically Significant Abnormalities for Neutrophils66.7 Percentage of participants
V300+Cis100Frequency of Participants (%) With Possible Clinically Significant Abnormalities for Neutrophils75.0 Percentage of participants
V350+Cis75Frequency of Participants (%) With Possible Clinically Significant Abnormalities for Neutrophils50.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Car4Frequency of Participants (%) With Possible Clinically Significant Abnormalities for Neutrophils33.3 Percentage of participants
V100+Car5Frequency of Participants (%) With Possible Clinically Significant Abnormalities for Neutrophils33.3 Percentage of participants
V200+Car5Frequency of Participants (%) With Possible Clinically Significant Abnormalities for Neutrophils33.3 Percentage of participants
V300+Car5Frequency of Participants (%) With Possible Clinically Significant Abnormalities for Neutrophils83.3 Percentage of participants
V300+Car6Frequency of Participants (%) With Possible Clinically Significant Abnormalities for Neutrophils76.9 Percentage of participants
V350+Car5Frequency of Participants (%) With Possible Clinically Significant Abnormalities for Neutrophils100.0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Frequency of Participants (%) With Possible Clinically Significant Abnormalities for Platelets

Frequency of participants (%) with possible clinically significant abnormalities for platelets : defined as platelets \>=CTCAE grade 2 (based on CTCAE v3.0), with worsening from baseline. The CTCAE scale measures the severity of adverse events which goes from 1 (mild AE) to 5 (death related AE).

Time frame: From first intake of trial drug to last intake of trial drug plus 21 days, up to 441 days

Population: Treated set

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
V100+Cis60Frequency of Participants (%) With Possible Clinically Significant Abnormalities for Platelets0.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Cis75Frequency of Participants (%) With Possible Clinically Significant Abnormalities for Platelets0.0 Percentage of participants
V200+Cis75Frequency of Participants (%) With Possible Clinically Significant Abnormalities for Platelets0.0 Percentage of participants
V300+Cis75Frequency of Participants (%) With Possible Clinically Significant Abnormalities for Platelets33.0 Percentage of participants
V300+Cis100Frequency of Participants (%) With Possible Clinically Significant Abnormalities for Platelets41.7 Percentage of participants
V350+Cis75Frequency of Participants (%) With Possible Clinically Significant Abnormalities for Platelets83.3 Percentage of participants
V100+Car4Frequency of Participants (%) With Possible Clinically Significant Abnormalities for Platelets0.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Car5Frequency of Participants (%) With Possible Clinically Significant Abnormalities for Platelets33.3 Percentage of participants
V200+Car5Frequency of Participants (%) With Possible Clinically Significant Abnormalities for Platelets0.0 Percentage of participants
V300+Car5Frequency of Participants (%) With Possible Clinically Significant Abnormalities for Platelets83.3 Percentage of participants
V300+Car6Frequency of Participants (%) With Possible Clinically Significant Abnormalities for Platelets76.9 Percentage of participants
V350+Car5Frequency of Participants (%) With Possible Clinically Significant Abnormalities for Platelets100.0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Last Value on Treatment

Percentage of participants with transitions relative to the baseline CTC grade (version 3) for neutrophils based on last value on treatment. Common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) grade on treatment for neutrophils (CTC version 3). The CTCAE scale measures the severity of adverse events which goes from 1 (mild AE) to 5 (death related AE)

Time frame: From first intake of trial drug to last intake of trial drug plus 21 days, up to 441 days

Population: Treated set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
V100+Cis60Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, last value=40.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Cis60Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, last value=20.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Cis60Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, last value=30.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Cis60Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, last value=0100.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Cis60Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=1, last value=10.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Cis60Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, last value=10.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Cis60Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=1, last value=00.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Cis75Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, last value=133.3 Percentage of participants
V100+Cis75Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=1, last value=10.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Cis75Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, last value=066.7 Percentage of participants
V100+Cis75Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, last value=40.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Cis75Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, last value=30.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Cis75Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=1, last value=00.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Cis75Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, last value=20.0 Percentage of participants
V200+Cis75Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=1, last value=00.0 Percentage of participants
V200+Cis75Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, last value=20.0 Percentage of participants
V200+Cis75Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, last value=10.0 Percentage of participants
V200+Cis75Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, last value=0100.0 Percentage of participants
V200+Cis75Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, last value=40.0 Percentage of participants
V200+Cis75Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, last value=30.0 Percentage of participants
V200+Cis75Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=1, last value=10.0 Percentage of participants
V300+Cis75Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=1, last value=133.3 Percentage of participants
V300+Cis75Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, last value=20.0 Percentage of participants
V300+Cis75Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, last value=066.7 Percentage of participants
V300+Cis75Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, last value=10.0 Percentage of participants
V300+Cis75Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=1, last value=00.0 Percentage of participants
V300+Cis75Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, last value=40.0 Percentage of participants
V300+Cis75Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, last value=30.0 Percentage of participants
V300+Cis100Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, last value=40.0 Percentage of participants
V300+Cis100Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=1, last value=10.0 Percentage of participants
V300+Cis100Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, last value=38.3 Percentage of participants
V300+Cis100Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=1, last value=00.0 Percentage of participants
V300+Cis100Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, last value=20.0 Percentage of participants
V300+Cis100Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, last value=091.7 Percentage of participants
V300+Cis100Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, last value=10.0 Percentage of participants
V350+Cis75Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, last value=30.0 Percentage of participants
V350+Cis75Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, last value=066.7 Percentage of participants
V350+Cis75Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, last value=40.0 Percentage of participants
V350+Cis75Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, last value=10.0 Percentage of participants
V350+Cis75Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=1, last value=033.3 Percentage of participants
V350+Cis75Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, last value=20.0 Percentage of participants
V350+Cis75Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=1, last value=10.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Car4Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=1, last value=10.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Car4Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, last value=0100.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Car4Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, last value=10.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Car4Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, last value=30.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Car4Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, last value=20.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Car4Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, last value=40.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Car4Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=1, last value=00.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Car5Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, last value=40.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Car5Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=1, last value=10.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Car5Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=1, last value=00.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Car5Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, last value=0100.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Car5Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, last value=20.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Car5Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, last value=30.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Car5Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, last value=10.0 Percentage of participants
V200+Car5Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, last value=0100.0 Percentage of participants
V200+Car5Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, last value=10.0 Percentage of participants
V200+Car5Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, last value=40.0 Percentage of participants
V200+Car5Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=1, last value=10.0 Percentage of participants
V200+Car5Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, last value=20.0 Percentage of participants
V200+Car5Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=1, last value=00.0 Percentage of participants
V200+Car5Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, last value=30.0 Percentage of participants
V300+Car5Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=1, last value=10.0 Percentage of participants
V300+Car5Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, last value=30.0 Percentage of participants
V300+Car5Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=1, last value=00.0 Percentage of participants
V300+Car5Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, last value=216.7 Percentage of participants
V300+Car5Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, last value=10.0 Percentage of participants
V300+Car5Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, last value=40.0 Percentage of participants
V300+Car5Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, last value=083.3 Percentage of participants
V300+Car6Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, last value=130.8 Percentage of participants
V300+Car6Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, last value=069.2 Percentage of participants
V300+Car6Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, last value=20.0 Percentage of participants
V300+Car6Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, last value=30.0 Percentage of participants
V300+Car6Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=1, last value=10.0 Percentage of participants
V300+Car6Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=1, last value=00.0 Percentage of participants
V300+Car6Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, last value=40.0 Percentage of participants
V350+Car5Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=1, last value=10.0 Percentage of participants
V350+Car5Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, last value=40.0 Percentage of participants
V350+Car5Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, last value=0100.0 Percentage of participants
V350+Car5Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, last value=30.0 Percentage of participants
V350+Car5Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, last value=10.0 Percentage of participants
V350+Car5Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, last value=20.0 Percentage of participants
V350+Car5Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=1, last value=00.0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Worst Value on Treatment

Percentage of participants with transitions relative to the baseline CTC grade (version 3) for neutrophils based on worst value on treatment. Worst Common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) grade on treatment for neutrophils (CTC version 3). The CTCAE scale measures the severity of adverse events which goes from 1 (mild AE) to 5 (death related AE)

Time frame: From first intake of trial drug to last intake of trial drug plus 21 days, up to 441 days

Population: Treated set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
V100+Cis60Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=40.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Cis60Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=30.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Cis60Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=033.3 Percentage of participants
V100+Cis60Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=1, worst value=40.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Cis60Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=233.3 Percentage of participants
V100+Cis60Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=1, worst value=30.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Cis60Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=133.3 Percentage of participants
V100+Cis75Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=00.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Cis75Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=233.3 Percentage of participants
V100+Cis75Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=1, worst value=30.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Cis75Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=40.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Cis75Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=10.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Cis75Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=1, worst value=40.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Cis75Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=366.7 Percentage of participants
V200+Cis75Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=20.0 Percentage of participants
V200+Cis75Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=1, worst value=40.0 Percentage of participants
V200+Cis75Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=10.0 Percentage of participants
V200+Cis75Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=30.0 Percentage of participants
V200+Cis75Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=0100.0 Percentage of participants
V200+Cis75Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=1, worst value=30.0 Percentage of participants
V200+Cis75Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=40.0 Percentage of participants
V300+Cis75Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=133.3 Percentage of participants
V300+Cis75Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=433.3 Percentage of participants
V300+Cis75Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=1, worst value=433.3 Percentage of participants
V300+Cis75Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=20.0 Percentage of participants
V300+Cis75Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=30.0 Percentage of participants
V300+Cis75Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=1, worst value=30.0 Percentage of participants
V300+Cis75Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=00.0 Percentage of participants
V300+Cis100Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=316.7 Percentage of participants
V300+Cis100Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=016.7 Percentage of participants
V300+Cis100Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=1, worst value=40.0 Percentage of participants
V300+Cis100Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=1, worst value=30.0 Percentage of participants
V300+Cis100Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=18.3 Percentage of participants
V300+Cis100Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=433.3 Percentage of participants
V300+Cis100Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=225.0 Percentage of participants
V350+Cis75Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=30.0 Percentage of participants
V350+Cis75Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=016.7 Percentage of participants
V350+Cis75Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=133.3 Percentage of participants
V350+Cis75Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=20.0 Percentage of participants
V350+Cis75Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=416.7 Percentage of participants
V350+Cis75Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=1, worst value=316.7 Percentage of participants
V350+Cis75Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=1, worst value=416.7 Percentage of participants
V100+Car4Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=10.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Car4Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=1, worst value=30.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Car4Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=20.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Car4Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=1, worst value=40.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Car4Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=40.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Car4Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=066.7 Percentage of participants
V100+Car4Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=333.3 Percentage of participants
V100+Car5Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=1, worst value=40.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Car5Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=066.7 Percentage of participants
V100+Car5Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=333.3 Percentage of participants
V100+Car5Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=10.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Car5Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=1, worst value=30.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Car5Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=40.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Car5Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=20.0 Percentage of participants
V200+Car5Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=1, worst value=40.0 Percentage of participants
V200+Car5Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=10.0 Percentage of participants
V200+Car5Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=40.0 Percentage of participants
V200+Car5Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=066.7 Percentage of participants
V200+Car5Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=1, worst value=30.0 Percentage of participants
V200+Car5Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=30.0 Percentage of participants
V200+Car5Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=233.3 Percentage of participants
V300+Car5Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=216.7 Percentage of participants
V300+Car5Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=316.7 Percentage of participants
V300+Car5Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=1, worst value=40.0 Percentage of participants
V300+Car5Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=450.0 Percentage of participants
V300+Car5Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=10.0 Percentage of participants
V300+Car5Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=1, worst value=30.0 Percentage of participants
V300+Car5Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=016.7 Percentage of participants
V300+Car6Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=1, worst value=30.0 Percentage of participants
V300+Car6Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=07.7 Percentage of participants
V300+Car6Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=353.8 Percentage of participants
V300+Car6Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=47.7 Percentage of participants
V300+Car6Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=115.4 Percentage of participants
V300+Car6Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=1, worst value=40.0 Percentage of participants
V300+Car6Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=215.4 Percentage of participants
V350+Car5Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=1, worst value=40.0 Percentage of participants
V350+Car5Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=1, worst value=30.0 Percentage of participants
V350+Car5Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=20.0 Percentage of participants
V350+Car5Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=10.0 Percentage of participants
V350+Car5Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=00.0 Percentage of participants
V350+Car5Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=433.3 Percentage of participants
V350+Car5Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Neutrophils Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=366.7 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Last Value on Treatment

Percentage of participants with transitions relative to the baseline CTC grade (version 3) for platelets based on last value on treatment. Common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) grade on treatment for platelets (CTC version 3). The CTCAE scale measures the severity of adverse events which goes from 1 (mild AE) to 5 (death related AE).

Time frame: From first intake of trial drug to last intake of trial drug plus 21 days, up to 441 days

Population: Treated set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
V100+Cis60Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, last value=20.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Cis60Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, last value=033.3 Percentage of participants
V100+Cis60Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=1, last value=10.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Cis60Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, last value=30.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Cis60Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, last value=133.3 Percentage of participants
V100+Cis60Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=1, last value=033.3 Percentage of participants
V100+Cis75Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=1, last value=10.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Cis75Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, last value=30.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Cis75Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, last value=066.7 Percentage of participants
V100+Cis75Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=1, last value=00.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Cis75Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, last value=133.3 Percentage of participants
V100+Cis75Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, last value=20.0 Percentage of participants
V200+Cis75Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=1, last value=00.0 Percentage of participants
V200+Cis75Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, last value=30.0 Percentage of participants
V200+Cis75Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, last value=10.0 Percentage of participants
V200+Cis75Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, last value=0100.0 Percentage of participants
V200+Cis75Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=1, last value=10.0 Percentage of participants
V200+Cis75Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, last value=20.0 Percentage of participants
V300+Cis75Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, last value=0100.0 Percentage of participants
V300+Cis75Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=1, last value=10.0 Percentage of participants
V300+Cis75Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, last value=10.0 Percentage of participants
V300+Cis75Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, last value=30.0 Percentage of participants
V300+Cis75Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=1, last value=00.0 Percentage of participants
V300+Cis75Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, last value=20.0 Percentage of participants
V300+Cis100Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, last value=116.7 Percentage of participants
V300+Cis100Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=1, last value=10.0 Percentage of participants
V300+Cis100Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, last value=083.3 Percentage of participants
V300+Cis100Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=1, last value=00.0 Percentage of participants
V300+Cis100Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, last value=30.0 Percentage of participants
V300+Cis100Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, last value=20.0 Percentage of participants
V350+Cis75Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, last value=30.0 Percentage of participants
V350+Cis75Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, last value=0100.0 Percentage of participants
V350+Cis75Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, last value=10.0 Percentage of participants
V350+Cis75Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=1, last value=00.0 Percentage of participants
V350+Cis75Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, last value=20.0 Percentage of participants
V350+Cis75Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=1, last value=10.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Car4Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, last value=0100.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Car4Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, last value=10.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Car4Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, last value=30.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Car4Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, last value=20.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Car4Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=1, last value=00.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Car4Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=1, last value=10.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Car5Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, last value=30.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Car5Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=1, last value=00.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Car5Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=1, last value=10.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Car5Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, last value=133.3 Percentage of participants
V100+Car5Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, last value=20.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Car5Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, last value=066.7 Percentage of participants
V200+Car5Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, last value=066.7 Percentage of participants
V200+Car5Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, last value=30.0 Percentage of participants
V200+Car5Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=1, last value=10.0 Percentage of participants
V200+Car5Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, last value=20.0 Percentage of participants
V200+Car5Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=1, last value=00.0 Percentage of participants
V200+Car5Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, last value=133.3 Percentage of participants
V300+Car5Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=1, last value=00.0 Percentage of participants
V300+Car5Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, last value=20.0 Percentage of participants
V300+Car5Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, last value=10.0 Percentage of participants
V300+Car5Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, last value=30.0 Percentage of participants
V300+Car5Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, last value=083.3 Percentage of participants
V300+Car5Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=1, last value=116.7 Percentage of participants
V300+Car6Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, last value=084.6 Percentage of participants
V300+Car6Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=1, last value=00.0 Percentage of participants
V300+Car6Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, last value=17.7 Percentage of participants
V300+Car6Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, last value=27.7 Percentage of participants
V300+Car6Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=1, last value=10.0 Percentage of participants
V300+Car6Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, last value=30.0 Percentage of participants
V350+Car5Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=1, last value=00.0 Percentage of participants
V350+Car5Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, last value=30.0 Percentage of participants
V350+Car5Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, last value=0100.0 Percentage of participants
V350+Car5Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, last value=10.0 Percentage of participants
V350+Car5Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, last value=20.0 Percentage of participants
V350+Car5Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Last Value on TreatmentBaseline=1, last value=10.0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Worst Value on Treatment

Percentage of participants with transitions relative to the baseline CTC grade (version 3) for platelets based on worst value on treatment. Worst Common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) grade on treatment for platelets (CTC version 3). The CTCAE scale measures the severity of adverse events which goes from 1 (mild AE) to 5 (death related AE).

Time frame: From first intake of trial drug to last intake of trial drug plus 21 days, up to 441 days

Population: Treated set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
V100+Cis60Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=20.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Cis60Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=133.3 Percentage of participants
V100+Cis60Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=033.3 Percentage of participants
V100+Cis60Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=30.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Cis60Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=1, worst value=10.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Cis60Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=40.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Cis60Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=1, worst value=40.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Cis60Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=1, worst value=033.3 Percentage of participants
V100+Cis75Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=1, worst value=00.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Cis75Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=20.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Cis75Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=066.7 Percentage of participants
V100+Cis75Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=1, worst value=40.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Cis75Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=133.3 Percentage of participants
V100+Cis75Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=40.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Cis75Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=1, worst value=10.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Cis75Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=30.0 Percentage of participants
V200+Cis75Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=20.0 Percentage of participants
V200+Cis75Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=40.0 Percentage of participants
V200+Cis75Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=133.3 Percentage of participants
V200+Cis75Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=066.7 Percentage of participants
V200+Cis75Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=1, worst value=00.0 Percentage of participants
V200+Cis75Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=30.0 Percentage of participants
V200+Cis75Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=1, worst value=40.0 Percentage of participants
V200+Cis75Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=1, worst value=10.0 Percentage of participants
V300+Cis75Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=1, worst value=00.0 Percentage of participants
V300+Cis75Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=00.0 Percentage of participants
V300+Cis75Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=233.3 Percentage of participants
V300+Cis75Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=166.7 Percentage of participants
V300+Cis75Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=1, worst value=10.0 Percentage of participants
V300+Cis75Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=40.0 Percentage of participants
V300+Cis75Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=1, worst value=40.0 Percentage of participants
V300+Cis75Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=30.0 Percentage of participants
V300+Cis100Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=1, worst value=00.0 Percentage of participants
V300+Cis100Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=28.3 Percentage of participants
V300+Cis100Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=1, worst value=10.0 Percentage of participants
V300+Cis100Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=133.3 Percentage of participants
V300+Cis100Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=025.0 Percentage of participants
V300+Cis100Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=333.3 Percentage of participants
V300+Cis100Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=1, worst value=40.0 Percentage of participants
V300+Cis100Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=40.0 Percentage of participants
V350+Cis75Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=016.7 Percentage of participants
V350+Cis75Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=316.7 Percentage of participants
V350+Cis75Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=1, worst value=00.0 Percentage of participants
V350+Cis75Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=1, worst value=40.0 Percentage of participants
V350+Cis75Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=266.7 Percentage of participants
V350+Cis75Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=40.0 Percentage of participants
V350+Cis75Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=1, worst value=10.0 Percentage of participants
V350+Cis75Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=10.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Car4Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=40.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Car4Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=1, worst value=00.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Car4Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=30.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Car4Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=1, worst value=40.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Car4Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=066.7 Percentage of participants
V100+Car4Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=133.3 Percentage of participants
V100+Car4Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=20.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Car4Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=1, worst value=10.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Car5Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=033.3 Percentage of participants
V100+Car5Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=133.3 Percentage of participants
V100+Car5Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=20.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Car5Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=1, worst value=00.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Car5Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=333.3 Percentage of participants
V100+Car5Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=1, worst value=10.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Car5Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=40.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Car5Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=1, worst value=40.0 Percentage of participants
V200+Car5Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=033.3 Percentage of participants
V200+Car5Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=40.0 Percentage of participants
V200+Car5Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=20.0 Percentage of participants
V200+Car5Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=1, worst value=10.0 Percentage of participants
V200+Car5Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=1, worst value=00.0 Percentage of participants
V200+Car5Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=166.7 Percentage of participants
V200+Car5Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=30.0 Percentage of participants
V200+Car5Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=1, worst value=40.0 Percentage of participants
V300+Car5Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=016.7 Percentage of participants
V300+Car5Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=1, worst value=416.7 Percentage of participants
V300+Car5Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=333.3 Percentage of participants
V300+Car5Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=10.0 Percentage of participants
V300+Car5Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=233.3 Percentage of participants
V300+Car5Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=40.0 Percentage of participants
V300+Car5Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=1, worst value=10.0 Percentage of participants
V300+Car5Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=1, worst value=00.0 Percentage of participants
V300+Car6Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=1, worst value=10.0 Percentage of participants
V300+Car6Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=423.1 Percentage of participants
V300+Car6Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=1, worst value=00.0 Percentage of participants
V300+Car6Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=338.5 Percentage of participants
V300+Car6Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=1, worst value=40.0 Percentage of participants
V300+Car6Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=215.4 Percentage of participants
V300+Car6Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=115.4 Percentage of participants
V300+Car6Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=07.7 Percentage of participants
V350+Car5Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=10.0 Percentage of participants
V350+Car5Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=466.7 Percentage of participants
V350+Car5Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=233.3 Percentage of participants
V350+Car5Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=30.0 Percentage of participants
V350+Car5Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=0, worst value=00.0 Percentage of participants
V350+Car5Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=1, worst value=10.0 Percentage of participants
V350+Car5Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=1, worst value=00.0 Percentage of participants
V350+Car5Frequency of Participants With Transitions Relative to the Baseline CTC Grade for Platelets Based on Worst Value on TreatmentBaseline=1, worst value=40.0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Incidence and Intensity of Adverse Events According to CTCAE Version 3.0

Incidence and intensity of adverse events according to common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) version 3.0

Time frame: From first intake of trial drug to last intake of trial drug plus 21 days, up to 441 days

Population: Treated set

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
V100+Cis60Incidence and Intensity of Adverse Events According to CTCAE Version 3.0Grade 3100.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Cis60Incidence and Intensity of Adverse Events According to CTCAE Version 3.0Grade 10.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Cis60Incidence and Intensity of Adverse Events According to CTCAE Version 3.0Grade 50.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Cis60Incidence and Intensity of Adverse Events According to CTCAE Version 3.0Grade 40.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Cis60Incidence and Intensity of Adverse Events According to CTCAE Version 3.0Grade 20.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Cis75Incidence and Intensity of Adverse Events According to CTCAE Version 3.0Grade 20.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Cis75Incidence and Intensity of Adverse Events According to CTCAE Version 3.0Grade 3100.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Cis75Incidence and Intensity of Adverse Events According to CTCAE Version 3.0Grade 40.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Cis75Incidence and Intensity of Adverse Events According to CTCAE Version 3.0Grade 10.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Cis75Incidence and Intensity of Adverse Events According to CTCAE Version 3.0Grade 50.0 Percentage of participants
V200+Cis75Incidence and Intensity of Adverse Events According to CTCAE Version 3.0Grade 266.7 Percentage of participants
V200+Cis75Incidence and Intensity of Adverse Events According to CTCAE Version 3.0Grade 333.3 Percentage of participants
V200+Cis75Incidence and Intensity of Adverse Events According to CTCAE Version 3.0Grade 10.0 Percentage of participants
V200+Cis75Incidence and Intensity of Adverse Events According to CTCAE Version 3.0Grade 40.0 Percentage of participants
V200+Cis75Incidence and Intensity of Adverse Events According to CTCAE Version 3.0Grade 50.0 Percentage of participants
V300+Cis75Incidence and Intensity of Adverse Events According to CTCAE Version 3.0Grade 30.0 Percentage of participants
V300+Cis75Incidence and Intensity of Adverse Events According to CTCAE Version 3.0Grade 10.0 Percentage of participants
V300+Cis75Incidence and Intensity of Adverse Events According to CTCAE Version 3.0Grade 50.0 Percentage of participants
V300+Cis75Incidence and Intensity of Adverse Events According to CTCAE Version 3.0Grade 466.7 Percentage of participants
V300+Cis75Incidence and Intensity of Adverse Events According to CTCAE Version 3.0Grade 233.3 Percentage of participants
V300+Cis100Incidence and Intensity of Adverse Events According to CTCAE Version 3.0Grade 28.3 Percentage of participants
V300+Cis100Incidence and Intensity of Adverse Events According to CTCAE Version 3.0Grade 441.7 Percentage of participants
V300+Cis100Incidence and Intensity of Adverse Events According to CTCAE Version 3.0Grade 50.0 Percentage of participants
V300+Cis100Incidence and Intensity of Adverse Events According to CTCAE Version 3.0Grade 341.7 Percentage of participants
V300+Cis100Incidence and Intensity of Adverse Events According to CTCAE Version 3.0Grade 18.3 Percentage of participants
V350+Cis75Incidence and Intensity of Adverse Events According to CTCAE Version 3.0Grade 350.0 Percentage of participants
V350+Cis75Incidence and Intensity of Adverse Events According to CTCAE Version 3.0Grade 10.0 Percentage of participants
V350+Cis75Incidence and Intensity of Adverse Events According to CTCAE Version 3.0Grade 216.7 Percentage of participants
V350+Cis75Incidence and Intensity of Adverse Events According to CTCAE Version 3.0Grade 433.3 Percentage of participants
V350+Cis75Incidence and Intensity of Adverse Events According to CTCAE Version 3.0Grade 50.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Car4Incidence and Intensity of Adverse Events According to CTCAE Version 3.0Grade 50.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Car4Incidence and Intensity of Adverse Events According to CTCAE Version 3.0Grade 133.3 Percentage of participants
V100+Car4Incidence and Intensity of Adverse Events According to CTCAE Version 3.0Grade 40.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Car4Incidence and Intensity of Adverse Events According to CTCAE Version 3.0Grade 366.7 Percentage of participants
V100+Car4Incidence and Intensity of Adverse Events According to CTCAE Version 3.0Grade 20.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Car5Incidence and Intensity of Adverse Events According to CTCAE Version 3.0Grade 366.7 Percentage of participants
V100+Car5Incidence and Intensity of Adverse Events According to CTCAE Version 3.0Grade 50.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Car5Incidence and Intensity of Adverse Events According to CTCAE Version 3.0Grade 10.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Car5Incidence and Intensity of Adverse Events According to CTCAE Version 3.0Grade 233.3 Percentage of participants
V100+Car5Incidence and Intensity of Adverse Events According to CTCAE Version 3.0Grade 40.0 Percentage of participants
V200+Car5Incidence and Intensity of Adverse Events According to CTCAE Version 3.0Grade 266.7 Percentage of participants
V200+Car5Incidence and Intensity of Adverse Events According to CTCAE Version 3.0Grade 10.0 Percentage of participants
V200+Car5Incidence and Intensity of Adverse Events According to CTCAE Version 3.0Grade 333.3 Percentage of participants
V200+Car5Incidence and Intensity of Adverse Events According to CTCAE Version 3.0Grade 50.0 Percentage of participants
V200+Car5Incidence and Intensity of Adverse Events According to CTCAE Version 3.0Grade 40.0 Percentage of participants
V300+Car5Incidence and Intensity of Adverse Events According to CTCAE Version 3.0Grade 20.0 Percentage of participants
V300+Car5Incidence and Intensity of Adverse Events According to CTCAE Version 3.0Grade 350.0 Percentage of participants
V300+Car5Incidence and Intensity of Adverse Events According to CTCAE Version 3.0Grade 450.0 Percentage of participants
V300+Car5Incidence and Intensity of Adverse Events According to CTCAE Version 3.0Grade 10.0 Percentage of participants
V300+Car5Incidence and Intensity of Adverse Events According to CTCAE Version 3.0Grade 50.0 Percentage of participants
V300+Car6Incidence and Intensity of Adverse Events According to CTCAE Version 3.0Grade 515.4 Percentage of participants
V300+Car6Incidence and Intensity of Adverse Events According to CTCAE Version 3.0Grade 361.5 Percentage of participants
V300+Car6Incidence and Intensity of Adverse Events According to CTCAE Version 3.0Grade 20.0 Percentage of participants
V300+Car6Incidence and Intensity of Adverse Events According to CTCAE Version 3.0Grade 10.0 Percentage of participants
V300+Car6Incidence and Intensity of Adverse Events According to CTCAE Version 3.0Grade 423.1 Percentage of participants
V350+Car5Incidence and Intensity of Adverse Events According to CTCAE Version 3.0Grade 20.0 Percentage of participants
V350+Car5Incidence and Intensity of Adverse Events According to CTCAE Version 3.0Grade 50.0 Percentage of participants
V350+Car5Incidence and Intensity of Adverse Events According to CTCAE Version 3.0Grade 10.0 Percentage of participants
V350+Car5Incidence and Intensity of Adverse Events According to CTCAE Version 3.0Grade 333.3 Percentage of participants
V350+Car5Incidence and Intensity of Adverse Events According to CTCAE Version 3.0Grade 466.7 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Objective Response Rate

Objective response was defined as the proportion of participants having at least a best response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) determined based on RECIST criteria, version 1.0 (V1.0). Tumour response was documented using appropriate techniques

Time frame: From first intake of trial drug to last intake of trial drug plus 21 days, up to 441 days

Population: Treated set

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
V100+Cis60Objective Response Rate0.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Cis75Objective Response Rate33.3 Percentage of participants
V200+Cis75Objective Response Rate0.0 Percentage of participants
V300+Cis75Objective Response Rate33.3 Percentage of participants
V300+Cis100Objective Response Rate0.0 Percentage of participants
V350+Cis75Objective Response Rate0.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Car4Objective Response Rate0.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Car5Objective Response Rate0.0 Percentage of participants
V200+Car5Objective Response Rate0.0 Percentage of participants
V300+Car5Objective Response Rate16.7 Percentage of participants
V300+Car6Objective Response Rate7.7 Percentage of participants
V350+Car5Objective Response Rate0.0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities

Percentage of participants with dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) during the first treatment cycle.

Time frame: 3 weeks

Population: Treated set.~There was one patient in the V300+Car6 group whose DLT data was not evaluable, so only 12 patients had evaluable data.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
V100+Cis60Percentage of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities0.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Cis75Percentage of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities0.0 Percentage of participants
V200+Cis75Percentage of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities0.0 Percentage of participants
V300+Cis75Percentage of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities0.0 Percentage of participants
V300+Cis100Percentage of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities25.0 Percentage of participants
V350+Cis75Percentage of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities33.3 Percentage of participants
V100+Car4Percentage of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities0.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Car5Percentage of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities0.0 Percentage of participants
V200+Car5Percentage of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities0.0 Percentage of participants
V300+Car5Percentage of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities16.7 Percentage of participants
V300+Car6Percentage of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities16.7 Percentage of participants
V350+Car5Percentage of Participants With Dose Limiting Toxicities66.7 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events

Percentage of participants with serious adverse events (AEs)

Time frame: From first intake of trial drug to last intake of trial drug plus 21 days, up to 441 days

Population: Treated set

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
V100+Cis60Percentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events66.7 Percentage of participants
V100+Cis75Percentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events33.3 Percentage of participants
V200+Cis75Percentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events0.0 Percentage of participants
V300+Cis75Percentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events33.3 Percentage of participants
V300+Cis100Percentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events50.0 Percentage of participants
V350+Cis75Percentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events50.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Car4Percentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events33.3 Percentage of participants
V100+Car5Percentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events0.0 Percentage of participants
V200+Car5Percentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events33.3 Percentage of participants
V300+Car5Percentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events16.7 Percentage of participants
V300+Car6Percentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events46.2 Percentage of participants
V350+Car5Percentage of Participants With Serious Adverse Events66.7 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Significant Adverse Events

Percentage of participants with significant adverse events (AEs): dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as significant AE. DLTs (i.e. significant AEs) per protocol were: * drug related CTCAE grade 3 or 4 non haematological toxicity (except vomiting or diarrhoea responding to supportive treatment and ototoxicity) * drug related CTCAE grade 4 neutropenia for seven or more days and / or complicated by infection * drug related CTCAE Grade 4 thrombocytopenia * drug related febrile neutropenia grade 3 (ANC\<1000/mm³ and fever≥ 38.5°C)

Time frame: From first intake of trial drug to last intake of trial drug plus 21 days, up to 441 days

Population: Treated set

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
V100+Cis60Percentage of Participants With Significant Adverse Events0.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Cis75Percentage of Participants With Significant Adverse Events0.0 Percentage of participants
V200+Cis75Percentage of Participants With Significant Adverse Events0.0 Percentage of participants
V300+Cis75Percentage of Participants With Significant Adverse Events66.7 Percentage of participants
V300+Cis100Percentage of Participants With Significant Adverse Events25.0 Percentage of participants
V350+Cis75Percentage of Participants With Significant Adverse Events33.3 Percentage of participants
V100+Car4Percentage of Participants With Significant Adverse Events0.0 Percentage of participants
V100+Car5Percentage of Participants With Significant Adverse Events0.0 Percentage of participants
V200+Car5Percentage of Participants With Significant Adverse Events0.0 Percentage of participants
V300+Car5Percentage of Participants With Significant Adverse Events16.7 Percentage of participants
V300+Car6Percentage of Participants With Significant Adverse Events15.4 Percentage of participants
V350+Car5Percentage of Participants With Significant Adverse Events0.0 Percentage of participants
Secondary

Progression-free Survival

Progression-free survival based on RECIST V1.0 criteria was defined as the time from start of treatment to the date of evidence of progressive disease (PD) or death from any cause, whichever occurred first.

Time frame: From first intake of trial drug to last intake of trial drug plus 21 days, up to 441 days

Population: Treated set

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
V100+Cis60Progression-free Survival123.0 Days
V100+Cis75Progression-free Survival309.0 Days
V200+Cis75Progression-free Survival37.0 Days
V300+Cis75Progression-free Survival100.0 Days
V300+Cis100Progression-free Survival49.5 Days
V350+Cis75Progression-free Survival69.5 Days
V100+Car4Progression-free Survival80.0 Days
V100+Car5Progression-free Survival64.0 Days
V200+Car5Progression-free Survival40.0 Days
V300+Car5Progression-free Survival71.0 Days
V300+Car6Progression-free Survival43.0 Days
V350+Car5Progression-free Survival39.0 Days
Secondary

Total Plasma Clearance After Intravascular Administration (CL)

Total plasma clearance after intravascular administration (CL) of Volasertib in combination with cisplatin or carboplatin during treatment cycle 1.

Time frame: 1 hour (h) 35 minutes (min) before start of volasertib infusion and 1h, 2h, 8h, 24h, 48h, 168h and 336h after start of volasertib infusion

Population: Pharmacokinetic (PK) set which included all participants in the treated set with evaluable PK data

ArmMeasureValue (GEOMETRIC_MEAN)Dispersion
V100+Cis60Total Plasma Clearance After Intravascular Administration (CL)852 mL/minGeometric Coefficient of Variation 28.1
V100+Cis75Total Plasma Clearance After Intravascular Administration (CL)1130 mL/minGeometric Coefficient of Variation 28.1
V200+Cis75Total Plasma Clearance After Intravascular Administration (CL)1090 mL/minGeometric Coefficient of Variation 7.6
V300+Cis75Total Plasma Clearance After Intravascular Administration (CL)1050 mL/minGeometric Coefficient of Variation 22.7
V300+Cis100Total Plasma Clearance After Intravascular Administration (CL)971 mL/minGeometric Coefficient of Variation 28.6
V350+Cis75Total Plasma Clearance After Intravascular Administration (CL)1010 mL/minGeometric Coefficient of Variation 47.9
V100+Car4Total Plasma Clearance After Intravascular Administration (CL)1110 mL/minGeometric Coefficient of Variation 33.6
V100+Car5Total Plasma Clearance After Intravascular Administration (CL)812 mL/minGeometric Coefficient of Variation 11.7
V200+Car5Total Plasma Clearance After Intravascular Administration (CL)881 mL/minGeometric Coefficient of Variation 6.92
V300+Car5Total Plasma Clearance After Intravascular Administration (CL)808 mL/minGeometric Coefficient of Variation 20.7
V300+Car6Total Plasma Clearance After Intravascular Administration (CL)974 mL/minGeometric Coefficient of Variation 19.1
V350+Car5Total Plasma Clearance After Intravascular Administration (CL)546 mL/minGeometric Coefficient of Variation 16.7
Secondary

Worst CTCAE Grade on Treatment for Neutrophils

Worst Common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) grade on treatment for neutrophils (CTC version 3). The CTCAE scale measures the severity of adverse events which goes from 1 (mild AE) to 5 (death related AE).

Time frame: From first intake of trial drug to last intake of trial drug plus 21 days, up to 441 days

Population: Treated set

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
V100+Cis60Worst CTCAE Grade on Treatment for Neutrophils2 Units on a scale
V100+Cis75Worst CTCAE Grade on Treatment for Neutrophils3 Units on a scale
V200+Cis75Worst CTCAE Grade on Treatment for Neutrophils0 Units on a scale
V300+Cis75Worst CTCAE Grade on Treatment for Neutrophils4 Units on a scale
V300+Cis100Worst CTCAE Grade on Treatment for Neutrophils4 Units on a scale
V350+Cis75Worst CTCAE Grade on Treatment for Neutrophils4 Units on a scale
V100+Car4Worst CTCAE Grade on Treatment for Neutrophils3 Units on a scale
V100+Car5Worst CTCAE Grade on Treatment for Neutrophils3 Units on a scale
V200+Car5Worst CTCAE Grade on Treatment for Neutrophils2 Units on a scale
V300+Car5Worst CTCAE Grade on Treatment for Neutrophils4 Units on a scale
V300+Car6Worst CTCAE Grade on Treatment for Neutrophils4 Units on a scale
V350+Car5Worst CTCAE Grade on Treatment for Neutrophils4 Units on a scale
Secondary

Worst CTCAE Grade on Treatment for Platelets

Worst Common terminology criteria for adverse events (CTCAE) grade on treatment for platelets (CTC version 3). The CTCAE scale measures the severity of adverse events which goes from 1 (mild AE) to 5 (death related AE).

Time frame: From first intake of trial drug to last intake of trial drug plus 21 days, up to 441 days

Population: Treated set

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)Dispersion
V100+Cis60Worst CTCAE Grade on Treatment for Platelets1 Units on a scale 48
V100+Cis75Worst CTCAE Grade on Treatment for Platelets1 Units on a scale 78
V200+Cis75Worst CTCAE Grade on Treatment for Platelets1 Units on a scale 94
V300+Cis75Worst CTCAE Grade on Treatment for Platelets2 Units on a scale 58
V300+Cis100Worst CTCAE Grade on Treatment for Platelets3 Units on a scale 58
V350+Cis75Worst CTCAE Grade on Treatment for Platelets3 Units on a scale 95
V100+Car4Worst CTCAE Grade on Treatment for Platelets1 Units on a scale 96
V100+Car5Worst CTCAE Grade on Treatment for Platelets3 Units on a scale 38
V200+Car5Worst CTCAE Grade on Treatment for Platelets1 Units on a scale 65
V300+Car5Worst CTCAE Grade on Treatment for Platelets4 Units on a scale 20
V300+Car6Worst CTCAE Grade on Treatment for Platelets4 Units on a scale 58
V350+Car5Worst CTCAE Grade on Treatment for Platelets4 Units on a scale 53

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 17, 2026