Spinal Cord Compression, Unspecified Adult Solid Tumor, Protocol Specific
Conditions
Keywords
spinal cord compression, unspecified adult solid tumor, protocol specific
Brief summary
RATIONALE: Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays to kill tumor cells. It is not yet known which radiation therapy schedule is more effective in treating patients with malignant spinal cord compression. PURPOSE: This randomized phase III trial is studying two different radiation therapy schedules to compare their side effects and how well they work in treating patients with malignant spinal cord compression.
Detailed description
OBJECTIVES: Primary * To compare the response in patients with malignant spinal cord compression treated with single fraction (10 Gy) radiotherapy vs standard multiple fraction (20 Gy) radiotherapy. * To compare the toxicity of these treatment regimens in these patients. Secondary * Examine the safety, practicability, and efficacy of treatment with a single 10 Gy fraction of radiotherapy in these patients. * Analyze the initial neurological status, document the response to treatment, and calculate median survival of these patients. * Perform an economic impact analysis comparing the two treatment arms. OUTLINE: This is a multicenter study. Patients are stratified according to participating center. Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms. * Arm I (control): Patients undergo radiotherapy to the area of spinal cord compression once daily for 5 days (total of 20 Gy). * Arm II: Patients undergo a single fraction of radiotherapy to the area of spinal cord compression (total of 10 Gy). Patients complete the EORTC QLQ-C30 quality-of-life questionnaire at baseline, at 5 weeks, and then every 3 months thereafter. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up at 1 and 5 weeks, at 3 months, and then every 3 months thereafter.
Interventions
Given in multiple fractions or as a single fraction
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS: * Histologically confirmed malignancy, excluding the following: * Leukemia * Myeloma * Germ cell tumor * Primary tumor of the spine or vertebral column * Diagnosis of malignant spinal cord compression confirmed by MRI of the entire spine * Deemed inoperable or unsuitable for neurosurgical intervention at the time of initial assessment * No single bone metastasis with controlled primary site PATIENT CHARACTERISTICS: * Karnofsky performance status 30-100% * No medical or psychiatric condition that, in the opinion of the investigator or research team, would contraindicate study participation PRIOR CONCURRENT THERAPY: * No prior radiotherapy to the involved area of the spinal cord such that further treatment exceeds spinal cord tolerance
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Mobility status: measured by the change in mobility status between baseline and 5 weeks, as measured by the in-house mobility scale | 5 weeks from date of randomisation |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Quality of life as assessed by the EORTC QLQ-C30 version 3 quality-of-life questionnaire | 5 weeks from date of randomisation |
| Toxicity: assessed at first follow-up, evaluated as per standard RTOG acute and long-term toxicity scale | 1 week after completion of therapy |
| Pain control: assessed using a Visual Analogue Scale | Until death |
| Overall survival: the survival duration will be calculated from time of randomisation to death whatever cause | Until death |
| Sphincter function: assessed using an 'In-House' Bladder Function Scale | Until death |
Countries
Ireland