Skip to content

Stability and 3D Motion Study of an Experimental Prosthetic Foot

Stability & 3D Motion Study of an Experimental Prosthetic Foot

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00968292
Enrollment
50
Registered
2009-08-28
Start date
2010-05-31
Completion date
2010-08-31
Last updated
2009-08-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Amputation

Keywords

K3 Promoter prosthetic foot Tensegrity Prosthetics Jerome Rifkin

Brief summary

The investigators are currently verifying early data showing that the K3 Promoter prosthetic foot affects walking efficiency or stability in transtibial, unilateral amputees when compared to their current prostheses. Phase II funds are being used to address these metrics. These studies are important basic research, however, while Tensegrity has the unique opportunity to study amputee gait and movement in the CGMA's state-of-the-art facility the investigators will expand these studies with BRDG-SPAN funding by studying the following metrics: 1. Four Square Step Test (FSST) 2. Amputee Mobility Predictor (AMP) 3. Timed Up and Go Test (TUG) 4. Quality of life (QOL) index (SF-36) 5. Activity-specific Balance Confidence Questionnaire (ABC) 6. 3D motion analysis

Detailed description

The tests will be unblinded randomized studies of the subject's current prosthetic foot and the K3 Promoter on traumatic/congenital amputees and dysvascular/diabetic amputees. Assessments will be made after a 30-day accommodation period with each foot prosthesis. In order to randomize the treatment and factor out habituation to the testing site and the protocol, two cohorts will be used. Half of the volunteers will be randomly assigned to be fitted with the K3 Promoter by their regular prosthetist or will continue wearing their current foot prothesis. Both cohorts will have a 30-day accommodation period. Subjects in either cohort will then visit the CGMA to be tested. Volunteers will then use the other prosthesis for 30 days. After that second 30-day period, height and weight will again be recorded, and the tests will be repeated. Because of anticipated difficulty with scheduling, volunteers will be given a +3 day grace period on the 30 day-accommodation time.

Interventions

DEVICEExperimental prosthetics foot (K3 Promoter)

The tests will be unblinded randomized studies of the subject's current prosthetic foot and the K3 Promoter on traumatic/congenital amputees and dysvascular/diabetic amputees. Assessments will be made after a 30-day accommodation period with each foot prosthesis. In order to randomize the treatment and factor out habituation to the testing site and the protocol, two cohorts will be used. Half of the volunteers will be randomly assigned to be fitted with the K3 Promoter by their regular prosthetist or will continue wearing their current foot prothesis. Both cohorts will have a 30-day accommodation period. Subjects in either cohort will then visit the CGMA to be tested. Volunteers will then use the other prosthesis for 30 days. After that second 30-day period, height and weight will again be recorded, and the tests will be repeated. Because of anticipated difficulty with scheduling, volunteers will be given a +3 day grace period on the 30 day-accommodation time.

Sponsors

Tensegrity Prosthetics
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
CROSSOVER
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

1. K2 or K3 classification based on current prosthetic device. 2. Males and females ≥ 18 years of age 3. Willing and able to sign informed consent 4. Able to read, write, and speak English 5. Documented to have a unilateral trans-tibial amputation 6. Actively utilizing a definitive prosthesis for at least 12 months 7. Utilizing current prosthetic foot for at least 3 months 8. Cognitively functional, in the opinion of their prosthetist 9. Able to walk on their existing limb 10. Have a healthy residual limb in good condition 11. Have a socket with a good, trouble-free fit on their residual limb

Exclusion criteria

1. Significant ulcers or infections associated with a compromised circulation of the other lower limb 2. Intermittent Claudication or Critical Leg Ischemia in the non-amputated leg 3. K0, K1or K4 Classification 4. Irreducible, pronounced knee or hip flexion contractures 5. Bilateral amputations 6. Use of a walker for ambulation 7. Severe arthritis that would limit the ability to stand without pain or discomfort or the subject's ability to ambulate is limited by symptoms other than the prothesis (e.g., shortness of breath, fatigue, angina, arthritis, etc.). If, in the opinion of the investigator, the subject were to improve their ability to ambulate from the K3 Promoter to the extent that his or her walking would then be limited by a symptom other than the prothesis, the subject will not be enrolled 8. Any other clinically significant medical or psychiatric condition that in the opinion of the Investigator could impact the subject's ability to successfully complete this trial 9. Advanced neurologic disorder 10. Severe congestive heart failure, angina pectoris, or obstructive pulmonary disease 11. Use of medication that causes impaired balance or judgment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Quality of Life Index2 collections 30 days apart
Activity-specific Balance Confidence Questionnaire2 collections 30 days apart
3D Motion Analysis2 collections 30 days apart
Four Square Step Test2 collections 30 days apart
Amputee Mobility Predictor2 collections 30 days apart
Timed Up and Go Test2 collections 30 days apart

Countries

United States

Contacts

Primary ContactJerome Rifkin, MS
jrifkin@tenspro.com303 666 7722

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026