Skip to content

Safety and Effectiveness Study of Combo Bio-engineered Sirolimus Eluting Stent

The REMEDEE Study: A Prospective, Randomized Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of an Abluminal Sirolimus Coated Bio-engineered Stent (Combo Bio-engineered Sirolimus Eluting Stent)

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00967902
Acronym
REMEDEE
Enrollment
180
Registered
2009-08-28
Start date
2009-11-30
Completion date
2015-09-30
Last updated
2016-03-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Coronary Artery Lesions

Keywords

intracoronary stent, drug eluting stent, sirolimus, endothelial progenitor cells

Brief summary

To demonstrate the safety and effectiveness of the Combo Bio-engineered Sirolimus Eluting Stent (Combo Stent) compared to the Taxus® Liberté® Stent in the treatment of coronary artery lesions.

Interventions

Balloon dilatation of obstructive coronary artery disease with deployment of a metallic stent to scaffold the dilated lesion; stent incorporating sustained release of anti-proliferative agent to control neointimal proliferation and reocclusion; test device incorporates affinity surface for circulating EPCs

Sponsors

OrbusNeich
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

General Inclusion Criteria * The patient must be ≥18 and ≤ 80 years of age; * Symptomatic ischemic heart disease (CCS class 1-4, Braunwald Class IB, IC, IIB, IIC, IIIB, IIIC, and/or objective evidence of myocardial ischemia); * Acceptable candidate for CABG; * The Patient is willing to comply with specified follow-up evaluations; * The Patient or legally authorized representative has been informed of the nature of the study, agrees to its provisions and has been provided written informed consent, approved by the appropriate Medical Ethics Committee (MEC), Institutional Review Board (IRB), or Human Research Ethics Committee (HREC). Angiographic Inclusion Criteria: * Single de novo or non-stented restenotic lesion in the target vessel; * Patients with two-vessel coronary disease, may have undergone successful treatment (\<20% diameter stenosis by visual estimate) of the non-target vessel with approved devices up to and including the index procedure but must be prior to the index target vessel treatment. Any non-target vessel or lesion intended to be treated during the index procedure, cannot be an unprotected left main, ostial lesion, chronic total occlusion (CTO), heavily calcified, bifurcation, vein grafts, have angiographic evidence of thrombus, be anything requiring atherectomy, thrombectomy, or pre-treatment with anything other than balloon angioplasty; * Target lesion located in a native coronary artery; * Target lesion (maximum length is 20 mm by visual estimate) covered by a single stent maximum 23 mm length for Combo Stent, and 24 mm in length for TAXUS® Liberté® (stent coverage including at least 3 mm of healthy vessel is recommended). The lesion length should be measured after pre-dilation procedure; * Reference vessel diameter must be ≥2.5 to ≤ 3.5 mm by visual estimate. The vessel diameter should be measured after pre-dilation procedure and after intra-coronary nitroglycerin if spasm is suspected; * Target lesion ≥50% and \<100% stenosed by visual estimate.

Exclusion criteria

General

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
In-stent late lumen loss of the Combo Stent compared to the TAXUS® Liberté® DES9 months post-procedure.

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
In-stent and in-segment angiographic binary restenosis9 months
In-stent and in-segment minimum lumen diameter (MLD)9 months
In-stent, proximal and distal late lumen loss9 months
Procedure success defined as lesion success without the occurrence of in-hospital MACEUp to hospital discharge
Clinically (ischemia)-driven target lesion revascularization30 days, 9 months, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years
All-cause and cardiac mortality30 days, 9 months, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 year
Myocardial infarction: Q-wave and non Q-wave, cumulative and individual30 days, 9 months, 1, 2, 3, 4, and 5 years
Clinically (ischemia)-driven target vessel revascularization30 days, 9 months, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years
Vascular complications from index procedureUp to hospital discharge
Rate of stent thrombosis, per ARC definition of definite and probable stent thrombosis further categorized as early, late or very late30 days, 9 months, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years post-procedure
Change in human anti-murine antibody (HAMA) plasma levels30 day and 9 month follow-up compared to baseline
Device success, defined as attainment of <50% residual stenosis of the target lesion using the Combo StentIndex procedure
Lesion success defined as attainment of < 50% residual stenosis using any percutaneous methodIndex procedure
Neointimal hyperplasia volume and % in-stent volume obstruction as measured by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) for patients receiving angiographic/IVUS follow-up9 months
Target lesion failure (TLF) (defined as death, MI and ischemic target lesion revascularization (TLR))30 days, 9 months, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years
Major Adverse Cardiac Event (MACE) defined as a composite of death, MI (Q-wave or non Q-wave), emergent CABG, or target lesion revascularization by repeat PTCA or CABGHospital discharge, 30 days, 9 months, 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 years post-procedure

Countries

Australia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026