Skip to content

Selective Versus Routine Shunting in Carotid Endarterectomy Patients

Selective Shunting in Appropriately Selected Patients Undergoing Carotid Endarterectomy Based on Stump Pressure

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00967486
Enrollment
200
Registered
2009-08-28
Start date
2006-12-01
Completion date
2009-06-01
Last updated
2026-09-16

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Stenoses, Carotid Artery

Brief summary

The project involves prospectively randomizing patients to either routine carotid shunting or selective carotid shunting during Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) under general anesthesia (GA) to see the difference in post-op complications and occurence rates. Patients will be randomized to Routine shunt vs selective groups.

Detailed description

The significance extends to all surgeons who perform Carotid endarterectomy because of their desire to improve patient care by decreasing the overall perioperative complication rate of the procedure by selectively not shunting those patients who ideally do not require it and thus eliminating the attendant morbidity associated with it. The hypothesis is that there will be no difference in patient outcomes (death, minor strokes, major strokes, transient ischemic attack (TIA)) for patients undergoing a Carotid endarterectomy with a SP of \> 50 mm Hg using selective shunting.Patients will be randomized to Routine shunt vs selective groups. In Selective shunt, there will be subgroup analysis to measure % stenosis if the systolic pressure is \< 40mmHg calling it as Shunt group. All patients in the study, irrespective of treatment group will be followed post-operatively from 24 hours to 30 days. The patient will be monitored and the following outcomes documented - death, minor stroke, major stroke, trans-ischemic attack (TIA).

Interventions

PROCEDURECarotid endarterectomy with routine shount
PROCEDURECarotid endarterectomy with selective shunt

Sponsors

CAMC Health System
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with a SP \>= 50 mmHg will be randomized to receive a shunt or not receive a shunt.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients that will be excluded are those who present for a redo CEA, have had a coronary artery bypass graft (CABG), permanent stroke, and or a contralateral artery total occlusion of \> 30%. * Finally, consented patients with a stump pressure of \<= 50 mm Hg will be excluded from the study and receive standard of care.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Overall Perioperative Complications Between Selective vs. Routine Shunting.Within 30 days of enrollmentperioperative complication included at least one of transient ischemic attack (TIA), hemorrhage, myocardial infarction \[MI\], or asymptomatic carotid thrombosis or congestive heart failure.

Countries

United States

Contacts

PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATORAli F AbuRhama, M.D.

CAMC Medical Staff - with admitting privileges

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Routine Shunt
routine methods of CEA
98
Selective Shunt
Selective method if CEA with based Systolic pressure 40 mmHg
102
Total200

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTotalRoutine ShuntSelective Shunt
Age, Continuous68.02 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.46
68.78 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.08
67.29 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.81
Age, Customized
>=65 years
118 participants60 participants58 participants
Age, Customized
Between 18 and 65 years
82 participants38 participants44 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
200 participants98 participants102 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
103 Participants50 Participants53 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
97 Participants48 Participants49 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 981 / 102
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 980 / 102
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 981 / 102

Outcome results

Primary

Overall Perioperative Complications Between Selective vs. Routine Shunting.

perioperative complication included at least one of transient ischemic attack (TIA), hemorrhage, myocardial infarction \[MI\], or asymptomatic carotid thrombosis or congestive heart failure.

Time frame: Within 30 days of enrollment

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Routine ShuntOverall Perioperative Complications Between Selective vs. Routine Shunting.7 Participants
Selective ShuntOverall Perioperative Complications Between Selective vs. Routine Shunting.8 Participants
p-value: <0.05Fisher Exact

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Sep 17, 2026