Skip to content

Lenalidomide, Thalidomide and Dexamethasone in Treating Participants With Relapsed or Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Phase I/II Study of Lenalidomide (Revlimid), Thalidomide, and Dexamethasone in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 1Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00966693
Enrollment
77
Registered
2009-08-27
Start date
2009-08-25
Completion date
2018-07-20
Last updated
2020-11-04

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Recurrent Plasma Cell Myeloma, Refractory Plasma Cell Myeloma

Brief summary

This phase I/II trial studies the best dose and side effects of lenalidomide and thalidomide, and how well they work with dexamethasone in treating participants with multiple myeloma that has come back or does not respond to treatment. Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as lenalidomide, thalidomide and dexamethasone, work in different ways to stop the growth of tumor cells, either by killing the cells, by stopping them from dividing, or by stopping them from spreading.

Detailed description

PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of the combination of lenalidomide and thalidomide and dexamethasone (LTD) in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). (Phase 1) II. To determine the overall (complete remission \[CR)\]+ very good partial response \[VGPR\]+ partial response \[PR)\] response rate of the combination after 4 cycles of therapy. (Phase 2) SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To determine the overall response rate (ORR). (Phase 1) II. To determine the time to progression (TTP). (Phase 1) III. To determine the progression free survival (PFS). (Phase 1) IV. To determine the time to best response. (Phase 1) V. To determine the CR, VGPR. (Phase 2) VI. To determine the time to progression (TTP). (Phase 2) VII. To determine the progression free survival (PFS). (Phase 2) VIII. To determine the time to best response. (Phase 2) IX. To assess the safety of the combination of LTD in patients with RRMM. (Phase 2) X. Time to next therapy. (Phase 2) XI. Symptom measurement - multiple-symptom assessment tool. (Phase 2) OUTLINE: This is a dose-escalation study of lenalidomide and thalidomide. Participants receive lenalidomide orally (PO) on days 1-21 and thalidomide PO once daily (QD) on days 1-28. Participants also receive dexamethasone PO QD on days 1-4, 9-12, and 17-20 of courses 1-2, and days 1, 8, 15, and 22 of subsequent courses. Treatment repeats every 28 days for up to 8 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. MAINTENANCE THERAPY: Participants who have stable or responding disease to treatment receive lenalidomide PO on days 1-21 and thalidomide PO QD on days 1-28. Courses repeat every 28 days in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Participants may receive dexamethasone at the discretion of the investigator. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up at 30 days.

Interventions

DRUGDexamethasone

Given PO

DRUGLenalidomide

Given PO

DRUGThalidomide

Given PO

Sponsors

National Cancer Institute (NCI)
CollaboratorNIH
M.D. Anderson Cancer Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SEQUENTIAL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Understand and voluntarily sign an informed consent form * Relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (MM) with measurable levels of myeloma paraprotein in serum (\>= 0.5 g/dl), urine (\>= 0.2 g excreted in a 24-hour collection sample), or abnormal free light chain (FLC) ratio * Serum creatinine =\< 2.5 mg/dl * Females of childbearing potential (FCBP)\* must have a negative serum or urine pregnancy test with a sensitivity of at least 50 mlU/mL within 10-14 days prior to and again within 24 hours of starting lenalidomide and must either commit to continued abstinence from heterosexual intercourse or begin TWO acceptable methods of birth control, one highly effective method and one additional effective method AT THE SAME TIME, at least 28 days before she starts taking lenalidomide. FCBP must also agree to ongoing pregnancy testing. Men must agree to use a latex condom during sexual contact with a female of childbearing potential even if they have had a successful vasectomy. All patients must be counseled at a minimum of every 28 days about pregnancy precautions and risks of fetal exposure. * A female of childbearing potential is a sexually mature woman who: 1) has not undergone a hysterectomy or bilateral oophorectomy; or 2) has not been naturally postmenopausal for at least 24 consecutive months (i.e., has had menses at any time in the preceding 24 consecutive months). * Absolute neutrophil count \> 1000 cells/mm\^3 * Platelet count \> 50,000 cells/mm\^3 for patients with \< 50% of bone marrow plasma cells and platelet count \> 25,000 cells/mm\^3 for patients in whom \> 50% of the bone marrow nucleated cells were plasma cells * Total bilirubin =\< 2.0 mg/dL * Aspartate aminotransferase (AST) (serum glutamic-oxaloacetic transaminase \[SGOT\]) and alanine aminotransferase (ALT) (serum glutamate pyruvate transaminase \[SGPT\]) \< 3 x upper limit of normal (ULN) * Able to take prophylactic anticoagulation, warfarin or equivalent agent * Patient is able to understand and comply with the terms and conditions of the lenalidomide and thalidomide counseling program * All study participants must be registered into the mandatory RevAssist program, and be willing and able to comply with the requirements of RevAssist, AND the S.T.E.P.S. program

Exclusion criteria

* Any serious medical condition, or psychiatric illness that would prevent the subject from signing the informed consent form * Pregnant or breast feeding females. (Lactating females must agree not to breast feed while taking lenalidomide) * Use of any cancer therapy within 21 days prior to beginning cycle 1 day 1 of therapy (radiation therapy allowed within 5 days of completion of radiation therapy). * Known hypersensitivity to thalidomide, lenalidomide and dexamethasone. * The development of erythema nodosum if characterized by a desquamating rash while taking thalidomide or similar drugs.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Number of Participants With Dose Limitations Toxicities of the Combination of Lenalidomide and Thalidomide and Dexamethasone (LTD) in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM)After one 28-day cycleTo determine the dose limitations toxicities of the combination of lenalidomide and thalidomide and dexamethasone (LTD) in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM).
Complete Response(CR) and Very Good Partial Response(VGPR)Evaluated each 28-day cycle and nadir of criteria is considered best overall response (median time to best response for this study was 2 cycles (range for best overall response was 1-21 cycles).To determine the best overall response (CR+VGPR+PR) of the lenalidomide, thalidomide, dexamethasone combination based on IMWG criteria at nadir.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Time to Best ResponseUp to 9 yearsEstimated using the method of Kaplan and Meier. Comparison of time-to-event endpoints by important subgroups was made using the log-rank test. Cox proportional hazard regression will be employed for multivariate analysis on time-to-event outcomes.
Time to ProgressionUp to 9 yearsTime to Progression was estimated using Kaplan Meier analysis.
Time to Next TherapyUp to 4.5 yearsEstimated using the method of Kaplan and Meier.
Incidence of Adverse EventsUp to 9 yearsLinear regression was utilized to assess the effect of patient prognostic factors on the toxicity rate.
Progression Free SurvivalUp to 9 yearsEstimated using the method of Kaplan and Meier. Comparison of time-to-event endpoints by important subgroups was made using the log-rank test. Cox proportional hazard regression will be employed for multivariate analysis on time-to-event outcomes.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
RTD (Cohort 1, Phase 1)
Oral Revlimid 15mg, Thalidomide 100mg, Dexamethasone 40mg\*21 days+ 7 days rest and reevaluation=28 day cycle
3
RTD (Cohort 2, Phase 1)
Oral Revlimid 25mg, Thalidomide 100mg, Dexamethasone \*21 days+ 7 days rest and reevaluation=28 day cycle
3
RTD (Cohort 3, Phase 1)
Oral Revlimid 25mg, Thalidomide 200mg, Dexamethasone 40mg\*21 days+ 7 days rest and reevaluation=28 day cycle
9
RTD (Cohort 2, Phase 2)
Oral Revlimid 25mg, Thalidomide 100mg, Dexamethasone \*21 days+ 7 days rest and reevaluation=28 day cycle
49
Total64

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall StudyAdverse Event0012
Overall StudyDeath0010
Overall StudyDisease Progression00116
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject1005

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicRTD (Cohort 1, Phase 1)RTD (Cohort 3, Phase 1)RTD (Cohort 2, Phase 2)RTD (Cohort 2, Phase 1)Total
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
3 Participants8 Participants23 Participants1 Participants35 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
0 Participants1 Participants26 Participants2 Participants29 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants3 Participants0 Participants3 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
3 Participants9 Participants46 Participants3 Participants61 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
2 Participants4 Participants10 Participants2 Participants18 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
1 Participants5 Participants38 Participants1 Participants45 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
3 participants9 participants49 participants3 participants64 participants
Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma
> = 1 line of previous therapy
3 Participants9 Participants49 Participants3 Participants64 Participants
Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma
Abnormal Free Light Chain Ratio
2 Participants9 Participants46 Participants3 Participants60 Participants
Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma
Age >= 18 years old
3 Participants9 Participants49 Participants3 Participants64 Participants
Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma
Anti-coagulant tolerance (PTT) normal
2 Participants4 Participants37 Participants3 Participants46 Participants
Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma
AST or ALT < 3x Upper Limit
3 Participants9 Participants49 Participants3 Participants64 Participants
Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma
Cognitively Aware & Physically Able
2 Participants7 Participants45 Participants2 Participants56 Participants
Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma
Creatine < 2.5 mg/dL
3 Participants9 Participants49 Participants3 Participants64 Participants
Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma
Days off prev treatment >= 25
3 Participants9 Participants44 Participants3 Participants59 Participants
Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma
Females non-procreative sex
1 Participants9 Participants19 Participants3 Participants32 Participants
Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma
Measurable levels of myeloma >=.2 Urine-Protein
0 Participants7 Participants42 Participants1 Participants50 Participants
Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma
Measurable levels of myeloma >=.5M serum-Protein
2 Participants7 Participants44 Participants2 Participants55 Participants
Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma
Men non-procreative sex
2 Participants9 Participants30 Participants3 Participants44 Participants
Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma
No Cancer Therapy in 21 days
3 Participants9 Participants49 Participants3 Participants64 Participants
Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma
No Desquamating Rash regarding Thalidomide
3 Participants9 Participants49 Participants3 Participants64 Participants
Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma
No Known Study Drug Allergies
3 Participants9 Participants49 Participants3 Participants64 Participants
Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma
No Pregnant/Breast Feeding Females
1 Participants9 Participants19 Participants3 Participants32 Participants
Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma
Platelets > 50,000
3 Participants9 Participants47 Participants3 Participants62 Participants
Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma
Total Bilirubin < 2.0
3 Participants9 Participants49 Participants3 Participants64 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
1 Participants3 Participants19 Participants0 Participants23 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
2 Participants6 Participants30 Participants3 Participants41 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
0 / 30 / 31 / 90 / 49
other
Total, other adverse events
3 / 33 / 39 / 949 / 49
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 30 / 31 / 97 / 49

Outcome results

Primary

Complete Response(CR) and Very Good Partial Response(VGPR)

To determine the best overall response (CR+VGPR+PR) of the lenalidomide, thalidomide, dexamethasone combination based on IMWG criteria at nadir.

Time frame: Evaluated each 28-day cycle and nadir of criteria is considered best overall response (median time to best response for this study was 2 cycles (range for best overall response was 1-21 cycles).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
RTD (Cohort 1, Phase 1)Complete Response(CR) and Very Good Partial Response(VGPR)Partial Remission2 Participants
RTD (Cohort 1, Phase 1)Complete Response(CR) and Very Good Partial Response(VGPR)Non Evaluable1 Participants
RTD (Cohort 1, Phase 1)Complete Response(CR) and Very Good Partial Response(VGPR)Stringent Complete Remission0 Participants
RTD (Cohort 1, Phase 1)Complete Response(CR) and Very Good Partial Response(VGPR)Progressive Disease0 Participants
RTD (Cohort 1, Phase 1)Complete Response(CR) and Very Good Partial Response(VGPR)Stable Disease0 Participants
RTD (Cohort 1, Phase 1)Complete Response(CR) and Very Good Partial Response(VGPR)Very Good Partial Remission0 Participants
RTD (Cohort 1, Phase 1)Complete Response(CR) and Very Good Partial Response(VGPR)Minimal Residual Disease0 Participants
RTD (Cohort 2, Phase 1)Complete Response(CR) and Very Good Partial Response(VGPR)Non Evaluable0 Participants
RTD (Cohort 2, Phase 1)Complete Response(CR) and Very Good Partial Response(VGPR)Minimal Residual Disease0 Participants
RTD (Cohort 2, Phase 1)Complete Response(CR) and Very Good Partial Response(VGPR)Very Good Partial Remission3 Participants
RTD (Cohort 2, Phase 1)Complete Response(CR) and Very Good Partial Response(VGPR)Stringent Complete Remission0 Participants
RTD (Cohort 2, Phase 1)Complete Response(CR) and Very Good Partial Response(VGPR)Stable Disease0 Participants
RTD (Cohort 2, Phase 1)Complete Response(CR) and Very Good Partial Response(VGPR)Progressive Disease2 Participants
RTD (Cohort 2, Phase 1)Complete Response(CR) and Very Good Partial Response(VGPR)Partial Remission0 Participants
RTD (Cohort 3, Phase 1)Complete Response(CR) and Very Good Partial Response(VGPR)Minimal Residual Disease1 Participants
RTD (Cohort 3, Phase 1)Complete Response(CR) and Very Good Partial Response(VGPR)Partial Remission2 Participants
RTD (Cohort 3, Phase 1)Complete Response(CR) and Very Good Partial Response(VGPR)Progressive Disease2 Participants
RTD (Cohort 3, Phase 1)Complete Response(CR) and Very Good Partial Response(VGPR)Very Good Partial Remission1 Participants
RTD (Cohort 3, Phase 1)Complete Response(CR) and Very Good Partial Response(VGPR)Stringent Complete Remission0 Participants
RTD (Cohort 3, Phase 1)Complete Response(CR) and Very Good Partial Response(VGPR)Non Evaluable3 Participants
RTD (Cohort 3, Phase 1)Complete Response(CR) and Very Good Partial Response(VGPR)Stable Disease0 Participants
RTD (Cohort 2, Phase 2)Complete Response(CR) and Very Good Partial Response(VGPR)Very Good Partial Remission8 Participants
RTD (Cohort 2, Phase 2)Complete Response(CR) and Very Good Partial Response(VGPR)Stable Disease7 Participants
RTD (Cohort 2, Phase 2)Complete Response(CR) and Very Good Partial Response(VGPR)Non Evaluable7 Participants
RTD (Cohort 2, Phase 2)Complete Response(CR) and Very Good Partial Response(VGPR)Progressive Disease6 Participants
RTD (Cohort 2, Phase 2)Complete Response(CR) and Very Good Partial Response(VGPR)Partial Remission13 Participants
RTD (Cohort 2, Phase 2)Complete Response(CR) and Very Good Partial Response(VGPR)Stringent Complete Remission3 Participants
RTD (Cohort 2, Phase 2)Complete Response(CR) and Very Good Partial Response(VGPR)Minimal Residual Disease9 Participants
Primary

Number of Participants With Dose Limitations Toxicities of the Combination of Lenalidomide and Thalidomide and Dexamethasone (LTD) in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM)

To determine the dose limitations toxicities of the combination of lenalidomide and thalidomide and dexamethasone (LTD) in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM).

Time frame: After one 28-day cycle

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
RTD (Cohort 1, Phase 1)Number of Participants With Dose Limitations Toxicities of the Combination of Lenalidomide and Thalidomide and Dexamethasone (LTD) in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM)1 Participants
RTD (Cohort 2, Phase 1)Number of Participants With Dose Limitations Toxicities of the Combination of Lenalidomide and Thalidomide and Dexamethasone (LTD) in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM)0 Participants
RTD (Cohort 3, Phase 1)Number of Participants With Dose Limitations Toxicities of the Combination of Lenalidomide and Thalidomide and Dexamethasone (LTD) in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM)3 Participants
RTD (Cohort 2, Phase 2)Number of Participants With Dose Limitations Toxicities of the Combination of Lenalidomide and Thalidomide and Dexamethasone (LTD) in Patients With Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM)0 Participants
Secondary

Incidence of Adverse Events

Linear regression was utilized to assess the effect of patient prognostic factors on the toxicity rate.

Time frame: Up to 9 years

Population: The Number in each of the arms was insufficient to conduct regression analyses, therefore regression analyses was conducted overall. Participants who were Thalidomide incompatible.

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
RTD (Cohort 1, Phase 1)Incidence of Adverse Events0 Participants
RTD (Cohort 2, Phase 1)Incidence of Adverse Events0 Participants
RTD (Cohort 3, Phase 1)Incidence of Adverse Events2 Participants
RTD (Cohort 2, Phase 2)Incidence of Adverse Events10 Participants
Secondary

Progression Free Survival

Estimated using the method of Kaplan and Meier. Comparison of time-to-event endpoints by important subgroups was made using the log-rank test. Cox proportional hazard regression will be employed for multivariate analysis on time-to-event outcomes.

Time frame: Up to 9 years

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RTD (Cohort 1, Phase 1)Progression Free Survival32.74 MonthsStandard Deviation 27
RTD (Cohort 2, Phase 1)Progression Free Survival9.04 MonthsStandard Deviation 7.49
RTD (Cohort 3, Phase 1)Progression Free Survival14.61 MonthsStandard Deviation 16.41
RTD (Cohort 2, Phase 2)Progression Free Survival10.02 MonthsStandard Deviation 17.61
Secondary

Time to Best Response

Estimated using the method of Kaplan and Meier. Comparison of time-to-event endpoints by important subgroups was made using the log-rank test. Cox proportional hazard regression will be employed for multivariate analysis on time-to-event outcomes.

Time frame: Up to 9 years

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RTD (Cohort 1, Phase 1)Time to Best Response19 monthsStandard Deviation 1.41
RTD (Cohort 2, Phase 1)Time to Best Response5 monthsStandard Deviation 6.08
RTD (Cohort 3, Phase 1)Time to Best Response5.16 monthsStandard Deviation 7.03
RTD (Cohort 2, Phase 2)Time to Best Response3.3 monthsStandard Deviation 4.2
Secondary

Time to Next Therapy

Estimated using the method of Kaplan and Meier.

Time frame: Up to 4.5 years

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
RTD (Cohort 1, Phase 1)Time to Next Therapy52.4 months
RTD (Cohort 2, Phase 1)Time to Next Therapy14.3 months
RTD (Cohort 3, Phase 1)Time to Next Therapy10.5 months
RTD (Cohort 2, Phase 2)Time to Next Therapy6.47 months
Secondary

Time to Progression

Time to Progression was estimated using Kaplan Meier analysis.

Time frame: Up to 9 years

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
RTD (Cohort 1, Phase 1)Time to Progression32.74 MonthsStandard Deviation 27
RTD (Cohort 2, Phase 1)Time to Progression9.04 MonthsStandard Deviation 7.49
RTD (Cohort 3, Phase 1)Time to Progression14.61 MonthsStandard Deviation 16.41
RTD (Cohort 2, Phase 2)Time to Progression10.02 MonthsStandard Deviation 17.61

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026