Low Versus High Dose Magnesium Sulfate in the Early Management of Rapid Atrial Fibrillation

Low Versus High Dose Magnesium Sulfate in the Early Management of Rapid Atrial Fibrillation : Randomised Controlled Double Blind Study (LOMAGHI Study)

Status

Completed

Phases

Phase 3

Study type

Interventional

Source

ClinicalTrials.gov

Registry ID

NCT00965874

Enrollment

450

Registered

2009-08-26

Start date

2009-11-30

Completion date

2014-08-31

Last updated

2018-04-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atrial Fibrillation

Keywords

Rapid Atrial Fibrillation, Magnesium Sulfate, Cardiac arrhythmia

Brief summary

Objective: To assess the efficacy and the safety of high (9g) and low dose (4.5g) of MgS in the immediate treatment of rapid AF.

Detailed description

Introduction: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a potentially life-threatening cardiac arrhythmia and a frequent chief complaint in emergency departments (ED). It is an important concern for a substantial proportion of people worldwide. According to the Rotterdam study, the prevalence of AF among individuals aged between 55 to 59 years is estimated at 1.1 for 1000 persons/year and 20.7 for individuals between 80 and 84 years. Given current adult advanced cardiac life support (ACLS), the immediate clinical objective in rapid AF is to achieve ventricular rate control. Digoxin, beta blockers and calcium channel antagonists are the most widely used agents for the emergent treatment of rapid AF. However, their effect is limited because only half of the patients will acutely respond to the first intention treatment. Several studies showed that the magnesium sulfate (MgS) is beneficial in the control of the rate and the rhythm of AF. In addition, hypomagnesemia is present among patients having AF in 20 to 53% of the cases . The association of hypomagnesemia and AF is common after a cardiac surgery and the prophylactic administration of MgS could be useful in post-operative AF . The last meta analysis published in 2007 showed that the MgS is as well efficient in rate control (OR = 1.96) as in rhythm control (OR = 1.60) of AF. However most studies included in this meta analysis were conducted on limited number of patients (303 patients included for rate control outcome analysis and 376 for rhythm control). Consequently we need further randomized controlled studies to establish definitively the efficacy and the safety of MgS in the early management of rapid AF. Objective: To assess the efficacy and the safety of high (9g) and low dose (4.5g) of MgS in the immediate treatment of rapid AF.

Interventions

DRUGMagnesium Sulfate high dose

9 g infusion once during 30 minutes

DRUGMagnesium Sulfate low dose

4.5 g magnesium sulfate infusion

DRUGPlacebos

serum salin

Study design

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Intervention model

PARALLEL

Primary purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

ALL

Age

18 Years to No maximum

Healthy volunteers

Inclusion criteria

* All patients presenting to ED with rapid AF (Heart rate \>120 bpm).

Exclusion criteria

* Unstable hemodynamic state. * Renal insufficiency (creatinemia\> 180 µmol/l). * Allergy to MgS.

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
HR <90 bpm or 20% reduction from baseline at 24 hours	24 hours

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
Arterial hypotension Bradycardia (HR <45 bpm) Other (chest pain, allergic reaction……)	24 hours

Countries

Tunisia

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026