Skip to content

Efficacy of Antidepressants in Chronic Back Pain

Efficacy of Antidepressants in Chronic Back Pain

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00964886
Enrollment
142
Registered
2009-08-25
Start date
2010-01-31
Completion date
2015-12-31
Last updated
2016-11-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Back Pain

Keywords

chronic pain, back pain, antidepressants

Brief summary

This 12 week placebo controlled clinical trial tests the individual and combined effects of an antidepressant medication and cognitive behavioral therapy for chronic back pain.

Detailed description

This is a 4 arm 12 week randomized clinical trial comparing the efficacy of 1) low concentration desipramine (\< 60 ng/ml); 2) cognitive behavioral therapy; 3) low concentration desipramine + cognitive behavioral therapy; and 4) placebo medication (benzotropine mesylate).

Interventions

BEHAVIORALcognitive behavioral therapy

cognitive behavioral therapy, a type of psychotherapy oriented towards restoring function and reducing impact of pain on everyday life

desipramine hydrochloride, with dose targeted to achieve a serum concentration of 5-60ng/ml

DRUGbenztropine mesylate 0.125 mg daily

benztropine mesylate is a placebo, some of whose side effects mimic those of experimental intervention, desipramine hydrochloride

Sponsors

University of California, San Diego
CollaboratorOTHER
VA Office of Research and Development
Lead SponsorFED

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Chronic back pain (daily pain for \> 6 months)

Exclusion criteria

* Major medical conditions which might contraindicate antidepressant treatment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Intent-toTreat Analysis of Descriptor Differential Scale (DDS) of Pain Intensity12 weeks after baseline (or last observation carried forward)The DDS is self-report measure of current pain intensity of chronic back pain. Participants rate pain on a 20 point scale as being greater or less intense relative to 12 adjectival descriptor words which serve as anchors (eg, greater or less than faint, moderate, strong). Scores range from 0 to 20 with higher scores indicating higher pain intensity. The analysis evaluated the 'as randomized' sample at 12 weeks after baseline or last observation carried forward, after co-varying for baseline (pre-treatment) values.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Roland and Morris Disability Questionnaire12 weeks after baseline (or last observation carried forward)This questionnaire measures disability in everyday function due to back pain. It is a 24-item checklist asking patients to endorse whether or not back pain limits activities they normally do (eg, I stay at home most of the time because of my back). Scores range from 0 to 24, with higher scores indicating greater disability in everyday function due to back pain. The analysis evaluated the 'as randomized' sample at 12 weeks after baseline, after co-varying for baseline (pre-treatment) values.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Arm 1
desipramine hydrochloride desipramine hydrochloride: desipramine hydrochloride, with dose targeted to achieve a serum concentration of 5-60ng/ml
37
Arm 2
cognitive behavioral therapy cognitive behavioral therapy: cognitive behavioral therapy, a type of psychotherapy oriented towards restoring function and reducing impact of pain on everyday life
33
Arm 3
desipramine hydrochloride and cognitive behavioral therapy desipramine hydrochloride: desipramine hydrochloride, with dose targeted to achieve a serum concentration of 5-60ng/ml cognitive behavioral therapy: cognitive behavioral therapy, a type of psychotherapy oriented towards restoring function and reducing impact of pain on everyday life
37
Arm 4
anticholinergic medication; active placebo benztropine mesylate 0.125 mg daily: benztropine mesylate is a placebo, some of whose side effects mimic those of experimental intervention, desipramine hydrochloride
32
Total139

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002FG003
Overall StudyAdverse Event3152
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up2264
Overall StudyProtocol Violation0200
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject6253

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicArm 3TotalArm 1Arm 2Arm 4
Age, Continuous51.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 13.7
55.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.7
56.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.7
57.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.2
57.9 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.9
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
5 Participants25 Participants6 Participants10 Participants4 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
28 Participants103 Participants29 Participants22 Participants24 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
4 Participants11 Participants2 Participants1 Participants4 Participants
Gender
Female
3 Participants15 Participants5 Participants4 Participants3 Participants
Gender
Male
34 Participants123 Participants32 Participants29 Participants28 Participants
Pain Intensity and Back Pain Disability
Back Pain Disability (Roland and Morris)
11.7 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.4
11.8 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.9
8.7 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.4
13.0 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.3
12.6 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 3.8
Pain Intensity and Back Pain Disability
Pain Intensity (Descriptor Differential Scale)
11.9 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.1
11.4 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4
9.9 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.9
11.9 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.3
12.1 units on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.6
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
1 Participants3 Participants0 Participants2 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
2 Participants5 Participants1 Participants1 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
4 Participants21 Participants6 Participants6 Participants5 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
7 Participants16 Participants4 Participants2 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
1 Participants2 Participants0 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants7 Participants1 Participants3 Participants2 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
21 Participants84 Participants25 Participants18 Participants20 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
37 participants139 participants37 participants33 participants32 participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
12 / 178 / 207 / 166 / 17
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 380 / 341 / 370 / 33

Outcome results

Primary

Intent-toTreat Analysis of Descriptor Differential Scale (DDS) of Pain Intensity

The DDS is self-report measure of current pain intensity of chronic back pain. Participants rate pain on a 20 point scale as being greater or less intense relative to 12 adjectival descriptor words which serve as anchors (eg, greater or less than faint, moderate, strong). Scores range from 0 to 20 with higher scores indicating higher pain intensity. The analysis evaluated the 'as randomized' sample at 12 weeks after baseline or last observation carried forward, after co-varying for baseline (pre-treatment) values.

Time frame: 12 weeks after baseline (or last observation carried forward)

Population: We conducted an intent-to-treat analysis of all randomized participants assigned to desipramine or to active drug placebo (benztropine) comparing mean DDS pain intensity at Week 12 (or the last observation carried forward) adjusted for mean baseline score.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Arm 1 + Arm 3Intent-toTreat Analysis of Descriptor Differential Scale (DDS) of Pain Intensity8.3 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.5
Arm 2 + Arm 4Intent-toTreat Analysis of Descriptor Differential Scale (DDS) of Pain Intensity8.1 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.6
Comparison: In an intent-to-treat analysis of all randomized participants assigned to experimental drug (desipramine) or active placebo (benztropine) an analysis of variance compared mean Descriptor Differential Scale scores at 12 weeks (or last observation carried forward) adjusted fro mean baseline score ( = ).p-value: 0.7ANCOVA
Primary

Intent-toTreat Analysis of Descriptor Differential Scale (DDS) of Pain Intensity

The DDS is self-report measure of current pain intensity of chronic back pain. Participants rate pain on a 20 point scale as being greater or less intense relative to 12 adjectival descriptor words which serve as anchors (eg, greater or less than faint, moderate, strong). Scores range from 0 to 20 with higher scores indicating higher pain intensity. The analysis evaluated the 'as randomized' sample at 12 weeks after baseline or last observation carried forward, after co-varying for baseline (pre-treatment) values.

Time frame: 12 weeks after baseline (or last observation carried forward)

Population: We conducted an intent-to-treat analysis of all randomized participants assigned to cognitive behavioral therapy to or no behavior therapy comparing mean DDS pain intensity at Week 12 (or the last observation carried forward) adjusted for mean baseline score.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Arm 1 + Arm 3Intent-toTreat Analysis of Descriptor Differential Scale (DDS) of Pain Intensity8.0 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.6
Arm 2 + Arm 4Intent-toTreat Analysis of Descriptor Differential Scale (DDS) of Pain Intensity8.4 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.6
p-value: 0.6ANCOVA
Secondary

Roland and Morris Disability Questionnaire

This questionnaire measures disability in everyday function due to back pain. It is a 24-item checklist asking patients to endorse whether or not back pain limits activities they normally do (eg, I stay at home most of the time because of my back). Scores range from 0 to 24, with higher scores indicating greater disability in everyday function due to back pain. The analysis evaluated the 'as randomized' sample at 12 weeks after baseline, after co-varying for baseline (pre-treatment) values.

Time frame: 12 weeks after baseline (or last observation carried forward)

Population: All participants assigned at baseline to receive desipramine hydrochloride or benztropine mesylate (drug effect). This is an 'as randomized' Intent-to-Treat analysis. Values are mean scores at Week 12 (or last observation carried forward). Means are adjusted for baseline Roland and Morris scores

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Arm 1 + Arm 3Roland and Morris Disability Questionnaire8.7 Units on a scale.Standard Error 0.5
Arm 2 + Arm 4Roland and Morris Disability Questionnaire8.9 Units on a scale.Standard Error 0.5
Comparison: In the intent-to-treat sample of all randomized participants assigned to experimental drug (desipramine) or active placebo (benztropine) an analysis of variance (ANOVA) compared mean Roland and Morris scores at 12 weeks adjusted for mean baseline scores.p-value: 0.84ANCOVA
Secondary

Roland and Morris Disability Questionnaire

This questionnaire measures disability in everyday function due to back pain. It is a 24-item checklist asking patients to endorse whether or not back pain limits activities they normally do (eg, I stay at home most of the time because of my back). Scores range from 0 to 24, with higher scores indicating greater disability in everyday function due to back pain. The analysis evaluated the 'as randomized' sample at 12 weeks after baseline, after co-varying for baseline (pre-treatment) values.

Time frame: 12 weeks after baseline (or last observation carried forward)

Population: All participants assigned at baseline to receive cognitive behavioral therapy or to no cognitive behavioral therapy (behavioral effect). This is an 'as randomized' Intent-to-Treat analysis. Values are mean scores at Week 12 (or last observation carried forward). Means are adjusted for baseline Roland and Morris scores

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Arm 1 + Arm 3Roland and Morris Disability Questionnaire8.7 Units on a scale.Standard Error 0.5
Arm 2 + Arm 4Roland and Morris Disability Questionnaire8.9 Units on a scale.Standard Error 0.5
Comparison: This analysis compares outcomes for participants assigned at baseline to receive cognitive behavioral therapy or not to receive cognitive behavioral therapy (behavioral effect)p-value: 0.8ANCOVA

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026