Skip to content

A Controlled Clinical Study to Determine the Gingivitis Benefit of Flossing

A Controlled Clinical Study to Determine the Gingivitis Benefit of Flossing

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00964860
Enrollment
60
Registered
2009-08-25
Start date
2009-08-31
Completion date
2009-08-31
Last updated
2012-10-31

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Gingivitis

Brief summary

This is a randomized, controlled, examiner-blind, parallel group, four week clinical study comparing brushing plus flossing to brushing alone in 60 healthy adults with pre-existing gingivitis.

Interventions

DEVICEGlide dental floss

Glide waxed dental floss

Sponsors

Procter and Gamble
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

In order to be included in the study, each subject must: * be at least 18 years of age; * be physically able to floss their teeth; * have a minimum of 18 natural teeth (teeth that are grossly carious, fully crowned, or extensively restored will not be included); * have refrained from performing oral hygiene the morning of the Baseline visit; * be in good general health; * have interproximal MGI (Modified Gingival Index) score of \>2.8.

Exclusion criteria

Subjects are excluded from study participation where there is evidence of: * severe periodontal disease; * discoloration or pigmentation in the gingival tissue; * meaningful misalignment of front teeth; * fixed facial orthodontic appliances; * use of antibiotics within two weeks of the Baseline Visit and at any time during the study; * any diseases or conditions that could be expected to interfere with the subject safely completing the study.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Interproximal Lobene Modified Gingival Index Between the Brushing Only Group and the Brushing + Flossing Group30 daysGingivitis was scored using the Lobene Modified Gingival Index (a visual examination for inflammation) on all scorable teeth. For each tooth, six gingival areas (distobuccal, buccal, mesiobuccal, mesiolingual, lingual, and distolingual) were scored on a 5-point, categorical scale (0 = absence of inflammation; 4 = severe inflammation) corresponding to Inflammation

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Whole Mouth Mean Lobene Modified Gingival Index Between the Brushing Only Group and the Brushing + Flossing Group30 daysWhole-mouth average MGI scores were calculated separately for each subject and visit by averaging the MGI scores of all gradable sites. Interpoximal average MGI scores were also calculated for each subject and visit by averaging over only interpoximal sites (buccal-mesial, buccal-distal, lingual-mesian, and lingual-distal). Within each treatment, changes from baseline were analyzed using paired t-test. Between treatments mean comparisons were conducted using analysis of covariance with baseline MGI score as a covariate. All statistical comparisons were two-sided with a 5% significance level. The average MGI score for a subject can range from 0 (no gingivitis) to 4 (inflammation on all gradable sites).

Countries

Guatemala

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Brushing Only
Brushing Only with an Oral B manual toothbrush and Crest Cavity Protection, sodium fluoride dentifrice
30
Brushing + Flossing
Brushing with an Oral B manual toothbrush and Crest Cavity Protection, sodium fluoride dentifrice, plus flossing with Glide floss
30
Total60

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject01

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicBrushing OnlyBrushing + FlossingTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
30 Participants30 Participants60 Participants
Age Continuous29.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 7.8
28.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.5
28.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.1
Region of Enrollment
Guatemala
30 participants30 participants60 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
16 Participants16 Participants32 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
14 Participants14 Participants28 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 300 / 30
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 300 / 30

Outcome results

Primary

Mean Interproximal Lobene Modified Gingival Index Between the Brushing Only Group and the Brushing + Flossing Group

Gingivitis was scored using the Lobene Modified Gingival Index (a visual examination for inflammation) on all scorable teeth. For each tooth, six gingival areas (distobuccal, buccal, mesiobuccal, mesiolingual, lingual, and distolingual) were scored on a 5-point, categorical scale (0 = absence of inflammation; 4 = severe inflammation) corresponding to Inflammation

Time frame: 30 days

Population: per protocol

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Brushing OnlyMean Interproximal Lobene Modified Gingival Index Between the Brushing Only Group and the Brushing + Flossing Group2.11 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.05
Brushing + FlossingMean Interproximal Lobene Modified Gingival Index Between the Brushing Only Group and the Brushing + Flossing Group1.87 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.05
p-value: 0.001ANCOVA
Secondary

Whole Mouth Mean Lobene Modified Gingival Index Between the Brushing Only Group and the Brushing + Flossing Group

Whole-mouth average MGI scores were calculated separately for each subject and visit by averaging the MGI scores of all gradable sites. Interpoximal average MGI scores were also calculated for each subject and visit by averaging over only interpoximal sites (buccal-mesial, buccal-distal, lingual-mesian, and lingual-distal). Within each treatment, changes from baseline were analyzed using paired t-test. Between treatments mean comparisons were conducted using analysis of covariance with baseline MGI score as a covariate. All statistical comparisons were two-sided with a 5% significance level. The average MGI score for a subject can range from 0 (no gingivitis) to 4 (inflammation on all gradable sites).

Time frame: 30 days

Population: per protocol

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
Brushing OnlyWhole Mouth Mean Lobene Modified Gingival Index Between the Brushing Only Group and the Brushing + Flossing Group2.06 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.05
Brushing + FlossingWhole Mouth Mean Lobene Modified Gingival Index Between the Brushing Only Group and the Brushing + Flossing Group1.86 units on a scaleStandard Error 0.05
p-value: 0.004ANCOVA

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026