Skip to content

Multi-Center, Prospective, Randomized, Comparison of AWBAT™-D vs. Xeroform™ or Glucan II™ for Treatment of Donor Sites in Burn Surgery

Multi-Center, Prospective, Randomized, Comparison of AWBAT™-D vs. Xeroform™ or Glucan II™ for Treatment of Donor Sites in Burn Surgery

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00964470
Acronym
AWBAT-D
Enrollment
60
Registered
2009-08-25
Start date
2009-08-31
Completion date
Unknown
Last updated
2010-06-22

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Treatment of Donor Site Burns

Keywords

Burn, donor site, skin graft, dressing, AWBAT™-D, XEROFORM™, GLUCAN II™

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the rate of healing and the non-adherence of three types of dressings. The study will also compare rate of infection, scarring and perception of pain associated with treatment.

Detailed description

The purpose of this study is to evaluate AWBAT™-D compared to Xeroform™ or Glucan II™ for the treatment of donor sites in burn surgery. Primary Study Goals: * To compare the rate of healing of donor sites. * To compare patient reported perception of pain * To compare the potential clinical complication rates of: * non-adherence, * seroma * hematoma * infection Secondary Study Goal: • To compare clinical outcome of donor sites: scarring based on the Vancouver Scar Scale.

Interventions

DEVICEAWBAT™-D and XEROFORM™ OR GLUCAN II™ dressings

Dressing, donor site dressings

Sponsors

Aubrey Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* Burn wounds measuring 1% - 30% TBSA requiring skin grafting * Anterior bilateral donor sites of approximately the same size taken from the thighs or abdomen

Exclusion criteria

* Ventilator dependence * Pregnancy /Lactation * Mechanism of injury was electrical, chemical or frostbite * Co-morbidity which may compromise healing * Known allergy to porcine or porcine products

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
• To compare the rate of healing of donor sites. • To compare patient reported perception of pain • To compare the potential clinical complication rates of: o non-adherence, o seroma o hematoma o infection2 year follow-up

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
• To compare clinical outcome of donor sites: scarring based on the Vancouver Scar Scale.2 year follow-up

Countries

United States

Contacts

Primary ContactSteven Moss
smoss@aubreyinc.com760-602-8300
Backup ContactTara Cordova
tcordova@aubreyinc.com760-602-8300

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026