Skip to content

Montelukast in Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis: Fall 2001 Study (0476-240)

A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Parallel-Group Study Investigating the Clinical Effect of Montelukast in Patients With Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis Over a 4-Week Treatment Period-Fall 2001

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00963469
Enrollment
1079
Registered
2009-08-21
Start date
2001-08-31
Completion date
2001-11-30
Last updated
2022-02-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis

Brief summary

This is a study to evaluate the treatment effect of montelukast 10 mg taken in the morning, versus placebo, in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis. Loratadine is included in the study as an active control.

Interventions

DRUGmontelukast sodium

montelukast 10 mg tablet orally once daily in the morning for 4 weeks

loratadine 10 mg tablet orally once daily in the morning for 4 weeks

DRUGComparator: placebo

placebo tablet orally once daily in the morning for 4 weeks

Sponsors

Organon and Co
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
15 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patient has a history of seasonal allergic rhinitis that worsens during the study season * Patient is a nonsmoker * Patient is in good health physical and mental health

Exclusion criteria

* Patient is hospitalized * Patient is a woman who is \< 8 weeks postpartum or is breastfeeding * Patient plans to move or vacation away during the study * Patient has had any major surgery with in past 4 weeks * Patient is a current or past abuser of alcohol or illicit drugs

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Change From Baseline in Daytime Nasal Symptoms Score Over First 2 Weeks of Treatment PeriodBaseline and first 2 Weeks of treatment period (from randomization through the end of Week 2)Mean change from baseline in Daytime Nasal Symptoms Score. Patients were asked to rate each nasal symptom of Congestion, Rhinorrhea, Itching, and Sneezing daily on a 4- point scale \[Score 0 (best) to 3 (worse)\]. The average of the 4 individual nasal symptoms scores was reported as the Daytime Nasal Symptoms Score.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Change From Baseline in Composite Symptoms Score (Daytime Nasal and Nighttime Symptoms) Over First 2 Weeks of Treatment PeriodBaseline and first 2 Weeks of treatment period (from randomization through the end of Week 2)Composite Symptoms Scores were computed as the average of Daytime Nasal Scores \[Score 0 (best) to 3 (worst)\] and Nighttime Symptoms Scores \[Score 0 (best) to 3 (worst)\].
Mean Change From Baseline in Daytime Eye Symptoms Score Over First 2 Weeks of Treatment PeriodBaseline and first 2 Weeks of treatment period (from randomization through the end of Week 2)Mean change from baseline in Daytime Eye Symptoms scores. Patients were asked to rate each of the 4 eye symptom of tearing, itchy, red, and puffy eyes daily on a 4-point scale \[Score 0 (best) to 3 (worst)\]. The average of the 4 individual eye symptoms scores was reported as the Daytime Eye Symptoms Score.
Mean Change From Baseline in Nighttime Symptoms Score Over First 2 Weeks of Treatment PeriodBaseline and first 2 Weeks of treatment period (from randomization through the end of Week 2)Mean change from baseline in Nighttime Symptoms Score. Patients were asked to rate each symptom daily on a 4-point scale \[Score 0 (best) to 3 (worse)\], and the combined score of Nasal Congestion Upon Awakening, Difficulty Going to Sleep, and Nighttime Awakenings was reported as the Nighttime Symptoms Score.
Physician's Global Evaluation of Allergic Rhinitis After First 2 Weeks of TreatmentAfter first 2 weeks of treatmentAn evaluation by the physician, administered after the first 2 weeks of treatment using a 7-point scale \[Score 0 (best) to 6 (worst)\], of the change in symptoms as compared to the beginning of the study.
Mean Change From Baseline in Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality-of-Life Score After First 2 Weeks of Treatment PeriodBaseline and first 2 Weeks of treatment period (from randomization through the end of Week 2)Patients completed a Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality-of-Life Questionnaire-28 questions on a 7-point scale \[0(best) to 6(worst)\] across 7 domains: activity,sleep,non-nose/eye symptoms,practical problems,nasal symptoms, eye symptoms, and emotions. The scores for each domain were averaged, then scores for the 7 domains were averaged for an overall score.
Patient's Global Evaluation of Allergic Rhinitis After First 2 Weeks of TreatmentAfter first 2 weeks of treatmentAn evaluation by the patient, administered after the first 2 weeks of treatment using a 7-point scale \[Score 0 (best) to 6 (worst)\], of the change in symptoms as compared to the beginning of the study.

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Forty-seven study centers in the United States. Prime Therapy Period: August 2001 to November 2001

Pre-assignment details

Patients who required excluded medication and those who did not meet a minimum predefined level of combined daytime nasal symptoms score during the run-in period were excluded from randomization.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Montelukast matching-image placebo tablet and Loratadine matching-image placebo tablet orally once daily in the morning for 4 weeks
451
Montelukast
Montelukast 10-mg tablet and Loratadine matching-image placebo tablet orally once daily in the morning for 4 weeks
448
Loratadine
Montelukast matching-image placebo tablet and Loratadine 10-mg tablet orally once daily in the morning for 4 weeks
180
Total1,079

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyAdverse Event15111
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy1072
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up110
Overall StudyMoved100
Overall StudyPre-randomization Adverse Event120
Overall StudyProtocol Violation553
Overall StudySite closed (local pollen Season ended)413
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject411

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboMontelukastLoratadineTotal
Age, Continuous35.9 years35.5 years38.7 years36.2 years
Composite Symptoms Score1.94 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.46
1.98 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.47
2.03 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.46
1.97 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.46
Daytime Eye Symptoms score1.61 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.81
1.64 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.73
1.64 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.78
1.63 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.77
Daytime Nasal Symptoms Score2.16 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.44
2.20 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.46
2.23 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.44
2.19 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.45
Nighttime Symptoms Score1.65 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.64
1.69 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.64
1.77 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.63
1.69 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.64
Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Score3.37 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.02
3.41 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1
3.46 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.08
3.40 Scores on a scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.02
Sex: Female, Male
Female
301 Participants301 Participants119 Participants721 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
150 Participants147 Participants61 Participants358 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
22 / 45127 / 44812 / 180
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 4512 / 4480 / 180

Outcome results

Primary

Mean Change From Baseline in Daytime Nasal Symptoms Score Over First 2 Weeks of Treatment Period

Mean change from baseline in Daytime Nasal Symptoms Score. Patients were asked to rate each nasal symptom of Congestion, Rhinorrhea, Itching, and Sneezing daily on a 4- point scale \[Score 0 (best) to 3 (worse)\]. The average of the 4 individual nasal symptoms scores was reported as the Daytime Nasal Symptoms Score.

Time frame: Baseline and first 2 Weeks of treatment period (from randomization through the end of Week 2)

Population: The primary efficacy analyses were based on the intention-to-treat (all-patients-treated) principle, i.e., all patients who had a baseline and at least one posttreatment measurement through the first 2 weeks of treatment were included.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Daytime Nasal Symptoms Score Over First 2 Weeks of Treatment Period-0.23 Scores on a scale
MontelukastMean Change From Baseline in Daytime Nasal Symptoms Score Over First 2 Weeks of Treatment Period-0.33 Scores on a scale
LoratadineMean Change From Baseline in Daytime Nasal Symptoms Score Over First 2 Weeks of Treatment Period-0.45 Scores on a scale
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Composite Symptoms Score (Daytime Nasal and Nighttime Symptoms) Over First 2 Weeks of Treatment Period

Composite Symptoms Scores were computed as the average of Daytime Nasal Scores \[Score 0 (best) to 3 (worst)\] and Nighttime Symptoms Scores \[Score 0 (best) to 3 (worst)\].

Time frame: Baseline and first 2 Weeks of treatment period (from randomization through the end of Week 2)

Population: The primary efficacy analyses were based on the intention-to-treat (all-patients-treated) principle, i.e., all patients who had a baseline and at least one posttreatment measurement through the first 2 weeks of treatment were included

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Composite Symptoms Score (Daytime Nasal and Nighttime Symptoms) Over First 2 Weeks of Treatment Period-0.21 Scores on a scale
MontelukastMean Change From Baseline in Composite Symptoms Score (Daytime Nasal and Nighttime Symptoms) Over First 2 Weeks of Treatment Period-0.30 Scores on a scale
LoratadineMean Change From Baseline in Composite Symptoms Score (Daytime Nasal and Nighttime Symptoms) Over First 2 Weeks of Treatment Period-0.36 Scores on a scale
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Daytime Eye Symptoms Score Over First 2 Weeks of Treatment Period

Mean change from baseline in Daytime Eye Symptoms scores. Patients were asked to rate each of the 4 eye symptom of tearing, itchy, red, and puffy eyes daily on a 4-point scale \[Score 0 (best) to 3 (worst)\]. The average of the 4 individual eye symptoms scores was reported as the Daytime Eye Symptoms Score.

Time frame: Baseline and first 2 Weeks of treatment period (from randomization through the end of Week 2)

Population: The primary efficacy analyses were based on the intention-to-treat (all-patients-treated) principle, i.e., all patients who had a baseline and at least one posttreatment measurement through the first 2 weeks of treatment were included

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Daytime Eye Symptoms Score Over First 2 Weeks of Treatment Period-0.18 Scores on a scale
MontelukastMean Change From Baseline in Daytime Eye Symptoms Score Over First 2 Weeks of Treatment Period-0.28 Scores on a scale
LoratadineMean Change From Baseline in Daytime Eye Symptoms Score Over First 2 Weeks of Treatment Period-0.33 Scores on a scale
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Nighttime Symptoms Score Over First 2 Weeks of Treatment Period

Mean change from baseline in Nighttime Symptoms Score. Patients were asked to rate each symptom daily on a 4-point scale \[Score 0 (best) to 3 (worse)\], and the combined score of Nasal Congestion Upon Awakening, Difficulty Going to Sleep, and Nighttime Awakenings was reported as the Nighttime Symptoms Score.

Time frame: Baseline and first 2 Weeks of treatment period (from randomization through the end of Week 2)

Population: The primary efficacy analyses were based on the intention-to-treat (all-patients-treated) principle, i.e., all patients who had a baseline and at least one posttreatment measurement through the first 2 weeks of treatment were included

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Nighttime Symptoms Score Over First 2 Weeks of Treatment Period-0.18 Scores on a scale
MontelukastMean Change From Baseline in Nighttime Symptoms Score Over First 2 Weeks of Treatment Period-0.28 Scores on a scale
LoratadineMean Change From Baseline in Nighttime Symptoms Score Over First 2 Weeks of Treatment Period-0.25 Scores on a scale
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality-of-Life Score After First 2 Weeks of Treatment Period

Patients completed a Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality-of-Life Questionnaire-28 questions on a 7-point scale \[0(best) to 6(worst)\] across 7 domains: activity,sleep,non-nose/eye symptoms,practical problems,nasal symptoms, eye symptoms, and emotions. The scores for each domain were averaged, then scores for the 7 domains were averaged for an overall score.

Time frame: Baseline and first 2 Weeks of treatment period (from randomization through the end of Week 2)

Population: The primary efficacy analyses were based on the intention-to-treat (all-patients-treated) principle, i.e., all patients who had a baseline and at least one posttreatment measurement through the first 2 weeks of treatment were included

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality-of-Life Score After First 2 Weeks of Treatment Period-0.55 Scores on a scale
MontelukastMean Change From Baseline in Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality-of-Life Score After First 2 Weeks of Treatment Period-0.85 Scores on a scale
LoratadineMean Change From Baseline in Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality-of-Life Score After First 2 Weeks of Treatment Period-0.85 Scores on a scale
Secondary

Patient's Global Evaluation of Allergic Rhinitis After First 2 Weeks of Treatment

An evaluation by the patient, administered after the first 2 weeks of treatment using a 7-point scale \[Score 0 (best) to 6 (worst)\], of the change in symptoms as compared to the beginning of the study.

Time frame: After first 2 weeks of treatment

Population: The primary efficacy analyses were based on the intention-to-treat. Since only 1 measurement was obtained during the treatment period, no missing values were imputed.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
PlaceboPatient's Global Evaluation of Allergic Rhinitis After First 2 Weeks of Treatment2.73 Scores on a scale
MontelukastPatient's Global Evaluation of Allergic Rhinitis After First 2 Weeks of Treatment2.43 Scores on a scale
LoratadinePatient's Global Evaluation of Allergic Rhinitis After First 2 Weeks of Treatment2.30 Scores on a scale
Secondary

Physician's Global Evaluation of Allergic Rhinitis After First 2 Weeks of Treatment

An evaluation by the physician, administered after the first 2 weeks of treatment using a 7-point scale \[Score 0 (best) to 6 (worst)\], of the change in symptoms as compared to the beginning of the study.

Time frame: After first 2 weeks of treatment

Population: The primary efficacy analyses were based on the intention-to-treat. Since only 1 measurement was obtained during the treatment period, no missing values were imputed.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
PlaceboPhysician's Global Evaluation of Allergic Rhinitis After First 2 Weeks of Treatment2.75 Scores on a scale
MontelukastPhysician's Global Evaluation of Allergic Rhinitis After First 2 Weeks of Treatment2.36 Scores on a scale
LoratadinePhysician's Global Evaluation of Allergic Rhinitis After First 2 Weeks of Treatment2.38 Scores on a scale

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026