Skip to content

Effect of Radius on Alpha Motor Neuron Excitability

Effect of Radius Subjecting to Mechanical Loading on Alpha Motor Neuron Excitability

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00961870
Acronym
ERAMNE
Enrollment
80
Registered
2009-08-19
Start date
2009-09-30
Completion date
2009-12-31
Last updated
2013-08-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Osteoporosis

Keywords

bone, motor neuron excitability, forearm vibration, Mechanical Loading

Brief summary

This study hypothesize that radius subjecting to mechanical loading may affect excitability of alpha motor neuron innervating muscle, based on its bone mineral density. If this hypothesis is valid, it can be firstly suggested that the relationship between bone mineral density and muscle strength is bidirectional. A total of 80 voluntaries are planned to include in this study. After forearm vibration is applied, bone mineral density (BMD) and bone mineral content (BMC) will be measured in all cases. Alpha motor neuron excitability (H/M ratio, recruitment), background muscle activity will be evaluated by electromyography at pre-treatment, post-treatment and, during treatment in cases. Forearm vibration will be applied by forearm vibration device (FAV). FAV with mechanical loading will apply forearm. Cases will sit on armchair. Two intervals of FAV will be applied at a frequency of 45 Hz. Each interval will consist of 60 second of FAV followed by rest. The right radius BMD and BMC will be evaluated by bone densitometer (GE-LUNAR DPX PRO). Motor unite potentials at rest, Hoffman reflex, F response, M response will be measured by electromyography at right flexor carpi radialis. Medtronic Keypoint Portable 2 channel electromyography and Neurotrac ETS device will be used.

Detailed description

It is usually reported that there is a parallelism between changes in the bone structure and function and the muscle structure and function. Sarcopenia is frequently observed in osteoporotic patients. Bone formation increases or bone resorption decreases with exercise. To date, the effect of bone on the muscle activity is not investigated. One of the most important functions of bone bear mechanical loads include body weight. Bone must be strong enough to resist the mechanical loading. Mechanisms need to protect bone when bone is subject to excessive mechanical loading. These mechanisms may mainly focus on strengthening the bone and/or changing vectorial properties of mechanical loading applied bone. The vectorial properties of mechanical loading applied bone may be controlled by muscle contractions. Bone contains wide mechanoreceptor net constructed by osteocytes. So,distribution of the mechanical loading on bone cross-sectional area is possible to perceive. It may be also possible that inappropriate distribution of mechanical loading on bone crosssectional area is optimized by muscle contractions. To get this regulation, there should be a mechanism that muscle activity is controlled by central nervous system based on mechanical loading distribution on bone cross-sectional area. We previously showed that bone can regulate muscle activity, based on its bone mineral density. According to this study result, it can be suggested there may exist a mechanism that bone sensing mechanical stimuli can send the signals to central nervous system and neuronally regulate muscle activity (bone myo-regulation reflex). (It is also well known that load-induced adaptive bone formation is neuronally regulated. Taken together, a general mechanism, bone reflex, may be defined that bone subjected to loading can neuronally regulate bone formation and muscle activity) This study hypothesize that radius subjecting to mechanical loading may affect excitability of alpha motor neuron innervating muscle, based on its bone mineral density.

Interventions

Mechanical loading with forearm vibration will be applied right radius in all groups.

Sponsors

Vakif Gureba Training and Research Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
BASIC_SCIENCE
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
Yes

Inclusion criteria

* females with postmenopausal osteoporosis (forearm BMD: T score \<-2.0) * females without postmenopausal osteoporosis (forearm BMD: T score \>-1.0) * healthy young adult females (forearm BMD normal) * healthy young adult males (forearm BMD normal) * cases with right handed patients in all groups

Exclusion criteria

* secondary osteoporosis * neuropathy (central or peripheral) * myopathy * systemic diseases (arthritis, endocrine-metabolic diseases, bone diseases) * professional sportswoman/sportsman * subjects doing regular sports activities * tendinopathy * amputee, endoprosthesis, metal implants

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Changing alpha motor neuron excitability1-2 months

Countries

Turkey (Türkiye)

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026