Skip to content

PEAK PlasmaBlade™ 4.0 Versus Traditional Electrosurgery in Lumpectomy

A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Study to Evaluate Use of the PEAK PlasmaBladeTM 4.0 in Breast Lumpectomy

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00960154
Acronym
PRECISE
Enrollment
50
Registered
2009-08-17
Start date
2009-07-31
Completion date
2012-02-29
Last updated
2013-01-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Breast Cancer

Keywords

Lumpectomy, PlasmaBlade, Electrosurgery, PEAK Surgical, Medtronic Advanced Energy, Medtronic

Brief summary

The purpose of this clinical study is to quantify the difference in thermal injury depth at the surgical margin in breast lumpectomy specimens excised with the PlasmaBlade; to subjectively assess histopathologic sample quality metrics; to examine the role that electrosurgical artifact may play in revision lumpectomy procedures; and to compare these endpoints to the standard of care (SOC) technology.

Detailed description

Lumpectomy is a surgical procedure performed to remove a localized mass of breast tissue that is suspicious for malignancy. The purpose of lumpectomy is to minimize the amount of tissue removed from the breast to retain normal breast architecture while simultaneously removing all of the suspected cancerous tissue. Typically, a scalpel is used for the skin incision and a traditional electrosurgical device is used to cut away any cancerous tissue. The PEAK PlasmaBlade™ uses pulsed radiofrequency (RF) energy and a highly-insulated handpiece design to enable precision cutting and coagulation at the point of application. The PlasmaBlade has received FDA clearance for use in plastic, general, and ear, nose, and throat (ENT) surgery, and has demonstrated a significantly reduced thermal injury profile in incised tissue compared to traditional electrosurgical devices. It is hypothesized that this benefit may improve the pathological analysis of excised breast lumps. This single site study was granted Institutional Review Board (IRB) approval and conducted between June 2009 and January 2011. Potential subjects were screened against the inclusion and exclusion criteria of the study protocol and were then required to provide informed consent prior to enrollment. Following enrollment, subjects were prospectively randomized to the SOC or PEAK PlasmaBlade study groups and scheduled for lumpectomy.

Interventions

The entirety of the lumpectomy will be performed with the PEAK PlasmaBlade including the skin incision

The skin incision will be performed using a standard scalpel; the subcutaneous dissection will be performed with traditional electrosurgery using the Cut and Coagulation modes.

Sponsors

Medtronic Surgical Technologies
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
FEMALE
Age
18 Years to 90 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Age between 18 and 90 years old 2. Physically healthy, stable weight 3. Requiring lumpectomy with wire localization for suspected or confirmed malignant breast disease. 4. Subject must understand the nature of the procedure and provide written informed consent prior to the procedure. 5. Subject must be willing and able to comply with all follow-up evaluations

Exclusion criteria

1. Age younger than 18 or greater than 90 years old 2. Infection (local or systemic) 3. Cognitive impairment or mental illness 4. Severe cardiopulmonary deficiencies 5. Unable to follow instructions or complete follow-up 6. Currently taking any medication known to affect healing 7. Currently enrolled in another investigational device or drug trial

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Histological Metrics: Amount of Overlying Adherent Char on Slide; Damage to Tumor Epithelium; Effect of Electrosurgical Damage on Diagnostic Quality of Lumpectomy SpecimenIntraoperativeOverall histological quality score will be a composite of the histological metrics

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Operative Metrics: Operative Time, Estimated Blood Loss, Skin ScarringIntraoperatively and 1-2 weeks postoperatively

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
PlasmaBlade
The entirety of the lumpectomy will be performed with the PEAK PlasmaBlade, including the skin incision.
25
Standard of Care (SOC)
The SOC consists of scalpel for the skin incision and traditional electrosurgery for the entirety of the subcutaneous dissection.
25
Total50

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyStudy termination2525

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlasmaBladeStandard of Care (SOC)Total
Age, Customized
18 to 90 years
25 participants25 participants50 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
25 participants25 participants50 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
25 Participants25 Participants50 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 250 / 25
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 250 / 25

Outcome results

Primary

Histological Metrics: Amount of Overlying Adherent Char on Slide; Damage to Tumor Epithelium; Effect of Electrosurgical Damage on Diagnostic Quality of Lumpectomy Specimen

Overall histological quality score will be a composite of the histological metrics

Time frame: Intraoperative

Population: An integrity audit found that the data for this study could not be analyzed owing to unverifiable source documentation.

Secondary

Operative Metrics: Operative Time, Estimated Blood Loss, Skin Scarring

Time frame: Intraoperatively and 1-2 weeks postoperatively

Population: An integrity audit found that the data for this study could not be analyzed owing to unverifiable source documentation.

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026