Skip to content

A Study Investigating the Effect of Montelukast in Patients With Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis (MK-0476-192)(COMPLETED)

A Multicenter, Double-Blind, Randomized, Parallel-Group Study Investigating the Clinical Effect of Montelukast in Patients With Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis-Fall Study

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00960141
Enrollment
829
Registered
2009-08-17
Start date
2000-08-31
Completion date
2000-11-30
Last updated
2022-02-03

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis

Brief summary

A study of the ability of montelukast to improve signs and symptoms of seasonal allergic rhinitis compared with placebo. Loratadine is included in the study as an active control.

Interventions

DRUGmontelukast sodium

montelukast 10 mg tablet, taken orally once daily at bed time for 2 weeks

loratadine 10 mg tablet, taken orally once daily at bed time for 2 weeks

DRUGComparator: placebo

placebo tablet, taken orally once daily at bed time for 2 weeks

Sponsors

Organon and Co
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Investigator)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
15 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patient has a documented clinical history of seasonal allergic rhinitis symptoms that become worse during the study season * Patient is a non-smoker * Patient is in good mental and physical health

Exclusion criteria

* Patient is hospitalized * Patient is a woman who is \<8 weeks postpartum or is breast feeding * Patient intends to move or vacation away during the study * Patient is a current or past abuser of alcohol or illicit drugs

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Change From Baseline in Daytime Nasal Symptoms ScoreBaseline and Week 2Mean change from baseline in Daytime Nasal Symptoms score on a 4-point scale \[0(best) to 3(worst)\]. The average of the 4 individual nasal symptoms scores (Congestion, Rhinorrhea, Itching, and Sneezing) was reported as the Daytime Nasal Symptoms Score.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Mean Change From Baseline in Nighttime Symptoms ScoreBaseline and Week 2Mean change from baseline in Nighttime Symptoms Score on a 4-point scale \[0(best) to 3(worst)\]. The average of 3 scores (Nasal Congestion Upon Awakening, Difficulty Going to Sleep, and Nighttime Awakenings) was reported as the Nighttime Symptoms Score.
Mean Change From Baseline in Daytime Eye Symptoms ScoreBaseline and Week 2Mean change from baseline in Daytime Eye Symptoms scores on a 4-point scale \[0(best) to 3(worst)\]. The average of the 4 individual eye symptoms scores (tearing, itchy, red, and puffy eyes) was reported as the Daytime Eye Symptoms Score.
Patient's Global Evaluation of Allergic RhinitisWeek 2 (or upon discontinuation)An evaluation by the patient, administered at the last visit (or upon discontinuation) using a 7-point scale, in answer to a single question regarding the change in symptoms as compared to the beginning of the study. Responses were assigned numerical values from 0 (very much better) to 6 (very much worse).
Physician's Global Evaluation of Allergic RhinitisWeek 2An evaluation by the physician, administered at the last visit (or upon discontinuation) using a 7-point scale, of the change in symptoms as compared to the beginning of the study. Responses were assigned numerical values from 0 (very much better) to 6 (very much worse).
Mean Change From Baseline in Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality-of-Life ScoreBaseline and Week 2Patients completed a validated, self-administered questionnaire, which included 28 questions on a 7-point scale \[score 0 (best) to 6 (worst)\] across 7 domains: activities, sleep, non-nose/eye symptoms, practical problems, nasal symptoms, eye symptoms, and emotional. The scores for each domain were averaged, then the scores for the 7 domains were averaged for the overall score.

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Twenty-nine study centers in the United States. Therapy Period: August 2000 to October 2000

Pre-assignment details

Patients who required excluded medication and those who did not meet a minimum predefined level of combined daytime nasal symptoms score during the run-in period were excluded from randomization.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Montelukast matching-image and Loratadine matching-image placebo tablets orally once daily at bedtime for 2 weeks
333
Montelukast
Montelukast 10 mg tablet and Loratadine matching-image placebo tablet orally once daily at bedtime for 2 weeks.
326
Loratadine
Montelukast matching-image placebo tablet and Loratadine 10 mg tablet orally once daily at bedtime for 2 weeks.
170
Total829

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyAdverse Event482
Overall StudyLack of Efficacy342
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up100
Overall StudyProtocol Violation132
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject121

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboMontelukastLoratadineTotal
Age, Continuous36.4 years36.3 years37.5 years36.6 years
Daytime Eye Symptoms score1.46 Units on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.78
1.46 Units on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.76
1.44 Units on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.8
1.46 Units on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.77
Daytime Nasal Symptoms Score2.09 Units on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.44
2.14 Units on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.43
2.08 Units on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.4
2.11 Units on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.43
Nighttime Symptoms Score1.53 Units on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.62
1.49 Units on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.6
1.54 Units on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.68
1.52 Units on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.62
Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality-of-Life score3.18 Units on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1
3.20 Units on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1
3.26 Units on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.08
3.20 Units on a Scale
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.02
Sex: Female, Male
Female
222 Participants227 Participants119 Participants568 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
111 Participants99 Participants51 Participants261 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
19 / 33313 / 3268 / 170
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 3331 / 3260 / 170

Outcome results

Primary

Mean Change From Baseline in Daytime Nasal Symptoms Score

Mean change from baseline in Daytime Nasal Symptoms score on a 4-point scale \[0(best) to 3(worst)\]. The average of the 4 individual nasal symptoms scores (Congestion, Rhinorrhea, Itching, and Sneezing) was reported as the Daytime Nasal Symptoms Score.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 2

Population: The primary efficacy analyses were based on the intention-to-treat (all-patients-treated) principle, i.e., all patients who had a baseline and at least one posttreatment measurement were included.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Daytime Nasal Symptoms Score-0.32 Units on a Scale
MontelukastMean Change From Baseline in Daytime Nasal Symptoms Score-0.38 Units on a Scale
LoratadineMean Change From Baseline in Daytime Nasal Symptoms Score-0.47 Units on a Scale
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Daytime Eye Symptoms Score

Mean change from baseline in Daytime Eye Symptoms scores on a 4-point scale \[0(best) to 3(worst)\]. The average of the 4 individual eye symptoms scores (tearing, itchy, red, and puffy eyes) was reported as the Daytime Eye Symptoms Score.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 2

Population: The primary efficacy analyses were based on the intention-to-treat (all-patients-treated) principle, i.e., all patients who had a baseline and at least one posttreatment measurement were included.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Daytime Eye Symptoms Score-0.23 Units on a Scale
MontelukastMean Change From Baseline in Daytime Eye Symptoms Score-0.29 Units on a Scale
LoratadineMean Change From Baseline in Daytime Eye Symptoms Score-0.35 Units on a Scale
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Nighttime Symptoms Score

Mean change from baseline in Nighttime Symptoms Score on a 4-point scale \[0(best) to 3(worst)\]. The average of 3 scores (Nasal Congestion Upon Awakening, Difficulty Going to Sleep, and Nighttime Awakenings) was reported as the Nighttime Symptoms Score.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 2

Population: The primary efficacy analyses were based on the intention-to-treat (all-patients-treated) principle, i.e., all patients who had a baseline and at least one posttreatment measurement were included.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Nighttime Symptoms Score-0.18 Units on a Scale
MontelukastMean Change From Baseline in Nighttime Symptoms Score-0.28 Units on a Scale
LoratadineMean Change From Baseline in Nighttime Symptoms Score-0.26 Units on a Scale
Secondary

Mean Change From Baseline in Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality-of-Life Score

Patients completed a validated, self-administered questionnaire, which included 28 questions on a 7-point scale \[score 0 (best) to 6 (worst)\] across 7 domains: activities, sleep, non-nose/eye symptoms, practical problems, nasal symptoms, eye symptoms, and emotional. The scores for each domain were averaged, then the scores for the 7 domains were averaged for the overall score.

Time frame: Baseline and Week 2

Population: The primary efficacy analyses were based on the intention-to-treat (all-patients-treated) principle, i.e., all patients who had a baseline and at least one posttreatment measurement were included. No missing values were imputed.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
PlaceboMean Change From Baseline in Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality-of-Life Score-0.75 Units on a Scale
MontelukastMean Change From Baseline in Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality-of-Life Score-0.85 Units on a Scale
LoratadineMean Change From Baseline in Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality-of-Life Score-0.97 Units on a Scale
Secondary

Patient's Global Evaluation of Allergic Rhinitis

An evaluation by the patient, administered at the last visit (or upon discontinuation) using a 7-point scale, in answer to a single question regarding the change in symptoms as compared to the beginning of the study. Responses were assigned numerical values from 0 (very much better) to 6 (very much worse).

Time frame: Week 2 (or upon discontinuation)

Population: The primary efficacy analyses were based on the intention-to-treat. Since only 1 measurement was obtained during the treatment period, no missing values were imputed.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
PlaceboPatient's Global Evaluation of Allergic Rhinitis2.62 Units on a Scale
MontelukastPatient's Global Evaluation of Allergic Rhinitis2.43 Units on a Scale
LoratadinePatient's Global Evaluation of Allergic Rhinitis2.27 Units on a Scale
Secondary

Physician's Global Evaluation of Allergic Rhinitis

An evaluation by the physician, administered at the last visit (or upon discontinuation) using a 7-point scale, of the change in symptoms as compared to the beginning of the study. Responses were assigned numerical values from 0 (very much better) to 6 (very much worse).

Time frame: Week 2

Population: The primary efficacy analyses were based on the intention-to-treat. Since only 1 measurement was obtained during the treatment period, no missing values were imputed.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)
PlaceboPhysician's Global Evaluation of Allergic Rhinitis2.53 Units on a Scale
MontelukastPhysician's Global Evaluation of Allergic Rhinitis2.35 Units on a Scale
LoratadinePhysician's Global Evaluation of Allergic Rhinitis2.26 Units on a Scale

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026