Skip to content

Exercise Intolerance in Elderly Patients With Diastolic Heart Failure

Study of the Effect of Caloric Restriction and Exercise Training in Patients With Heart Failure and a Normal Ejection Fraction.(SECRET)

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00959660
Acronym
SECRET
Enrollment
100
Registered
2009-08-17
Start date
2009-02-28
Completion date
2013-08-31
Last updated
2019-02-15

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Heart Failure, Diastolic, Obesity

Keywords

Diastolic heart failure, Heart Failure, Elderly, Obesity

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to examine the effects of weight loss via hypocaloric diet, aerobic exercise training, combined hypocaloric diet and exercise training, and attention control in patients with heart failure and a normal ejection fraction (HFNEF) and body mass index greater than or equal to 30.

Detailed description

Heart failure with a normal ejection fraction (HFNEF, previously termed diastolic heart failure), accounts for the majority of heart failure cases in the population \> 65 years old and has been recognized as a true geriatric syndrome. Exercise intolerance is the primary chronic symptom of HFNEF and a major determinant of these patients' severely reduced quality of life; however little is known regarding its pathophysiology and treatment. Therefore, our work has focused on understanding the pathophysiology of exercise intolerance in HFNEF and developing and testing interventions that may improve this pivotal outcome in this highly prevalent disorder of older persons. The aims of the proposed study are to conduct a randomized, controlled, single-blinded, 2x2 design trial to examine the effects of weight loss via hypocaloric diet, aerobic exercise training, combined hypocaloric diet and exercise training, and attention control in patients with HFNEF and body mass index \>30 in order to test the following hypotheses: 1) Both weight loss and exercise training will improve exercise intolerance and quality of life in older, obese patients with HFNEF; 2) The combination of weight loss and exercise training will produce complementary effects on body and thigh muscle composition and additive improvements in exercise intolerance in HFNEF; 3) Improvements in exercise intolerance will correlate with improvements in lean body mass, reversal of adverse thigh muscle remodeling, and increased thigh muscle capillarity. The study has the potential to significantly advance our understanding of exercise intolerance and its treatment in the large population of older persons with HFNEF.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALExercise

walking, treadmill and bicycle exercise

DIETARY_SUPPLEMENTDietary Intervention

Subjects will be provided meals and instructions for individual food selections.

BEHAVIORALDiet and exercise

Subjects will be provided meals and instructions for individual food selections and will undergo walking, treadmill and bicycle exercise.

OTHERAttention Control

control group- continue their previously randomized life style

Sponsors

National Institute on Aging (NIA)
CollaboratorNIH
Wake Forest University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
FACTORIAL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
60 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Heart failure clinical score greater than or equal to 3 * Age 60 and over * Normal ejection fraction greater than or equal to 50% * BMI greater than or equal to 30

Exclusion criteria

* Valvular heart disease * Significant change in cardiac medication \<4 weeks * Uncontrolled hypertension * Recent or debilitating stroke * Cancer or other noncardiovascular conditions with life expectancy less than 2 years * Significant Anemia * Renal insufficiency (creatinine \>2.5mg/dl) * Psychiatric disease- uncontrolled major psychoses, depressions, dementia, or personality disorder * Plans to leave area within 6 months * Refuses informed consent * Failure to pass screening test:pulmonary function, echocardiogram,or exercise

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Exercise Capacity20 weeksExercise capacity assessed as Peak VO2 (ml/kg/min) via treadmill cardiopulmonary exercise testing using the modified Naughton protocol to the end point of exhaustion.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Quality of Life20 weeksHeart failure-specific quality of life was assessed with the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) on a range 0-100; higher scores indicate better quality of life.
Body Composition20 weeksTotal Body Fat Mass and Total Non-bone Lean Mass via DEXA
Thigh Muscle Composition20 weeksThigh Skeletal Muscle and Subcutaneous Fat via MRI

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Exercise Training
Based on initial evaluations and the stress testing results, (HR(heart rate), VO2(maximal volume of oxygen that the body can deliver to the working muscles per minute), RPE(rate perceived exertion) an individualized exercise prescription will be developed for each subject. Exercise: walking, treadmill and bicycle exercise
26
Dietary Intervention
A hypocaloric diet will be developed to achieve a 2800 kcal/week deficit, which should produce about 0.4 kg (1 lb) weight loss per week. Dietary Intervention: Subjects will be provided meals and instructions for individual food selections.
24
Attention Control
Attention control participants will be provided a counseling session regarding general health education at baseline and will be contacted by staff via telephone every 2 weeks to discuss general health status. Attention Control: control group- continue their previously randomized life style
25
Diet and Exercise
The diet and exercise group is a combination of the two groups previously described. Exercise: walking, treadmill and bicycle exercise Diet and exercise: Combination of the exercise and diet group as previously described.
25
Total100

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicExercise TrainingTotalDiet and ExerciseAttention ControlDietary Intervention
Age, Continuous67.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.9
66.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.2
66.3 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 5.2
65.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.8
66.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 4.9
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
11 Participants45 Participants12 Participants9 Participants13 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
15 Participants55 Participants13 Participants16 Participants11 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
21 Participants81 Participants20 Participants20 Participants20 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
5 Participants19 Participants5 Participants5 Participants4 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
EG003
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
2 / 261 / 240 / 252 / 25
serious
Total, serious adverse events
1 / 260 / 241 / 251 / 25

Outcome results

Primary

Exercise Capacity

Exercise capacity assessed as Peak VO2 (ml/kg/min) via treadmill cardiopulmonary exercise testing using the modified Naughton protocol to the end point of exhaustion.

Time frame: 20 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Exercise TrainingExercise Capacity15.5 ml/kg/min
Dietary InterventionExercise Capacity15.5 ml/kg/min
Attention ControlExercise Capacity14.1 ml/kg/min
Diet and ExerciseExercise Capacity16.6 ml/kg/min
p-value: <0.001ANCOVA
p-value: <0.001ANCOVA
Secondary

Body Composition

Total Body Fat Mass and Total Non-bone Lean Mass via DEXA

Time frame: 20 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Exercise TrainingBody CompositionTotal Fat45 kg
Exercise TrainingBody CompositionTotal Non-Bone Lean52 kg
Dietary InterventionBody CompositionTotal Non-Bone Lean50 kg
Dietary InterventionBody CompositionTotal Fat42 kg
Attention ControlBody CompositionTotal Non-Bone Lean53 kg
Attention ControlBody CompositionTotal Fat47 kg
Diet and ExerciseBody CompositionTotal Fat40 kg
Diet and ExerciseBody CompositionTotal Non-Bone Lean50 kg
Comparison: Total Body Fat Massp-value: <0.001ANCOVA
Comparison: Total Body Fat Massp-value: 0.001ANCOVA
Comparison: Total Non-Bone Lean Massp-value: <0.001ANCOVA
Comparison: Total Non-Bone Lean Massp-value: 0.25ANCOVA
Secondary

Quality of Life

Heart failure-specific quality of life was assessed with the Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire (KCCQ) on a range 0-100; higher scores indicate better quality of life.

Time frame: 20 weeks

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
Exercise TrainingQuality of Life71 units on a scale
Dietary InterventionQuality of Life77 units on a scale
Attention ControlQuality of Life69 units on a scale
Diet and ExerciseQuality of Life79 units on a scale
p-value: 0.004ANCOVA
p-value: 0.43ANCOVA
Secondary

Thigh Muscle Composition

Thigh Skeletal Muscle and Subcutaneous Fat via MRI

Time frame: 20 weeks

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)
Exercise TrainingThigh Muscle CompositionThigh Subcutaneous Fat155 cm^2
Exercise TrainingThigh Muscle CompositionThigh Skeletal Muscle120 cm^2
Dietary InterventionThigh Muscle CompositionThigh Skeletal Muscle115 cm^2
Dietary InterventionThigh Muscle CompositionThigh Subcutaneous Fat143 cm^2
Attention ControlThigh Muscle CompositionThigh Subcutaneous Fat164 cm^2
Attention ControlThigh Muscle CompositionThigh Skeletal Muscle121 cm^2
Diet and ExerciseThigh Muscle CompositionThigh Subcutaneous Fat144 cm^2
Diet and ExerciseThigh Muscle CompositionThigh Skeletal Muscle114 cm^2
Comparison: Thigh Subcutaneous Fatp-value: <0.001ANCOVA
Comparison: Thigh Subcutaneous Fatp-value: 0.26ANCOVA
Comparison: Thigh Skeletal Musclep-value: <0.001ANCOVA
Comparison: Thigh Skeletal Musclep-value: 0.26ANCOVA

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 6, 2026