Comparison of Lingualized and Full Bilaterally Balanced Articulation

A Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Lingualized and Full Bilaterally Balanced Articulation for Complete Dentures

Status

Completed

Phases

Study type

Interventional

Source

ClinicalTrials.gov

Registry ID

NCT00959530

Acronym

denture

Enrollment

Registered

2009-08-14

Start date

2007-11-30

Completion date

2011-12-31

Last updated

2017-03-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Jaw, Edentulous

Keywords

complete dentures, patient satisfaction, treatment cost

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to find the difference between patient satisfaction, masticatory performance and cost between two occlusal schemes for complete denture prosthodontics.

Detailed description

Two occlusal scheme applied to complete denture prosthodontics has been compared in RCT. This will have clinical benefit for deciding which occlusal scheme is better according to patient conditions. It will also have impact on dental educational curriculum.

Interventions

PROCEDURElingualized occlusion

occlusal surface arranged by lingualized occlusion

PROCEDUREFull Bilaterally Balanced Articulation

occlusal surface arranged by Full Bilaterally Balanced Articulation

Study design

Allocation

RANDOMIZED

Intervention model

PARALLEL

Primary purpose

TREATMENT

Masking

SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender

ALL

Healthy volunteers

Yes

Inclusion criteria

* edentulous both maxilla and mandible, asking for new denture fabrication

Exclusion criteria

* psychiatric problem * those who have difficulty answering the questionnaire * oral cancer * radiation experience

Design outcomes

Primary

Measure	Time frame
patient satisfaction on 100mm visual analogue scale	6month

Secondary

Measure	Time frame
treatment cost	6month

Countries

Japan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026