Atrial Fibrillation
Conditions
Brief summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of electroanatomic imaging compared to conventional method in patients with VT.
Detailed description
To evaluate the efficacy and safety of electroanatomic imaging (CARTO) compared to conventional fluoroscopically guided activation mapping (Conventional) method in patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Substrate-dependent Ventricular Tachycardia To evaluate cost-effectiveness of CARTO 3D image system compared to conventional method in the same study subjects
Interventions
Conventional fluoroscopically guided activation mapping
CARTO (3D Electroanatomic imaging)
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* patients with AF or substrate-dependent VT
Exclusion criteria
* administering with anticoagulants
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Fluoroscopic time | 24weeks | Total duration of procedure using fluoroscopy on , in minute |
| Procedural duration | 24weeks | Time from after puncture to catheter remover |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Clinical Success | 24weeks | * 3 months freedom from recurrence of target arrhythmia * \> 6 months freedom from recurrence of target arrhythmia |
| Radiation dose | 24weeks | Calculated dose (in Gray) to the patient as recorded in the laboratory log |
| Morphology of ablation | 24weeks | Number of Gap and the distance from the ostia of the pulmonary veins (In conventional group) |
| Ablation time | 24weeks | Time from to Ablation |
| Cost Effectiveness | 24weeks | — |
| Survival Rate | 24weeks | — |
| Complications | 24weeks | * procedure and device related adverse event requiring any intervention to prevent permanent medical intervention * Important complications are reported individually |
| Procedural Success | 24weeks | Achievement of the procedure endpoint for each arrhythmia |
Countries
South Korea