Skip to content

The Efficacy and Safety of CARTO 3D Mapping System Versus Conventional Method in AF and VT

Phase Ⅳ Study of CARTO 3D Mapping System vs Conventional Method in AF & VT

Status
UNKNOWN
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00959205
Acronym
CARTOAF&VT
Enrollment
160
Registered
2009-08-14
Start date
2009-07-31
Completion date
2011-02-28
Last updated
2010-05-20

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Atrial Fibrillation

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of electroanatomic imaging compared to conventional method in patients with VT.

Detailed description

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of electroanatomic imaging (CARTO) compared to conventional fluoroscopically guided activation mapping (Conventional) method in patients with Atrial Fibrillation and Substrate-dependent Ventricular Tachycardia To evaluate cost-effectiveness of CARTO 3D image system compared to conventional method in the same study subjects

Interventions

DEVICEAngiography

Conventional fluoroscopically guided activation mapping

DEVICECARTO 3D

CARTO (3D Electroanatomic imaging)

Sponsors

Korea University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Subject)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
20 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* patients with AF or substrate-dependent VT

Exclusion criteria

* administering with anticoagulants

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Fluoroscopic time24weeksTotal duration of procedure using fluoroscopy on , in minute
Procedural duration24weeksTime from after puncture to catheter remover

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Clinical Success24weeks* 3 months freedom from recurrence of target arrhythmia * \> 6 months freedom from recurrence of target arrhythmia
Radiation dose24weeksCalculated dose (in Gray) to the patient as recorded in the laboratory log
Morphology of ablation24weeksNumber of Gap and the distance from the ostia of the pulmonary veins (In conventional group)
Ablation time24weeksTime from to Ablation
Cost Effectiveness24weeks
Survival Rate24weeks
Complications24weeks* procedure and device related adverse event requiring any intervention to prevent permanent medical intervention * Important complications are reported individually
Procedural Success24weeksAchievement of the procedure endpoint for each arrhythmia

Countries

South Korea

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026