Conscious Sedation, Critical Illness, Deep Sedation, Respiration, Artificial
Conditions
Keywords
Pilot Study, Randomized Controlled Trial, Critically Ill, Child, Pediatric, Clonidine, Sedation
Brief summary
Almost all critically ill children who are mechanically ventilated require sedation and analgesia. Providing effective sedation for children in the PICU requires careful balancing of the need for sedation with the adverse effects associated with sedative medications. Clonidine is often used as an adjunctive sedative and analgesic in children but a well designed and adequately powered randomized trial is required to test the effect of clonidine-based sedation. Because there are no large randomized trials of sedation related interventions among critically ill children there are many unknown factors. This pilot trial, focussing on feasibility outcomes will assess the feasibility of, and inform the design of, a larger randomized controlled trial which will focus on clinically important outcomes.
Detailed description
Almost all critically ill children who are mechanically ventilated require sedation and analgesia. Providing effective sedation for children in the PICU requires careful balancing of the need for sedation with the adverse effects associated with sedative medications. Inadequate sedation may result in undue pain and suffering for children, ventilator dysynchrony and may risk removal of life sustaining devices. Excess sedation limits patients' interaction with their parents and care-givers and may result in delayed weaning from mechanical ventilation, prolonged PICU stay and the attendant risks of increased morbidity. Critically ill children may also experience withdrawal when these medications are stopped. Randomized trails in adults have shown that sedation related interventions can improve patients outcomes, but such trials have not been performed in children. Clonidine is often used as an adjunctive sedative and analgesic in children but a well designed and adequately powered randomized trial is required to test the effect of clonidine-based sedation. Because there are no large randomized trials of sedation related interventions among critically ill children there are many unknown factors. This pilot trial, focussing on feasibility outcomes will assess the feasibility of, and inform the design of, a larger randomized controlled trial which will focus on clinically important outcomes.
Interventions
DRUGclonidine
5 mcg/kg (maximum 200 mcg) enterally every 6 hours
DRUGplacebo
Preparation visually identical to clonidine.
Sponsors
McMaster University
Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
1 Months to 18 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
* aged 1 month to 18 years * mechanically ventilated * the attending physician expects to require mechanical ventilation for at least 2 more days * requires sedation in the form of: morphine by continuous infusion or greater than 4 intermittent doses in the previous 24 hours or fentanyl as a continuous infusion AND midazolam or lorazepam by continuous infusion or more than 3 intermittent doses of lorazepam or 6 doses of midazolam in the previous 12 hours * has enteral access (gastric or jejunal feeding tube)
Exclusion criteria
* hemodynamically unstable * meet the American College of Critical Care Medicine hemodynamic definition of shock * hypotensive or tachycardic * bradycardia, hemodynamically significant cardiac disease or chronic use of anti-hypertensive or diuretic medications * a traumatic brain injury on admission * chronically (defined as routine administration prior to hospital admission or for greater than 7 days in hospital prior to PICU admission) use benzodiazepines or opioids * have received greater than two doses of clonidine within the previous 2 days or dexmedetomidine in the past 2 days * were previously enrolled in this study * are currently enrolled in a related study * are known to be pregnant or breastfeeding * are known to be allergic to clonidine or any other ingredient in the tablets or suspension * are being considered for organ procurement * were chronically (\>30 days) ventilated prior to PICU admission * are currently receiving, or are expected to initiate the ketogenic diet * are receiving cyclosporine or methylphenidate
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Feasibility of screening procedures. | 90 days |
| Protocol adherence. | 90 days |
| Enrollment rate. | 90 days |
| Timeliness of drug administration. | 90 days |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Sedation and analgesia requirements. | 90 days |
| Ventilator-free days (number of days alive and breathing unaided within the first 28 days after intubation). | 28 days |
| Opioid and/or benzodiazepine withdrawal symptoms. | 90 days |
| Adverse effects. | 90 days |
| Duration of hospital stay. | 90 days |
Countries
Canada
Outcome results
None listed