Skip to content

Brazilian Intervention to Increase Evidence Usage in Practice - Acute Coronary Syndromes

Brazilian Intervention to Increase Evidence Usage in Practice - Acute Coronary Syndromes

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00958958
Acronym
BRIDGE
Enrollment
1150
Registered
2009-08-14
Start date
2010-01-31
Completion date
2012-02-29
Last updated
2012-02-28

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Acute Coronary Syndrome

Keywords

Acute Coronary Syndrome, randomized cluster trial, quality improvement

Brief summary

Phase 1: An observational study (registry) will be conducted which will objectively document the ACS clinical practice in Brazilian public hospitals, and identify the important barriers for the evidence usage incorporation in the clinical practice. Phase 2: A Cluster randomized clinical trial in which public hospital will be randomized to receive or not a multifaceted strategy in order to increase evidence based therapy in clinical practice.

Detailed description

STUDY POPULATION: Patients with thoracic pain who the emergency department physician suspects of ACS and plans start a treatment for this issue; It will be excluded patients transferred of others institutions with 12 hours of symptoms. PROGRAM: There are multifaceted Interventions Including 1. Distribution of educational materials 2. Case manager: Use of a trained person who works in the hospital and will be responsible to assure that all interventions were used 3. Reminders: specific information that is designed or intended to prompt a health professional to recall information (patient bracelets, labels, posters, pocket cards, checklists). 4. Practical training ENDPOINTS: Phase 1 Primary outcome; patient who've received interventions based on evidence proportion informed by the indicators; Phase 2 Primary outcome: Increase of prescription of evidence based treatment in clinical practice Secondary outcome Total mortality and major cardiovascular events

Interventions

There are multifaceted Interventions Including 1. Distribution of educational materials: distribution of published or printed recommendations for clinical care. 2. Case manager: Use of a trained person who works in the hospital and will be responsible to assure that all interventions were used 3. Reminders 4. Practical training

Sponsors

Ministry of Health, Brazil
CollaboratorOTHER_GOV
Hospital do Coracao
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

Patient Eligibility criteria Inclusion Criteria: * Patients with thoracic pain who the emergency department physician suspects of ACS and plans start a treatment for this issue

Exclusion criteria

* Patients transferred from others institutions within 12 hours of the symptoms Cluster Eligibility Criteria * National Public Hospitals with emergency department. A cluster can be one hospital with emergency department, or 2 or more hospitals (for example: 1 emergency hospital and 1 general hospital which receive the patients to perform PCI).

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Phase 1: patient who've received interventions based on evidence proportion informed by the indicators9 months
Phase 2: increase of prescription of evidence based treatment in clinical practice6 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Total mortality and major cardiovascular events6 months

Countries

Brazil

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 26, 2026