Skip to content

Low Vision Intervention Trial II (LOVIT II)

VA Low Vision Intervention Trial (LOVIT) II

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00958360
Acronym
LOVIT II
Enrollment
323
Registered
2009-08-13
Start date
2010-08-31
Completion date
2015-09-30
Last updated
2016-08-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Central Vision Loss From Macular Diseases

Keywords

vision, low

Brief summary

This study will determine if the interdisciplinary team low vision rehabilitation program is more effective than basic low vision care provided by an optometrist working alone in improving visual reading ability in veterans with macular diseases and best corrected visual acuity of 20/50 to 20/200.

Detailed description

Key Questions: The purpose of our proposed single-masked multicenter randomized controlled trial is to determine if the Interdisciplinary Team approach to low vision service delivery is more effective than the Basic Low Vision Service in improving visual reading ability for 330 veterans with macular diseases and best corrected visual acuity of 20/50-20/200. Effectiveness will be measured with the Veterans Affairs Low Vision Visual Functioning Questionnaire (VA LV VFQ-48), a valid and reliable questionnaire that is administered by telephone to capture changes in patients' self-report of their difficulty reading and performing other daily living activities affected by visual impairment before and after rehabilitation. The primary outcome measure is the comparison of changes in patients' visual reading ability on the VA LV VFQ-48 after they receive low vision care from the Interdisciplinary Team or Basic Low Vision Care program. The secondary outcome measures are comparisons of changes in other VA LV VFQ-48 visual ability scores (overall, mobility, visual information processing, visual motor skills). Hypothesis: The improvement in visual reading ability measured with the VA LV VFQ-48 will be larger for patients who received low vision services from the Interdisciplinary Team than for patients who received the Basic Low Vision Service. Specific Aims:(1) Compare the mean changes in patients' visual reading ability (estimated from patients' difficulty ratings of reading items on the VA LV VFQ-48 before and after low vision service delivery) in the Interdisciplinary Team and Basic Low Vision Care Programs.(2) Compare the mean changes in visual ability \[patients' difficulty ratings of other items on the VA LV VFQ-48 (mobility, visual information processing, visual motor skills) before and after low vision service delivery\] in the Interdisciplinary Team and Basic Low Vision Care programs.(3). Identify the characteristics of patients who benefit from the Interdisciplinary Team and Basic Low Vision Service. (4). Conduct an economic evaluation to compare the costs and cost effectiveness of the Interdisciplinary Team and Basic Low Vision Service.

Interventions

OTHERInterdisciplinary Low Vision Service

Services are provided by optometrist(s) and low vision therapist(s), and include low vision therapy to improve use of remaining vision and low vision devices, and structured homework to practice use of low vision devices that are prescribed and dispensed.

OTHERBasic Low Vision Service

Service is provided by the optometrist alone and includes demonstration of low vision device use and maintenance of prescribed low vision devices, without low vision therapy or homework and with less contact time.

Sponsors

VA Office of Research and Development
Lead SponsorFED

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Primary eye diagnosis (better seeing Eye) macular disease * Best-corrected visual acuity (better seeing eye) 20/50-20/200

Exclusion criteria

* Does not have a telephone * Does not speak English * Has received interdisciplinary low vision services * English literacy less that 5th grade reading level * Failed TICS * Unable or unwilling to attend required clinic visits * Severe hearing impairment preventing administration of telephone questionnaires * Planned cataract extraction in next 4 months * Visual fields contracted to diameter of 20 degrees in better-seeing eye * Vitreous hemorrhage or serous hemorrhagic detachment of macula * CNVM treated with fewer than 3 anti-VEGF injections * Diabetic macular edema (DME) treated with focal/grid laser within the last two months * DME treated with intravitreal injections of anti-VEGF or intravitreal triamcinolone acetonide (IVTA) within the last two months * Cystoid macular edema (CME) treated with topical (non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs) NSAIDS, topical steroids or IVTA within the last three months

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Comparison of Changes in Visual Reading Ability From Baseline to Four Months Later Measured With 48 Item VA Low Vision Visual Functioning Questionnairechanges from baseline to 4 months laterThe range of scores for the Visual Reading Ability subscale of the VA Low Vision Visual Functioning Questionnaire is 0 to 3.5 logits (log odds ratio). A higher score indicates better ability or less difficulty performing activities.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Comparison of Changes in Mobility From Baseline to Four Months Later Measured With 48 Item VA Low Vision Visual Functioning Questionnairechanges from baseline to 4 months laterThe range of scores for the Mobility subscale of the VA Low Vision Visual Functioning Questionnaire is 0 to 3.5 logits (log odds ratio). A higher score indicates better ability or less difficulty performing activities.
Comparison of Changes in Visual Information Processing From Baseline to Four Months Later Measured With 48 Item VA Low Vision Visual Functioning Questionnairechanges from baseline to 4 months laterThe range of scores for the Visual Information Processing subscale of the VA Low Vision Visual Functioning Questionnaire is 0 to 3.5 logits (log odds ratio). A higher score indicates better ability or less difficulty performing activities.
Comparison of Changes in Visual Motor Skills From Baseline to Four Months Later Measured With 48 Item VA Low Vision Visual Functioning Questionnairechanges from baseline to 4 months laterThe range of scores for the Visual Motor Skills subscale of the VA Low Vision Visual Functioning Questionnaire is 0 to 3.5 logits (log odds ratio). A higher score indicates better ability or less difficulty performing activities.
Comparison of Overall Visual Ability From Baseline to Four Months Later Measured With 48 Item VA Low Vision Visual Functioning Questionnairechanges from baseline to 4 months laterThe range of scores for the Overall Visual Ability subscale of the VA Low Vision Visual Functioning Questionnaire is 0 to 3.5 logits (log odds ratio). A higher score indicates better ability or less difficulty performing activities.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

A total of 2,051 patients were screened, of whom 1,728 were excluded (1,706 ineligible per chart review and 22 ineligible after screening).

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Interdisciplinary Low Vision Rehabilitation Group
Interdisciplinary Low Vision Rehabilitation: Low vision examination, prescription and dispensing of low vision devices, low vision therapy and homework. Interdisciplinary Low Vision Service: Services are provided by optometrist(s) and low vision therapist(s), and include low vision therapy to improve use of remaining vision and low vision devices, and structured homework to practice use of low vision devices that are prescribed and dispensed.
163
Basic Low Vision Care Group
Basic Low Vision Care: Low vision examination, prescription and dispensing of low vision devices without low vision therapy or assigned homework. Basic Low Vision Service: Service is provided by the optometrist alone and includes demonstration of low vision device use and maintenance of prescribed low vision devices, without low vision therapy or homework and with less contact time.
160
Total323

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyDeath67
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up01
Overall StudyPhysician Decision21
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject31

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicBasic Low Vision Care GroupTotalInterdisciplinary Low Vision Rehabilitation Group
Age, Continuous79.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.1
79.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.5
80.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.8
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
8 Participants14 Participants6 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
152 Participants309 Participants157 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
10 Participants25 Participants15 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
6 Participants6 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
144 Participants292 Participants148 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
4 Participants9 Participants5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
156 Participants314 Participants158 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
10 / 1631 / 160
serious
Total, serious adverse events
27 / 16329 / 160

Outcome results

Primary

Comparison of Changes in Visual Reading Ability From Baseline to Four Months Later Measured With 48 Item VA Low Vision Visual Functioning Questionnaire

The range of scores for the Visual Reading Ability subscale of the VA Low Vision Visual Functioning Questionnaire is 0 to 3.5 logits (log odds ratio). A higher score indicates better ability or less difficulty performing activities.

Time frame: changes from baseline to 4 months later

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Interdisciplinary Low Vision Rehabilitation GroupComparison of Changes in Visual Reading Ability From Baseline to Four Months Later Measured With 48 Item VA Low Vision Visual Functioning Questionnaire1.29 logitsStandard Deviation 1.66
Basic Low Vision Care GroupComparison of Changes in Visual Reading Ability From Baseline to Four Months Later Measured With 48 Item VA Low Vision Visual Functioning Questionnaire0.95 logitsStandard Deviation 1.46
p-value: 0.05t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Comparison of Changes in Mobility From Baseline to Four Months Later Measured With 48 Item VA Low Vision Visual Functioning Questionnaire

The range of scores for the Mobility subscale of the VA Low Vision Visual Functioning Questionnaire is 0 to 3.5 logits (log odds ratio). A higher score indicates better ability or less difficulty performing activities.

Time frame: changes from baseline to 4 months later

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Interdisciplinary Low Vision Rehabilitation GroupComparison of Changes in Mobility From Baseline to Four Months Later Measured With 48 Item VA Low Vision Visual Functioning Questionnaire0.31 logitsStandard Deviation 1.15
Basic Low Vision Care GroupComparison of Changes in Mobility From Baseline to Four Months Later Measured With 48 Item VA Low Vision Visual Functioning Questionnaire0.12 logitsStandard Deviation 1.16
p-value: 0.13t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Comparison of Changes in Visual Information Processing From Baseline to Four Months Later Measured With 48 Item VA Low Vision Visual Functioning Questionnaire

The range of scores for the Visual Information Processing subscale of the VA Low Vision Visual Functioning Questionnaire is 0 to 3.5 logits (log odds ratio). A higher score indicates better ability or less difficulty performing activities.

Time frame: changes from baseline to 4 months later

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Interdisciplinary Low Vision Rehabilitation GroupComparison of Changes in Visual Information Processing From Baseline to Four Months Later Measured With 48 Item VA Low Vision Visual Functioning Questionnaire0.67 logitsStandard Deviation 1.21
Basic Low Vision Care GroupComparison of Changes in Visual Information Processing From Baseline to Four Months Later Measured With 48 Item VA Low Vision Visual Functioning Questionnaire0.40 logitsStandard Deviation 1.13
p-value: 0.05t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Comparison of Changes in Visual Motor Skills From Baseline to Four Months Later Measured With 48 Item VA Low Vision Visual Functioning Questionnaire

The range of scores for the Visual Motor Skills subscale of the VA Low Vision Visual Functioning Questionnaire is 0 to 3.5 logits (log odds ratio). A higher score indicates better ability or less difficulty performing activities.

Time frame: changes from baseline to 4 months later

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Interdisciplinary Low Vision Rehabilitation GroupComparison of Changes in Visual Motor Skills From Baseline to Four Months Later Measured With 48 Item VA Low Vision Visual Functioning Questionnaire0.77 logitsStandard Deviation 1.47
Basic Low Vision Care GroupComparison of Changes in Visual Motor Skills From Baseline to Four Months Later Measured With 48 Item VA Low Vision Visual Functioning Questionnaire0.40 logitsStandard Deviation 1.19
p-value: 0.013t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Comparison of Overall Visual Ability From Baseline to Four Months Later Measured With 48 Item VA Low Vision Visual Functioning Questionnaire

The range of scores for the Overall Visual Ability subscale of the VA Low Vision Visual Functioning Questionnaire is 0 to 3.5 logits (log odds ratio). A higher score indicates better ability or less difficulty performing activities.

Time frame: changes from baseline to 4 months later

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Interdisciplinary Low Vision Rehabilitation GroupComparison of Overall Visual Ability From Baseline to Four Months Later Measured With 48 Item VA Low Vision Visual Functioning Questionnaire0.70 logitsStandard Deviation 1.06
Basic Low Vision Care GroupComparison of Overall Visual Ability From Baseline to Four Months Later Measured With 48 Item VA Low Vision Visual Functioning Questionnaire0.43 logitsStandard Deviation 0.89
p-value: 0.013t-test, 2 sided

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 28, 2026