Skip to content

Triathlon® Posteriorly Stabilized (PS) Total Knee System - Outcomes Study

A Prospective, Post-market, Multi-center Study of the Outcomes of the Triathlon® Posteriorly Stabilized (PS) Total Knee System

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00957021
Enrollment
409
Registered
2009-08-12
Start date
2005-12-31
Completion date
2014-01-31
Last updated
2017-01-25

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee

Keywords

Knee

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical outcomes (range of motion, pain, function, radiographic stability, and health related quality of life) of patients receiving the Triathlon® Posterior Stabilized (PS) Total Knee System. These outcomes will be evaluated using pre-operative scores and comparing them to post-operative scores in addition to being compared with cases who received the Scorpio® PS implant.

Detailed description

The Triathlon® Posteriorly Stabilized (PS) Total Knee System components are for use in cemented total knee arthroplasty for painful, disabling joint disease of the knee resulting from non-inflammatory degenerative joint disease (including osteoarthritis, traumatic arthritis or avascular necrosis) or rheumatoid arthritis (excluded from this study according to protocol). The components are designed to improve range of motion (ROM) and stability. This study serves to demonstrate that subjects have reduced pain, increased ROM and improved stability following implantation with the Triathlon® PS Total Knee System.

Interventions

DEVICETriathlon® PS Total Knee System

Triathlon® PS Total Knee system

Sponsors

Stryker Orthopaedics
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
21 Years to 80 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. The subject is a male or non-pregnant female 21-80 years of age at the time of enrollment. 2. The subject requires a primary cemented total knee replacement. 3. The subject has a diagnosis of osteoarthritis (OA), traumatic arthritis (TA), or avascular necrosis (AVN). 4. The subject has intact collateral ligaments. 5. The subject has signed the IRB approved, study specific Informed Patient Consent Form. 6. The subject is willing and able to comply with postoperative scheduled clinical and radiographic evaluations and rehabilitation.

Exclusion criteria

1. The subject has inflammatory arthritis. 2. The subject is morbidly obese, BMI \> 40. 3. The subject has a history of total or unicompartmental reconstruction of the affected joint. 4. The subject has had a high tibial osteotomy or femoral osteotomy. 5. The subject has a neuromuscular or neurosensory deficiency that would limit the ability to assess the performance of the device. 6. The subject has a systemic or metabolic disorder leading to progressive bone deterioration. 7. The subject is immunologically suppressed, or receiving chronic steroids (\>30 days duration). 8. The subject's bone stock is compromised by disease or infection and cannot provide adequate support and/or fixation to the prosthesis. 9. The subject has had a knee fusion at the affected joint. 10. The subject has an active or suspected latent infection in or about the knee joint. 11. The subject is a prisoner.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Range of Motion2 yearsThe primary outcome of this study is to compare active range of motion values for the Triathlon PS Total Knee System.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Radiographic Outcome1,2 and 5 yearsRadiographic success/failure at 1, 2, and 5-year visits will be assessed. Radiographic failure is defined as a score of 10 or greater according to the Knee Society Roentgenographic Scoring System, regardless of symptoms. A migrating or shifting prosthesis with or without the disappearance of radiolucent lines is also a failure regardless of score.
Patient Outcome Lower-Extremity Activity Scale1,2,3,4 and 5 yearsThe Lower-Extremity Activity Scale (LEAS) score at 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5-year intervals will be compared at each post-surgery visit with baseline to see if any improvement is seen for each time point.The LEAS is completed by the participant to assess activity level. Activity levels were ordered in terms of intensity from 1 to 18, with 18 indicating the highest activity level. A level of 1 indicated that the subject was confined to bed all day while a level of 18 indicated that the subject was up and about at will inside and outside of the house, and also participated in vigorous physical activity, such as competitive level sports, on a daily basis.
Patient Outcome Knee Society Score1,2 and 5 yearsThe Knee Society Scores (KSS) at 1, 2, and 5-year visits will be compared. Additionally, comparison of scores at each post-surgery visit with baseline will be tested to see if any improvement is seen at each time point. The Knee Society Clinical Rating System is comprised of two distinct sub-scores: one for pain, ROM and joint stability, and one for functional parameters. Sub-scores range from a potential minimum score of 0 to a maximum score of 100 points. Although the specific scores are not distinguished as excellent, good, fair, or poor, a higher value represents a better outcome.
Patient Outcome SF-361,2,3,4 and 5 yearsThe SF-36 score at 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5-year visits will be compared at each post-surgery visit with baseline to see if any improvement is seen for each time point.The SF-36 includes a physical component and a mental component and is completed by the participant. Physical component and mental component scores were calculated on a scale ranging from 0 to 100. Low values represented a poor health state and high values represented a good health state.
Patient Outcome WOMAC5 yearsThe Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores at 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5-year visits will be compared between groups, when data is available. Additionally, comparison of scores at each post-surgery visit with baseline will be tested to see if any improvement is seen for each time point. The WOMAC collects information specific to osteoarthritis outcomes. The questionnaire uses a visual analog scale for pain, measuring factors of general pain, stiffness, and physical findings. Pain is scored from 0 to 100 for each set of factors, with 0 indicating no pain and 100 indicating extreme pain. Total WOMAC scores range from 0 to 300. Lower values represent better outcomes. Data for the WOMAC is only available at the 5 year interval due to typographical errors noted on earlier interval forms rendering them invalid for comparison.

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

409 participants/500 knees enrolled - 55 participants/65 knees censored = 354 participants/435 knees followed.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Triathlon® PS Total Knee System
Participants who were not censored from analysis.
351
Total351

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyDeath5
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up8
Overall StudyNo 2 yr ROM data35
Overall StudyRevised study component by 2 yr visit8
Overall StudySite Termination by the 2 yr visit16
Overall StudySurgery Cancelled9
Overall StudyTermination due to language issue2
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject34

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicTriathlon® PS Total Knee System
Age, Continuous65.12 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.59
Gender
Female
200 Participants
Gender
Male
151 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
351 participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
194 / 354
serious
Total, serious adverse events
86 / 354

Outcome results

Primary

Range of Motion

The primary outcome of this study is to compare active range of motion values for the Triathlon PS Total Knee System.

Time frame: 2 years

Population: Participants can have both knees replaced. Range of motion is measured for each knee, as such the number of knees evaluated can be greater than the number of participants.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Triathlon® PS Total Knee SystemRange of Motion124 degreesStandard Deviation 9.98
Secondary

Patient Outcome Knee Society Score

The Knee Society Scores (KSS) at 1, 2, and 5-year visits will be compared. Additionally, comparison of scores at each post-surgery visit with baseline will be tested to see if any improvement is seen at each time point. The Knee Society Clinical Rating System is comprised of two distinct sub-scores: one for pain, ROM and joint stability, and one for functional parameters. Sub-scores range from a potential minimum score of 0 to a maximum score of 100 points. Although the specific scores are not distinguished as excellent, good, fair, or poor, a higher value represents a better outcome.

Time frame: 1,2 and 5 years

Population: Maximum number of knees evaluated at any interval.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Triathlon® PS Total Knee SystemPatient Outcome Knee Society ScorePain/Motion 1 Yr (N=335)93.77 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.03
Triathlon® PS Total Knee SystemPatient Outcome Knee Society ScorePain/Motion 1 Yr difference from Baseline (N=333)57.36 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.8
Triathlon® PS Total Knee SystemPatient Outcome Knee Society ScoreFunction 1 Yr (N=340)86.26 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 15.5
Triathlon® PS Total Knee SystemPatient Outcome Knee Society ScoreFunction 1 Yr difference from Baseline (N=340)30.99 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.43
Triathlon® PS Total Knee SystemPatient Outcome Knee Society ScorePain/Motion 2 Yr (N=281)93.96 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.45
Triathlon® PS Total Knee SystemPatient Outcome Knee Society ScorePain/Motion 2 Yr difference from Baseline (N=279)57.76 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 17.2
Triathlon® PS Total Knee SystemPatient Outcome Knee Society ScoreFunction 2 Yr (N=284)87.38 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.4
Triathlon® PS Total Knee SystemPatient Outcome Knee Society ScoreFunction 2 Yr difference from Baseline (N=284)32.55 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 18.89
Triathlon® PS Total Knee SystemPatient Outcome Knee Society ScorePain/Motion 5 Yr (N=230)94.61 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.62
Triathlon® PS Total Knee SystemPatient Outcome Knee Society ScorePain/Motion 5 Yr difference from Baseline (N=229)58.56 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 16.35
Triathlon® PS Total Knee SystemPatient Outcome Knee Society ScoreFunction 5 Yr (N=232)82.07 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 20.74
Triathlon® PS Total Knee SystemPatient Outcome Knee Society ScoreFunction 5 Yr difference from Baseline (N=232)27.33 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 22.59
Comparison: KSS Pain/Motion and Function Score comparison from pre-op to 1, 2 and 5 yearp-value: <0.0001t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Patient Outcome Lower-Extremity Activity Scale

The Lower-Extremity Activity Scale (LEAS) score at 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5-year intervals will be compared at each post-surgery visit with baseline to see if any improvement is seen for each time point.The LEAS is completed by the participant to assess activity level. Activity levels were ordered in terms of intensity from 1 to 18, with 18 indicating the highest activity level. A level of 1 indicated that the subject was confined to bed all day while a level of 18 indicated that the subject was up and about at will inside and outside of the house, and also participated in vigorous physical activity, such as competitive level sports, on a daily basis.

Time frame: 1,2,3,4 and 5 years

Population: Maximum number of knees available at any interval.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Triathlon® PS Total Knee SystemPatient Outcome Lower-Extremity Activity ScaleLEAS 1 Year (N=339)11.22 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.62
Triathlon® PS Total Knee SystemPatient Outcome Lower-Extremity Activity ScaleLEAS 1 Year difference from Baseline (N=339)1.97 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.84
Triathlon® PS Total Knee SystemPatient Outcome Lower-Extremity Activity ScaleLEAS 2 Year (N=291)11.04 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.63
Triathlon® PS Total Knee SystemPatient Outcome Lower-Extremity Activity ScaleLEAS 2 Year difference from Baseline (N=291)1.86 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.98
Triathlon® PS Total Knee SystemPatient Outcome Lower-Extremity Activity ScaleLEAS 3 Year (N=266)11.15 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.87
Triathlon® PS Total Knee SystemPatient Outcome Lower-Extremity Activity ScaleLEAS 3 Year difference from Baseline (N=266)1.95 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.12
Triathlon® PS Total Knee SystemPatient Outcome Lower-Extremity Activity ScaleLEAS 4 Year (N=262)10.97 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.76
Triathlon® PS Total Knee SystemPatient Outcome Lower-Extremity Activity ScaleLEAS 4 Year difference from Baseline (N=262)1.87 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.03
Triathlon® PS Total Knee SystemPatient Outcome Lower-Extremity Activity ScaleLEAS 5 Year (N=244)11.02 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 2.93
Triathlon® PS Total Knee SystemPatient Outcome Lower-Extremity Activity ScaleLEAS 5 Year difference from Baseline (N=244)1.89 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 3.14
Comparison: LEAS score comparison from pre-op to 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 yearsp-value: <0.0001t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Patient Outcome SF-36

The SF-36 score at 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5-year visits will be compared at each post-surgery visit with baseline to see if any improvement is seen for each time point.The SF-36 includes a physical component and a mental component and is completed by the participant. Physical component and mental component scores were calculated on a scale ranging from 0 to 100. Low values represented a poor health state and high values represented a good health state.

Time frame: 1,2,3,4 and 5 years

Population: Maximum number of knees evaluated at any interval.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Triathlon® PS Total Knee SystemPatient Outcome SF-36SF36 Physical Component 1 Yr (N=335)48.16 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.5
Triathlon® PS Total Knee SystemPatient Outcome SF-36SF36 Physical 1 Yr difference from Baseline(N=332)15.32 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.28
Triathlon® PS Total Knee SystemPatient Outcome SF-36SF36 Mental Component 1 Yr (N=335)55.21 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.02
Triathlon® PS Total Knee SystemPatient Outcome SF-36SF36 Mental 1Yr difference from Baseline(N=332)2.58 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.06
Triathlon® PS Total Knee SystemPatient Outcome SF-36SF36 Physical Component 2Yr (N=290)47.34 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.57
Triathlon® PS Total Knee SystemPatient Outcome SF-36SF36 Physical 2 Yr difference from Baseline(N=288)14.54 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.75
Triathlon® PS Total Knee SystemPatient Outcome SF-36SF36 Mental Component 2 Yr (N=290)55.04 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.1
Triathlon® PS Total Knee SystemPatient Outcome SF-36SF36 Mental 2Yr difference from Baseline(N=288)2.04 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.9
Triathlon® PS Total Knee SystemPatient Outcome SF-36SF36 Physical Component 3Yr (N=259)47.23 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.31
Triathlon® PS Total Knee SystemPatient Outcome SF-36SF36 Physical 3 Yr difference from Baseline(N=257)14.45 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.58
Triathlon® PS Total Knee SystemPatient Outcome SF-36SF36 Mental Component 3 Yr (N=259)54.30 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.68
Triathlon® PS Total Knee SystemPatient Outcome SF-36SF36 Mental 3 Yr difference from Baseline(N=257)1.93 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.06
Triathlon® PS Total Knee SystemPatient Outcome SF-36SF36 Physical Component 4 Yr (N=254)46.26 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.05
Triathlon® PS Total Knee SystemPatient Outcome SF-36SF36 Physical 4 Yr difference from Baseline(N=253)13.58 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.54
Triathlon® PS Total Knee SystemPatient Outcome SF-36SF36 Mental 4 Yr difference from Baseline(N=253)1.93 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.88
Triathlon® PS Total Knee SystemPatient Outcome SF-36SF36 Physical Component 5 Yr (N=243)46.33 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 9.72
Triathlon® PS Total Knee SystemPatient Outcome SF-36SF36 Physical 5 Yr difference from Baseline(N=242)13.65 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 10.82
Triathlon® PS Total Knee SystemPatient Outcome SF-36SF36 Mental Component 5 Yr (N=243)54.82 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 7.97
Triathlon® PS Total Knee SystemPatient Outcome SF-36SF36 Mental 5 Yr difference from Baseline(N=242)2.25 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 11.06
Triathlon® PS Total Knee SystemPatient Outcome SF-36SF36 Mental Component 4 Yr (N=254)54.49 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 8.74
Comparison: SF-36 Physical score comparison from pre-op to 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 yearsp-value: <0.0001t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: SF-36 Mental score comparison from pre-op to 1 yearp-value: <0.0001t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: SF-36 Mental score comparison from pre-op to 2 yearp-value: 0.0017t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: SF-36 Mental score comparison from pre-op to 3 yearp-value: 0.0055t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: SF-36 Mental score comparison from pre-op to 4 yearp-value: 0.005t-test, 2 sided
Comparison: SF-36 Mental score comparison from pre-op to 5 yearp-value: 0.0018t-test, 2 sided
Secondary

Patient Outcome WOMAC

The Western Ontario and McMaster Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) scores at 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5-year visits will be compared between groups, when data is available. Additionally, comparison of scores at each post-surgery visit with baseline will be tested to see if any improvement is seen for each time point. The WOMAC collects information specific to osteoarthritis outcomes. The questionnaire uses a visual analog scale for pain, measuring factors of general pain, stiffness, and physical findings. Pain is scored from 0 to 100 for each set of factors, with 0 indicating no pain and 100 indicating extreme pain. Total WOMAC scores range from 0 to 300. Lower values represent better outcomes. Data for the WOMAC is only available at the 5 year interval due to typographical errors noted on earlier interval forms rendering them invalid for comparison.

Time frame: 5 years

Population: The number of knees evaluated at 5 years.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
Triathlon® PS Total Knee SystemPatient Outcome WOMAC45.11 units on a scaleStandard Deviation 53.96
Secondary

Radiographic Outcome

Radiographic success/failure at 1, 2, and 5-year visits will be assessed. Radiographic failure is defined as a score of 10 or greater according to the Knee Society Roentgenographic Scoring System, regardless of symptoms. A migrating or shifting prosthesis with or without the disappearance of radiolucent lines is also a failure regardless of score.

Time frame: 1,2 and 5 years

Population: Maximum number of knees evaluable at any interval.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Triathlon® PS Total Knee SystemRadiographic OutcomeRadiographic failure at 1 Yr (N=347 knees)1 knees
Triathlon® PS Total Knee SystemRadiographic OutcomeRadiographic failure at 2 Yrs (N=282 knees)2 knees
Triathlon® PS Total Knee SystemRadiographic OutcomeRadiographic failure at 5 Yrs (N=217 knees)3 knees

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026