Skip to content

Regional Anesthesia for Major Surgery of the Foot. Levobupivacaïne Ropivacaine 0.5% Versus 0.5% in the Sciatic Block Through médiofémorale

Status
Terminated
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00956709
Acronym
SCIALERO
Enrollment
35
Registered
2009-08-11
Start date
2008-12-31
Completion date
2011-11-30
Last updated
2016-10-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Nerve Block

Brief summary

Ropivacaine 0.5% and 0.5% in levobupivacaïne are used in regional anesthesia for major surgery of the foot. The literature does not highlight a significant difference in terms of onset of action between these two molecules to block the sciatic nerve \[4\]. Our hypothesis is that this lack of difference is due to the use of a neurostimulator for locating the injection site (indiscriminate nature of the anatomical approach to the sciatic nerve). Indeed, the sensitivity of neurostimulation is low compared with ultrasound \[58\] and ultrasound, for accurate visualization of the deposit of the local anesthetic around the nerve to improve the quality of the block and reduce the onset of action of local anesthetic \[46, 47\]. The investigators propose to make a comparative trial between levobupivacaïne 0.5% ropivacaine and 0.5% under the control of the ultrasound as part of a sciatic nerve block. The use of ultrasound will reduce the variability of results because the changes would be linked exclusively to the local anesthetic. The investigators test the hypothesis that levobupivacaïne gives better results in terms of onset of action than ropivacaine.

Interventions

DRUGlevobupivacaïne 0,5 %

20mL de levobupivacaïne 0,5 % 20mL de ropivacaïne 0,5 %

DRUGropivacaïne 0,5 %

20mL de ropivacaïne 0,5 %

Sponsors

Nantes University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 65 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients with unilateral major surgery of the foot: hallux valgus (not ambulatory), claw toes, fusion-Astragalo calcaneum, complex syntheses of tarsus-aged over 18 years . * Male and female * ASA 1 or 2 * Insured Social * Informed Consent

Exclusion criteria

* Diabetes * Intoxication-alcoholic chronic * Allergy to local anesthetics * Hemostasis disorders * Hepatic failure * Chronic pain syndrome

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Compare the Onset of Action of Ropivacaine 0.5% and levobupivacaïne 0.5 % for Sciatic Nerve Block Guided in Major Surgery of the Foot72 hours

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Evaluate the Relative Position of the Tibial and Contigent Fibulaire Common in the Sciatic Nerve.72 hours
Duration of Motor Sciatic Block (h)72 hours
Duration of Sensory Sciatic Block (h)72 hours

Countries

France

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Levobupivacaïne 0,5 %
levobupivacaïne 0,5 %: 20mL de levobupivacaïne 0,5 % 20mL de ropivacaïne 0,5 %
16
Ropivacaïne 0,5%
ropivacaïne 0,5 %: 20mL de ropivacaïne 0,5 %
19
Total35

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicLevobupivacaïne 0,5 %Ropivacaïne 0,5%Total
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
6 Participants4 Participants10 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
10 Participants15 Participants25 Participants
Age, Continuous62 years62 years62 years
Region of Enrollment
France
16 participants19 participants35 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
12 Participants15 Participants27 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
4 Participants4 Participants8 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 160 / 19
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 160 / 19

Outcome results

Primary

Compare the Onset of Action of Ropivacaine 0.5% and levobupivacaïne 0.5 % for Sciatic Nerve Block Guided in Major Surgery of the Foot

Time frame: 72 hours

Population: Two patients in each group had incomplete block before surgery.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Levobupivacaïne 0,5 %Compare the Onset of Action of Ropivacaine 0.5% and levobupivacaïne 0.5 % for Sciatic Nerve Block Guided in Major Surgery of the Foot40 minutes
Ropivacaïne 0,5%Compare the Onset of Action of Ropivacaine 0.5% and levobupivacaïne 0.5 % for Sciatic Nerve Block Guided in Major Surgery of the Foot35 minutes
p-value: 0.56Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Duration of Motor Sciatic Block (h)

Time frame: 72 hours

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Levobupivacaïne 0,5 %Duration of Motor Sciatic Block (h)15.54 hours
Ropivacaïne 0,5%Duration of Motor Sciatic Block (h)15.17 hours
p-value: 0.3354Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Duration of Sensory Sciatic Block (h)

Time frame: 72 hours

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
Levobupivacaïne 0,5 %Duration of Sensory Sciatic Block (h)17.25 hours
Ropivacaïne 0,5%Duration of Sensory Sciatic Block (h)15.00 hours
p-value: 0.0445Wilcoxon (Mann-Whitney)
Secondary

Evaluate the Relative Position of the Tibial and Contigent Fibulaire Common in the Sciatic Nerve.

Time frame: 72 hours

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026