Skip to content

Clinical Evaluation of the Storz CMAC Laryngoscope

A Randomized Control Trial to Determine First Attempt Intubation Success With the CMAC Laryngoscope vs. Macintosh Blade in Airways Predicted to be Difficult

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00956592
Enrollment
300
Registered
2009-08-11
Start date
2009-10-31
Completion date
2010-12-31
Last updated
2018-04-05

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Airway Management, Intubation

Keywords

Video laryngoscopy, Intubation success, Difficult airway, CMAC laryngoscope

Brief summary

This study aims to evaluate the utility of a video assisted device for intubation (placement of a breathing tube) during surgery. This study specifically aims to compare a video assisted intubation with the CMAC laryngoscope to conventional devices in the setting of intubations predicted to be difficult.

Detailed description

Patients will be specifically screened for predictors by history and physical exam of potential airway difficulty. The role of video laryngoscopy in airways predicted to be difficult is poorly defined. This study aims to recognize if video laryngoscopy is more useful than conventional laryngoscopy as a first attempt for those with anticipated difficulty.

Interventions

DEVICECMAC video laryngoscope

Intubation utilizing the assistance of video enhancement

DEVICEMacintosh laryngoscope

Patients will be intubated utilizing either a Macintosh 3 or Macintosh 4 designed blade

Sponsors

Oregon Health and Science University
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 99 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Adult patients presenting for elective surgery who are fasted and who have one of the following difficult airway predictors: * mallampati classification 3 * mallampati classification 4 * Reduced mouth opening (\<3cm) * reduced cervical motion * history of previous difficult intubation or multiple laryngoscopy attempts

Exclusion criteria

* Patients less than 18 years old, patients who are not fasted (\>6 hrs. NPO) * Patients who have contraindications to the administration of neuromuscular blocking drugs * Patients who have a documented history of intubation on first attempt with C-L grade 1 laryngeal view * Patients who are deemed to difficult and dangerous to anesthetize without first securing an airway.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Measure of Intubation SuccessDuring each intubation in a 14 month periodSuccess was measured by confirmed tracheal tube placement with one attempt. Any removal of the laryngoscope blade constituted a failure

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Intubation TimeDuring laryngoscopy procedureTime was measured as the duration of laryngoscopy defined by blade insertion to tracheal tube cuff inflation
Number of Participants Intubated With a Rescue Device1 year
Number of Participants With Complications1 year
Number of Participants With a Laryngeal View Grade of 1 or 2 vs. 3 or 4.1 yearGrade 1= full view of the glottis achieved Grade 2= partial view of the glottis achieved Grade 3= only the epiglottis visualized Grade 4= no laryngeal view achieved
Number of Particpants Requiring Adjuncts to Assist Intubation1 year

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Patients were recruited at OHSU OR and procedure rooms. 300 patients were enrolled in the study from 10/09-12/10

Pre-assignment details

4 exclusions were noted for failure to follow the randomization

Participants by arm

ArmCount
CMAC Video Laryngoscope
Subjects will have their intubation attempted first with the CMAC video laryngoscope. Success is measured as confirmed tube placement with single blade insertion
150
Macintosh Blade
Patients will have their first intubation attempted utilizing the conventional Macintosh design laryngoscope blade. Success is measured as confirmed tube placement with a single blade insertion
150
Total300

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyProtocol Violation13

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicMacintosh BladeCMAC Video LaryngoscopeTotal
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
36 Participants28 Participants64 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
114 Participants122 Participants236 Participants
Age, Continuous55.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.5
53.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.2
54.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 14.5
Region of Enrollment
United States
150 participants150 participants300 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
65 Participants76 Participants141 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
85 Participants74 Participants159 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
0 / 1500 / 150
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 1500 / 150

Outcome results

Primary

Measure of Intubation Success

Success was measured by confirmed tracheal tube placement with one attempt. Any removal of the laryngoscope blade constituted a failure

Time frame: During each intubation in a 14 month period

Population: 4 patients of the 300 were excluded because the randomization was not followed due to unavailability of equipment or provider preference to remove patient from study

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
CMAC Video LaryngoscopeMeasure of Intubation Success138 Participants
Macintosh BladeMeasure of Intubation Success124 Participants
Secondary

Intubation Time

Time was measured as the duration of laryngoscopy defined by blade insertion to tracheal tube cuff inflation

Time frame: During laryngoscopy procedure

Population: time

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)
CMAC Video LaryngoscopeIntubation Time46 seconds
Macintosh BladeIntubation Time33 seconds
Secondary

Number of Participants Intubated With a Rescue Device

Time frame: 1 year

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
CMAC Video LaryngoscopeNumber of Participants Intubated With a Rescue Device6 participants
Macintosh BladeNumber of Participants Intubated With a Rescue Device12 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With a Laryngeal View Grade of 1 or 2 vs. 3 or 4.

Grade 1= full view of the glottis achieved Grade 2= partial view of the glottis achieved Grade 3= only the epiglottis visualized Grade 4= no laryngeal view achieved

Time frame: 1 year

ArmMeasureCategoryValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CMAC Video LaryngoscopeNumber of Participants With a Laryngeal View Grade of 1 or 2 vs. 3 or 4.Grade I view achieved103 Participants
CMAC Video LaryngoscopeNumber of Participants With a Laryngeal View Grade of 1 or 2 vs. 3 or 4.Grade 2 view achieved36 Participants
CMAC Video LaryngoscopeNumber of Participants With a Laryngeal View Grade of 1 or 2 vs. 3 or 4.Grade 3 view achieved9 Participants
CMAC Video LaryngoscopeNumber of Participants With a Laryngeal View Grade of 1 or 2 vs. 3 or 4.Grade 4 view achieved1 Participants
Macintosh BladeNumber of Participants With a Laryngeal View Grade of 1 or 2 vs. 3 or 4.Grade 4 view achieved2 Participants
Macintosh BladeNumber of Participants With a Laryngeal View Grade of 1 or 2 vs. 3 or 4.Grade I view achieved72 Participants
Macintosh BladeNumber of Participants With a Laryngeal View Grade of 1 or 2 vs. 3 or 4.Grade 3 view achieved26 Participants
Macintosh BladeNumber of Participants With a Laryngeal View Grade of 1 or 2 vs. 3 or 4.Grade 2 view achieved47 Participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Complications

Time frame: 1 year

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CMAC Video LaryngoscopeNumber of Participants With Complications35 Participants
Macintosh BladeNumber of Participants With Complications26 Participants
Secondary

Number of Particpants Requiring Adjuncts to Assist Intubation

Time frame: 1 year

Population: Use of bougie or external manipulation

ArmMeasureValue (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS)
CMAC Video LaryngoscopeNumber of Particpants Requiring Adjuncts to Assist Intubation33 Participants
Macintosh BladeNumber of Particpants Requiring Adjuncts to Assist Intubation46 Participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026