Skip to content

A Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of Ustekinumab or Golimumab Administered Subcutaneously (SC) in Patients With Sarcoidosis

A Phase 2, Multicenter, Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel-group, Placebo-controlled Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Treatment With Ustekinumab or Golimumab in Subjects With Chronic Sarcoidosis

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00955279
Enrollment
173
Registered
2009-08-10
Start date
2009-11-30
Completion date
2012-08-31
Last updated
2014-07-17

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Sarcoidosis

Keywords

Ustekinumab, CNTO 1275, Stelara, Golimumab, CNTO 148, Simponi, Sarcoidosis, Sarcoid, Pulmonary Sarcoidosis, Skin Sarcoidosis

Brief summary

This study tests the safety and effectiveness of ustekinumab or golimumab compared to placebo (placebo looks like the drugs being studied, but has no active ingredients). The purpose of this research study is to determine if ustekinumab or golimumab is safe and to determine its effects (good and bad) on patients with chronic sarcoidosis with pulmonary and/or skin involvement. Patients with pulmonary involvement constitute the primary population for analysis, and patients with skin involvement constitute the secondary population; a patient may be in both populations. The study will be conducted at approximately 40 sites globally.

Detailed description

Ustekinumab is approved for dosing in patients with psoriasis and golimumab is approved for dosing in patients with rheumatoid arthritis, psoriatic arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis. This study will use either drug in patients with chronic sarcoidosis. Ustekinumab and golimumab are being tested to see if they may be useful in treating chronic sarcoidosis. This study will compare the effects (both good and bad) of ustekinumab and golimumab to those of placebo. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of ustekinumab and golimumab (administered as individual treatments) in patients with chronic sarcoidosis with lung and/or skin involvement who still have symptoms even though receiving current therapy. About 180 patients will take part in the study. While in this study, patients may not take part in any other medical research studies. Ustekinumab and golimumab are not approved by the national health authorities for treatment of chronic sarcoidosis; therefore, they can only be used in a research setting to treat this condition. The screening phase of the study, where the doctor will determine if a patient is eligible for the study, will last 1 to 4 weeks. Patients are put into 1 of 3 groups and each group will get a different treatment. The results of the golimumab group and the ustekinumab group are compared to placebo. Patients will either receive ustekinumab, golimumab or placebo. Placebo looks like ustekinumab and golimumab and is given in the same way, by injection, but contains no active drug. Patients will receive study agent until Week 24 and will continue to be followed through Week 44 for assessment of safety and any other effects after discontinuation of therapy. The patient will continue to take all sarcoidosis medication(s) at current, stable dose for the first part of the study. If the patient remained on a stable steroid dose from Week 0 through Week 16 of the study, the study doctor will begin to taper (lower) the steroid dose. The steroid taper will continue through to the end of the Week 28 visit. The patient will continue to take their other sarcoidosis medication(s) at the same dose for the rest of the study. An independent Data Monitoring Committee will be responsible for reviewing the safety data for the study. Patients will be in the study for about 48 weeks. The end of the study is defined as the last visit of the last patient. A site-specific substudy is being implemented to collect serum and lung samples from patients who are currently enrolled in this study. A separate protocol is being implemented to collect lung fluid and serum samples from normal, healthy subjects to be used as comparators for similar samples obtained in the 1275148SCD2001 substudy. Patients will be randomly assigned to 1 of 3 treatment groups: ustekinumab (180 mg at Week 0, followed by 90 mg at Weeks 8, 16, and 24 with placebo at Weeks 4, 12, and 20), golimumab (200 mg at Week 0, followed by 100 mg at Weeks 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24) or placebo (at Weeks 0, 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 24) administered by SC injection.

Interventions

DRUGPlacebo

Matching Placebo will be administered subcutaneously (injected under the skin by way of a needle) every 4 weeks up to Week 24.

DRUGGolimumab

Golimumab will be administered subcutaneously at a dose of 200 milligram (mg) at Week 0 and thereafter at a dose of 100 mg every 4 weeks up to Week 24.

DRUGUstekinumab

Ustekinumab will be administered subcutaneously at a dose of 180 mg at Week 0 and thereafter at a dose of 90 mg at Week 8, 16 and 24 and matching Placebo was administered subcutaneously at Week 4, 12 and 20.

Sponsors

Centocor, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
QUADRUPLE (Subject, Caregiver, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 85 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients must have sarcoidosis with onset date of \>=2 years prior to screening with at least 1 of the following: a. pulmonary sarcoidosis defined as 1) a diagnosis of sarcoidosis with evidence of lung parenchymal disease (Stage II, III or IV on chest radiograph), and 2) an FVC of \>=45% and \<=80% of predicted normal value at screening, and 3) an MRC dyspnea score of \>2 at screening, and 4) a 6 minute walk distance between 100 to 550 meters at screening, and 5) \<=15% absolute change in percent-predicted FVC at baseline relative to screening AND/OR b. skin sarcoidosis defined as 1) active chronic skin lesions for \>=3 months either on face or elsewhere on body that have not resolved on current systemic and/or local therapy, and 2) have either: a single lesion of \>=2 cm in longest dimension or multiple (3 or more) lesions with at least 1 lesion having a longest dimension of \>=1 cm, and 3) have an SPGA score \>=2 at screening * have been receiving treatment with oral corticosteroids and/or 1 or more immunomodulators for \>=3-month period immediately prior to screening * on a stable dose of these medications for \>=4 weeks before screening

Exclusion criteria

* Have a diagnosis of other significant respiratory disorder other than sarcoidosis that would complicate the evaluation of response to treatment * Have a smoking history of \>=20 pack years * Have used an investigational drug within 1 month prior to screening or within 5 half-lives of the investigational agent, whichever is longer * have received previous administration of a treatment with any other therapeutic agent targeted at reducing TNFalpha within 6 months or 5 half-lives of the agent, whichever is longer, prior to screening * Patients who have previously received biologic anti-TNFalpha agents outside of the above period are allowed to enter the study * Have previously used cyclophosphamide * Have previously used or received local therapy (including local injections) within 3 months before the screening visit or used or received treatment with prescription topical creams within 1 month before the screening visit for treatment of sarcoidosis skin lesions * Have used any therapeutic agent targeted at reducing IL-12 and/or IL-23, including but not limited to, ustekinumab and briakinumab within 6 months or 5 half-lives of the agent, whichever is longer, prior to the screening visit * have received natalizumab or agents that deplete or modulate the activity of B cells or T cells within 12 months of screening, or, if after receiving these agents, evidence is available at screening of persistent depletion of the targeted lymphocyte population * have used any antibody (monoclonal or polyclonal) or antibody-based agents \<= 6 months or within 5 half-lives of the biologic prior to the screening visit, whichever is longer

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Percent-predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Week 16Baseline (Day 1) and Week 16Forced vital capacity (FVC) is a standard pulmonary function test used to quantify respiratory muscle weakness . FVC was the volume of air that can forcibly be blown out after full inspiration in the upright position, measured in liters. Predicted forced vital capacity is based on a formula using sex, age and height of a person, and is an estimate of healthy lung capacity. Percent of predicted FVC = (observed value)/(predicted value) \* 100%. Change was calculated as the value at Week 16 minus the baseline value.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in 6-minute Walk Distance at Week 28Baseline (Day 1) and Week 28Change from Baseline in 6-minute walk distance at Week 28 was calculated as 6-minute walk distance at Week 28 minus 6-minute walk distance at Baseline. The 6-minute walk distance was the total distance walked during the 6-minute walk test.
Change From Baseline in the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total Score at Week 28Baseline (Day 1) and Week 28St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) is a health related quality of life questionnaire consisting of 51 items in three components: symptoms, activity, and impacts. The lowest possible value is zero and the highest 100. Higher values correspond to greater impairment in quality of life. Change from Baseline was calculated as the value at Week 28 minus value at Baseline.
Percentage of Responders With a Score of Less Than or Equal to 1 on Skin Physician's Global Assessment (SPGA) ScaleWeek 28The SPGA is 7-point scale used to assess the condition of skin in participants. The physician checks the state of the skin and gives them score from 0 (clear) to 5 (severe). Higher scores indicate worsening of skin condition.
Change From Baseline in Percent-predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Week 28Baseline (Day 1) and Week 28Forced vital capacity (FVC) is a standard pulmonary function test used to quantify respiratory muscle weakness. FVC is the volume of air that can forcibly be blown out after full inspiration in the upright position, measured in liters. Predicted forced vital capacity is based on a formula using sex, age and height of a person, and is an estimate of healthy lung capacity. Percent of predicted FVC = (observed value)/(predicted value) \* 100%. Change is calculated as the value at week 28 minus the baseline value.

Countries

Belgium, Denmark, France, Germany, Netherlands, Norway, Romania, United Kingdom, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Placebo
Matching Placebo was administered subcutaneously (injected under the skin by way of a needle) every 4 weeks up to Week 24.
58
Golimumab
Golimumab was administered subcutaneously at a dose of 200 milligram (mg) at Week 0 and thereafter at a dose of 100 mg every 4 weeks up to Week 24.
55
Ustekinumab
Ustekinumab was administered subcutaneously at a dose of 180 mg at Week 0 and thereafter at a dose of 90 mg at Week 8, 16 and 24 and matching Placebo was administered subcutaneously at Week 4, 12 and 20.
60
Total173

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001FG002
Overall StudyDeath111
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up031
Overall StudyOther003
Overall StudyWithdrawal by Subject203

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicPlaceboGolimumabUstekinumabTotal
Age, Continuous49.5 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.51
50.0 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.44
49.8 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.17
49.8 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 9.67
Number of Participants by stratification factors
Both Pulmonary and Skin
6 participants4 participants7 participants17 participants
Number of Participants by stratification factors
Pulmonary Only
38 participants38 participants39 participants115 participants
Number of Participants by stratification factors
Skin Only
14 participants13 participants14 participants41 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
29 Participants27 Participants29 Participants85 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
29 Participants28 Participants31 Participants88 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
EG002
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
52 / 5849 / 5552 / 60
serious
Total, serious adverse events
9 / 587 / 5510 / 60

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Percent-predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Week 16

Forced vital capacity (FVC) is a standard pulmonary function test used to quantify respiratory muscle weakness . FVC was the volume of air that can forcibly be blown out after full inspiration in the upright position, measured in liters. Predicted forced vital capacity is based on a formula using sex, age and height of a person, and is an estimate of healthy lung capacity. Percent of predicted FVC = (observed value)/(predicted value) \* 100%. Change was calculated as the value at Week 16 minus the baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 16

Population: Modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population included all the participants who were randomized and who received at least 1 dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Percent-predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Week 162.02 percent of predicted FVCStandard Error 1.35
GolimumabChange From Baseline in Percent-predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Week 161.15 percent of predicted FVCStandard Error 1.413
UstekinumabChange From Baseline in Percent-predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Week 16-0.15 percent of predicted FVCStandard Error 1.279
p-value: 0.543ANCOVA
p-value: 0.126ANCOVA
Secondary

Change From Baseline in 6-minute Walk Distance at Week 28

Change from Baseline in 6-minute walk distance at Week 28 was calculated as 6-minute walk distance at Week 28 minus 6-minute walk distance at Baseline. The 6-minute walk distance was the total distance walked during the 6-minute walk test.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 28

Population: mITT population included all the participants who were randomized and who received at least 1 dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in 6-minute Walk Distance at Week 2814.52 metersStandard Error 14.223
GolimumabChange From Baseline in 6-minute Walk Distance at Week 2812.53 metersStandard Error 14.919
UstekinumabChange From Baseline in 6-minute Walk Distance at Week 28-13.22 metersStandard Error 13.584
p-value: 0.896Linear Contrasts Test
p-value: 0.063Linear Contrasts Test
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Percent-predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Week 28

Forced vital capacity (FVC) is a standard pulmonary function test used to quantify respiratory muscle weakness. FVC is the volume of air that can forcibly be blown out after full inspiration in the upright position, measured in liters. Predicted forced vital capacity is based on a formula using sex, age and height of a person, and is an estimate of healthy lung capacity. Percent of predicted FVC = (observed value)/(predicted value) \* 100%. Change is calculated as the value at week 28 minus the baseline value.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 28

Population: mITT population included all the participants who were randomized and who received at least 1 dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in Percent-predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Week 281.59 percent of predicted FVCStandard Error 1.621
GolimumabChange From Baseline in Percent-predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Week 280.29 percent of predicted FVCStandard Error 1.697
UstekinumabChange From Baseline in Percent-predicted Forced Vital Capacity (FVC) at Week 280.56 percent of predicted FVCStandard Error 1.536
p-value: 0.451Linear Contrast Test
p-value: 0.546Linear Contrast Test
Secondary

Change From Baseline in the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total Score at Week 28

St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) is a health related quality of life questionnaire consisting of 51 items in three components: symptoms, activity, and impacts. The lowest possible value is zero and the highest 100. Higher values correspond to greater impairment in quality of life. Change from Baseline was calculated as the value at Week 28 minus value at Baseline.

Time frame: Baseline (Day 1) and Week 28

Population: mITT population included all the participants who were randomized and who received at least 1 dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureValue (LEAST_SQUARES_MEAN)Dispersion
PlaceboChange From Baseline in the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total Score at Week 28-9.50 Units on a scaleStandard Error 2.79
GolimumabChange From Baseline in the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total Score at Week 28-6.86 Units on a scaleStandard Error 2.921
UstekinumabChange From Baseline in the St. George's Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) Total Score at Week 28-4.25 Units on a scaleStandard Error 2.662
p-value: 0.374Linear Contrasts Test
p-value: 0.073Linear Contrasts Test
Secondary

Percentage of Responders With a Score of Less Than or Equal to 1 on Skin Physician's Global Assessment (SPGA) Scale

The SPGA is 7-point scale used to assess the condition of skin in participants. The physician checks the state of the skin and gives them score from 0 (clear) to 5 (severe). Higher scores indicate worsening of skin condition.

Time frame: Week 28

Population: Secondary population included all the participants with chronic sarcoidosis with skin involvement who have received at least 1 dose of study medication.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)Dispersion
PlaceboPercentage of Responders With a Score of Less Than or Equal to 1 on Skin Physician's Global Assessment (SPGA) Scale30.0 Percentage of Participants 2.79
GolimumabPercentage of Responders With a Score of Less Than or Equal to 1 on Skin Physician's Global Assessment (SPGA) Scale52.9 Percentage of Participants 2.921
UstekinumabPercentage of Responders With a Score of Less Than or Equal to 1 on Skin Physician's Global Assessment (SPGA) Scale14.3 Percentage of Participants 2.662
p-value: 0.1931Fisher Exact
p-value: 0.2772Fisher Exact

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026