Skip to content

Laryngeal Morbidity After Endotracheal Intubation - Endoflex-tube Versus Use of Stylet

Laryngeal Morbidity After Endotracheal Intubation - Endoflex-tube Versus Use of Stylet

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00953433
Enrollment
130
Registered
2009-08-06
Start date
2010-04-30
Completion date
2011-08-31
Last updated
2011-08-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Anaesthesia, Intubation Complication

Keywords

Intratracheal

Brief summary

This study is aimed at reducing the risk of hoarseness and damage to the vocal cords following general anaesthesia. Conventional endotracheal intubation with use of a stylet will be compared with the Endoflex tube. A conventional stylet enforced endotracheal tube is dirigible because of the stiffness gained by the addition of a stylet. In high risk rapid sequence intubation settings the enhanced dirigibility can be crucial, which is why most anaesthesiologists choose to add the stylet in these situations. A new endotracheal tube with a dynamic dirigible end called the Endoflex tube might prove to be a good alternative to the conventional stylet enforced endotracheal tube. Study hypothesis: The Endoflex tube will reduce the risk of hoarseness after intubation when compared to the conventional stylet enforced endotracheal tube under optimal intubation conditions.

Interventions

DEVICEEndoflex tube

Size decided upon gender.

DEVICEPolyvinyl chloride endotracheal tube with a stylet

Size decided upon gender.

Sponsors

TrygFonden, Denmark
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Rigshospitalet, Denmark
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
TRIPLE (Subject, Investigator, Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Elective surgical patients who require an endotracheal tube during general anaesthesia. * Informed consent. * Legally competent. * Be able to understand Danish and be able to read the given information in Danish.

Exclusion criteria

* Planned or former operation in or around the pharynx or the larynx. * Cancer, infection or sequelae in or around the pharynx or the larynx. * Use of a stomach tube before or during surgery. * Suspected difficult intubation.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Postoperative hoarseness1 hr postoperatively

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Vocal cord sequelaePreoperative - on average 12 hours before operation
Intubation conditionsDuring and after intubation - on average 5 minutes
Intubation difficulty scaleDuring and after intubation - on average 5 minutes
Multi Dimensional Voice ProfilePreoperative - on average 12 hours before operation
Voice Handicap IndexPreoperative - on average 12 hours before operation
Voice Range Profile72 hours postoperativelyOnly for the subgroup of patients with persisting hoarseness

Countries

Denmark

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026