Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease, Morbid Obesity
Conditions
Keywords
GERD, Gastric bypass
Brief summary
The hypothesis of this study was that gastric bypass (GBP) ameliorates gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) in morbidly obese patients.
Detailed description
The investigators studied the impact of this surgical procedure on GERD in patients with morbid obesity. Esophageal syndromes were evaluated according to the Montreal Consensus, where troublesome symptoms were defined as score ≥ 2 on a validated questionnaire of symptoms for Portuguese language along with esophageal syndromes with injury assessed through upper endoscopy. Esophageal acid exposure was determined through 24h pH monitoring. Increased acid exposure was characterized when total esophageal pH \< 4 for at least 4% of the total monitoring time.
Interventions
Open Silastic® ring Roux-en Y gastric bypass was performed through an upper midline incision. A gastric pouch was created by dividing the stomach with a 10-cm stapler from the lesser curvature (7 cm vertically from the cardia) to 1 cm to the left of the Hiss angle. The estimated volume of the gastric pouch was 20 to 30 ml that was banded with a 6.5 cm long Silastic® ring. A gastrojejunal anastomosis was performed with two-layers hand sewn absorbable suture over a 1.2 cm bougie distal to the ring, keeping an alimentary limb with 100 cm in length, and a biliopancreatic limb ranging 60 and 80 cm.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Morbid obesity * Acceptance to undergo open gastric bypass
Exclusion criteria
* Prior gastroesophageal surgery * Achalasia
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Number of Participants Presenting Reflux Symptoms | Before GBP, 6 months after GBP and 39 months after GBP | Prevalence of typical reflux syndrome according to the Montreal Consensus. This Consensus institutes that GERD can be outlined when troublesome symptoms and/or complications induced by reflux of the gastric content back to the esophagus are present. In order to assess such troublesome symptoms a validated questionnaire translated into Portuguese language was used. |
| Number of Participants With Esophageal Injury | Before GBP, 6 months after GBP and 39 months after GBP | Syndromes with esophageal injury were represented exclusively by the presence of reflux esophagitis |
| Number of Participants With Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) | Before GBP, 6 months after GBP and 39 months after GBP | Prevalence of GERD in patients characterized according to troublesome symptomatic syndromes assessed through a validated questionnaire based on the Montreal Consensus. |
| Total Esophageal Acid Exposure at 24h pH Monitoring | Before GBP, 6 months after GBP and 39 months after GBP | Esophageal acid exposure was measured through 24h pH monitoring. During the entire period, esophageal pH was measured and recorded as the percent of time pH was below 4. |
| Esophageal Acid Exposure at 24h pH Monitoring in Upright Position | Before GBP, 6 months after GBP and 39 months after GBP | Esophageal acid exposure was measured through 24h pH monitoring. Esophageal pH was measured and recorded as the percent of time pH was below 4 while participant in upright position |
| Esophageal Acid Exposure at 24h pH Monitoring in Supine Position | Before GBP, 6 months after GBP and 39 months after GBP | Esophageal acid exposure was measured through 24h pH monitoring. Esophageal pH was measured and recorded as the percent of time pH was below 4 while participant in supine position |
| Number of Participants With Increased Acid Exposure | Before GBP, 6 months after GBP and 39 months after GBP | Increased Acid Exposure occurs when esophageal pH is \<4 for a period longer than 4% of the total test time on a 24h pH monitoring. |
Countries
Brazil
Participant flow
Recruitment details
126 consecutive patients were assessed on site (Gastrobese Clinic) between March and October 2007, 94 met the criteria. 8 patients were lost to follow-up, 4 before and 4 after GBP. Out of those, 15 were lost to follow-up and 18 refused to follow through, resulting on the actual 53 patients.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Patients Assessed for GERD Patients who had an open gastric bypass were assessed for GERD before and after surgery. | 53 |
| Total | 53 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Patients Assessed for GERD |
|---|---|
| Age, Categorical <=18 years | 0 Participants |
| Age, Categorical >=65 years | 0 Participants |
| Age, Categorical Between 18 and 65 years | 53 Participants |
| Age, Continuous | 38.26 years STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.56 |
| Region of Enrollment Brazil | 53 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 38 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 15 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk |
|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | — / — |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 0 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 0 / 0 |
Outcome results
Esophageal Acid Exposure at 24h pH Monitoring in Supine Position
Esophageal acid exposure was measured through 24h pH monitoring. Esophageal pH was measured and recorded as the percent of time pH was below 4 while participant in supine position
Time frame: Before GBP, 6 months after GBP and 39 months after GBP
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Before GBP | Esophageal Acid Exposure at 24h pH Monitoring in Supine Position | 1.8 percentage of time |
| 6 Months After GBP | Esophageal Acid Exposure at 24h pH Monitoring in Supine Position | 0.5 percentage of time |
| 39 Months After GBP | Esophageal Acid Exposure at 24h pH Monitoring in Supine Position | 0.0 percentage of time |
Esophageal Acid Exposure at 24h pH Monitoring in Upright Position
Esophageal acid exposure was measured through 24h pH monitoring. Esophageal pH was measured and recorded as the percent of time pH was below 4 while participant in upright position
Time frame: Before GBP, 6 months after GBP and 39 months after GBP
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Before GBP | Esophageal Acid Exposure at 24h pH Monitoring in Upright Position | 5.9 percentage of time |
| 6 Months After GBP | Esophageal Acid Exposure at 24h pH Monitoring in Upright Position | 0.8 percentage of time |
| 39 Months After GBP | Esophageal Acid Exposure at 24h pH Monitoring in Upright Position | 0.1 percentage of time |
Number of Participants Presenting Reflux Symptoms
Prevalence of typical reflux syndrome according to the Montreal Consensus. This Consensus institutes that GERD can be outlined when troublesome symptoms and/or complications induced by reflux of the gastric content back to the esophagus are present. In order to assess such troublesome symptoms a validated questionnaire translated into Portuguese language was used.
Time frame: Before GBP, 6 months after GBP and 39 months after GBP
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Before GBP | Number of Participants Presenting Reflux Symptoms | 31 participants |
| 6 Months After GBP | Number of Participants Presenting Reflux Symptoms | 8 participants |
| 39 Months After GBP | Number of Participants Presenting Reflux Symptoms | 5 participants |
Number of Participants With Esophageal Injury
Syndromes with esophageal injury were represented exclusively by the presence of reflux esophagitis
Time frame: Before GBP, 6 months after GBP and 39 months after GBP
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Before GBP | Number of Participants With Esophageal Injury | 24 participants |
| 6 Months After GBP | Number of Participants With Esophageal Injury | 17 participants |
| 39 Months After GBP | Number of Participants With Esophageal Injury | 10 participants |
Number of Participants With Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD)
Prevalence of GERD in patients characterized according to troublesome symptomatic syndromes assessed through a validated questionnaire based on the Montreal Consensus.
Time frame: Before GBP, 6 months after GBP and 39 months after GBP
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Before GBP | Number of Participants With Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) | 34 participants |
| 6 Months After GBP | Number of Participants With Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) | 21 participants |
| 39 Months After GBP | Number of Participants With Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) | 12 participants |
Number of Participants With Increased Acid Exposure
Increased Acid Exposure occurs when esophageal pH is \<4 for a period longer than 4% of the total test time on a 24h pH monitoring.
Time frame: Before GBP, 6 months after GBP and 39 months after GBP
| Arm | Measure | Value (NUMBER) |
|---|---|---|
| Before GBP | Number of Participants With Increased Acid Exposure | 31 participants |
| 6 Months After GBP | Number of Participants With Increased Acid Exposure | 16 participants |
| 39 Months After GBP | Number of Participants With Increased Acid Exposure | 9 participants |
Total Esophageal Acid Exposure at 24h pH Monitoring
Esophageal acid exposure was measured through 24h pH monitoring. During the entire period, esophageal pH was measured and recorded as the percent of time pH was below 4.
Time frame: Before GBP, 6 months after GBP and 39 months after GBP
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEDIAN) |
|---|---|---|
| Before GBP | Total Esophageal Acid Exposure at 24h pH Monitoring | 5.1 percentage of time |
| 6 Months After GBP | Total Esophageal Acid Exposure at 24h pH Monitoring | 1.2 percentage of time |
| 39 Months After GBP | Total Esophageal Acid Exposure at 24h pH Monitoring | 0.1 percentage of time |