Skip to content

Acoustic Reflection Method and Work of Breathing

Acoustic Reflection Method and Work of Breathing : Two New Methods to Measure Children's Upper Airway Obstruction

Status
Terminated
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00950443
Acronym
MAVAS
Enrollment
38
Registered
2009-07-31
Start date
2009-12-31
Completion date
2011-11-30
Last updated
2011-12-29

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Airway Obstruction

Keywords

Upper airway obstruction, child, acoustic reflection method, endoscopy, work of breathing, sleep study, CT scan

Brief summary

Upper airway obstruction (UAO) is very common in children. Presently, the importance of the UAO is evaluated by the physician during an endoscopic evaluation under general anaesthesia. The aim of the study is to evaluate two new techniques to quantify the importance of the UAO in children; the acoustic reflection method and the measurement of the work of breathing. 80 children will be included in this monocentric, prospective, open labelled study.

Detailed description

The following evaluations will be performed the day prior to the endoscopic evaluation :1) calculation of a clinical score based on the diurnal and nocturnal respiratory and nutritional tolerance of the UAO, 2) evaluation of the importance and the localisation of the UAO assessed by the acoustic reflection method, 3) measurement of the work of breathing, 4) recording of nocturnal gas exchange during at least 6 hours by s single monitor (Sentec™) which measures pulse oximetry (SaO2) and transcutaneous carbon dioxide (PtcCO2), and evaluation of sleep quality by actigraphy (recording of patient's movements by an Actiwatch™). All the patients will be re-assessed after 3 months. If no treatment is required, a second clinical evaluation with an acoustic reflection examination will be performed. If a surgical treatment or a noninvasive positive pressure ventilation will be necessary, a second complete evaluation will be performed with an endoscopic examination, the calculation of the clinical score, an acoustic reflection examination, the measurement of the work of breathing, and the recording of the nocturnal gas exchange and sleep quality. This second endoscopic examination will be performed only for medical purpose and not for research only. The study will last 24 months, comprising 21 months for the inclusion of the patients and 3 months for the analysis of the data.

Interventions

Acoustic reflection gives the longitudinal cross-sectional area profile along airway.Based on planar acoustic wave propagating in a rigid duct connected to airway.

DEVICEAcoustic method and breathing/endoscopic evaluation

Endoscopic evaluation done under general anaesthesia.

Sponsors

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
DIAGNOSTIC
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
No minimum to 15 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* children aged 0 to 15 years old, * in a stable state, * presenting an UAO which requires an endoscopic evaluation under general anaesthesia * signed informed consent * affiliation to french health benefits

Exclusion criteria

* UAO due solely to a hypertrophy of the adenoids and/or the tonsils, * patients with a tracheostomy or a non operated cleft palate

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
To compare the importance and the localisation of the UAO assessed by the acoustic reflection method and by the endoscopic evaluation under general anaesthesiaAt the inclusion visit

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
To evaluate the feasibility of the acoustic method for the evaluation of UAO in childrenAt the inclusion visit
To compare the importance and the localisation of the UAO assessed by the acoustic reflection method with the respiratory (during sleep and wakefulness) and nutritional consequences of the UAOAt the inclusion visit
To compare the importance of the UAO assessed by the acoustic reflection method with the measurements of the work of breathingAt the inclusion visit
To compare the importance and the localisation of the UAO assessed by the acoustic reflection method with the results of a high resolution computed tomography scan of the upper airways if done for the medical reasonsAt the inclusion visit
To correlate the importance and the localisation of the UAO assessed by the acoustic reflection method with the outcome of surgery if requiredAt the inclusion and 3 months visits

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026