Skip to content

Comparison Study of Biofoam Porous Metal Versus Allograft to Treat Adult Acquired Flatfoot

A Randomized, Prospective, Controlled Trial for Lateral Column Lengthening in Adult Acquired Flatfoot Using Biofoam Porous Metal Compared With Allograft

Status
Withdrawn
Phases
Phase 4
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00949897
Enrollment
0
Registered
2009-07-31
Start date
2009-03-31
Completion date
2011-06-30
Last updated
2013-03-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Adult Acquired Flatfoot

Keywords

Adult Acquired Flatfoot, Biofoam Porous Metal Implant, Allograft Bone Wedge

Brief summary

The purpose of this study is to compare the clinical and radiographic outcomes of a randomized, consecutive series of adult patients, with an acquired flatfoot, treated with a lateral column lengthening using an allograft bone wedge versus a titanium porous metal implant (Biofoam, Wright Medical). Null hypothesis: At six months postoperatively, there is no difference in the degree of correction as measured by the talonavicular coverage angle between patients randomized to allograft and Biofoam. Alternative hypothesis: At six months postoperatively, the degree of correction as measured by the talonavicular coverage angle will be less in patients randomized to allograft than the degree of correction in patients randomized to Biofoam.

Interventions

DEVICEBiofoam

Device

OTHERIliac Crest Allograft with locked plate

Sponsors

Stryker Trauma and Extremities
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
OrthoCarolina Research Institute, Inc.
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
25 Years to 75 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Ages 25-75 * Unresponsive to conservative treatment * Patient with acquired flatfoot deformity, who is a candidate for lateral column lengthening (Stage IIB) = (greater than \> 40% uncoverage of talar head by navicular on standing AP radiograph)

Exclusion criteria

* Less than 25 years of age and greater than 75 years * Pre-existing infection * Peripheral neuropathy * Charcot arthropathy * Peripheral vascular disease * Rhematoid Arthritis (RA) or inflammatory arthropathy * Metal allergy or sensitivity to metal

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
The degree of correction as measured by talonavicular coverage angle, which is used to quantify the degree of deformity. Degree of correction is defined as the difference between the preoperative and postoperative talonavicular coverage angle.2 weeks, 6 weeks, 12 weeks, and 6 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
American Orthopaedic Foot and Ankle Society (AOFAS) Ankle-Hindfoot Score2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months
Foot Function Index (FFI) Score2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months
Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS)2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months
Implant failure2 weeks, 6 weeks, 3 months, and 6 months

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026