Skip to content

A Study on Emergence of Resistance With Oseltamivir (Tamiflu) in Participants With Seasonal Influenza

A Phase IIIb, Open-label, Comparative, Randomized Study on Resistance of Influenza A/H1N1 2009 Virus to Treatment With Oseltamivir at Standard Dose Versus Double Dose

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00949533
Enrollment
37
Registered
2009-07-30
Start date
2009-08-31
Completion date
2010-10-31
Last updated
2016-08-08

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Influenza

Brief summary

This open-label randomized 2 arm study will determine the emergence of viral resistance in participants with seasonal influenza A infection treated with oseltamivir. Eligible participants less than or equal to (\</=) 5 years of age will be randomized to receive oseltamivir at either standard dose (30-75 milligrams \[mg\] orally twice daily \[bid\]) or double dose (60-150 mg orally bid) for 5 days. Target sample size is greater than (\>) 100.

Interventions

DRUGOseltamivir

Standard dose (30 - 75 mg orally bid) or double dose (60 - 150 mg orally bid); for 5 days

Sponsors

Hoffmann-La Roche
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
1 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* positive rapid antigen test for influenza A * onset of symptoms of influenza (fever, at least one respiratory symptom) \</=48 hours

Exclusion criteria

* clinical suspicion of infection with a respiratory virus other than influenza * suspicion of invasive bacterial infection * evidence of poorly controlled underlying disease * known immunosuppression * known allergy to Oseltamivir * women who are pregnant or planning to get pregnant during the study

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants Excreting Resistant VirusDay 5Resistant virus included new influenza A virus subtype hemagglutinin type 1 and neuraminidase type 1 (New AH1N1).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percentage of Participants With A Reduction in Viral LoadBaseline, Day 5Viral load is defined as the amount of H1N1 virus in blood. As per investigator, a participant was considered as having viral load reduction at Day 5 if the Day 5 viral load was lower than the Baseline viral load.
Number of Participants With Various Clinical Signs and SymptomsDay 5Number of participants with various clinical signs and symptoms, as per investigator's discretion, were reported. Same participants were reported in more than 1 category. Other in the category included abdominal pain, breathlessness, thoracic pain and tired.
Number of Participants With Various Clinical Signs and Symptoms in Whom Resistant Virus Were DetectedDay 5Number of participants with various clinical signs and symptoms, as per investigator's discretion, in whom new AH1N1 virus was detected, were reported. Same participants were reported in more than 1 category.

Countries

Brazil

Participant flow

Pre-assignment details

Out of 199 participants, 162 were considered as screening failures, mainly due to the negative result detected by the quick test for Influenza A Antigen. Therefore, 37 participants included in the study.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Standard Dose
Oseltamivir capsule was administered orally at a dose of 75 mg BID in adult participants and children received oseltamivir powder for oral suspension dose (at 12 mg/mL) based on their body weight with a starting dose of 30 mg BID to a maximum dose of 75 mg BID; for 5 days.
19
Double Dose
Oseltamivir capsule was administered orally at a dose of 150 mg BID in adult participants and children received oseltamivir powder for oral suspension dose (at 12 mg/mL) based on their body weight with a starting dose of 60 mg BID to a maximum dose of 150 mg BID; for 5 days.
18
Total37

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000FG001
Overall StudyLost to Follow-up01

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicStandard DoseDouble DoseTotal
Age, Continuous21.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11
22.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.7
21.8 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.7
Sex: Female, Male
Female
11 Participants9 Participants20 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
8 Participants9 Participants17 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
8 / 197 / 18
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 190 / 18

Outcome results

Primary

Percentage of Participants Excreting Resistant Virus

Resistant virus included new influenza A virus subtype hemagglutinin type 1 and neuraminidase type 1 (New AH1N1).

Time frame: Day 5

Population: ITT population. Here number of participants analyzed included evaluable participants for the outcome measure.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Standard DosePercentage of Participants Excreting Resistant Virus26.3 percentage of participants
Double DosePercentage of Participants Excreting Resistant Virus35.3 percentage of participants
p-value: 0.825Pearson Chi-Square
Secondary

Number of Participants With Various Clinical Signs and Symptoms

Number of participants with various clinical signs and symptoms, as per investigator's discretion, were reported. Same participants were reported in more than 1 category. Other in the category included abdominal pain, breathlessness, thoracic pain and tired.

Time frame: Day 5

Population: ITT population. Here number of participants analyzed included evaluable participants for the outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Standard DoseNumber of Participants With Various Clinical Signs and SymptomsRhinorrhea10 participants
Standard DoseNumber of Participants With Various Clinical Signs and SymptomsHeadache1 participants
Standard DoseNumber of Participants With Various Clinical Signs and SymptomsShortness of breath2 participants
Standard DoseNumber of Participants With Various Clinical Signs and SymptomsConjunctivitis1 participants
Standard DoseNumber of Participants With Various Clinical Signs and SymptomsSore throat2 participants
Standard DoseNumber of Participants With Various Clinical Signs and SymptomsVomiting1 participants
Standard DoseNumber of Participants With Various Clinical Signs and SymptomsDiarrhea2 participants
Standard DoseNumber of Participants With Various Clinical Signs and SymptomsOther4 participants
Standard DoseNumber of Participants With Various Clinical Signs and SymptomsCough10 participants
Double DoseNumber of Participants With Various Clinical Signs and SymptomsOther0 participants
Double DoseNumber of Participants With Various Clinical Signs and SymptomsCough9 participants
Double DoseNumber of Participants With Various Clinical Signs and SymptomsRhinorrhea5 participants
Double DoseNumber of Participants With Various Clinical Signs and SymptomsSore throat2 participants
Double DoseNumber of Participants With Various Clinical Signs and SymptomsShortness of breath1 participants
Double DoseNumber of Participants With Various Clinical Signs and SymptomsDiarrhea0 participants
Double DoseNumber of Participants With Various Clinical Signs and SymptomsHeadache2 participants
Double DoseNumber of Participants With Various Clinical Signs and SymptomsConjunctivitis0 participants
Double DoseNumber of Participants With Various Clinical Signs and SymptomsVomiting0 participants
Comparison: Cough: statistical difference between 2 groups was based on chi-squared test.p-value: 1Chi-squared
Comparison: Rhinorrhea: statistical difference between 2 groups was based on chi-squared test.p-value: 0.284Chi-squared
Comparison: Sore throat: statistical difference between 2 groups was based on fisher-exact test.p-value: 1Fisher Exact
Comparison: Shortness of breath: statistical difference between 2 groups was based on fisher-exact test.p-value: 1Fisher Exact
Comparison: Diarrhea: statistical difference between 2 groups was based on fisher-exact test.p-value: 0.487Fisher Exact
Comparison: Headache: statistical difference between 2 groups was based on fisher-exact test.p-value: 0.593Fisher Exact
Comparison: Conjunctivitis: statistical difference between 2 groups was based on fisher-exact test.p-value: 1Fisher Exact
Comparison: Vomiting: statistical difference between 2 groups was based on fisher-exact test.p-value: 1Fisher Exact
Comparison: Other: statistical difference between 2 groups was based on fisher-exact test.p-value: 0.106Fisher Exact
Secondary

Number of Participants With Various Clinical Signs and Symptoms in Whom Resistant Virus Were Detected

Number of participants with various clinical signs and symptoms, as per investigator's discretion, in whom new AH1N1 virus was detected, were reported. Same participants were reported in more than 1 category.

Time frame: Day 5

Population: ITT population. Here number of participants analyzed included evaluable participants for the outcome measure.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Standard DoseNumber of Participants With Various Clinical Signs and Symptoms in Whom Resistant Virus Were DetectedCough3 participants
Standard DoseNumber of Participants With Various Clinical Signs and Symptoms in Whom Resistant Virus Were DetectedRhinorrhea3 participants
Standard DoseNumber of Participants With Various Clinical Signs and Symptoms in Whom Resistant Virus Were DetectedShortness of breath0 participants
Double DoseNumber of Participants With Various Clinical Signs and Symptoms in Whom Resistant Virus Were DetectedCough4 participants
Double DoseNumber of Participants With Various Clinical Signs and Symptoms in Whom Resistant Virus Were DetectedRhinorrhea3 participants
Double DoseNumber of Participants With Various Clinical Signs and Symptoms in Whom Resistant Virus Were DetectedShortness of breath1 participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With A Reduction in Viral Load

Viral load is defined as the amount of H1N1 virus in blood. As per investigator, a participant was considered as having viral load reduction at Day 5 if the Day 5 viral load was lower than the Baseline viral load.

Time frame: Baseline, Day 5

Population: ITT population.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Standard DosePercentage of Participants With A Reduction in Viral Load100 percentage of participants
Double DosePercentage of Participants With A Reduction in Viral Load100 percentage of participants
p-value: >0.05Chi-squared

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026