Skip to content

Comparison of Two Regimens of Anesthesia for Children Undergoing Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) in General Anesthesia

Comparison of Two Regimens of Anesthesia for Children Undergoing MRI in General Anesthesia. Advantages, Disadvantages and Time Consumption Regarding the Two Regimens.

Status
Completed
Phases
Unknown
Study type
Observational
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00949507
Enrollment
120
Registered
2009-07-30
Start date
2008-10-31
Completion date
2011-05-31
Last updated
2013-05-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Children, General Anesthesia, MRI, Propofol/Remifentanil, Sevoflurane

Brief summary

Comparison of two regimens (Sevorane/LMA ctr. Propofol/Remifentanil) for children undergoing MRI in general anesthesia.

Interventions

None listed

Sponsors

Niels Anker Pedersen
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Observational model
COHORT
Time perspective
PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
1 Years to 10 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* children aged 1 to 10 yrs. * ASA 1-2

Exclusion criteria

* Allergy to soya (propofol) * Allergy to Pentobarbital * Allergy to Remifentanil * Allergy to Sevoflurane * Children undergoing blood tests or further examinations in conjunction with the MRI * Children with unexplained fever * Children which are evaluated not to be able to keep a open airway

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
postanaesthetic recovery and behavioral score0-24 hours hours postoperatively

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Time span of the recovery process0-3 hours postoperatively

Countries

Denmark

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026