Skip to content

Online and Narrative Interventions for Advanced Cancer Patients

Online Narrative Interventions and Family Support for Advanced Cancer Patients

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00948207
Enrollment
117
Registered
2009-07-29
Start date
2009-02-28
Completion date
2011-07-31
Last updated
2019-11-19

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Metastatic Cancer

Keywords

Metastatic Cancer, Recurrent Cancer, Distributed Hematological Cancer, Advanced Cancer, Terminal Cancer, Stage III Cancer, Stage IV Cancer

Brief summary

The investigators will test whether narrative life review and web-based social networking for middle aged adults with advanced cancer will improve: 1. existential well being (and reduce psychological distress) 2. generativity and relationship quality, thereby mediating the intervention effects The investigators will also conduct exploratory process analyses of each participant's social network.

Detailed description

Middle aged patients with advanced cancer report more distress, and active search for meaning and personal growth than older and/or early stage patients. Nonetheless, such positive growth is far from typical and interventions help. Expert-guided life review reduced distress for hospice patients, but is not widely accessible-and many patients lack the energy or skill to write their own life story. Online cancer information and support expert systems improve quality of life. Patients are increasingly developing their own social networks, but many lack the skills to do so. Moreover the effects on social networking on patient well-being have not been studied. My Living Story elicits a dignity-enhancing life story via a telephone interview (based on Chochinov, JAMA 2002), and delivers the edited transcript on the patient's personal miLivingStory social network. miLivingStory links to a life review education website (called miStory) with links to high quality cancer information, support and interactive planning tools. We hypothesize that telling, revising and sharing the life story with one's selected social network will improve the patient's existential well-being and reduce their distress. Furthermore, we hypothesize that these effects will be mediated by My Living Story's effects on improving the patient's sense of legacy (generativity) and the quality of their relationships. Our exploratory observational analyses of each individual miLivingStory network will contribute to an understanding of how social network configuration and communication patterns correlate with measured outcomes We will recruit and randomize 100 patients with advanced cancer. The control group will receive a personalized web portal (called miOwnResources) with links to high quality cancer information, social support and interactive planning tools, and a feature to add their own links. All participants will sign informed consent forms, complete a pre-test survey and post-tests at tow and four months.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALMy Living Story

Components include: 1\. Life Review Interview by phone (questions based on Chochinov, 2002 dignity enhancing interview); 2\) Edited transcript is delivered in a word format on...; 3\) miLivingStory, a personal social network, where participants can manage content, design and layer; invite and manage their fiends and family. 4\) miStory, a life review education website and portal to websites for: cancer information, databases to do your own research, social support, interactive planning tools, and a page to add their own weblinks.

BEHAVIORALMy Own Resources

miOwnResources is a personalized, password-protected web portal to high quality websites that provide cancer information, cancer research databases for do your own research, social support, and interactive planning tools. miOwnResources also has a page for participants to add their own weblinks.

Sponsors

National Cancer Institute (NCI)
CollaboratorNIH
University of Wisconsin, Madison
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
SUPPORTIVE_CARE
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
30 Years to 60 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Age 30 - 60, * Stage III or IV Cancer, * Able and willing to use an internet computer to complete study activities.

Exclusion criteria

* Institutionalized, \< 6 months prognosis, * Cannot read or understand English, * Unable or unwilling to use an internet computer to complete study activities.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Existential Well-being (FACIT-Sp)0, 2 and 4 months

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Distress (POMS-SF)0, 2, and 4 months

Countries

United States

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026