Traumatic Nerve Injury
Conditions
Keywords
Peripheral Nerve Repair, Conduit, AVANCE, Neuroma Resection, Nerve Gap Repair, Digital Nerve Repair, Nerve Graft, Nerve Allograft
Brief summary
This study is a comparison of sensory recovery outcomes following the use of AVANCE Nerve Graft or hollow tube conduit for peripheral nerve gap repairs in the hand.
Detailed description
The CHANGE study is a post-marketing study designed as a prospective, single-blind, randomized, two phase study comparing clinical outcomes of AVANCE Nerve Graft to hollow tube conduits. The first phase (pilot phase) assesses projected differences expected between two treatment groups. The second phase of the study provides comparison data between the two treatment groups. AVANCE Nerve Graft is current regulated in the United States as a 361 HCT/P Tissue for transplantation; not a Drug, Biologic, or Medical Device. Hollow tube conduits are currently regulated in the United States as medical devices.
Interventions
Appropriately size matched hollow tube nerve conduit (Neurotube, NeuroLac, NeuraGen, NeuroMatrix, NeuroFlex)
Implantation of appropriate length of processed human nerve tissue at time of surgery.
Sponsors
Study design
Eligibility
Inclusion criteria
* Require primary or secondary nerve injury repair with Hollow Nerve Conduit or AVANCE™ in at least 1 digital nerve; * Undergo End to End nerve to nerve graft coaptation on both the proximal and distal portion of the nerve gap in the AVANCE™ group or nerve entubulation in the Hollow Nerve Conduit group; * Be willing to comply with all aspects of the treatment and evaluation schedule over a 12 Month duration; and * Sign and date an IRB-approved written informed consent prior to initiation of any study procedures, including screening procedures.
Exclusion criteria
* Nerve gaps of \< 5 mm or \> 20 mm; * Estimated distance of regeneration of \>125 mm (distance from injury site to sensory target) * Nerve crush or avulsion injuries; * Incomplete nerve transections; * Injury requiring replantation of target digit; * Contralateral digital injuries corresponding to the target digit; * Nerve injuries in the affected limb proximal to the crease of the wrist; * End to side nerve repair; * Injuries with significant vascular damage which may impair adequate perfusion of the target limb; * Subjects who are undergoing treatment with chemotherapy, radiation therapy, or other know treatment which affects the growth of neural and/or vascular system; * Use of bovine collagen based hollow nerve conduit in a subject with known or suspected bovine sensitivity; * Subjects age ≤18 years or ≥70 years; * History neuropathy, diabetic or any other known neuropathy; * Secondary nerve repair \>12 weeks post initial injury; * Currently enrolled in another investigational study; * Expected use of medications during the study that are known to cause peripheral neuropathy; * History or Reynaud's or other disorder known to compromise circulation or sensation in the upper extremity; and * Any subject who at the discretion of the Investigator is not suitable for inclusion in the study.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Recovery of Static 2-point Discrimination in the Affected Digit | 12 Months | Mean change in static 2-Point Discrimination between baseline and 12 months |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame | Description |
|---|---|---|
| Semmes-Weinstein Monofilament Assessment | 12 months | Percent Change from Baseline of Semmes-Weinstein Monofilament Assessment at Month 12 |
| 12-month DASH Core Module Scores | 12 months | Summary of Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) scores (Core Module) at Month 12 The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) core module questionnaire is a 30-item questionnaire includes 21 physical function items, 6 symptom items, and 3 social/role function items. It is a patient reported questionnaire used to assess physical function and severity of symptoms in patients with musculoskeletal disorders of the upper limb. Each of the items in the DASH use a 5-point Likert scale to assess the corresponding severity or functional parameter. The outcome measure is scored based on the formula (\[sum of n responses)/ - 30 (minimum score\]/1.2 (range of scores ÷100), where n represents the number of completed items. Computed scores range from 0 (no disability) to 100 (most severe disability). |
| 12-month DASH (Work Module) Scores | 12 month | Summary of Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) scores (Work Module) at Month 12 The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Work Module questionnaire is a 4-item questionnaire used to identify the job-specific difficulties that workers might experience but which may not affect their activities of daily living. It is a patient reported questionnaire used to assess the impact that musculoskeletal disorders of the upper limb have on a patient's ability to perform work-related tasks. Each of the items in the DASH Work Module use a 5-point Likert scale to assess the corresponding severity or functional parameter. The outcome measure is scored based on the formula (\[sum of n responses)/ - 4 (minimum score\]/0.16 (range of scores ÷100), where n represents the number of completed items. Computed scores range from 0 (no difficulty) to 100 (most severe difficulty). |
| 12- Month DASH (Sports/Performing Arts Module) | 12 months | Summary of Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) scores (Sports/Performing Arts Module) at month 12 The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Sports/Performing Arts Module questionnaire is a 4-item questionnaire used to identify the specific difficulties that professional athletes/performing artists might experience but which may not affect their activities of daily living. It is a patient reported questionnaire used to assess the impact that musculoskeletal disorders of the upper limb have on a patient's ability to perform sports or play a musical instrument. Each of the items in the DASH use a 5-point Likert scale to assess the corresponding severity or functional parameter. The outcome measure is scored based on the formula (\[sum of n responses)/ - 4 (minimum score\]/0.16 (range of scores ÷100), where n represents the number of completed items. Computed scores range from 0 (no difficulty) to 100 (most severe difficulty). |
| Moving 2-point Discrimination | 12 months | Percent Change from Baseline of Moving 2-Point Discriminations at Month 12 |
| Thermal Discretion at 12-months | 12-month | Summary of Thermal Discretion at Month 12 as determined by the Investigator. Thermal discretion was assessed by applying a hot and/or cold object to the patient's affected digit. Thermal discretion was reported as either present (Yes) or not present (No). |
| Protective Sensation Present at 12-months | 12 months | Summary of Protective Sensation by Month 12 Semmes-Weinstein Monofilament (SWMF) assessment of protective sensation. The gauge of the monofilaments range from 2.83 (normal) to 6.65 (deep pressure sensation only). Protective Sensation Present (SWMF score of 3.61 or better), Protective Sensation Diminished (SWMF score of 4.31-3.84), Protective Sensation Absent (SWMF score of 4.56 or greater). |
| Functional Recovery Classification (Medical Research Council Evaluation of Sensory Function) at 12-months | 12 months | Summary of Functional Recovery Classification (Medical Research Council Evaluation of Sensory Function) at 12-months Patients were assessed for functional recovery of sensation on a scale from S0 to S4 with S0 representing absence of sensibility, S1 representing recovery of deep cutaneous pain sensibility, S2 representing the return of some degree of superficial cutaneous pain and tactile sensibility, S3 representing return of superficial cutaneous pain and tactile sensibility, S3+ representing return of sensibility as in S3 and some recovery of 2-point discrimination (a 2-PD score between 7-15mm), and S4 representing complete recovery of normal sensation as assessed by 2-point discrimination (score between 2-6mm). |
| Pain at 12-months | 12-months | Summary of Pain Assessment using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at Month 12 The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) For Pain is a patient reported outcomes scale whereby the patient indicates his/her current pain level by making a mark on a continuous horizontal 10 centimeter (100 millimeter) line. The distance from the 0 millimeter to the patient's mark corresponds to the amount of pain the subject is currently experiencing. VAS for Pain data are recorded as the number of millimeters from the left of the line to the patients mark across the range of 0-100 millimeters, with 0 millimeter representing no pain and 100 millimeters representing the worst pain imaginable. |
Countries
United States
Participant flow
Recruitment details
Recruitment began on 22 June 2009 and ended on 23 May 2012.
Participants by arm
| Arm | Count |
|---|---|
| Avance Nerve Graft Commercially available Avance Nerve Graft for repair of nerve gap
Processed Human Nerve Tissue: Implantation of appropriate length of processed human nerve tissue scaffold at time of surgery. | 14 |
| Hollow Tube Conduit Commercially available hollow tube conduit for repair of nerve gap.
Hollow tube nerve conduit, synthetic or biosynthetic: Appropriately size matched hollow tube nerve conduit (Neurotube, NeuroLac, NeuraGen, NeuroMatrix, NeuroFlex) | 9 |
| Total | 23 |
Withdrawals & dropouts
| Period | Reason | FG000 | FG001 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Phase 1 (Pilot Phase) | Adverse Event | 1 | 1 |
| Phase 1 (Pilot Phase) | Lost to Follow-up | 7 | 1 |
| Phase 1 (Pilot Phase) | Withdrawal by Subject | 1 | 1 |
Baseline characteristics
| Characteristic | Hollow Tube Conduit | Avance Nerve Graft | Total |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age, Categorical <=18 years | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Age, Categorical >=65 years | 0 Participants | 0 Participants | 0 Participants |
| Age, Categorical Between 18 and 65 years | 9 Participants | 14 Participants | 23 Participants |
| Age, Continuous | 39 years | 45 years | 41 years |
| Region of Enrollment United States | 9 participants | 14 participants | 23 participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Female | 3 Participants | 2 Participants | 5 Participants |
| Sex: Female, Male Male | 6 Participants | 12 Participants | 18 Participants |
Adverse events
| Event type | EG000 affected / at risk | EG001 affected / at risk |
|---|---|---|
| deaths Total, all-cause mortality | 0 / 14 | 0 / 9 |
| other Total, other adverse events | 0 / 14 | 1 / 9 |
| serious Total, serious adverse events | 1 / 14 | 1 / 9 |
Outcome results
Recovery of Static 2-point Discrimination in the Affected Digit
Mean change in static 2-Point Discrimination between baseline and 12 months
Time frame: 12 Months
Population: Number of subjects
| Arm | Measure | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|
| Avance Nerve Graft | Recovery of Static 2-point Discrimination in the Affected Digit | -65.6 percent change from baseline | Standard Error 5.94 |
| Hollow Tube Conduit | Recovery of Static 2-point Discrimination in the Affected Digit | -31.8 percent change from baseline | Standard Error 10.9 |
12-month DASH Core Module Scores
Summary of Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) scores (Core Module) at Month 12 The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) core module questionnaire is a 30-item questionnaire includes 21 physical function items, 6 symptom items, and 3 social/role function items. It is a patient reported questionnaire used to assess physical function and severity of symptoms in patients with musculoskeletal disorders of the upper limb. Each of the items in the DASH use a 5-point Likert scale to assess the corresponding severity or functional parameter. The outcome measure is scored based on the formula (\[sum of n responses)/ - 30 (minimum score\]/1.2 (range of scores ÷100), where n represents the number of completed items. Computed scores range from 0 (no disability) to 100 (most severe disability).
Time frame: 12 months
Population: Modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All participants who were randomized, received one of the study treatments, and completed at least the 3 month follow-up visit.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Avance Nerve Graft | 12-month DASH Core Module Scores | modified intent to treat | 4.66 score on a scale | Standard Error 2.9 |
| Avance Nerve Graft | 12-month DASH Core Module Scores | per protocol | 4.66 score on a scale | Standard Error 2.9 |
| Hollow Tube Conduit | 12-month DASH Core Module Scores | modified intent to treat | 7.77 score on a scale | Standard Error 2.58 |
| Hollow Tube Conduit | 12-month DASH Core Module Scores | per protocol | 7.77 score on a scale | Standard Error 2.58 |
12- Month DASH (Sports/Performing Arts Module)
Summary of Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) scores (Sports/Performing Arts Module) at month 12 The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Sports/Performing Arts Module questionnaire is a 4-item questionnaire used to identify the specific difficulties that professional athletes/performing artists might experience but which may not affect their activities of daily living. It is a patient reported questionnaire used to assess the impact that musculoskeletal disorders of the upper limb have on a patient's ability to perform sports or play a musical instrument. Each of the items in the DASH use a 5-point Likert scale to assess the corresponding severity or functional parameter. The outcome measure is scored based on the formula (\[sum of n responses)/ - 4 (minimum score\]/0.16 (range of scores ÷100), where n represents the number of completed items. Computed scores range from 0 (no difficulty) to 100 (most severe difficulty).
Time frame: 12 months
Population: Modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All participants who were randomized, received one of the study treatments, and completed at least the 3 month follow-up visit.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Avance Nerve Graft | 12- Month DASH (Sports/Performing Arts Module) | modified intent-to-treat | 8.33 score on a scale | Standard Error 8.33 |
| Avance Nerve Graft | 12- Month DASH (Sports/Performing Arts Module) | per protocol | 8.33 score on a scale | Standard Error 8.33 |
| Hollow Tube Conduit | 12- Month DASH (Sports/Performing Arts Module) | modified intent-to-treat | 18.77 score on a scale | Standard Error 9.56 |
| Hollow Tube Conduit | 12- Month DASH (Sports/Performing Arts Module) | per protocol | 18.77 score on a scale | Standard Error 9.56 |
12-month DASH (Work Module) Scores
Summary of Disability of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (DASH) scores (Work Module) at Month 12 The Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) Work Module questionnaire is a 4-item questionnaire used to identify the job-specific difficulties that workers might experience but which may not affect their activities of daily living. It is a patient reported questionnaire used to assess the impact that musculoskeletal disorders of the upper limb have on a patient's ability to perform work-related tasks. Each of the items in the DASH Work Module use a 5-point Likert scale to assess the corresponding severity or functional parameter. The outcome measure is scored based on the formula (\[sum of n responses)/ - 4 (minimum score\]/0.16 (range of scores ÷100), where n represents the number of completed items. Computed scores range from 0 (no difficulty) to 100 (most severe difficulty).
Time frame: 12 month
Population: Modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All participants who were randomized, received one of the study treatments, and completed at least the 3 month follow-up visit.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Avance Nerve Graft | 12-month DASH (Work Module) Scores | modified intent to treat | 0.00 score on a scale | Standard Error 0 |
| Avance Nerve Graft | 12-month DASH (Work Module) Scores | per protocol | 0.00 score on a scale | Standard Error 0 |
| Hollow Tube Conduit | 12-month DASH (Work Module) Scores | modified intent to treat | 5.22 score on a scale | Standard Error 4.09 |
| Hollow Tube Conduit | 12-month DASH (Work Module) Scores | per protocol | 5.22 score on a scale | Standard Error 4.09 |
Functional Recovery Classification (Medical Research Council Evaluation of Sensory Function) at 12-months
Summary of Functional Recovery Classification (Medical Research Council Evaluation of Sensory Function) at 12-months Patients were assessed for functional recovery of sensation on a scale from S0 to S4 with S0 representing absence of sensibility, S1 representing recovery of deep cutaneous pain sensibility, S2 representing the return of some degree of superficial cutaneous pain and tactile sensibility, S3 representing return of superficial cutaneous pain and tactile sensibility, S3+ representing return of sensibility as in S3 and some recovery of 2-point discrimination (a 2-PD score between 7-15mm), and S4 representing complete recovery of normal sensation as assessed by 2-point discrimination (score between 2-6mm).
Time frame: 12 months
Population: Modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All participants who were randomized, received one of the study treatments, and completed at least the 3 month follow-up visit.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Avance Nerve Graft | Functional Recovery Classification (Medical Research Council Evaluation of Sensory Function) at 12-months | modified intent to treat | S1 | 0 Participants |
| Avance Nerve Graft | Functional Recovery Classification (Medical Research Council Evaluation of Sensory Function) at 12-months | modified intent to treat | S2 | 0 Participants |
| Avance Nerve Graft | Functional Recovery Classification (Medical Research Council Evaluation of Sensory Function) at 12-months | modified intent to treat | S3 | 2 Participants |
| Avance Nerve Graft | Functional Recovery Classification (Medical Research Council Evaluation of Sensory Function) at 12-months | modified intent to treat | S3+ | 1 Participants |
| Avance Nerve Graft | Functional Recovery Classification (Medical Research Council Evaluation of Sensory Function) at 12-months | modified intent to treat | S4 | 3 Participants |
| Avance Nerve Graft | Functional Recovery Classification (Medical Research Council Evaluation of Sensory Function) at 12-months | per protocol | S1 | 0 Participants |
| Avance Nerve Graft | Functional Recovery Classification (Medical Research Council Evaluation of Sensory Function) at 12-months | per protocol | S2 | 0 Participants |
| Avance Nerve Graft | Functional Recovery Classification (Medical Research Council Evaluation of Sensory Function) at 12-months | per protocol | S3 | 2 Participants |
| Avance Nerve Graft | Functional Recovery Classification (Medical Research Council Evaluation of Sensory Function) at 12-months | per protocol | S3+ | 1 Participants |
| Avance Nerve Graft | Functional Recovery Classification (Medical Research Council Evaluation of Sensory Function) at 12-months | per protocol | S4 | 3 Participants |
| Hollow Tube Conduit | Functional Recovery Classification (Medical Research Council Evaluation of Sensory Function) at 12-months | per protocol | S3 | 0 Participants |
| Hollow Tube Conduit | Functional Recovery Classification (Medical Research Council Evaluation of Sensory Function) at 12-months | modified intent to treat | S1 | 2 Participants |
| Hollow Tube Conduit | Functional Recovery Classification (Medical Research Council Evaluation of Sensory Function) at 12-months | per protocol | S1 | 2 Participants |
| Hollow Tube Conduit | Functional Recovery Classification (Medical Research Council Evaluation of Sensory Function) at 12-months | modified intent to treat | S2 | 0 Participants |
| Hollow Tube Conduit | Functional Recovery Classification (Medical Research Council Evaluation of Sensory Function) at 12-months | per protocol | S4 | 5 Participants |
| Hollow Tube Conduit | Functional Recovery Classification (Medical Research Council Evaluation of Sensory Function) at 12-months | modified intent to treat | S3 | 0 Participants |
| Hollow Tube Conduit | Functional Recovery Classification (Medical Research Council Evaluation of Sensory Function) at 12-months | per protocol | S2 | 0 Participants |
| Hollow Tube Conduit | Functional Recovery Classification (Medical Research Council Evaluation of Sensory Function) at 12-months | modified intent to treat | S3+ | 0 Participants |
| Hollow Tube Conduit | Functional Recovery Classification (Medical Research Council Evaluation of Sensory Function) at 12-months | per protocol | S3+ | 0 Participants |
| Hollow Tube Conduit | Functional Recovery Classification (Medical Research Council Evaluation of Sensory Function) at 12-months | modified intent to treat | S4 | 5 Participants |
Moving 2-point Discrimination
Percent Change from Baseline of Moving 2-Point Discriminations at Month 12
Time frame: 12 months
Population: Modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All participants who were randomized, received one of the study treatments, and completed at least the 3 month follow-up visit.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Avance Nerve Graft | Moving 2-point Discrimination | Modified Intent to Treat population | -62.5 percentage | Standard Error 4.78 |
| Avance Nerve Graft | Moving 2-point Discrimination | Per protocol population | -62.5 percentage | Standard Error 4.78 |
| Hollow Tube Conduit | Moving 2-point Discrimination | Modified Intent to Treat population | -35.4 percentage | Standard Error 13.71 |
| Hollow Tube Conduit | Moving 2-point Discrimination | Per protocol population | -35.4 percentage | Standard Error 13.71 |
Pain at 12-months
Summary of Pain Assessment using Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) at Month 12 The Visual Analog Scale (VAS) For Pain is a patient reported outcomes scale whereby the patient indicates his/her current pain level by making a mark on a continuous horizontal 10 centimeter (100 millimeter) line. The distance from the 0 millimeter to the patient's mark corresponds to the amount of pain the subject is currently experiencing. VAS for Pain data are recorded as the number of millimeters from the left of the line to the patients mark across the range of 0-100 millimeters, with 0 millimeter representing no pain and 100 millimeters representing the worst pain imaginable.
Time frame: 12-months
Population: Modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All participants who were randomized, received one of the study treatments, and completed at least the 3 month follow-up visit.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Avance Nerve Graft | Pain at 12-months | modified intent to treat | 0.54 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.28 |
| Avance Nerve Graft | Pain at 12-months | per protocol | 0.54 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.28 |
| Hollow Tube Conduit | Pain at 12-months | modified intent to treat | 0.92 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.41 |
| Hollow Tube Conduit | Pain at 12-months | per protocol | 0.92 units on a scale | Standard Error 0.41 |
Protective Sensation Present at 12-months
Summary of Protective Sensation by Month 12 Semmes-Weinstein Monofilament (SWMF) assessment of protective sensation. The gauge of the monofilaments range from 2.83 (normal) to 6.65 (deep pressure sensation only). Protective Sensation Present (SWMF score of 3.61 or better), Protective Sensation Diminished (SWMF score of 4.31-3.84), Protective Sensation Absent (SWMF score of 4.56 or greater).
Time frame: 12 months
Population: Modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All participants who were randomized, received one of the study treatments, and completed at least the 3 month follow-up visit.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Avance Nerve Graft | Protective Sensation Present at 12-months | modified intent to treat | Protective Sensation Diminished | 1 Participants |
| Avance Nerve Graft | Protective Sensation Present at 12-months | per protocol | Protective Sensation Present | 5 Participants |
| Avance Nerve Graft | Protective Sensation Present at 12-months | modified intent to treat | Protective Sensation Present | 5 Participants |
| Avance Nerve Graft | Protective Sensation Present at 12-months | per protocol | Protective Sensation Diminished | 1 Participants |
| Avance Nerve Graft | Protective Sensation Present at 12-months | modified intent to treat | Protective Sensation Absent | 0 Participants |
| Avance Nerve Graft | Protective Sensation Present at 12-months | per protocol | Protective Sensation Absent | 0 Participants |
| Hollow Tube Conduit | Protective Sensation Present at 12-months | per protocol | Protective Sensation Absent | 2 Participants |
| Hollow Tube Conduit | Protective Sensation Present at 12-months | modified intent to treat | Protective Sensation Present | 4 Participants |
| Hollow Tube Conduit | Protective Sensation Present at 12-months | modified intent to treat | Protective Sensation Diminished | 3 Participants |
| Hollow Tube Conduit | Protective Sensation Present at 12-months | modified intent to treat | Protective Sensation Absent | 2 Participants |
| Hollow Tube Conduit | Protective Sensation Present at 12-months | per protocol | Protective Sensation Present | 4 Participants |
| Hollow Tube Conduit | Protective Sensation Present at 12-months | per protocol | Protective Sensation Diminished | 3 Participants |
Semmes-Weinstein Monofilament Assessment
Percent Change from Baseline of Semmes-Weinstein Monofilament Assessment at Month 12
Time frame: 12 months
Population: Modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All participants who were randomized, received one of the study treatments, and completed at least the 3 month follow-up visit.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Value (MEAN) | Dispersion |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Avance Nerve Graft | Semmes-Weinstein Monofilament Assessment | modified intent to treat | -46.1 percentage | Standard Error 4.07 |
| Avance Nerve Graft | Semmes-Weinstein Monofilament Assessment | per protocol | -46.1 percentage | Standard Error 4.07 |
| Hollow Tube Conduit | Semmes-Weinstein Monofilament Assessment | modified intent to treat | -21.1 percentage | Standard Error 6.66 |
| Hollow Tube Conduit | Semmes-Weinstein Monofilament Assessment | per protocol | -21.1 percentage | Standard Error 6.66 |
Thermal Discretion at 12-months
Summary of Thermal Discretion at Month 12 as determined by the Investigator. Thermal discretion was assessed by applying a hot and/or cold object to the patient's affected digit. Thermal discretion was reported as either present (Yes) or not present (No).
Time frame: 12-month
Population: Modified Intent-to-Treat Population (mITT): All participants who were randomized, received one of the study treatments, and completed at least the 3 month follow-up visit.
| Arm | Measure | Group | Category | Value (COUNT_OF_PARTICIPANTS) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Avance Nerve Graft | Thermal Discretion at 12-months | Modified Intent to Treat | Yes (Thermal Discretion) | 6 Participants |
| Avance Nerve Graft | Thermal Discretion at 12-months | Modified Intent to Treat | No (Thermal Discretion) | 0 Participants |
| Avance Nerve Graft | Thermal Discretion at 12-months | Per Protocol | Yes (Thermal Discretion) | 6 Participants |
| Avance Nerve Graft | Thermal Discretion at 12-months | Per Protocol | No (Thermal Discretion) | 0 Participants |
| Hollow Tube Conduit | Thermal Discretion at 12-months | Per Protocol | No (Thermal Discretion) | 0 Participants |
| Hollow Tube Conduit | Thermal Discretion at 12-months | Modified Intent to Treat | Yes (Thermal Discretion) | 7 Participants |
| Hollow Tube Conduit | Thermal Discretion at 12-months | Per Protocol | Yes (Thermal Discretion) | 7 Participants |
| Hollow Tube Conduit | Thermal Discretion at 12-months | Modified Intent to Treat | No (Thermal Discretion) | 0 Participants |