Chronic Proctalgia (Also Called Levator Ani Syndrome)
Conditions
Keywords
Biofeedback, Pelvic floor, Levator ani syndrome, Chronic proctalgia, Electrogalvanic stimulation, Massage
Brief summary
This study has been completed. The following is a brief description of the aims, methods, and results of the study: Previous small studies suggest that chronic proctalgia (chronic recurring pain in the anal canal or rectum), which is also called levator ani syndrome, can be treated with biofeedback to teach relaxation of pelvic floor muscles, or electrogalvanic stimulation (electrical stimulation to relax muscles), or massage of pelvic floor muscles. The aim of this study was to compare the effectiveness of these three treatments, to determine how they work physiologically, and to identify which patients are most likely to benefit. Methods: Subjects had to meet the diagnostic criteria for chronic proctalgia and to report pain at least once a week. They had to also be free of medical or psychiatric disorders that could explain their chronic proctalgia. Patients qualified to enter the study were separated into two groups based on whether they reported tenderness when the examining physician pressed on the levator ani muscles of the pelvic floor. All 157 patients who were enrolled received 9 sessions of psychological counseling plus biofeedback or electrogalvanic stimulation or massage. The results of treatment were assessed at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after the end of treatment.
Interventions
BEHAVIORALBiofeedback
Electromyographic (EMG) activity was recorded from sensors placed in the anal canal, averaged, and displayed to patients to help them learn to relax the pelvic floor muscles during straining.
OTHERElectrogalvanic stimulation
Electrical stimulation was applied to pelvic floor muscles through an anal plug. Frequency was 80 pulses per sec, and voltage was slowly increased from 0 to 150-350 volts as tolerated.
BEHAVIORALDigital massage
Using a gloved finger, the therapist pressed on the levator ani as firmly as tolerated and moved the finger from side to side 3-4 times.
Sponsors
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (NIDDK)
Study design
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
SINGLE (Outcomes Assessor)
Eligibility
Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to 70 Years
Healthy volunteers
No
Inclusion criteria
Recurring episodes of pain or aching in the anal canal or rectum for at least 12 weeks in the previous year. Episodes last at least 20 minutes. Pain must occur at least weekly during a 4-week run-in.
Exclusion criteria
Other medical or psychiatric diagnoses that could explain recurring rectal pain. Daily use of psychotropic medications. Meets diagnostic criteria for irritable bowel syndrome or functional constipation. Screening studies included physical examination by a gastroenterologist, colonoscopy, pelvic ultrasound, and surgical consult in all patients and referral to a gynecologist or urologist if indicated by history.
Design outcomes
Primary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Adequate relief of pain (proctalgia) | 1, 3, 6, and 12 months following treatment |
Secondary
| Measure | Time frame |
|---|---|
| Subjective pain improvement (ordinal scale) | 1, 3, and 6 months follow-up |
| Number of days per month with rectal pain (inferred from 30 day symptom diary) | Baseline, then 1, 3, and 6 months follow-up |
| Visual analog scale rating of pain averaged across weeks for 30 day diary period | Baseline, then 1, 3, and 6 months follow-up |
Countries
Italy
Outcome results
None listed