Skip to content

Evaluation of a Lopinavir/Ritonavir Monotherapy vs a Triple Therapy as Maintenance Regimens in HIV-1 Infected Patients

A Study Comparing Efficacy and Tolerance of Two Maintenance Strategies : a Monotherapy With Lopinavir/Ritonavir or a Single-tablet Triple Therapy by Efavirenz/Emtricitabin/Tenofovir in HIV-1 Infected Patients With HIV RNA Below 50 cp/mL

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00946595
Acronym
ANRS 140 DREAM
Enrollment
420
Registered
2009-07-27
Start date
2009-11-30
Completion date
2014-01-31
Last updated
2014-06-24

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

HIV Infections

Keywords

Undetectable, HIV infections, Monotherapy, Lopinavir/ritonavir, Protease inhibitor, Treatment experienced

Brief summary

A 2-year multicenter, phase II/III, randomized active-controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy and tolerance of two maintenance strategies in HIV-1 infected patients with HIV RNA below 50 copies/mL : a monotherapy with lopinavir/ritonavir or a single-tablet triple therapy (EFV/FTC/TDF).

Detailed description

Today, one of the challenges of HIV treatment is to overcome side effects and toxicity of long term antiretroviral therapy. A promising approach may be the simplification of treatment maintenance strategies, sparing certain antiretroviral drug classes. This is a two-year prospective phase II/III, multicenter randomized trial to evaluate the efficacy and tolerance of a lopinavir/ritonavir monotherapy as a maintenance regimen in HIV-infected adults. Enrolled patients must have had stable antiretroviral treatment and HIV-1 RNA below 50 cp/mL over the previous 12 months, and no prior treatment failure. Provided informed consent, 420 patients are randomized in a 1:1 ratio to two open-label treatment groups and receive either lopinavir/r 800/200mg per day or EFV/FTC/TDF 600/200/245 mg per day (fixed dose combination). The main objective is to assess treatment efficacy and tolerance after 2 years. In 80 patients, repeated DEXA measurements are performed during the trial in order to evaluate changes in bone mineral density and in body composition.

Interventions

DRUGefavirenz/emtricitabin/tenofovir

1x600/200/245 mg per day (one tablet) between W0 et W98

DRUGlopinavir/ritonavir

4 x 200/50 mg (4 tablets) once a day between W0 and W98

Sponsors

Abbott
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
Gilead Sciences
CollaboratorINDUSTRY
French National Agency for Research on AIDS and Viral Hepatitis
Lead SponsorOTHER_GOV

Study design

Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Confirmed HIV-1 infection * Stable antiretroviral treatment over 6 months * HIV-1 RNA \< 50 cp/mL for at least 12 months * Lymphocytes CD4+ \> 200/mm3 * Lymphocytes CD4+ nadir \> 100/mm3 * Absence of prior treatment failure (defined by two successive HIV-1 RNA ≥ 50 cp/mL under NNRTI or PI treatment) * Absence of documentation of a mutation conferring NRTI or NNRTI resistance or a primary mutation in the protease gene * Written informed consent * Patient affiliated to a social security scheme

Exclusion criteria

* Woman of child bearing potential without efficient contraception * Pregnant or breastfeeding woman * HBV infection (HbS Ag+) * HBC infection requiring specific treatment during the trial * Liver cirrhosis Child-Pugh C * HIV-1/HIV-2 Co-infection or isolated HIV-2 infection * Ongoing interleukin or interferon treatment * Co-administration of contraindicated treatments * Hypersensibility to efavirenz or lopinavir/r * Absolute neutrophil count \< 750/mm3, hemoglobin \< 8g/dL, platelets \< 60.000/mm3, creatinine clearance \< 50 mL/min, ASAT, ALAT, lipase, alkaline phosphatase or total bilirubin \> 3 ULN, CD4 nadir \< 100/mm3. * Participation in another clinical trial interfering with the study drug assignment in DREAM * Subject under legal guardianship or incapacitation

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
Proportion of patients without treatment failure at Week 96Week 96

Secondary

MeasureTime frame
Evolution of CD4 cell count between Week 0 and Week 96Between Week 0 and Week 96
Evaluation of treatment adherenceFrom Week 0 to Week 96
Evaluation of treatment toleranceFrom Week 0 to Week 96
Proportion of patients with plasma HIV-1 RNA below 50 cp/mL at all time points during the trialFrom Week 0 to Week 96
Proportion of patients with plasma HIV-1 RNA below 50 cp/mL at Week 96Week 96
Number and type of new resistance mutations in case of two successive plasma HIV-1 RNA ≥ 400 cp/mLFrom Week 0 to Week 96
Proportion of patients with plasma HIV-1 RNA below 400 cp/mL at all time points during the trialFrom Week 0 to Week 96
Evaluation of quality of life assessmentsFrom Week 0 to Week 96
Prevalence of acquired impairment in cognitive functioning, involving at least two ability domains, without interference in daily functioning or functioning complaint between Week 0 and Week 96Between Week 0 and Week 96
Prevalence of acquired impairment in cognitive functioning, involving at least two ability domains, with interference in daily functioning or functioning complaint between Week 0 and Week 96Between Week 0 and Week 96
Evolution of densitometric parameters between Week 0 and Week 96 in 80 patientsBetween Week 0 and Week 96
Analysis of the determinants of the durability of the virological responseFrom Week 0 to Week 96
Assessment of pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic parameters in both groups if relevantFrom Week 0 to Week 96
Proportion of patients with loss of future drug optionsFrom Week 0 to Week 96

Countries

France

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 1, 2026