Skip to content

Application and Evaluation of Group Cognitive Intervention for Depressed Adolescents

Application and Evaluation of Group Cognitive Intervention for Depressed Adolescents

Status
Completed
Phases
Early Phase 1
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00946413
Enrollment
31
Registered
2009-07-27
Start date
2006-01-31
Completion date
2007-12-31
Last updated
2009-07-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Community Adolescents at Risk for Depression and Suicide

Keywords

CBT, Depressed and suicidal adolescents

Brief summary

Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is effective and CBT with parental involvement has potential in preventing and treating adolescent depression. The purpose of this study was to compare the short- and long-term effectiveness of CBT alone and CBT plus parental education for community-based adolescents at risk for depression and suicide in Taiwan. It is hypothesized that the CBT alone and CBT with parental education group are more effective than the control group.

Detailed description

Cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT) is well known for its active, directive, time-limited, and structured approach. Despite an increasing prevalence of adolescent depression in Taiwan, few studies have been conducted to evaluate the immediate and long-term effectiveness of CBT for community-based adolescents at risk for depression and suicide. Also, little is known about the effectiveness of the involvement of parents in CBT groups. The Adolescent Coping with Depression Course (CWDA) (19) is an effective CBT-oriented group intervention for adolescent depression. However, it has not been tested in specific cultural groups. The primary purpose of this study was therefore to compare the immediate and long-term effectiveness of CBT alone, CBT with parental education, and control groups for community-based adolescents at risk for depression and suicide.A quasi-experimental research design was used in this study. Community-based high school students at risk for depression and suicide were recruited and assigned to one of two experimental groups or a control group. Students in the experimental groups received CBT plus parental education (group A, n = 9) or CBT alone (group B, n = 10). The control group was designed as a waiting list group (group C, n = 12). Both experimental groups received a follow-up session 1 year after the intervention. Several outcome variables (depressive symptoms, suicidal ideation, cognitive triad, learned resourcefulness \[LR\], and salivary cortisol level) were used to determine the effectiveness of treatment.

Interventions

BEHAVIORALCBT plus parent education

The 10-session group CBT with two-session parental education in our study was derived from the CWDA, with some modifications made based on cultural considerations. Skills taught and discussed included mood monitoring, improving social skills, increasing pleasant activities, decreasing anxiety, reducing depressogenic cognitions, improving communication, and conflict resolution. The issues taught and discussed included an introduction to adolescent depression and suicide, their etiology, symptoms, treatment, and prognosis, as well as stress management. A 1-year individual follow-up program was used to maintain the effect of the experimental intervention and to provide necessary individual interventions for students such as CBT, support, and counseling.

BEHAVIORALCBT alone

The 10-session group CBT with two-session parental education in our study was derived from the CWDA, with some modifications made based on cultural considerations. Skills taught and discussed included mood monitoring, improving social skills, increasing pleasant activities, decreasing anxiety, reducing depressogenic cognitions, improving communication, and conflict resolution.A 1-year individual follow-up program was used to maintain the effect of the experimental intervention and to provide necessary individual interventions for students such as CBT, support, and counseling.

Sponsors

Department of Health
CollaboratorAMBIG
Taipei Medical University Hospital
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
PREVENTION
Masking
DOUBLE (Subject, Caregiver)

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
14 Years to 19 Years
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* willing to participate group assignment and grant consents

Exclusion criteria

* unwilling to participate potential group activity and grant consents * severe physical or psychiatric disorders

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frame
depressive symptoms, suicidal ideation, cognitive triad, learned resourcefulness (LR), and salivary cortisol6

Countries

Taiwan

Outcome results

None listed

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026