Skip to content

Radiation Therapy in Treating Patients With Recurrent Breast Cancer

Partial Breast Re-Irradiation for Patients With Ipsilateral Breast Tumor Recurrence, After First Being Treated With Breast Conservation for Early Stage Breast Cancer: An Efficacy Trial Comparing Mammosite® and Intraoperative Radiation

Status
Completed
Phases
NA
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00945061
Enrollment
13
Registered
2009-07-23
Start date
2008-09-23
Completion date
2018-07-06
Last updated
2020-08-18

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Breast Cancer

Keywords

ductal breast carcinoma in situ, recurrent breast cancer, invasive ductal breast carcinoma, medullary ductal breast carcinoma with lymphocytic infiltrate, mucinous ductal breast carcinoma, papillary ductal breast carcinoma, tubular ductal breast carcinoma, male breast cancer

Brief summary

RATIONALE: Radiation therapy uses high-energy x-rays and other types of radiation to kill tumor cells. It is not yet known whether a single dose of radiation therapy is more effective than implant radiation therapy for 5 days in treating patients with recurrent breast cancer. PURPOSE: This phase II trial is studying implant radiation therapy to see how well it works compared with radiation therapy during surgery in treating patients with recurrent breast cancer.

Detailed description

OBJECTIVES: * To determine the in breast recurrence rate following repeat radiation to the breast. These patients will be followed for a period of five years following completion of radiation to determine these rates. * To determine the cosmetic outcome resulting from partial breast re-irradiation using different techniques, including both physician and patient rated scales. * To determine patient satisfaction of partial breast re-irradiation as it pertains to their overall treatment experience, as measured by a questionnaire. * To determine if there are patient factors illuminated during a discussion of informed consent, which limit a patient's suitability to receive partial breast re-irradiation delivered by a particular technique. * To evaluate tylectomy wound healing and overall complication rate after partial breast re-irradiation. * To determine ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence rates and tumor bed recurrence rates.These patients will be followed for a period of five years following completion of the second course of radiation to determine these rates. OUTLINE: Patients are stratified according to which modality is best suited for the patient. Patients are assigned to 1 of 2 groups. All patients undergo excisional biopsy or needle localization removal of the tumor. Patients with margins \< 2 mm undergo re-excision of the biopsy cavity. * Group 1: Patients undergo partial breast irradiation delivered as a single intra-operative radiation dose to the tumor bed. * Group 2: Patients undergo partial breast irradiation delivered by Mammosite® brachytherapy consisting of 10 fractions over 5 days. Quality of life is assessed at baseline, 1 month after completion of radiotherapy, and then at follow-up visits. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up at 1 month, every 3 months for 1 year, and then every 6 months for 5 years.

Interventions

Patients undergo brachytherapy

Patients undergo radiotherapy

Sponsors

Case Comprehensive Cancer Center
Lead SponsorOTHER

Study design

Allocation
NON_RANDOMIZED
Intervention model
PARALLEL
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Patients' recurrences must have histologically confirmed ductal carcinoma in-situ, invasive ductal, medullary, papillary, colloid (mucinous), or tubular histologies. * Lesion size ≤ 3 cm treated with a tylectomy and whole breast irradiation (with or without tumor bed boost) * Unifocal breast cancer recurrence * Negative resection margins with at least a 2 mm margin from invasive and in situ cancer or a negative re-excision * Hormonal therapy is allowed. If chemotherapy is planned, the radiation is delivered first and chemotherapy must begin no earlier than two weeks following completion of radiation. * Signed study-specific informed consent prior to study entry.

Exclusion criteria

* Patients with distant metastatic disease * Patients with invasive lobular carcinoma, extensive lobular carcinoma in-situ, extensive ductal carcinoma in-situ (spanning more than 3 cm), or nonepithelial breast malignancies such as lymphoma or sarcoma. * Patients with multicentric carcinoma (tumors in different quadrants of the breast or tumors separated by at least 4 cm). Palpable or radiographically suspicious contralateral axillary, ipsilateral or contralateral supraclavicular, infraclavicular, or internal mammary lymph nodes unless these are histologically or cytologically confirmed negative. * Extensive intraductal component (EIC) by the Harvard definition, i.e. 1) more than 25% of the invasive tumor is Ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and DCIS present in adjacent breast tissue. Presence of an EIC increases the chance of local recurrence, and as such, one might not be a candidate for repeat breast conservation. * Patients with Paget's disease of the nipple. * Patients with skin involvement. * Patients with collagen vascular disorders, specifically systemic lupus erythematosis, scleroderma, or dermatomyositis. * Patients with psychiatric, neurologic, or addictive disorders that would preclude obtaining informed consent. * Other malignancy, except non-melanomatous skin cancer, \< 5 years prior to participation in this study. * Patients who are pregnant or lactating due to potential fetal exposure to radiation and unknown effects of radiation on lactating females. * Patients with known BReast CAncer gene (BRCA)1/BRCA 2 mutations.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Ipsilateral Breast Tumor Recurrence Rates1 month after radiation therapy (RT)Percent of participants with Ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR). IBTR includes: true recurrence (TR) thought to occur when residual cancer cells grow gradually to detectable size and new primary (NP) thought to be new cancer independently arising in the preserved breast.
Tumor Bed Recurrence Rates1 month after RTPercent of participants with tumor bed recurrence, defined as recurrence in the same quadrant as the surgical excision
Cosmetic Outcome as Determined by an Established Scale1 month after RT & Q3mos for one year and at 5 yearsCosmetic outcome as determined by four-level scale of cosmetic outcome scale, with levels poor, fair, good, and excellent in increasingly positive outcomes. Excellent: Minimal or no difference in the size or shape of the treated breast Good: Slight difference in the size or shape of the treated breast Fair: Obvious difference in the shape and size of the treated breast Poor: Obvious difference in the shape and size of the treated breast
Percent of Participants Indicating Total Satisfaction or Not Totally Satisfied But Would Choose Same Treatment Again on Quality of Life (QOL) Survey1 month after RTPercent of participants indicating total satisfaction or not totally satisfied but would choose same treatment again on QOL survey Participants indicate level of satisfaction by answering my satisfaction about the treatment and results is 1. I am totally satisfied with the treatment and results 2. I am not totally satisfied but would choose the same treatment again. 3. I am not totally satisfied and would choose the standard 5-6 week course of radiation if I had it to do all over again. 4. I am dissatisfied with my treatment.
Percent of Participants Experiencing Complications After Intervention1 month after RTOverall complication rate, as measured by percent of participants experiencing complications after intervention

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent of Participants With Delayed Wound Healing1 month after RTWound healing rate, as measured by percent of participants with delayed wound healing

Countries

United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Intraoperative Radiation Therapy
Patients undergo partial breast irradiation delivered as a single intra-operative radiation dose to the tumor bed.
12
Intracavitary Balloon Brachytherapy
Patients undergo partial breast irradiation delivered as MammoSite® brachytherapy consisting of 10 fractions over 5 days.
1
Total13

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicIntraoperative Radiation TherapyIntracavitary Balloon BrachytherapyTotal
Age, Customized
40-49 years
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Age, Customized
50-59 years
4 Participants0 Participants4 Participants
Age, Customized
60-69 years
4 Participants1 Participants5 Participants
Age, Customized
70-79 years
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Age, Customized
80-89 years
2 Participants0 Participants2 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Hispanic or Latino
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Not Hispanic or Latino
11 Participants1 Participants12 Participants
Ethnicity (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants0 Participants1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
3 Participants0 Participants3 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
9 Participants1 Participants10 Participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
12 participants1 participants13 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
12 Participants1 Participants13 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants0 Participants0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
1 / 120 / 1
other
Total, other adverse events
11 / 121 / 1
serious
Total, serious adverse events
0 / 120 / 1

Outcome results

Primary

Cosmetic Outcome as Determined by an Established Scale

Cosmetic outcome as determined by four-level scale of cosmetic outcome scale, with levels poor, fair, good, and excellent in increasingly positive outcomes. Excellent: Minimal or no difference in the size or shape of the treated breast Good: Slight difference in the size or shape of the treated breast Fair: Obvious difference in the shape and size of the treated breast Poor: Obvious difference in the shape and size of the treated breast

Time frame: 1 month after RT & Q3mos for one year and at 5 years

Population: Participants who had data collected for survey. Only participants in group 1 completed survey.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
Intraoperative Radiation TherapyCosmetic Outcome as Determined by an Established ScaleGood54 percentage of participants
Intraoperative Radiation TherapyCosmetic Outcome as Determined by an Established ScaleFair38 percentage of participants
Intraoperative Radiation TherapyCosmetic Outcome as Determined by an Established ScalePoor0 percentage of participants
Intraoperative Radiation TherapyCosmetic Outcome as Determined by an Established ScaleExcellent8 percentage of participants
Intracavitary Balloon BrachytherapyCosmetic Outcome as Determined by an Established ScaleFair50 percentage of participants
Intracavitary Balloon BrachytherapyCosmetic Outcome as Determined by an Established ScaleExcellent0 percentage of participants
Intracavitary Balloon BrachytherapyCosmetic Outcome as Determined by an Established ScalePoor0 percentage of participants
Intracavitary Balloon BrachytherapyCosmetic Outcome as Determined by an Established ScaleGood50 percentage of participants
3 MonthsCosmetic Outcome as Determined by an Established ScaleFair37 percentage of participants
3 MonthsCosmetic Outcome as Determined by an Established ScaleGood37 percentage of participants
3 MonthsCosmetic Outcome as Determined by an Established ScaleExcellent13 percentage of participants
3 MonthsCosmetic Outcome as Determined by an Established ScalePoor13 percentage of participants
6 MonthCosmetic Outcome as Determined by an Established ScaleExcellent0 percentage of participants
6 MonthCosmetic Outcome as Determined by an Established ScaleGood25 percentage of participants
6 MonthCosmetic Outcome as Determined by an Established ScaleFair75 percentage of participants
6 MonthCosmetic Outcome as Determined by an Established ScalePoor0 percentage of participants
9 MonthsCosmetic Outcome as Determined by an Established ScaleGood20 percentage of participants
9 MonthsCosmetic Outcome as Determined by an Established ScalePoor20 percentage of participants
9 MonthsCosmetic Outcome as Determined by an Established ScaleFair60 percentage of participants
9 MonthsCosmetic Outcome as Determined by an Established ScaleExcellent0 percentage of participants
12 MonthsCosmetic Outcome as Determined by an Established ScaleGood20 percentage of participants
12 MonthsCosmetic Outcome as Determined by an Established ScalePoor10 percentage of participants
12 MonthsCosmetic Outcome as Determined by an Established ScaleFair60 percentage of participants
12 MonthsCosmetic Outcome as Determined by an Established ScaleExcellent10 percentage of participants
5 YearsCosmetic Outcome as Determined by an Established ScalePoor17 percentage of participants
5 YearsCosmetic Outcome as Determined by an Established ScaleExcellent0 percentage of participants
5 YearsCosmetic Outcome as Determined by an Established ScaleGood33 percentage of participants
5 YearsCosmetic Outcome as Determined by an Established ScaleFair50 percentage of participants
Primary

Ipsilateral Breast Tumor Recurrence Rates

Percent of participants with Ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR). IBTR includes: true recurrence (TR) thought to occur when residual cancer cells grow gradually to detectable size and new primary (NP) thought to be new cancer independently arising in the preserved breast.

Time frame: 3 months after RT

Population: Evaluable participants enrolled in study

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Intraoperative Radiation TherapyIpsilateral Breast Tumor Recurrence Rates0 percentage of participants
Intracavitary Balloon BrachytherapyIpsilateral Breast Tumor Recurrence Rates0 percentage of participants
Primary

Ipsilateral Breast Tumor Recurrence Rates

Percent of participants with Ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR). IBTR includes: true recurrence (TR) thought to occur when residual cancer cells grow gradually to detectable size and new primary (NP) thought to be new cancer independently arising in the preserved breast.

Time frame: 6 months after RT

Population: Evaluable participants enrolled in study

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Intraoperative Radiation TherapyIpsilateral Breast Tumor Recurrence Rates0 percentage of participants
Intracavitary Balloon BrachytherapyIpsilateral Breast Tumor Recurrence Rates0 percentage of participants
Primary

Ipsilateral Breast Tumor Recurrence Rates

Percent of participants with Ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR). IBTR includes: true recurrence (TR) thought to occur when residual cancer cells grow gradually to detectable size and new primary (NP) thought to be new cancer independently arising in the preserved breast.

Time frame: 9 months after RT

Population: Evaluable participants enrolled in study

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Intraoperative Radiation TherapyIpsilateral Breast Tumor Recurrence Rates0 percentage of participants
Intracavitary Balloon BrachytherapyIpsilateral Breast Tumor Recurrence Rates0 percentage of participants
Primary

Ipsilateral Breast Tumor Recurrence Rates

Percent of participants with Ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR). IBTR includes: true recurrence (TR) thought to occur when residual cancer cells grow gradually to detectable size and new primary (NP) thought to be new cancer independently arising in the preserved breast.

Time frame: 12 months after RT

Population: Evaluable participants enrolled in study

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Intraoperative Radiation TherapyIpsilateral Breast Tumor Recurrence Rates0 percentage of participants
Intracavitary Balloon BrachytherapyIpsilateral Breast Tumor Recurrence Rates0 percentage of participants
Primary

Ipsilateral Breast Tumor Recurrence Rates

Percent of participants with Ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR). IBTR includes: true recurrence (TR) thought to occur when residual cancer cells grow gradually to detectable size and new primary (NP) thought to be new cancer independently arising in the preserved breast.

Time frame: 2 years after RT

Population: Evaluable participants enrolled in study

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Intraoperative Radiation TherapyIpsilateral Breast Tumor Recurrence Rates9 percentage of participants
Intracavitary Balloon BrachytherapyIpsilateral Breast Tumor Recurrence Rates0 percentage of participants
Primary

Ipsilateral Breast Tumor Recurrence Rates

Percent of participants with Ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR). IBTR includes: true recurrence (TR) thought to occur when residual cancer cells grow gradually to detectable size and new primary (NP) thought to be new cancer independently arising in the preserved breast.

Time frame: 3 years after RT

Population: Evaluable participants enrolled in study

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Intraoperative Radiation TherapyIpsilateral Breast Tumor Recurrence Rates9 percentage of participants
Intracavitary Balloon BrachytherapyIpsilateral Breast Tumor Recurrence Rates0 percentage of participants
Primary

Ipsilateral Breast Tumor Recurrence Rates

Percent of participants with Ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR). IBTR includes: true recurrence (TR) thought to occur when residual cancer cells grow gradually to detectable size and new primary (NP) thought to be new cancer independently arising in the preserved breast.

Time frame: 4 years after RT

Population: Evaluable participants enrolled in study

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Intraoperative Radiation TherapyIpsilateral Breast Tumor Recurrence Rates10 percentage of participants
Intracavitary Balloon BrachytherapyIpsilateral Breast Tumor Recurrence Rates0 percentage of participants
Primary

Ipsilateral Breast Tumor Recurrence Rates

Percent of participants with Ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR). IBTR includes: true recurrence (TR) thought to occur when residual cancer cells grow gradually to detectable size and new primary (NP) thought to be new cancer independently arising in the preserved breast.

Time frame: 1 month after radiation therapy (RT)

Population: Evaluable participants enrolled in study

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Intraoperative Radiation TherapyIpsilateral Breast Tumor Recurrence Rates0 percentage of participants
Intracavitary Balloon BrachytherapyIpsilateral Breast Tumor Recurrence Rates0 percentage of participants
Primary

Ipsilateral Breast Tumor Recurrence Rates

Percent of participants with Ipsilateral breast tumor recurrence (IBTR). IBTR includes: true recurrence (TR) thought to occur when residual cancer cells grow gradually to detectable size and new primary (NP) thought to be new cancer independently arising in the preserved breast.

Time frame: 5 years after RT

Population: Evaluable participants enrolled in study

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Intraoperative Radiation TherapyIpsilateral Breast Tumor Recurrence Rates11 percentage of participants
Intracavitary Balloon BrachytherapyIpsilateral Breast Tumor Recurrence Rates0 percentage of participants
Primary

Percent of Participants Experiencing Complications After Intervention

Overall complication rate, as measured by percent of participants experiencing complications after intervention

Time frame: 5 years after RT

Population: Evaluable participants enrolled in study

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Intraoperative Radiation TherapyPercent of Participants Experiencing Complications After Intervention40 percentage of participants
Intracavitary Balloon BrachytherapyPercent of Participants Experiencing Complications After Intervention0 percentage of participants
Primary

Percent of Participants Experiencing Complications After Intervention

Overall complication rate, as measured by percent of participants experiencing complications after intervention

Time frame: 4 years after RT

Population: Evaluable participants enrolled in study

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Intraoperative Radiation TherapyPercent of Participants Experiencing Complications After Intervention36 percentage of participants
Intracavitary Balloon BrachytherapyPercent of Participants Experiencing Complications After Intervention0 percentage of participants
Primary

Percent of Participants Experiencing Complications After Intervention

Overall complication rate, as measured by percent of participants experiencing complications after intervention

Time frame: 3 years after RT

Population: Evaluable participants enrolled in study

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Intraoperative Radiation TherapyPercent of Participants Experiencing Complications After Intervention36 percentage of participants
Intracavitary Balloon BrachytherapyPercent of Participants Experiencing Complications After Intervention0 percentage of participants
Primary

Percent of Participants Experiencing Complications After Intervention

Overall complication rate, as measured by percent of participants experiencing complications after intervention

Time frame: 12 month after RT

Population: Evaluable participants enrolled in study

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Intraoperative Radiation TherapyPercent of Participants Experiencing Complications After Intervention36 percentage of participants
Intracavitary Balloon BrachytherapyPercent of Participants Experiencing Complications After Intervention0 percentage of participants
Primary

Percent of Participants Experiencing Complications After Intervention

Overall complication rate, as measured by percent of participants experiencing complications after intervention

Time frame: 9 month after RT

Population: Evaluable participants enrolled in study

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Intraoperative Radiation TherapyPercent of Participants Experiencing Complications After Intervention36 percentage of participants
Intracavitary Balloon BrachytherapyPercent of Participants Experiencing Complications After Intervention0 percentage of participants
Primary

Percent of Participants Experiencing Complications After Intervention

Overall complication rate, as measured by percent of participants experiencing complications after intervention

Time frame: 6 month after RT

Population: Evaluable participants enrolled in study

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Intraoperative Radiation TherapyPercent of Participants Experiencing Complications After Intervention36 percentage of participants
Intracavitary Balloon BrachytherapyPercent of Participants Experiencing Complications After Intervention0 percentage of participants
Primary

Percent of Participants Experiencing Complications After Intervention

Overall complication rate, as measured by percent of participants experiencing complications after intervention

Time frame: 3 month after RT

Population: Evaluable participants enrolled in study

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Intraoperative Radiation TherapyPercent of Participants Experiencing Complications After Intervention36 percentage of participants
Intracavitary Balloon BrachytherapyPercent of Participants Experiencing Complications After Intervention0 percentage of participants
Primary

Percent of Participants Experiencing Complications After Intervention

Overall complication rate, as measured by percent of participants experiencing complications after intervention

Time frame: 1 month after RT

Population: Evaluable participants enrolled in study

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Intraoperative Radiation TherapyPercent of Participants Experiencing Complications After Intervention33 percentage of participants
Intracavitary Balloon BrachytherapyPercent of Participants Experiencing Complications After Intervention0 percentage of participants
Primary

Percent of Participants Experiencing Complications After Intervention

Overall complication rate, as measured by percent of participants experiencing complications after intervention

Time frame: 2 years after RT

Population: Evaluable participants enrolled in study

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Intraoperative Radiation TherapyPercent of Participants Experiencing Complications After Intervention36 percentage of participants
Intracavitary Balloon BrachytherapyPercent of Participants Experiencing Complications After Intervention0 percentage of participants
Primary

Percent of Participants Indicating Total Satisfaction or Not Totally Satisfied But Would Choose Same Treatment Again on Quality of Life (QOL) Survey

Percent of participants indicating total satisfaction or not totally satisfied but would choose same treatment again on QOL survey Participants indicate level of satisfaction by answering my satisfaction about the treatment and results is 1. I am totally satisfied with the treatment and results 2. I am not totally satisfied but would choose the same treatment again. 3. I am not totally satisfied and would choose the standard 5-6 week course of radiation if I had it to do all over again. 4. I am dissatisfied with my treatment.

Time frame: 5 years after RT

Population: Evaluable participants enrolled in study

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Intraoperative Radiation TherapyPercent of Participants Indicating Total Satisfaction or Not Totally Satisfied But Would Choose Same Treatment Again on Quality of Life (QOL) Survey100 percentage of participants
Primary

Percent of Participants Indicating Total Satisfaction or Not Totally Satisfied But Would Choose Same Treatment Again on Quality of Life (QOL) Survey

Percent of participants indicating total satisfaction or not totally satisfied but would choose same treatment again on QOL survey Participants indicate level of satisfaction by answering my satisfaction about the treatment and results is 1. I am totally satisfied with the treatment and results 2. I am not totally satisfied but would choose the same treatment again. 3. I am not totally satisfied and would choose the standard 5-6 week course of radiation if I had it to do all over again. 4. I am dissatisfied with my treatment.

Time frame: 1 month after RT

Population: Evaluable participants enrolled in study

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Intraoperative Radiation TherapyPercent of Participants Indicating Total Satisfaction or Not Totally Satisfied But Would Choose Same Treatment Again on Quality of Life (QOL) Survey100 percentage of participants
Intracavitary Balloon BrachytherapyPercent of Participants Indicating Total Satisfaction or Not Totally Satisfied But Would Choose Same Treatment Again on Quality of Life (QOL) Survey100 percentage of participants
Primary

Percent of Participants Indicating Total Satisfaction or Not Totally Satisfied But Would Choose Same Treatment Again on Quality of Life (QOL) Survey

Percent of participants indicating total satisfaction or not totally satisfied but would choose same treatment again on QOL survey Participants indicate level of satisfaction by answering my satisfaction about the treatment and results is 1. I am totally satisfied with the treatment and results 2. I am not totally satisfied but would choose the same treatment again. 3. I am not totally satisfied and would choose the standard 5-6 week course of radiation if I had it to do all over again. 4. I am dissatisfied with my treatment.

Time frame: 3 month after RT

Population: Evaluable participants enrolled in study

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Intraoperative Radiation TherapyPercent of Participants Indicating Total Satisfaction or Not Totally Satisfied But Would Choose Same Treatment Again on Quality of Life (QOL) Survey100 percentage of participants
Intracavitary Balloon BrachytherapyPercent of Participants Indicating Total Satisfaction or Not Totally Satisfied But Would Choose Same Treatment Again on Quality of Life (QOL) Survey100 percentage of participants
Primary

Percent of Participants Indicating Total Satisfaction or Not Totally Satisfied But Would Choose Same Treatment Again on Quality of Life (QOL) Survey

Percent of participants indicating total satisfaction or not totally satisfied but would choose same treatment again on QOL survey Participants indicate level of satisfaction by answering my satisfaction about the treatment and results is 1. I am totally satisfied with the treatment and results 2. I am not totally satisfied but would choose the same treatment again. 3. I am not totally satisfied and would choose the standard 5-6 week course of radiation if I had it to do all over again. 4. I am dissatisfied with my treatment.

Time frame: 6 month after RT

Population: Evaluable participants enrolled in study

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Intraoperative Radiation TherapyPercent of Participants Indicating Total Satisfaction or Not Totally Satisfied But Would Choose Same Treatment Again on Quality of Life (QOL) Survey100 percentage of participants
Intracavitary Balloon BrachytherapyPercent of Participants Indicating Total Satisfaction or Not Totally Satisfied But Would Choose Same Treatment Again on Quality of Life (QOL) Survey100 percentage of participants
Primary

Percent of Participants Indicating Total Satisfaction or Not Totally Satisfied But Would Choose Same Treatment Again on Quality of Life (QOL) Survey

Percent of participants indicating total satisfaction or not totally satisfied but would choose same treatment again on QOL survey Participants indicate level of satisfaction by answering my satisfaction about the treatment and results is 1. I am totally satisfied with the treatment and results 2. I am not totally satisfied but would choose the same treatment again. 3. I am not totally satisfied and would choose the standard 5-6 week course of radiation if I had it to do all over again. 4. I am dissatisfied with my treatment.

Time frame: 9 month after RT

Population: Evaluable participants enrolled in study

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Intraoperative Radiation TherapyPercent of Participants Indicating Total Satisfaction or Not Totally Satisfied But Would Choose Same Treatment Again on Quality of Life (QOL) Survey100 percentage of participants
Intracavitary Balloon BrachytherapyPercent of Participants Indicating Total Satisfaction or Not Totally Satisfied But Would Choose Same Treatment Again on Quality of Life (QOL) Survey100 percentage of participants
Primary

Percent of Participants Indicating Total Satisfaction or Not Totally Satisfied But Would Choose Same Treatment Again on Quality of Life (QOL) Survey

Percent of participants indicating total satisfaction or not totally satisfied but would choose same treatment again on QOL survey Participants indicate level of satisfaction by answering my satisfaction about the treatment and results is 1. I am totally satisfied with the treatment and results 2. I am not totally satisfied but would choose the same treatment again. 3. I am not totally satisfied and would choose the standard 5-6 week course of radiation if I had it to do all over again. 4. I am dissatisfied with my treatment.

Time frame: 12 month after RT

Population: Evaluable participants enrolled in study

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Intraoperative Radiation TherapyPercent of Participants Indicating Total Satisfaction or Not Totally Satisfied But Would Choose Same Treatment Again on Quality of Life (QOL) Survey100 percentage of participants
Intracavitary Balloon BrachytherapyPercent of Participants Indicating Total Satisfaction or Not Totally Satisfied But Would Choose Same Treatment Again on Quality of Life (QOL) Survey100 percentage of participants
Primary

Percent of Participants Indicating Total Satisfaction or Not Totally Satisfied But Would Choose Same Treatment Again on Quality of Life (QOL) Survey

Percent of participants indicating total satisfaction or not totally satisfied but would choose same treatment again on QOL survey Participants indicate level of satisfaction by answering my satisfaction about the treatment and results is 1. I am totally satisfied with the treatment and results 2. I am not totally satisfied but would choose the same treatment again. 3. I am not totally satisfied and would choose the standard 5-6 week course of radiation if I had it to do all over again. 4. I am dissatisfied with my treatment.

Time frame: 2 years after RT

Population: Evaluable participants enrolled in study

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Intraoperative Radiation TherapyPercent of Participants Indicating Total Satisfaction or Not Totally Satisfied But Would Choose Same Treatment Again on Quality of Life (QOL) Survey100 percentage of participants
Intracavitary Balloon BrachytherapyPercent of Participants Indicating Total Satisfaction or Not Totally Satisfied But Would Choose Same Treatment Again on Quality of Life (QOL) Survey100 percentage of participants
Primary

Percent of Participants Indicating Total Satisfaction or Not Totally Satisfied But Would Choose Same Treatment Again on Quality of Life (QOL) Survey

Percent of participants indicating total satisfaction or not totally satisfied but would choose same treatment again on QOL survey Participants indicate level of satisfaction by answering my satisfaction about the treatment and results is 1. I am totally satisfied with the treatment and results 2. I am not totally satisfied but would choose the same treatment again. 3. I am not totally satisfied and would choose the standard 5-6 week course of radiation if I had it to do all over again. 4. I am dissatisfied with my treatment.

Time frame: 3 years after RT

Population: Evaluable participants enrolled in study

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Intraoperative Radiation TherapyPercent of Participants Indicating Total Satisfaction or Not Totally Satisfied But Would Choose Same Treatment Again on Quality of Life (QOL) Survey100 percentage of participants
Intracavitary Balloon BrachytherapyPercent of Participants Indicating Total Satisfaction or Not Totally Satisfied But Would Choose Same Treatment Again on Quality of Life (QOL) Survey100 percentage of participants
Primary

Percent of Participants Indicating Total Satisfaction or Not Totally Satisfied But Would Choose Same Treatment Again on Quality of Life (QOL) Survey

Percent of participants indicating total satisfaction or not totally satisfied but would choose same treatment again on QOL survey Participants indicate level of satisfaction by answering my satisfaction about the treatment and results is 1. I am totally satisfied with the treatment and results 2. I am not totally satisfied but would choose the same treatment again. 3. I am not totally satisfied and would choose the standard 5-6 week course of radiation if I had it to do all over again. 4. I am dissatisfied with my treatment.

Time frame: 4 years after RT

Population: Evaluable participants enrolled in study

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Intraoperative Radiation TherapyPercent of Participants Indicating Total Satisfaction or Not Totally Satisfied But Would Choose Same Treatment Again on Quality of Life (QOL) Survey100 percentage of participants
Primary

Tumor Bed Recurrence Rates

Percent of participants with tumor bed recurrence, defined as recurrence in the same quadrant as the surgical excision

Time frame: 5 years after RT

Population: Evaluable participants enrolled in study

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Intraoperative Radiation TherapyTumor Bed Recurrence Rates11 percentage of participants
Intracavitary Balloon BrachytherapyTumor Bed Recurrence Rates0 percentage of participants
Primary

Tumor Bed Recurrence Rates

Percent of participants with tumor bed recurrence, defined as recurrence in the same quadrant as the surgical excision

Time frame: 4 years after RT

Population: Evaluable participants enrolled in study

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Intraoperative Radiation TherapyTumor Bed Recurrence Rates10 percentage of participants
Intracavitary Balloon BrachytherapyTumor Bed Recurrence Rates0 percentage of participants
Primary

Tumor Bed Recurrence Rates

Percent of participants with tumor bed recurrence, defined as recurrence in the same quadrant as the surgical excision

Time frame: 3 years after RT

Population: Evaluable participants enrolled in study

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Intraoperative Radiation TherapyTumor Bed Recurrence Rates9 percentage of participants
Intracavitary Balloon BrachytherapyTumor Bed Recurrence Rates0 percentage of participants
Primary

Tumor Bed Recurrence Rates

Percent of participants with tumor bed recurrence, defined as recurrence in the same quadrant as the surgical excision

Time frame: 2 years after RT

Population: Evaluable participants enrolled in study

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Intraoperative Radiation TherapyTumor Bed Recurrence Rates9 percentage of participants
Intracavitary Balloon BrachytherapyTumor Bed Recurrence Rates0 percentage of participants
Primary

Tumor Bed Recurrence Rates

Percent of participants with tumor bed recurrence, defined as recurrence in the same quadrant as the surgical excision

Time frame: 12 month after RT

Population: Evaluable participants enrolled in study

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Intraoperative Radiation TherapyTumor Bed Recurrence Rates0 percentage of participants
Intracavitary Balloon BrachytherapyTumor Bed Recurrence Rates0 percentage of participants
Primary

Tumor Bed Recurrence Rates

Percent of participants with tumor bed recurrence, defined as recurrence in the same quadrant as the surgical excision

Time frame: 6 month after RT

Population: Evaluable participants enrolled in study

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Intraoperative Radiation TherapyTumor Bed Recurrence Rates0 percentage of participants
Intracavitary Balloon BrachytherapyTumor Bed Recurrence Rates0 percentage of participants
Primary

Tumor Bed Recurrence Rates

Percent of participants with tumor bed recurrence, defined as recurrence in the same quadrant as the surgical excision

Time frame: 3 month after RT

Population: Evaluable participants enrolled in study

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Intraoperative Radiation TherapyTumor Bed Recurrence Rates0 percentage of participants
Intracavitary Balloon BrachytherapyTumor Bed Recurrence Rates0 percentage of participants
Primary

Tumor Bed Recurrence Rates

Percent of participants with tumor bed recurrence, defined as recurrence in the same quadrant as the surgical excision

Time frame: 1 month after RT

Population: Evaluable participants enrolled in study

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Intraoperative Radiation TherapyTumor Bed Recurrence Rates0 percentage of participants
Intracavitary Balloon BrachytherapyTumor Bed Recurrence Rates0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percent of Participants With Delayed Wound Healing

Wound healing rate, as measured by percent of participants with delayed wound healing

Time frame: 5 years after RT

Population: Evaluable participants enrolled on study

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Intraoperative Radiation TherapyPercent of Participants With Delayed Wound Healing10 percentage of participants
Intracavitary Balloon BrachytherapyPercent of Participants With Delayed Wound Healing0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percent of Participants With Delayed Wound Healing

Wound healing rate, as measured by percent of participants with delayed wound healing

Time frame: 3 month after RT

Population: Evaluable participants enrolled on study

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Intraoperative Radiation TherapyPercent of Participants With Delayed Wound Healing9 percentage of participants
Intracavitary Balloon BrachytherapyPercent of Participants With Delayed Wound Healing0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percent of Participants With Delayed Wound Healing

Wound healing rate, as measured by percent of participants with delayed wound healing

Time frame: 1 month after RT

Population: Evaluable participants enrolled on study

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Intraoperative Radiation TherapyPercent of Participants With Delayed Wound Healing8 percentage of participants
Intracavitary Balloon BrachytherapyPercent of Participants With Delayed Wound Healing0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percent of Participants With Delayed Wound Healing

Wound healing rate, as measured by percent of participants with delayed wound healing

Time frame: 6 month after RT

Population: Evaluable participants enrolled on study

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Intraoperative Radiation TherapyPercent of Participants With Delayed Wound Healing9 percentage of participants
Intracavitary Balloon BrachytherapyPercent of Participants With Delayed Wound Healing0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percent of Participants With Delayed Wound Healing

Wound healing rate, as measured by percent of participants with delayed wound healing

Time frame: 9 month after RT

Population: Evaluable participants enrolled on study

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Intraoperative Radiation TherapyPercent of Participants With Delayed Wound Healing9 percentage of participants
Intracavitary Balloon BrachytherapyPercent of Participants With Delayed Wound Healing0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percent of Participants With Delayed Wound Healing

Wound healing rate, as measured by percent of participants with delayed wound healing

Time frame: 12 month after RT

Population: Evaluable participants enrolled on study

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Intraoperative Radiation TherapyPercent of Participants With Delayed Wound Healing9 percentage of participants
Intracavitary Balloon BrachytherapyPercent of Participants With Delayed Wound Healing0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percent of Participants With Delayed Wound Healing

Wound healing rate, as measured by percent of participants with delayed wound healing

Time frame: 2 years after RT

Population: Evaluable participants enrolled on study

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Intraoperative Radiation TherapyPercent of Participants With Delayed Wound Healing9 percentage of participants
Intracavitary Balloon BrachytherapyPercent of Participants With Delayed Wound Healing0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percent of Participants With Delayed Wound Healing

Wound healing rate, as measured by percent of participants with delayed wound healing

Time frame: 3 years after RT

Population: Evaluable participants enrolled on study

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Intraoperative Radiation TherapyPercent of Participants With Delayed Wound Healing9 percentage of participants
Intracavitary Balloon BrachytherapyPercent of Participants With Delayed Wound Healing0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percent of Participants With Delayed Wound Healing

Wound healing rate, as measured by percent of participants with delayed wound healing

Time frame: 4 years after RT

Population: Evaluable participants enrolled on study

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
Intraoperative Radiation TherapyPercent of Participants With Delayed Wound Healing9 percentage of participants
Intracavitary Balloon BrachytherapyPercent of Participants With Delayed Wound Healing0 percentage of participants

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026