Skip to content

Corrected QT Interval Effects of Trastuzumab Emtansine (T-DM1) in Patients With Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2)-Positive Locally Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer and the Safety and Tolerability of Combined T-DM1 and Pertuzumab in Patients With Early Disease Progression

A Phase II, Open-Label Study to Evaluate Corrected QT Interval Effects of Trastuzumab-MCC-DM1 (T-DM1) in Patients With HER2-Positive Locally Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer and to Evaluate the Safety and Tolerability of Combined T-DM1 and Pertuzumab in Patients With Early Disease Progression While Receiving T-DM1 Alone

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 2
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00943670
Enrollment
51
Registered
2009-07-22
Start date
2009-07-31
Completion date
2011-08-31
Last updated
2013-05-27

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Metastatic Breast Cancer

Keywords

MBC, TDM1, Armed Herceptin, Herceptin, Trastuzumab emtansine

Brief summary

This is a multicenter, open-label, single-arm Phase II study designed to evaluate the effect of T-DM1 on the duration of corrected QT (QTc) interval in patients with HER2-positive locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer and to make preliminary assessments regarding the safety, tolerability, and efficacy of combined T-DM1 and pertuzumab in patients with early disease progression. The QT interval is a measure of time between the start of the Q wave and the end of the T wave in the heart's electrical cycle. The QTcF interval is the QT interval as calculated using Fridericia's correction; the QTcB interval is the QT interval as calculated using Bazett's correction.

Interventions

BIOLOGICALpertuzumab

Intravenous repeating dose

Intravenous repeating dose

Sponsors

Genentech, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

* Histologically documented, locally advanced, or metastatic breast cancer; measurable and/or non-measureable but evaluable disease is permitted * HER2-positive disease * History of prior trastuzumab therapy * Life expectancy ≥ 90 days as assessed by the investigator * Negative urine pregnancy test ≤ 72 hours prior to Cycle 1 Day 1 for all women of childbearing potential * For patients of childbearing potential, agreement to use one highly effective form of contraception or two effective forms of contraception for the duration of the study treatment(s) and for 4 months after the last dose of T-DM1 or 6 months after the last dose of pertuzumab, if applicable

Exclusion criteria

* Any chemotherapy, hormonal therapy, radiotherapy, immunotherapy, or biologic therapy for the treatment of breast cancer within 2 weeks of the first study treatment * Prior T-DM1 or pertuzumab therapy * History of intolerance (such as Grade 3-4 infusion reaction) and/or adverse events related to trastuzumab * Grade ≥ 2 (based on National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events \[NCI CTCAE\] v3) peripheral neuropathy at the time of or within 3 weeks prior to the first study treatment * Brain metastases that are untreated or progressive or have required any type of therapy, including radiation, surgery, and/or steroids, to control symptoms from brain metastases within 60 days prior to the first study treatment * History of cardiac disease, unstable angina, symptomatic congestive heart failure (CHF) (Class ≥ II per the New York Heart Associate \[NYHA\] guidelines), myocardial infarction, or ventricular arrhythmia ≤ 6 months prior to Cycle 1, Day 1 * Implantable pacemaker or automatic implantable cardioverter defibrillator * Congenital long QT syndrome or family history of long QT syndrome * Current uncontrolled hypertension * Current treatment with medications that alter cardiac conduction (e.g., digitalis, beta-blockers, or calcium channel blockers) or medications that are generally accepted to have a risk of causing torsades de pointes (TdP) * Current known active infection with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV), hepatitis B virus, or hepatitis C virus * Major surgical procedure or significant traumatic injury within 28 days prior to first study treatment, or anticipation of the need for major surgery during the course of study treatment

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Mean Duration of the QTc IntervalCycle 1 Day 1, pre-dose (Baseline); Cycle 1 Day 1, 15 and 60 minutes post-dose; Cycle 1 Day 8; and Cycle 3 Day 1, 15 minutes pre-dose and 15 and 60 minutes post-dose.The QT interval is a measure of time between the start of the Q wave and the end of the T wave in the heart's electrical cycle. The corrected QT interval was calculated using Fridericia's correction (QTcF) from electrocardiogram (ECG) data. Each participant had triplicate QTcF intervals measured at each timepoint and the average was calculated for each patient at each timepoint. For each timepoint, a participant's corresponding baseline QTcF interval was subtracted from the average QTcF intervals to create a baseline-adjusted average QTcF interval.

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Change From Baseline in Mean Duration of the QTc Interval Using Bazett's CorrectionCycle 1 Day 1, pre-dose (Baseline); Cycle 1 Day 1, 15 and 60 minutes post-dose; Cycle 1 Day 8; and Cycle 3 Day 1, 15 minutes pre-dose and 15 and 60 minutes post-dose.The corrected QT interval was calculated using Bazett's correction (QTcB) from electrocardiogram (ECG) data. Each participant had triplicate QTcB intervals measured at each timepoint and the average was calculated for each patient at each timepoint. For each timepoint, a participant's corresponding baseline QTcB interval was subtracted from the average QTcB intervals to create a baseline-adjusted average QTcB interval.
Change From Baseline in Uncorrected QT IntervalCycle 1 Day 1, pre-dose (Baseline); Cycle 1 Day 1, 15 and 60 minutes post-dose; Cycle 1 Day 8; and Cycle 3 Day 1, 15 minutes pre-dose and 15 and 60 minutes post-dose.The uncorrected QT interval was calculated from electrocardiogram (ECG) data. Each participant had triplicate QT intervals measured at each timepoint and the average was calculated for each patient at each timepoint. For each timepoint, a participant's corresponding baseline QT interval was subtracted from the average QT intervals to create a baseline-adjusted average QT interval.
Change From Baseline in PR IntervalCycle 1 Day 1, pre-dose (Baseline); Cycle 1 Day 1, 15 and 60 minutes post-dose; Cycle 1 Day 8; and Cycle 3 Day 1, 15 minutes pre-dose and 15 and 60 minutes post-dose.The PR interval is the time in seconds from the beginning of the P wave to the beginning of the QRS complex, and was calculated from electrocardiogram (ECG) data. Each participant had triplicate PR intervals measured at each timepoint and the average was calculated for each patient at each timepoint. For each timepoint, a participant's corresponding baseline PR interval was subtracted from the average PR intervals to create a baseline-adjusted average PR interval.
Change From Baseline in QRS DurationCycle 1 Day 1, pre-dose (Baseline); Cycle 1 Day 1, 15 and 60 minutes post-dose; Cycle 1 Day 8; and Cycle 3 Day 1, 15 minutes pre-dose and 15 and 60 minutes post-dose.The QRS interval represents the time it takes for depolarization of the ventricles and was calculated from electrocardiogram (ECG) data. Each participant had triplicate QRS intervals measured at each timepoint and the average was calculated for each patient at each timepoint. For each timepoint, a participant's corresponding baseline QRS interval was subtracted from the average QRS intervals to create a baseline-adjusted average QRS interval.
Change From Baseline in Heart RateCycle 1 Day 1, pre-dose (Baseline); Cycle 1 Day 1, 15 and 60 minutes post-dose; Cycle 1 Day 8; and Cycle 3 Day 1, 15 minutes pre-dose and 15 and 60 minutes post-dose.
Percentage of Participants Within Each Absolute QTc Interval CategoryCycle 1 Day 1, 15 and 60 minutes post-dose; Cycle 1 Day 8; and Cycle 3 Day 1, 15 minutes pre-dose and 15 and 60 minutes post-dose.The corrected QT interval was calculated using Fridericia's correction (QTcF) and using Bazett's correction (QTcB) from electrocardiogram (ECG) data. Each participant had triplicate QTc intervals measured at each timepoint and the average was calculated for each patient at each timepoint. QTc interval categories are based off International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH) Tripartite Guideline E14.
Percentage of Participants Within Each Baseline-adjusted QTc Interval CategoryCycle 1 Day 1, pre-dose (Baseline); Cycle 1 Day 1, 15 and 60 minutes post-dose; Cycle 1 Day 8; and Cycle 3 Day 1, 15 minutes pre-dose and 15 and 60 minutes post-dose.The corrected QT interval was calculated using Fridericia's correction (QTcF) and using Bazett's correction (QTcB) from electrocardiogram (ECG) data. Each participant had triplicate QTc intervals measured at each timepoint and the average was calculated for each patient at each timepoint. For each timepoint, a participant's corresponding baseline QTc interval was subtracted from the average QTc intervals to create a baseline-adjusted average QTc interval. QTc interval categories are based off International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH) Tripartite Guideline E14.
Percentage of Participants With New Abnormal U WavesCycle 1 Day 1, pre-dose (Baseline); Cycle 1 Day 1, 15 and 60 minutes post-dose; Cycle 1 Day 8; and Cycle 3 Day 1, 15 minutes pre-dose and 15 and 60 minutes post-dose.The incidence of abnormal U-wave changes from baseline was determined based on centrally read electrocardiogram (ECG) tracings comparing each of the three triplicate readings from the post baseline ECG time points to the baseline ECG reading. At each time point, if at least one of the three triplicate readings was abnormal, the participant was counted as abnormal for that ECG timepoint as follows: a large U wave, inverted U wave, or T-U fusion compared with baseline was considered an abnormal significant change from baseline.
Percentage of Participants With New Abnormal T WavesCycle 1 Day 1, pre-dose (Baseline); Cycle 1 Day 1, 15 and 60 minutes post-dose; Cycle 1 Day 8; and Cycle 3 Day 1, 15 minutes pre-dose and 15 and 60 minutes post-dose.The incidence of abnormal T-wave changes from baseline was determined based on centrally read electrocardiogram (ECG) tracings comparing each of the three triplicate readings from the post baseline ECG time points to the baseline ECG reading. At each time point, if at least one of the three triplicate readings was abnormal, the participant was counted as abnormal for that ECG timepoint as follows: an inverted T, flat T, or biphasic T compared with baseline was considered an abnormal significant change from baseline. Additionally, nonspecific T-wave changes from baseline were considered as abnormal nonsignificant changes from baseline. T-wave changes from baseline due to ventricular conduction or left ventricular hypertrophy strain were considered not evaluable. C=Cycle; D=Day.
Percentage of Participants With an Objective Response During the Single-agent Trastuzumab Emtansine Treatment PeriodTumor assessments were performed after every three cycles until study termination or progressive disease (up to a maximum of one year).Objective response was defined as a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) determined on two consecutive assessments conducted by the investigator ≥ 4 weeks apart. Responses were assessed by physical examination and imaged-based evaluation using a modified version of the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.0: CR-the disappearance of all target lesions and the disappearance of all nontarget lesions and normalization of tumor marker level and no new lesions. PR-either the disappearance of all target lesions with persistence of one or more nontarget lesion(s) and/or the maintenance of tumor marker level above the normal limits, or, at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum longest diameter with no new lesions or unequivocal progression of existing nontarget lesions.
Duration of Objective Response Based on Investigator Assessment During the Single-agent Trastuzumab Emtansine Treatment PeriodTime from the first documented objective response to the time of first documented disease progression or death, up to a maximum time period of one year.In patients with an objective response during the single-agent trastuzumab emtansine treatment period, duration of response was defined as the time from the first documented objective response to the time of first documented disease progression or death, whichever occurred first. Progressive disease was defined as either at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study with an absolute increase of at least 5 mm, or the appearance of one or more new lesions, or the unequivocal progression of existing nontarget lesions. If a patient did not die or experience disease progression before the end of the study, duration of response was censored at the day of the last tumor assessment when the patient was known to be progression free.
Progression-free Survival During the Single-agent Trastuzumab Emtansine Treatment PeriodFrom the first day of study treatment to the first documented disease progression or death, up to a maximum time period of one year.Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time from the first day of study treatment (Day 1) to first documented disease progression or death, whichever occurred first. If a patient did not experience disease progression or die, PFS was censored at the day of the last tumor assessment that a patient was known to be progression free.
Percentage of Participants With Clinical Benefit During the Single-agent Trastuzumab Emtansine Treatment PeriodTumor assessments were performed after every three cycles until study termination or progressive disease (up to a maximum of one year).Participants were considered to have experienced clinical benefit if they had an objective response or maintained stable disease for at least 6 months from start of study treatment. Objective response was defined as a complete or partial response determined on two consecutive tumor assessments at least 4 weeks apart based on a modified version of RECIST. Stable disease was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for partial response nor sufficient increase to qualify for progressive disease, taking as reference the smallest sum longest diameter since the treatment started and no new lesions or unequivocal progression of existing nontarget lesions.
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)From first dose until 30 days after last dose (up to 1 year).An serious AE is any AE that is fatal, life threatening, requires or prolongs inpatient hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect in a neonate/infant born to a mother exposed to the investigational product(s), or is considered a significant medical event by the investigator (e.g., may jeopardize the patient or may require medical/surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above). The severity of each AE was graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) v3.0, or as follows: Grade 1 = Mild; Grade 2 = Moderate; Grade 3 = Severe; Grade 4 = Very severe; Grade 5 = Death related to AE.
Number of Participants With Decreased Ejection FractionAssessed at Baseline and after every 3 cycles, up to 1 year.Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was assessed on the basis of local assessments of echocardiogram or multigated acquisition scan (MUGA) data. A decrease in LVEF is defined as a decrease from Baseline of greater than or equal to 15%. Grade 3 LVEF is an ejection fraction between 20 and 40%.
Volume of Distribution at Steady State for T-DM1 and Total TrastuzumabBlood samples were collected prior to T-DM1 dosing, 15 and 60 minutes after the end of infusion, and anytime on Days 8 and 15 in Cycles 1 and 3, and pre-dose in Cycle 4.
Maximum Observed Serum Concentration of T-DM1 and Total TrastuzumabBlood samples were collected prior to dosing, 15 and 60 minutes after the end of infusion, and anytime on Days 8 and 15 in Cycles 1 and 3, and pre-dose in Cycle 4.Serum samples were quantitated for T-DM1 (DM1 conjugated to trastuzumab) levels in a validated assay using an indirect sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The minimum quantifiable concentration in human serum was 40 ng/mL. Serum samples were assayed for total trastuzumab (conjugated and unconjugated T-DM1) in a validated assay using an indirect sandwich ELISA method; the minimum quantifiable concentration in human serum was 40 ng/mL.
Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Time of Last Measurable Concentration for T-DM1 and Total TrastuzumabBlood samples were collected prior to T-DM1 dosing, 15 and 60 minutes after the end of infusion, and anytime on Days 8 and 15 in Cycles 1 and 3, and pre-dose in Cycle 4.Area under the serum concentration-time curve from Time zero to time of last measurable concentration (AUClast) for T-DM1 (conjugated trastuzumab) and Total Trastuzumab (conjugated and unconjugated T-DM1) at Cycle 1 and Cycle 3.
Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 Extrapolated to Infinity for T-DM1 and Total TrastuzumabBlood samples were collected prior to T-DM1 dosing, 15 and 60 minutes after the end of infusion, and anytime on Days 8 and 15 in Cycle 1.Area under the serum concentration-time curve from Time zero extrapolated to infinity (AUCinf) for T-DM1 (conjugated trastuzumab) and total trastuzumab (conjugated and unconjugated T-DM1) at Cycle 1.
Terminal Half-life for T-DM1 and Total TrastuzumabBlood samples were collected prior to T-DM1 dosing, 15 and 60 minutes after the end of infusion, and anytime on Days 8 and 15 in Cycles 1 and 3, and pre-dose in Cycle 4.
Clearance T-DM1 and Total TrastuzumabBlood samples were collected prior to T-DM1 dosing, 15 and 60 minutes after the end of infusion, and anytime on Days 8 and 15 in Cycles 1 and 3, and pre-dose in Cycle 4.
Number of Participants With Anti-therapeutic Antibodies (ATAs) to Trastuzumab EmtansineBlood samples were collected prior to T-DM1 dosing, 15 and 60 minutes after the end of infusion, and anytime on Days 8 and 15 in Cycles 1 and 3, and pre-dose in Cycle 4.The number of participants with anti-T-DM1 antibodies was assessed using a validated bridging antibody enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).

Participant flow

Recruitment details

Between 14 July 2009 and 4 December 2009, 51 patients from 13 study sites in the United States were enrolled and initiated treatment in the study.

Pre-assignment details

All patients enrolled in the study were initially treated with single-agent trastuzumab emtansine. Participants with early progressive disease could elect to receive pertuzumab in combination with trastuzumab emtansine.

Participants by arm

ArmCount
T-DM1 / T-DM1 + Pertuzumab
Trastuzumab emtansine (T-DM1) was administered to participants by intravenous (IV) infusion on Day 1 of every 3 week cycle at a dose of 3.6 mg/kg. From Cycle 4, participants with early Progressive disease (demonstrated prior to the end of Cycle 6) could receive combined pertuzumab and trastuzumab emtansine. Pertuzumab was administered after trastuzumab emtansine by IV infusion at a loading dose of 840 mg on Day 1, starting at the cycle after tumor progression was determined, followed by 420 mg IV infusion every 3 weeks in subsequent cycles. Participants who met criteria for ongoing clinical benefit were allowed to continue study treatment in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity for up to 1 year.
51
Total51

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Single-agent Trastuzumab EmtansineAdverse Event2
Single-agent Trastuzumab EmtansineEarly progressive disease20
Single-agent Trastuzumab EmtansinePhysician Decision2
Single-agent Trastuzumab EmtansineSystemic progression15
Single-agent Trastuzumab EmtansineWithdrawal by Subject3
Trastuzumab Emtansine + PertuzumabAdverse Event5
Trastuzumab Emtansine + PertuzumabPhysician Decision1
Trastuzumab Emtansine + PertuzumabProgression of brain metastases2
Trastuzumab Emtansine + PertuzumabSystemic progression6
Trastuzumab Emtansine + PertuzumabWithdrawal by Subject4

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicT-DM1 / T-DM1 + Pertuzumab
Age Continuous53.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.4
Region of Enrollment
United States
51 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
51 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
EG001
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
— / —— / —
other
Total, other adverse events
51 / 5118 / 20
serious
Total, serious adverse events
4 / 515 / 20

Outcome results

Primary

Change From Baseline in Mean Duration of the QTc Interval

The QT interval is a measure of time between the start of the Q wave and the end of the T wave in the heart's electrical cycle. The corrected QT interval was calculated using Fridericia's correction (QTcF) from electrocardiogram (ECG) data. Each participant had triplicate QTcF intervals measured at each timepoint and the average was calculated for each patient at each timepoint. For each timepoint, a participant's corresponding baseline QTcF interval was subtracted from the average QTcF intervals to create a baseline-adjusted average QTcF interval.

Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1, pre-dose (Baseline); Cycle 1 Day 1, 15 and 60 minutes post-dose; Cycle 1 Day 8; and Cycle 3 Day 1, 15 minutes pre-dose and 15 and 60 minutes post-dose.

Population: ECG-evaluable population consisted of patients who received T-DM1, had at least 1 interpretable pre-T-DM1 ECG measurement recorded on Cycle 1 Day 1, had at least 1 interpretable post-T-DM1 ECG measurement and who were not treated with medications that may have altered cardiac conduction. N indicates the ECG-evaluable population at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
T-DM1Change From Baseline in Mean Duration of the QTc IntervalCycle 1, Day 1, 60 minutes post-dose [N=45]-1.0 millisecondsStandard Deviation 6.3
T-DM1Change From Baseline in Mean Duration of the QTc IntervalCycle 1, Day 8 [N=43]-4.0 millisecondsStandard Deviation 13.4
T-DM1Change From Baseline in Mean Duration of the QTc IntervalCycle 3, Day 1, 15 minutes pre-dose [N=35]-0.1 millisecondsStandard Deviation 10.1
T-DM1Change From Baseline in Mean Duration of the QTc IntervalCycle 3, Day 1, 15 minutes post-dose [N=37]4.7 millisecondsStandard Deviation 9.6
T-DM1Change From Baseline in Mean Duration of the QTc IntervalCycle 3, Day 1, 60 minutes post-dose [N=37]4.7 millisecondsStandard Deviation 10.9
T-DM1Change From Baseline in Mean Duration of the QTc IntervalCycle 1, Day 1, 15 minutes post-dose [N=44]1.2 millisecondsStandard Deviation 8.3
Secondary

Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 Extrapolated to Infinity for T-DM1 and Total Trastuzumab

Area under the serum concentration-time curve from Time zero extrapolated to infinity (AUCinf) for T-DM1 (conjugated trastuzumab) and total trastuzumab (conjugated and unconjugated T-DM1) at Cycle 1.

Time frame: Blood samples were collected prior to T-DM1 dosing, 15 and 60 minutes after the end of infusion, and anytime on Days 8 and 15 in Cycle 1.

Population: PK-evaluable patients were defined as patients who had adequate concentration-time data to estimate at least one PK parameter. N refers to the number of PK-evaluable patients in that cycle.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
T-DM1Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 Extrapolated to Infinity for T-DM1 and Total TrastuzumabT-DM1431 μg * day/mLStandard Deviation 126
T-DM1Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 Extrapolated to Infinity for T-DM1 and Total TrastuzumabTotal trastuzumab1420 μg * day/mLStandard Deviation 1390
Secondary

Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Time of Last Measurable Concentration for T-DM1 and Total Trastuzumab

Area under the serum concentration-time curve from Time zero to time of last measurable concentration (AUClast) for T-DM1 (conjugated trastuzumab) and Total Trastuzumab (conjugated and unconjugated T-DM1) at Cycle 1 and Cycle 3.

Time frame: Blood samples were collected prior to T-DM1 dosing, 15 and 60 minutes after the end of infusion, and anytime on Days 8 and 15 in Cycles 1 and 3, and pre-dose in Cycle 4.

Population: PK-evaluable patients were defined as patients who had adequate concentration-time data to estimate at least one PK parameter. N refers to the number of PK-evaluable patients in that cycle.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
T-DM1Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Time of Last Measurable Concentration for T-DM1 and Total TrastuzumabCycle 1: T-DM1 [N=51]418 μg * day/mLStandard Deviation 121
T-DM1Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Time of Last Measurable Concentration for T-DM1 and Total TrastuzumabCycle 1: Total trastuzumab [N=51]929 μg * day/mLStandard Deviation 564
T-DM1Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Time of Last Measurable Concentration for T-DM1 and Total TrastuzumabCycle 3: T-Dm1 [N=47]475 μg * day/mLStandard Deviation 150
T-DM1Area Under the Concentration-time Curve From Time 0 to Time of Last Measurable Concentration for T-DM1 and Total TrastuzumabCycle 3: Total trastuzumab [N=47]958 μg * day/mLStandard Deviation 394
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Heart Rate

Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1, pre-dose (Baseline); Cycle 1 Day 1, 15 and 60 minutes post-dose; Cycle 1 Day 8; and Cycle 3 Day 1, 15 minutes pre-dose and 15 and 60 minutes post-dose.

Population: ECG-evaluable population; N indicates the ECG-evaluable population with available data at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
T-DM1Change From Baseline in Heart RateCycle 1 Day 1, 15 minutes post-dose [N=44]2.9 beats per minuteStandard Deviation 8.3
T-DM1Change From Baseline in Heart RateCycle 1 Day 1, 60 minutes post-dose [N=45]4.4 beats per minuteStandard Deviation 7.9
T-DM1Change From Baseline in Heart RateCycle 1 Day 8 [N=43]5.4 beats per minuteStandard Deviation 8.8
T-DM1Change From Baseline in Heart RateCycle 3 Day 1, 15 minutes pre-dose [N=35]4.1 beats per minuteStandard Deviation 7.9
T-DM1Change From Baseline in Heart RateCycle 3 Day 1, 15 minutes post-dose [N=37]0.8 beats per minuteStandard Deviation 7.6
T-DM1Change From Baseline in Heart RateCycle 3 Day 1, 60 minutes post-dose [N=37]2.4 beats per minuteStandard Deviation 7.8
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Mean Duration of the QTc Interval Using Bazett's Correction

The corrected QT interval was calculated using Bazett's correction (QTcB) from electrocardiogram (ECG) data. Each participant had triplicate QTcB intervals measured at each timepoint and the average was calculated for each patient at each timepoint. For each timepoint, a participant's corresponding baseline QTcB interval was subtracted from the average QTcB intervals to create a baseline-adjusted average QTcB interval.

Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1, pre-dose (Baseline); Cycle 1 Day 1, 15 and 60 minutes post-dose; Cycle 1 Day 8; and Cycle 3 Day 1, 15 minutes pre-dose and 15 and 60 minutes post-dose.

Population: ECG-Evaluable population; N indicates the ECG-evaluable population with available data at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
T-DM1Change From Baseline in Mean Duration of the QTc Interval Using Bazett's CorrectionCycle 1, Day 1, 15 minutes post-dose [N=44]3.6 millisecondsStandard Deviation 9.1
T-DM1Change From Baseline in Mean Duration of the QTc Interval Using Bazett's CorrectionCycle 1, Day 1, 60 minutes post-dose [N=45]2.6 millisecondsStandard Deviation 7.4
T-DM1Change From Baseline in Mean Duration of the QTc Interval Using Bazett's CorrectionCycle 1, Day 8 [N=43]0.7 millisecondsStandard Deviation 13.1
T-DM1Change From Baseline in Mean Duration of the QTc Interval Using Bazett's CorrectionCycle 3, Day 1, 15 minutes pre-dose [N=35]3.7 millisecondsStandard Deviation 14.5
T-DM1Change From Baseline in Mean Duration of the QTc Interval Using Bazett's CorrectionCycle 3, Day 1, 15 minutes post-dose [N=37]6.0 millisecondsStandard Deviation 13.2
T-DM1Change From Baseline in Mean Duration of the QTc Interval Using Bazett's CorrectionCycle 3, Day 1, 60 minutes post-dose [N=37]7.3 millisecondsStandard Deviation 12.2
Secondary

Change From Baseline in PR Interval

The PR interval is the time in seconds from the beginning of the P wave to the beginning of the QRS complex, and was calculated from electrocardiogram (ECG) data. Each participant had triplicate PR intervals measured at each timepoint and the average was calculated for each patient at each timepoint. For each timepoint, a participant's corresponding baseline PR interval was subtracted from the average PR intervals to create a baseline-adjusted average PR interval.

Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1, pre-dose (Baseline); Cycle 1 Day 1, 15 and 60 minutes post-dose; Cycle 1 Day 8; and Cycle 3 Day 1, 15 minutes pre-dose and 15 and 60 minutes post-dose.

Population: ECG-Evaluable population

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
T-DM1Change From Baseline in PR IntervalCycle 1 Day 1, 15 minutes post-dose [N=44]2.3 millisecondsStandard Deviation 7.5
T-DM1Change From Baseline in PR IntervalCycle 1 Day 1, 60 minutes post-dose [N=45]2.5 millisecondsStandard Deviation 8.7
T-DM1Change From Baseline in PR IntervalCycle 1 Day 8 [N=43]-0.7 millisecondsStandard Deviation 10.7
T-DM1Change From Baseline in PR IntervalCycle 3 Day 1, 15 minutes pre-dose [N=35]1.8 millisecondsStandard Deviation 11
T-DM1Change From Baseline in PR IntervalCycle 3 Day 1, 15 minutes post-dose [N=37]6.7 millisecondsStandard Deviation 9.8
T-DM1Change From Baseline in PR IntervalCycle 3 Day 1, 60 minutes post-dose [N=37]5.3 millisecondsStandard Deviation 8.6
Secondary

Change From Baseline in QRS Duration

The QRS interval represents the time it takes for depolarization of the ventricles and was calculated from electrocardiogram (ECG) data. Each participant had triplicate QRS intervals measured at each timepoint and the average was calculated for each patient at each timepoint. For each timepoint, a participant's corresponding baseline QRS interval was subtracted from the average QRS intervals to create a baseline-adjusted average QRS interval.

Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1, pre-dose (Baseline); Cycle 1 Day 1, 15 and 60 minutes post-dose; Cycle 1 Day 8; and Cycle 3 Day 1, 15 minutes pre-dose and 15 and 60 minutes post-dose.

Population: ECG-Evaluable population; N indicates the ECG-evaluable population with available data at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
T-DM1Change From Baseline in QRS DurationCycle 1 Day 1, 15 minutes post-dose [N=44]1.2 millisecondsStandard Deviation 3.1
T-DM1Change From Baseline in QRS DurationCycle 1 Day 1, 60 minutes post-dose [N=45]0.4 millisecondsStandard Deviation 3
T-DM1Change From Baseline in QRS DurationCycle 1 Day 8 [N=43]1.1 millisecondsStandard Deviation 4.8
T-DM1Change From Baseline in QRS DurationCycle 3 Day 1, 15 minutes pre-dose [N=35]0.5 millisecondsStandard Deviation 4.5
T-DM1Change From Baseline in QRS DurationCycle 3 Day 1, 15 minutes post-dose [N=37]1.9 millisecondsStandard Deviation 4
T-DM1Change From Baseline in QRS DurationCycle 3 Day 1, 60 minutes post-dose [N=37]1.5 millisecondsStandard Deviation 3.8
Secondary

Change From Baseline in Uncorrected QT Interval

The uncorrected QT interval was calculated from electrocardiogram (ECG) data. Each participant had triplicate QT intervals measured at each timepoint and the average was calculated for each patient at each timepoint. For each timepoint, a participant's corresponding baseline QT interval was subtracted from the average QT intervals to create a baseline-adjusted average QT interval.

Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1, pre-dose (Baseline); Cycle 1 Day 1, 15 and 60 minutes post-dose; Cycle 1 Day 8; and Cycle 3 Day 1, 15 minutes pre-dose and 15 and 60 minutes post-dose.

Population: ECG-Evaluable population; N indicates the ECG-evaluable population with available data at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
T-DM1Change From Baseline in Uncorrected QT IntervalCycle 1 Day 1, 15 minutes post-dose [N=44]-2.6 millisecondsStandard Deviation 17.4
T-DM1Change From Baseline in Uncorrected QT IntervalCycle 1 Day 1, 60 minutes post-dose [N=45]-7.0 millisecondsStandard Deviation 14.9
T-DM1Change From Baseline in Uncorrected QT IntervalCycle 1 Day 8 [N=43]12.2 millisecondsStandard Deviation 22.1
T-DM1Change From Baseline in Uncorrected QT IntervalCycle 3 Day 1, 15 minutes pre-dose [N=35]-7.0 millisecondsStandard Deviation 14.9
T-DM1Change From Baseline in Uncorrected QT IntervalCycle 3 Day 1, 15 minutes post-dose [N=37]2.4 millisecondsStandard Deviation 16.4
T-DM1Change From Baseline in Uncorrected QT IntervalCycle 3 Day 1, 60 minutes post-dose [N=37]0.1 millisecondsStandard Deviation 19.6
Secondary

Clearance T-DM1 and Total Trastuzumab

Time frame: Blood samples were collected prior to T-DM1 dosing, 15 and 60 minutes after the end of infusion, and anytime on Days 8 and 15 in Cycles 1 and 3, and pre-dose in Cycle 4.

Population: PK-evaluable patients were defined as patients who had adequate concentration-time data to estimate at least one PK parameter. N refers to the number of PK-evaluable patients in that cycle.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
T-DM1Clearance T-DM1 and Total TrastuzumabCycle 1: T-DM1 [N=51]9.17 mL/day/kgStandard Deviation 3.03
T-DM1Clearance T-DM1 and Total TrastuzumabCycle 1: Total trastuzumab [N=51]4.21 mL/day/kgStandard Deviation 2.43
T-DM1Clearance T-DM1 and Total TrastuzumabCycle 3: T-Dm1 [N=47]7.91 mL/day/kgStandard Deviation 3.3
T-DM1Clearance T-DM1 and Total TrastuzumabCycle 3: Total trastuzumab [N=47]3.12 mL/day/kgStandard Deviation 1.71
Secondary

Duration of Objective Response Based on Investigator Assessment During the Single-agent Trastuzumab Emtansine Treatment Period

In patients with an objective response during the single-agent trastuzumab emtansine treatment period, duration of response was defined as the time from the first documented objective response to the time of first documented disease progression or death, whichever occurred first. Progressive disease was defined as either at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum on study with an absolute increase of at least 5 mm, or the appearance of one or more new lesions, or the unequivocal progression of existing nontarget lesions. If a patient did not die or experience disease progression before the end of the study, duration of response was censored at the day of the last tumor assessment when the patient was known to be progression free.

Time frame: Time from the first documented objective response to the time of first documented disease progression or death, up to a maximum time period of one year.

Population: Efficacy evaluable patients who achieved an objective response.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
T-DM1Duration of Objective Response Based on Investigator Assessment During the Single-agent Trastuzumab Emtansine Treatment Period9.3 months
Secondary

Maximum Observed Serum Concentration of T-DM1 and Total Trastuzumab

Serum samples were quantitated for T-DM1 (DM1 conjugated to trastuzumab) levels in a validated assay using an indirect sandwich enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). The minimum quantifiable concentration in human serum was 40 ng/mL. Serum samples were assayed for total trastuzumab (conjugated and unconjugated T-DM1) in a validated assay using an indirect sandwich ELISA method; the minimum quantifiable concentration in human serum was 40 ng/mL.

Time frame: Blood samples were collected prior to dosing, 15 and 60 minutes after the end of infusion, and anytime on Days 8 and 15 in Cycles 1 and 3, and pre-dose in Cycle 4.

Population: Pharmacokinetic (PK)-evaluable patients were defined as patients who had adequate concentration-time data to estimate at least one PK parameter. N refers to the number of PK-evaluable patients in that cycle.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
T-DM1Maximum Observed Serum Concentration of T-DM1 and Total TrastuzumabCycle 1: T-DM1 [N=51]75.6 μg/mLStandard Deviation 21.9
T-DM1Maximum Observed Serum Concentration of T-DM1 and Total TrastuzumabCycle 1: Total trastuzumab [N=51]95.9 μg/mLStandard Deviation 32.3
T-DM1Maximum Observed Serum Concentration of T-DM1 and Total TrastuzumabCycle 3: T-Dm1 [N=47]80.7 μg/mLStandard Deviation 18.1
T-DM1Maximum Observed Serum Concentration of T-DM1 and Total TrastuzumabCycle 3: Total trastuzumab [N=47]98.6 μg/mLStandard Deviation 26.1
Secondary

Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)

An serious AE is any AE that is fatal, life threatening, requires or prolongs inpatient hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability/incapacity, is a congenital anomaly/birth defect in a neonate/infant born to a mother exposed to the investigational product(s), or is considered a significant medical event by the investigator (e.g., may jeopardize the patient or may require medical/surgical intervention to prevent one of the outcomes listed above). The severity of each AE was graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI CTCAE) v3.0, or as follows: Grade 1 = Mild; Grade 2 = Moderate; Grade 3 = Severe; Grade 4 = Very severe; Grade 5 = Death related to AE.

Time frame: From first dose until 30 days after last dose (up to 1 year).

Population: Safety-Evaluable Patients (i.e., the treated population).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
T-DM1Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Grade ≥ 3 adverse events17 participants
T-DM1Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Adverse events leading to treatment discontinuatio2 participants
T-DM1Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Serious adverse events4 participants
T-DM1Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Deaths0 participants
T-DM1Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Any adverse event51 participants
Average QTc Interval > 450 to ≤ 480 msNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Deaths0 participants
Average QTc Interval > 450 to ≤ 480 msNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Any adverse event18 participants
Average QTc Interval > 450 to ≤ 480 msNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Grade ≥ 3 adverse events12 participants
Average QTc Interval > 450 to ≤ 480 msNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Serious adverse events5 participants
Average QTc Interval > 450 to ≤ 480 msNumber of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs)Adverse events leading to treatment discontinuatio5 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Anti-therapeutic Antibodies (ATAs) to Trastuzumab Emtansine

The number of participants with anti-T-DM1 antibodies was assessed using a validated bridging antibody enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA).

Time frame: Blood samples were collected prior to T-DM1 dosing, 15 and 60 minutes after the end of infusion, and anytime on Days 8 and 15 in Cycles 1 and 3, and pre-dose in Cycle 4.

Population: Evaluable patients, defined as patients who had at least one ATA measurement available for analysis at Baseline (pre-dose in Cycle 1) and post-baseline.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
T-DM1Number of Participants With Anti-therapeutic Antibodies (ATAs) to Trastuzumab EmtansinePre-dose (Baseline)2 participants
T-DM1Number of Participants With Anti-therapeutic Antibodies (ATAs) to Trastuzumab EmtansinePost-dose0 participants
Secondary

Number of Participants With Decreased Ejection Fraction

Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) was assessed on the basis of local assessments of echocardiogram or multigated acquisition scan (MUGA) data. A decrease in LVEF is defined as a decrease from Baseline of greater than or equal to 15%. Grade 3 LVEF is an ejection fraction between 20 and 40%.

Time frame: Assessed at Baseline and after every 3 cycles, up to 1 year.

Population: Safety-Evaluable Patients (i.e., the treated population).

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
T-DM1Number of Participants With Decreased Ejection FractionGrade 31 participants
T-DM1Number of Participants With Decreased Ejection FractionOverall1 participants
Average QTc Interval > 450 to ≤ 480 msNumber of Participants With Decreased Ejection FractionGrade 30 participants
Average QTc Interval > 450 to ≤ 480 msNumber of Participants With Decreased Ejection FractionOverall1 participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With an Objective Response During the Single-agent Trastuzumab Emtansine Treatment Period

Objective response was defined as a complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) determined on two consecutive assessments conducted by the investigator ≥ 4 weeks apart. Responses were assessed by physical examination and imaged-based evaluation using a modified version of the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.0: CR-the disappearance of all target lesions and the disappearance of all nontarget lesions and normalization of tumor marker level and no new lesions. PR-either the disappearance of all target lesions with persistence of one or more nontarget lesion(s) and/or the maintenance of tumor marker level above the normal limits, or, at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum longest diameter with no new lesions or unequivocal progression of existing nontarget lesions.

Time frame: Tumor assessments were performed after every three cycles until study termination or progressive disease (up to a maximum of one year).

Population: The efficacy-evaluable population was defined as patients who received at least one dose of study drug. Patients with missing or no post-baseline response assessments were classified as non-responders.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
T-DM1Percentage of Participants With an Objective Response During the Single-agent Trastuzumab Emtansine Treatment Period25.5 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With Clinical Benefit During the Single-agent Trastuzumab Emtansine Treatment Period

Participants were considered to have experienced clinical benefit if they had an objective response or maintained stable disease for at least 6 months from start of study treatment. Objective response was defined as a complete or partial response determined on two consecutive tumor assessments at least 4 weeks apart based on a modified version of RECIST. Stable disease was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for partial response nor sufficient increase to qualify for progressive disease, taking as reference the smallest sum longest diameter since the treatment started and no new lesions or unequivocal progression of existing nontarget lesions.

Time frame: Tumor assessments were performed after every three cycles until study termination or progressive disease (up to a maximum of one year).

Population: The efficacy-evaluable population was defined as patients who received at least one dose of study drug.

ArmMeasureValue (NUMBER)
T-DM1Percentage of Participants With Clinical Benefit During the Single-agent Trastuzumab Emtansine Treatment Period39.2 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Within Each Absolute QTc Interval Category

The corrected QT interval was calculated using Fridericia's correction (QTcF) and using Bazett's correction (QTcB) from electrocardiogram (ECG) data. Each participant had triplicate QTc intervals measured at each timepoint and the average was calculated for each patient at each timepoint. QTc interval categories are based off International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH) Tripartite Guideline E14.

Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1, 15 and 60 minutes post-dose; Cycle 1 Day 8; and Cycle 3 Day 1, 15 minutes pre-dose and 15 and 60 minutes post-dose.

Population: The number of participants analyzed for each QTc interval category represents the total treated population. N indicates the ECG-evaluable population with available data at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
T-DM1Percentage of Participants Within Each Absolute QTc Interval CategoryQTcB: Cycle 1, Day 8 [N=43]79.1 percentage of participants
T-DM1Percentage of Participants Within Each Absolute QTc Interval CategoryQTcF: Cycle 1, Day 1, 15 minutes post-dose [N=44]100 percentage of participants
T-DM1Percentage of Participants Within Each Absolute QTc Interval CategoryQTcF: Cycle 1, Day 1, 60 minutes post-dose [N=45]100 percentage of participants
T-DM1Percentage of Participants Within Each Absolute QTc Interval CategoryQTcF: Cycle 1, Day 8 [N=43]100 percentage of participants
T-DM1Percentage of Participants Within Each Absolute QTc Interval CategoryQTcF: Cycle 3, Day 1, 15 minutes pre-dose [N=35]97.1 percentage of participants
T-DM1Percentage of Participants Within Each Absolute QTc Interval CategoryQTcF: Cycle 3, Day 1, 15 minutes post-dose [N=37]94.6 percentage of participants
T-DM1Percentage of Participants Within Each Absolute QTc Interval CategoryQTcF: Cycle 3, Day 1, 60 minutes post-dose [N=37]97.3 percentage of participants
T-DM1Percentage of Participants Within Each Absolute QTc Interval CategoryQTcB: Cycle 1, Day 1, 15 minutes post-dose [N=44]79.5 percentage of participants
T-DM1Percentage of Participants Within Each Absolute QTc Interval CategoryQTcB: Cycle 1, Day 1, 60 minutes post-dose [N=45]73.3 percentage of participants
T-DM1Percentage of Participants Within Each Absolute QTc Interval CategoryQTcB: Cycle 3, Day 1, 15 minutes pre-dose [N=35]82.9 percentage of participants
T-DM1Percentage of Participants Within Each Absolute QTc Interval CategoryQTcB: Cycle 3, Day 1, 15 minutes post-dose [N=37]70.3 percentage of participants
T-DM1Percentage of Participants Within Each Absolute QTc Interval CategoryQTcB: Cycle 3, Day 1, 60 minutes post-dose [N=37]70.3 percentage of participants
Average QTc Interval > 450 to ≤ 480 msPercentage of Participants Within Each Absolute QTc Interval CategoryQTcF: Cycle 1, Day 8 [N=43]0 percentage of participants
Average QTc Interval > 450 to ≤ 480 msPercentage of Participants Within Each Absolute QTc Interval CategoryQTcB: Cycle 3, Day 1, 15 minutes pre-dose [N=35]17.1 percentage of participants
Average QTc Interval > 450 to ≤ 480 msPercentage of Participants Within Each Absolute QTc Interval CategoryQTcB: Cycle 3, Day 1, 60 minutes post-dose [N=37]29.7 percentage of participants
Average QTc Interval > 450 to ≤ 480 msPercentage of Participants Within Each Absolute QTc Interval CategoryQTcB: Cycle 1, Day 1, 15 minutes post-dose [N=44]20.5 percentage of participants
Average QTc Interval > 450 to ≤ 480 msPercentage of Participants Within Each Absolute QTc Interval CategoryQTcF: Cycle 1, Day 1, 60 minutes post-dose [N=45]0 percentage of participants
Average QTc Interval > 450 to ≤ 480 msPercentage of Participants Within Each Absolute QTc Interval CategoryQTcB: Cycle 1, Day 1, 60 minutes post-dose [N=45]26.7 percentage of participants
Average QTc Interval > 450 to ≤ 480 msPercentage of Participants Within Each Absolute QTc Interval CategoryQTcB: Cycle 3, Day 1, 15 minutes post-dose [N=37]29.7 percentage of participants
Average QTc Interval > 450 to ≤ 480 msPercentage of Participants Within Each Absolute QTc Interval CategoryQTcF: Cycle 3, Day 1, 15 minutes post-dose [N=37]5.4 percentage of participants
Average QTc Interval > 450 to ≤ 480 msPercentage of Participants Within Each Absolute QTc Interval CategoryQTcF: Cycle 3, Day 1, 15 minutes pre-dose [N=35]2.9 percentage of participants
Average QTc Interval > 450 to ≤ 480 msPercentage of Participants Within Each Absolute QTc Interval CategoryQTcF: Cycle 1, Day 1, 15 minutes post-dose [N=44]0 percentage of participants
Average QTc Interval > 450 to ≤ 480 msPercentage of Participants Within Each Absolute QTc Interval CategoryQTcB: Cycle 1, Day 8 [N=43]20.9 percentage of participants
Average QTc Interval > 450 to ≤ 480 msPercentage of Participants Within Each Absolute QTc Interval CategoryQTcF: Cycle 3, Day 1, 60 minutes post-dose [N=37]2.7 percentage of participants
Average QTc Interval > 480 to ≤ 500 msPercentage of Participants Within Each Absolute QTc Interval CategoryQTcF: Cycle 1, Day 8 [N=43]0 percentage of participants
Average QTc Interval > 480 to ≤ 500 msPercentage of Participants Within Each Absolute QTc Interval CategoryQTcF: Cycle 3, Day 1, 15 minutes pre-dose [N=35]0 percentage of participants
Average QTc Interval > 480 to ≤ 500 msPercentage of Participants Within Each Absolute QTc Interval CategoryQTcB: Cycle 3, Day 1, 15 minutes post-dose [N=37]0 percentage of participants
Average QTc Interval > 480 to ≤ 500 msPercentage of Participants Within Each Absolute QTc Interval CategoryQTcF: Cycle 3, Day 1, 15 minutes post-dose [N=37]0 percentage of participants
Average QTc Interval > 480 to ≤ 500 msPercentage of Participants Within Each Absolute QTc Interval CategoryQTcF: Cycle 3, Day 1, 60 minutes post-dose [N=37]0 percentage of participants
Average QTc Interval > 480 to ≤ 500 msPercentage of Participants Within Each Absolute QTc Interval CategoryQTcB: Cycle 1, Day 1, 15 minutes post-dose [N=44]0 percentage of participants
Average QTc Interval > 480 to ≤ 500 msPercentage of Participants Within Each Absolute QTc Interval CategoryQTcB: Cycle 1, Day 1, 60 minutes post-dose [N=45]0 percentage of participants
Average QTc Interval > 480 to ≤ 500 msPercentage of Participants Within Each Absolute QTc Interval CategoryQTcB: Cycle 3, Day 1, 15 minutes pre-dose [N=35]0 percentage of participants
Average QTc Interval > 480 to ≤ 500 msPercentage of Participants Within Each Absolute QTc Interval CategoryQTcF: Cycle 1, Day 1, 15 minutes post-dose [N=44]0 percentage of participants
Average QTc Interval > 480 to ≤ 500 msPercentage of Participants Within Each Absolute QTc Interval CategoryQTcB: Cycle 1, Day 8 [N=43]0 percentage of participants
Average QTc Interval > 480 to ≤ 500 msPercentage of Participants Within Each Absolute QTc Interval CategoryQTcF: Cycle 1, Day 1, 60 minutes post-dose [N=45]0 percentage of participants
Average QTc Interval > 480 to ≤ 500 msPercentage of Participants Within Each Absolute QTc Interval CategoryQTcB: Cycle 3, Day 1, 60 minutes post-dose [N=37]0 percentage of participants
Average QTc Interval > 500 msPercentage of Participants Within Each Absolute QTc Interval CategoryQTcF: Cycle 3, Day 1, 15 minutes pre-dose [N=35]0 percentage of participants
Average QTc Interval > 500 msPercentage of Participants Within Each Absolute QTc Interval CategoryQTcB: Cycle 3, Day 1, 15 minutes post-dose [N=37]0 percentage of participants
Average QTc Interval > 500 msPercentage of Participants Within Each Absolute QTc Interval CategoryQTcB: Cycle 3, Day 1, 15 minutes pre-dose [N=35]0 percentage of participants
Average QTc Interval > 500 msPercentage of Participants Within Each Absolute QTc Interval CategoryQTcF: Cycle 3, Day 1, 15 minutes post-dose [N=37]0 percentage of participants
Average QTc Interval > 500 msPercentage of Participants Within Each Absolute QTc Interval CategoryQTcF: Cycle 1, Day 8 [N=43]0 percentage of participants
Average QTc Interval > 500 msPercentage of Participants Within Each Absolute QTc Interval CategoryQTcF: Cycle 1, Day 1, 15 minutes post-dose [N=44]0 percentage of participants
Average QTc Interval > 500 msPercentage of Participants Within Each Absolute QTc Interval CategoryQTcB: Cycle 1, Day 8 [N=43]0 percentage of participants
Average QTc Interval > 500 msPercentage of Participants Within Each Absolute QTc Interval CategoryQTcB: Cycle 1, Day 1, 15 minutes post-dose [N=44]0 percentage of participants
Average QTc Interval > 500 msPercentage of Participants Within Each Absolute QTc Interval CategoryQTcF: Cycle 1, Day 1, 60 minutes post-dose [N=45]0 percentage of participants
Average QTc Interval > 500 msPercentage of Participants Within Each Absolute QTc Interval CategoryQTcB: Cycle 1, Day 1, 60 minutes post-dose [N=45]0 percentage of participants
Average QTc Interval > 500 msPercentage of Participants Within Each Absolute QTc Interval CategoryQTcB: Cycle 3, Day 1, 60 minutes post-dose [N=37]0 percentage of participants
Average QTc Interval > 500 msPercentage of Participants Within Each Absolute QTc Interval CategoryQTcF: Cycle 3, Day 1, 60 minutes post-dose [N=37]0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants Within Each Baseline-adjusted QTc Interval Category

The corrected QT interval was calculated using Fridericia's correction (QTcF) and using Bazett's correction (QTcB) from electrocardiogram (ECG) data. Each participant had triplicate QTc intervals measured at each timepoint and the average was calculated for each patient at each timepoint. For each timepoint, a participant's corresponding baseline QTc interval was subtracted from the average QTc intervals to create a baseline-adjusted average QTc interval. QTc interval categories are based off International Conference on Harmonisation (ICH) Tripartite Guideline E14.

Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1, pre-dose (Baseline); Cycle 1 Day 1, 15 and 60 minutes post-dose; Cycle 1 Day 8; and Cycle 3 Day 1, 15 minutes pre-dose and 15 and 60 minutes post-dose.

Population: The number of participants analyzed for each QTc interval category represents the total treated population. N indicates the ECG-evaluable population with available data at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
T-DM1Percentage of Participants Within Each Baseline-adjusted QTc Interval CategoryQTcB: Cycle 1, Day 8 [N=43]100 percentage of participants
T-DM1Percentage of Participants Within Each Baseline-adjusted QTc Interval CategoryQTcB: Cycle 1, Day 1, 15 minutes post-dose [N=44]100 percentage of participants
T-DM1Percentage of Participants Within Each Baseline-adjusted QTc Interval CategoryQTcF: Cycle 3, Day 1, 60 minutes post-dose [N=37]100 percentage of participants
T-DM1Percentage of Participants Within Each Baseline-adjusted QTc Interval CategoryQTcF: Cycle 3, Day 1, 15 minutes pre-dose [N=35]100 percentage of participants
T-DM1Percentage of Participants Within Each Baseline-adjusted QTc Interval CategoryQTcF: Cycle 3, Day 1, 15 minutes post-dose [N=37]100 percentage of participants
T-DM1Percentage of Participants Within Each Baseline-adjusted QTc Interval CategoryQTcB: Cycle 3, Day 1, 15 minutes pre-dose [N=35]94.3 percentage of participants
T-DM1Percentage of Participants Within Each Baseline-adjusted QTc Interval CategoryQTcF: Cycle 1, Day 1, 60 minutes post-dose [N=45]100 percentage of participants
T-DM1Percentage of Participants Within Each Baseline-adjusted QTc Interval CategoryQTcF: Cycle 1, Day 8 [N=43]100 percentage of participants
T-DM1Percentage of Participants Within Each Baseline-adjusted QTc Interval CategoryQTcB: Cycle 1, Day 1, 60 minutes post-dose [N=45]100 percentage of participants
T-DM1Percentage of Participants Within Each Baseline-adjusted QTc Interval CategoryQTcF: Cycle 1, Day 1, 15 minutes post-dose [N=44]100 percentage of participants
T-DM1Percentage of Participants Within Each Baseline-adjusted QTc Interval CategoryQTcB: Cycle 3, Day 1, 60 minutes post-dose [N=37]97.3 percentage of participants
T-DM1Percentage of Participants Within Each Baseline-adjusted QTc Interval CategoryQTcB: Cycle 3, Day 1, 15 minutes post-dose [N=37]94.6 percentage of participants
Average QTc Interval > 450 to ≤ 480 msPercentage of Participants Within Each Baseline-adjusted QTc Interval CategoryQTcB: Cycle 3, Day 1, 15 minutes pre-dose [N=35]5.7 percentage of participants
Average QTc Interval > 450 to ≤ 480 msPercentage of Participants Within Each Baseline-adjusted QTc Interval CategoryQTcF: Cycle 1, Day 1, 60 minutes post-dose [N=45]0 percentage of participants
Average QTc Interval > 450 to ≤ 480 msPercentage of Participants Within Each Baseline-adjusted QTc Interval CategoryQTcF: Cycle 1, Day 8 [N=43]0 percentage of participants
Average QTc Interval > 450 to ≤ 480 msPercentage of Participants Within Each Baseline-adjusted QTc Interval CategoryQTcF: Cycle 3, Day 1, 15 minutes pre-dose [N=35]0 percentage of participants
Average QTc Interval > 450 to ≤ 480 msPercentage of Participants Within Each Baseline-adjusted QTc Interval CategoryQTcF: Cycle 1, Day 1, 15 minutes post-dose [N=44]0 percentage of participants
Average QTc Interval > 450 to ≤ 480 msPercentage of Participants Within Each Baseline-adjusted QTc Interval CategoryQTcF: Cycle 3, Day 1, 60 minutes post-dose [N=37]0 percentage of participants
Average QTc Interval > 450 to ≤ 480 msPercentage of Participants Within Each Baseline-adjusted QTc Interval CategoryQTcB: Cycle 1, Day 1, 15 minutes post-dose [N=44]0 percentage of participants
Average QTc Interval > 450 to ≤ 480 msPercentage of Participants Within Each Baseline-adjusted QTc Interval CategoryQTcF: Cycle 3, Day 1, 15 minutes post-dose [N=37]0 percentage of participants
Average QTc Interval > 450 to ≤ 480 msPercentage of Participants Within Each Baseline-adjusted QTc Interval CategoryQTcB: Cycle 1, Day 1, 60 minutes post-dose [N=45]0 percentage of participants
Average QTc Interval > 450 to ≤ 480 msPercentage of Participants Within Each Baseline-adjusted QTc Interval CategoryQTcB: Cycle 1, Day 8 [N=43]0 percentage of participants
Average QTc Interval > 450 to ≤ 480 msPercentage of Participants Within Each Baseline-adjusted QTc Interval CategoryQTcB: Cycle 3, Day 1, 60 minutes post-dose [N=37]2.7 percentage of participants
Average QTc Interval > 450 to ≤ 480 msPercentage of Participants Within Each Baseline-adjusted QTc Interval CategoryQTcB: Cycle 3, Day 1, 15 minutes post-dose [N=37]5.4 percentage of participants
Average QTc Interval > 480 to ≤ 500 msPercentage of Participants Within Each Baseline-adjusted QTc Interval CategoryQTcB: Cycle 1, Day 1, 60 minutes post-dose [N=45]0 percentage of participants
Average QTc Interval > 480 to ≤ 500 msPercentage of Participants Within Each Baseline-adjusted QTc Interval CategoryQTcF: Cycle 3, Day 1, 60 minutes post-dose [N=37]0 percentage of participants
Average QTc Interval > 480 to ≤ 500 msPercentage of Participants Within Each Baseline-adjusted QTc Interval CategoryQTcB: Cycle 3, Day 1, 15 minutes post-dose [N=37]0 percentage of participants
Average QTc Interval > 480 to ≤ 500 msPercentage of Participants Within Each Baseline-adjusted QTc Interval CategoryQTcB: Cycle 1, Day 8 [N=43]0 percentage of participants
Average QTc Interval > 480 to ≤ 500 msPercentage of Participants Within Each Baseline-adjusted QTc Interval CategoryQTcF: Cycle 1, Day 1, 60 minutes post-dose [N=45]0 percentage of participants
Average QTc Interval > 480 to ≤ 500 msPercentage of Participants Within Each Baseline-adjusted QTc Interval CategoryQTcF: Cycle 3, Day 1, 15 minutes pre-dose [N=35]0 percentage of participants
Average QTc Interval > 480 to ≤ 500 msPercentage of Participants Within Each Baseline-adjusted QTc Interval CategoryQTcB: Cycle 3, Day 1, 15 minutes pre-dose [N=35]0 percentage of participants
Average QTc Interval > 480 to ≤ 500 msPercentage of Participants Within Each Baseline-adjusted QTc Interval CategoryQTcB: Cycle 1, Day 1, 15 minutes post-dose [N=44]0 percentage of participants
Average QTc Interval > 480 to ≤ 500 msPercentage of Participants Within Each Baseline-adjusted QTc Interval CategoryQTcF: Cycle 1, Day 8 [N=43]0 percentage of participants
Average QTc Interval > 480 to ≤ 500 msPercentage of Participants Within Each Baseline-adjusted QTc Interval CategoryQTcF: Cycle 3, Day 1, 15 minutes post-dose [N=37]0 percentage of participants
Average QTc Interval > 480 to ≤ 500 msPercentage of Participants Within Each Baseline-adjusted QTc Interval CategoryQTcF: Cycle 1, Day 1, 15 minutes post-dose [N=44]0 percentage of participants
Average QTc Interval > 480 to ≤ 500 msPercentage of Participants Within Each Baseline-adjusted QTc Interval CategoryQTcB: Cycle 3, Day 1, 60 minutes post-dose [N=37]0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With New Abnormal T Waves

The incidence of abnormal T-wave changes from baseline was determined based on centrally read electrocardiogram (ECG) tracings comparing each of the three triplicate readings from the post baseline ECG time points to the baseline ECG reading. At each time point, if at least one of the three triplicate readings was abnormal, the participant was counted as abnormal for that ECG timepoint as follows: an inverted T, flat T, or biphasic T compared with baseline was considered an abnormal significant change from baseline. Additionally, nonspecific T-wave changes from baseline were considered as abnormal nonsignificant changes from baseline. T-wave changes from baseline due to ventricular conduction or left ventricular hypertrophy strain were considered not evaluable. C=Cycle; D=Day.

Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1, pre-dose (Baseline); Cycle 1 Day 1, 15 and 60 minutes post-dose; Cycle 1 Day 8; and Cycle 3 Day 1, 15 minutes pre-dose and 15 and 60 minutes post-dose.

Population: ECG-Evaluable population; N indicates the ECG-evaluable population with available data at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
T-DM1Percentage of Participants With New Abnormal T WavesSignificant: C1D1, 15 minutes post-dose [N=44]0 percentage of participants
T-DM1Percentage of Participants With New Abnormal T WavesSignificant: C1D1, 60 minutes post-dose [N=45]0 percentage of participants
T-DM1Percentage of Participants With New Abnormal T WavesSignificant: C1D8 [N=43]2.3 percentage of participants
T-DM1Percentage of Participants With New Abnormal T WavesSignificant: C3D1, 15 minutes pre-dose [N=35]0 percentage of participants
T-DM1Percentage of Participants With New Abnormal T WavesSignificant: C3D1, 15 minutes post-dose [N=36]0 percentage of participants
T-DM1Percentage of Participants With New Abnormal T WavesSignificant: C3D1, 60 minutes post-dose [N=37]0 percentage of participants
T-DM1Percentage of Participants With New Abnormal T WavesNon-Significant: C1D1, 15 minutes post-dose [N=44]13.6 percentage of participants
T-DM1Percentage of Participants With New Abnormal T WavesNon-Significant: C1D1, 60 minutes post-dose [N=45]11.1 percentage of participants
T-DM1Percentage of Participants With New Abnormal T WavesNon-Significant: C1D8 [N=43]20.9 percentage of participants
T-DM1Percentage of Participants With New Abnormal T WavesNon-Significant: C3D1, 15 minutes pre-dose [N=35]17.1 percentage of participants
T-DM1Percentage of Participants With New Abnormal T WavesNon-Significant: C3D1, 15 minutes post-dose [N=36]13.9 percentage of participants
T-DM1Percentage of Participants With New Abnormal T WavesNon-Significant: C3D1, 60 minutes post-dose [N=37]27.0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Percentage of Participants With New Abnormal U Waves

The incidence of abnormal U-wave changes from baseline was determined based on centrally read electrocardiogram (ECG) tracings comparing each of the three triplicate readings from the post baseline ECG time points to the baseline ECG reading. At each time point, if at least one of the three triplicate readings was abnormal, the participant was counted as abnormal for that ECG timepoint as follows: a large U wave, inverted U wave, or T-U fusion compared with baseline was considered an abnormal significant change from baseline.

Time frame: Cycle 1 Day 1, pre-dose (Baseline); Cycle 1 Day 1, 15 and 60 minutes post-dose; Cycle 1 Day 8; and Cycle 3 Day 1, 15 minutes pre-dose and 15 and 60 minutes post-dose.

Population: ECG-evaluable population; N indicates the ECG-evaluable population with available data at each time point.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (NUMBER)
T-DM1Percentage of Participants With New Abnormal U WavesCycle 1, Day 1, 15 minutes post-dose [N=44]0 percentage of participants
T-DM1Percentage of Participants With New Abnormal U WavesCycle 1, Day 1, 60 minutes post-dose [N=45]0 percentage of participants
T-DM1Percentage of Participants With New Abnormal U WavesCycle 1, Day 8 [N=43]0 percentage of participants
T-DM1Percentage of Participants With New Abnormal U WavesCycle 3, Day 1, 15 minutes pre-dose [N=35]0 percentage of participants
T-DM1Percentage of Participants With New Abnormal U WavesCycle 3, Day 1, 15 minutes post-dose [N=36]0 percentage of participants
T-DM1Percentage of Participants With New Abnormal U WavesCycle 3, Day 1, 60 minutes post-dose [N=37]0 percentage of participants
Secondary

Progression-free Survival During the Single-agent Trastuzumab Emtansine Treatment Period

Progression-free survival (PFS) was defined as the time from the first day of study treatment (Day 1) to first documented disease progression or death, whichever occurred first. If a patient did not experience disease progression or die, PFS was censored at the day of the last tumor assessment that a patient was known to be progression free.

Time frame: From the first day of study treatment to the first documented disease progression or death, up to a maximum time period of one year.

Population: Efficacy evaluable patients.

ArmMeasureValue (MEDIAN)
T-DM1Progression-free Survival During the Single-agent Trastuzumab Emtansine Treatment Period4.3 months
Secondary

Terminal Half-life for T-DM1 and Total Trastuzumab

Time frame: Blood samples were collected prior to T-DM1 dosing, 15 and 60 minutes after the end of infusion, and anytime on Days 8 and 15 in Cycles 1 and 3, and pre-dose in Cycle 4.

Population: PK-evaluable patients were defined as patients who had adequate concentration-time data to estimate at least one PK parameter. N refers to the number of PK-evaluable patients in that cycle.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
T-DM1Terminal Half-life for T-DM1 and Total TrastuzumabCycle 1: T-DM1 [N=51]4.02 daysStandard Deviation 0.938
T-DM1Terminal Half-life for T-DM1 and Total TrastuzumabCycle 1: Total trastuzumab [N=51]10.3 daysStandard Deviation 6.81
T-DM1Terminal Half-life for T-DM1 and Total TrastuzumabCycle 3: T-Dm1 [N=47]4.46 daysStandard Deviation 0.926
T-DM1Terminal Half-life for T-DM1 and Total TrastuzumabCycle 3: Total trastuzumab [N=47]12.0 daysStandard Deviation 6.24
Secondary

Volume of Distribution at Steady State for T-DM1 and Total Trastuzumab

Time frame: Blood samples were collected prior to T-DM1 dosing, 15 and 60 minutes after the end of infusion, and anytime on Days 8 and 15 in Cycles 1 and 3, and pre-dose in Cycle 4.

Population: PK-evaluable patients were defined as patients who had adequate concentration-time data to estimate at least one PK parameter. N refers to the number of PK-evaluable patients in that cycle.

ArmMeasureGroupValue (MEAN)Dispersion
T-DM1Volume of Distribution at Steady State for T-DM1 and Total TrastuzumabCycle 1: T-DM1 [N=51]41.2 mL/kgStandard Deviation 24.5
T-DM1Volume of Distribution at Steady State for T-DM1 and Total TrastuzumabCycle 1: Total trastuzumab [N=51]41.9 mL/kgStandard Deviation 16.2
T-DM1Volume of Distribution at Steady State for T-DM1 and Total TrastuzumabCycle 3: T-Dm1 [N=47]43.6 mL/kgStandard Deviation 40.7
T-DM1Volume of Distribution at Steady State for T-DM1 and Total TrastuzumabCycle 3: Total trastuzumab [N=47]43.7 mL/kgStandard Deviation 15.4

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Feb 4, 2026