Skip to content

Long Term, Follow-on Study of Lomitapide in Patients With Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia

A Phase III, Long Term, Open Label, Follow on Study of Microsomal Triglyceride Transfer Protein (MTP) Inhibitor 'Lomitapide' (LOMITAPIDE) in Patients With Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia

Status
Completed
Phases
Phase 3
Study type
Interventional
Source
ClinicalTrials.gov
Registry ID
NCT00943306
Enrollment
19
Registered
2009-07-22
Start date
2009-10-29
Completion date
2014-12-01
Last updated
2018-06-13

For informational purposes only — not medical advice. Sourced from public registries and may not reflect the latest updates. Terms

Conditions

Familial Hypercholesterolemia

Keywords

Homozygous, Familial, Hypercholesterolemia, MTP, Apheresis, lomitapide, Homozygous Familial Hypercholesterolemia (HoFH)

Brief summary

This was a long term follow on study to assess the continued long term safety and efficacy of lomitapide in patients with homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia.

Detailed description

This was a phase III open label clinical trial to evaluate the long-term efficacy and safety of lomitapide at the maximum tolerated dose (for each patient) established during the clinical trial 733-005/UP1002. Subjects completing the 78-week treatment period in study 733-005/UP1002 who have not met any of the stopping criteria will be eligible to participate in 733-012. The treatment period continued until a decision was made by the local competent authority regarding marketing authorization. Lomitapide will be given orally once daily. Patient specific doses will be carried forward from 733-005/UP1002, but will not exceed the maximum tolerated dose the patient received during 733-005 /UP1002. The maximum dose for any patient was 80 mg/day. There was no reference therapy in this trial. The effects of the study drug were compared to baseline data (from 733-005/UP1002). Concomitant lipid-lowering therapy including plasmapheresis or LDL apheresis is permitted. Note that hereafter, Week 0 in Study 733-005/UP1002 will be referred to as Baseline and Week 48 in Study AEGR-733-012 will be referred to as Week 126 (of overall treatment).

Interventions

5-60 mg po every day

Sponsors

Aegerion Pharmaceuticals, Inc.
Lead SponsorINDUSTRY

Study design

Allocation
NA
Intervention model
SINGLE_GROUP
Primary purpose
TREATMENT
Masking
NONE

Eligibility

Sex/Gender
ALL
Age
18 Years to No maximum
Healthy volunteers
No

Inclusion criteria

1. Completed UP1002 or 733-005. 2. Willing and able to provide consent and comply with the requirements of the study protocol.

Exclusion criteria

1. Met any of the stopping rules for study discontinuation at the final visit of study UP1002 or 733-005.

Design outcomes

Primary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent Change in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C)Baseline and Week 126Percent Change in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) from Baseline (Week 0 of Study 733-005/UP1002) to Week 126 (Week 48 in Study AEGR-733-012).

Secondary

MeasureTime frameDescription
Percent Change in Total CholesterolBaseline and Week 126Percent change in Total Cholesterol from Baseline (Week 0 of Study 733-005/UP1002) to Week 126 (Week 48 in Study AEGR-733-012).
Percent Change in Apolipoprotein B (Apo B)Baseline and Week 126Percent change in Apolipoprotein B (Apo B) from Baseline (Week 0 of Study 733-005/UP1002) to Week 126 (Week 48 in Study AEGR-733-012).
Percent Change in TriglyceridesBaseline and Week 126Percent change in Triglycerides from Baseline (Week 0 of Study 733-005/UP1002) to Week 126 (Week 48 in Study AEGR-733-012).
Percent Change in Non High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C)Baseline and Week 126Percent change in Non High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C) from Baseline (Week 0 of Study 733-005/UP1002) to Week 126 (Week 48 in Study AEGR-733-012).
Percent Change in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C)Baseline and Week 174Percent change in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) from Baseline (Week 0 of Study 733-005/UP1002) to Week 174 (Week 96 in Study AEGR-733-012).
Percent Change in Lp(a)Baseline and Week 126Percent change in Lp(a) from Baseline (Week 0 of Study 733-005/UP1002) to Week 126 (Week 48 in Study AEGR-733-012).
Percent Change in High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C)Baseline and Week 126Percent change in High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) from Baseline (Week 0 of Study 733-005/UP1002) to Week 126 (Week 48 in Study AEGR-733-012).
Percent Change in Apolipoprotein AI (Apo AI)Baseline and Week 126Percent change in Apolipoprotein AI (Apo AI) from Baseline (Week 0 of Study 733-005/UP1002) to Week 126 (Week 48 in Study AEGR-733-012).
Percent Change in Very Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (VLDL-C)Baseline and Week 126Percent change in Very Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (VLDL-C) from Baseline (Week 0 of Study 733-005/UP1002) to Week 126 (Week 48 in Study AEGR-733-012).

Countries

Canada, Italy, South Africa, United States

Participant flow

Participants by arm

ArmCount
Lomitapide
Maximum tolerated dose of lomitapide in addition to existing lipid lowering therapy including plasmapheresis or lipid apheresis. lomitapide: 5-60 mg po every day
19
Total19

Withdrawals & dropouts

PeriodReasonFG000
Overall StudyDeath1
Overall StudyPhysician Decision1
Overall StudySponsor decision due to non-compliance1

Baseline characteristics

CharacteristicLomitapide
Age, Categorical
<=18 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
>=65 years
0 Participants
Age, Categorical
Between 18 and 65 years
19 Participants
Age, Continuous30.4 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.74
Race (NIH/OMB)
American Indian or Alaska Native
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Asian
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Black or African American
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
More than one race
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Native Hawaiian or Other Pacific Islander
0 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
Unknown or Not Reported
1 Participants
Race (NIH/OMB)
White
17 Participants
Region of Enrollment
Canada
2 participants
Region of Enrollment
Italy
5 participants
Region of Enrollment
South Africa
9 participants
Region of Enrollment
United States
3 participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
9 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
10 Participants

Adverse events

Event typeEG000
affected / at risk
deaths
Total, all-cause mortality
1 / 19
other
Total, other adverse events
17 / 19
serious
Total, serious adverse events
7 / 19

Outcome results

Primary

Percent Change in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C)

Percent Change in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) from Baseline (Week 0 of Study 733-005/UP1002) to Week 126 (Week 48 in Study AEGR-733-012).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 126

Population: Week 126 Completers Population

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LomitapidePercent Change in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C)-45.5 Percent ChangeStandard Deviation 31.35
Secondary

Percent Change in Apolipoprotein AI (Apo AI)

Percent change in Apolipoprotein AI (Apo AI) from Baseline (Week 0 of Study 733-005/UP1002) to Week 294 (Week 216 in Study AEGR-733-012).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 294

Population: Safety Population - The number of patients in the Safety Population at time points after Week 126 decreased because the study remained active within each country until either approval of the marketing application was obtained, or, in countries where marketing authorization was not sought for, patients transitioned into an Expanded Access Program.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LomitapidePercent Change in Apolipoprotein AI (Apo AI)-30.5 Percent ChangeStandard Deviation 22.2
Secondary

Percent Change in Apolipoprotein AI (Apo AI)

Percent change in Apolipoprotein AI (Apo AI) from Baseline (Week 0 of Study 733-005/UP1002) to Week 270 (Week 192 in Study AEGR-733-012).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 270

Population: Safety Population - The number of patients in the Safety Population at time points after Week 126 decreased because the study remained active within each country until either approval of the marketing application was obtained, or, in countries where marketing authorization was not sought for, patients transitioned into an Expanded Access Program.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LomitapidePercent Change in Apolipoprotein AI (Apo AI)-17.8 Percent ChangeStandard Deviation 20.12
Secondary

Percent Change in Apolipoprotein AI (Apo AI)

Percent change in Apolipoprotein AI (Apo AI) from Baseline (Week 0 of Study 733-005/UP1002) to Week 246 (Week 168 in Study AEGR-733-012).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 246

Population: Safety Population - The number of patients in the Safety Population at time points after Week 126 decreased because the study remained active within each country until either approval of the marketing application was obtained, or, in countries where marketing authorization was not sought for, patients transitioned into an Expanded Access Program.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LomitapidePercent Change in Apolipoprotein AI (Apo AI)-16.8 Percent ChangeStandard Deviation 26.62
Secondary

Percent Change in Apolipoprotein AI (Apo AI)

Percent change in Apolipoprotein AI (Apo AI) from Baseline (Week 0 of Study 733-005/UP1002) to Week 222 (Week 144 in Study AEGR-733-012).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 222

Population: Safety Population - The number of patients in the Safety Population at time points after Week 126 decreased because the study remained active within each country until either approval of the marketing application was obtained, or, in countries where marketing authorization was not sought for, patients transitioned into an Expanded Access Program.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LomitapidePercent Change in Apolipoprotein AI (Apo AI)-2.7 Percent ChangeStandard Deviation 33.3
Secondary

Percent Change in Apolipoprotein AI (Apo AI)

Percent change in Apolipoprotein AI (Apo AI) from Baseline (Week 0 of Study 733-005/UP1002) to Week 174 (Week 96 in Study AEGR-733-012).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 174

Population: Safety Population - The number of patients in the Safety Population at time points after Week 126 decreased because the study remained active within each country until either approval of the marketing application was obtained, or, in countries where marketing authorization was not sought for, patients transitioned into an Expanded Access Program.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LomitapidePercent Change in Apolipoprotein AI (Apo AI)-8.2 Percent ChangeStandard Deviation 20.12
Secondary

Percent Change in Apolipoprotein AI (Apo AI)

Percent change in Apolipoprotein AI (Apo AI) from Baseline (Week 0 of Study 733-005/UP1002) to Week 126 (Week 48 in Study AEGR-733-012).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 126

Population: Week 126 Completers Population

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LomitapidePercent Change in Apolipoprotein AI (Apo AI)-14.0 Percent ChangeStandard Deviation 17.71
Secondary

Percent Change in Apolipoprotein B (Apo B)

Percent change in Apolipoprotein B (Apo B) from Baseline (Week 0 of Study 733-005/UP1002) to Week 126 (Week 48 in Study AEGR-733-012).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 126

Population: Week 126 Completers Population

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LomitapidePercent Change in Apolipoprotein B (Apo B)-53.6 Percent ChangeStandard Deviation 23.74
Secondary

Percent Change in Apolipoprotein B (Apo B)

Percent change in Apolipoprotein B (Apo B) from Baseline (Week 0 of Study 733-005/UP1002) to Week 294 (Week 216 in Study AEGR-733-012).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 294

Population: Safety Population - The number of patients in the Safety Population at time points after Week 126 decreased because the study remained active within each country until either approval of the marketing application was obtained, or, in countries where marketing authorization was not sought for, patients transitioned into an Expanded Access Program.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LomitapidePercent Change in Apolipoprotein B (Apo B)-60.9 Percent ChangeStandard Deviation 12.17
Secondary

Percent Change in Apolipoprotein B (Apo B)

Percent change in Apolipoprotein B (Apo B) from Baseline (Week 0 of Study 733-005/UP1002) to Week 270 (Week 192 in Study AEGR-733-012).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 270

Population: Safety Population - The number of patients in the Safety Population at time points after Week 126 decreased because the study remained active within each country until either approval of the marketing application was obtained, or, in countries where marketing authorization was not sought for, patients transitioned into an Expanded Access Program.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LomitapidePercent Change in Apolipoprotein B (Apo B)-76.7 Percent ChangeStandard Deviation 16.09
Secondary

Percent Change in Apolipoprotein B (Apo B)

Percent change in Apolipoprotein B (Apo B) from Baseline (Week 0 of Study 733-005/UP1002) to Week 246 (Week 168 in Study AEGR-733-012).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 246

Population: Safety Population - The number of patients in the Safety Population at time points after Week 126 decreased because the study remained active within each country until either approval of the marketing application was obtained, or, in countries where marketing authorization was not sought for, patients transitioned into an Expanded Access Program.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LomitapidePercent Change in Apolipoprotein B (Apo B)-65.9 Percent ChangeStandard Deviation 15.76
Secondary

Percent Change in Apolipoprotein B (Apo B)

Percent change in Apolipoprotein B (Apo B) from Baseline (Week 0 of Study 733-005/UP1002) to Week 222 (Week 144 in Study AEGR-733-012).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 222

Population: Safety Population - The number of patients in the Safety Population at time points after Week 126 decreased because the study remained active within each country until either approval of the marketing application was obtained, or, in countries where marketing authorization was not sought for, patients transitioned into an Expanded Access Program.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LomitapidePercent Change in Apolipoprotein B (Apo B)-65.1 Percent ChangeStandard Deviation 20.72
Secondary

Percent Change in Apolipoprotein B (Apo B)

Percent change in Apolipoprotein B (Apo B) from Baseline (Week 0 of Study 733-005/UP1002) to Week 174 (Week 96 in Study AEGR-733-012).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 174

Population: Safety Population - The number of patients in the Safety Population at time points after Week 126 decreased because the study remained active within each country until either approval of the marketing application was obtained, or, in countries where marketing authorization was not sought for, patients transitioned into an Expanded Access Program.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LomitapidePercent Change in Apolipoprotein B (Apo B)-59.4 Percent ChangeStandard Deviation 12.6
Secondary

Percent Change in High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C)

Percent change in High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) from Baseline (Week 0 of Study 733-005/UP1002) to Week 294 (Week 216 in Study AEGR-733-012).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 294

Population: Safety Population - The number of patients in the Safety Population at time points after Week 126 decreased because the study remained active within each country until either approval of the marketing application was obtained, or, in countries where marketing authorization was not sought for, patients transitioned into an Expanded Access Program.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LomitapidePercent Change in High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C)-23.5 Percent ChangeStandard Deviation 2.27
Secondary

Percent Change in High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C)

Percent change in High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) from Baseline (Week 0 of Study 733-005/UP1002) to Week 126 (Week 48 in Study AEGR-733-012).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 126

Population: Week 126 Completers Population

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LomitapidePercent Change in High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C)-8.3 Percent ChangeStandard Deviation 19.28
Secondary

Percent Change in High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C)

Percent change in High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) from Baseline (Week 0 of Study 733-005/UP1002) to Week 174 (Week 96 in Study AEGR-733-012).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 174

Population: Safety Population - The number of patients in the Safety Population at time points after Week 126 decreased because the study remained active within each country until either approval of the marketing application was obtained, or, in countries where marketing authorization was not sought for, patients transitioned into an Expanded Access Program.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LomitapidePercent Change in High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C)3.8 Percent ChangeStandard Deviation 26.51
Secondary

Percent Change in High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C)

Percent change in High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) from Baseline (Week 0 of Study 733-005/UP1002) to Week 222 (Week 144 in Study AEGR-733-012).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 222

Population: Safety Population - The number of patients in the Safety Population at time points after Week 126 decreased because the study remained active within each country until either approval of the marketing application was obtained, or, in countries where marketing authorization was not sought for, patients transitioned into an Expanded Access Program.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LomitapidePercent Change in High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C)-2.7 Percent ChangeStandard Deviation 21.22
Secondary

Percent Change in High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C)

Percent change in High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) from Baseline (Week 0 of Study 733-005/UP1002) to Week 246 (Week 168 in Study AEGR-733-012).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 246

Population: Safety Population - The number of patients in the Safety Population at time points after Week 126 decreased because the study remained active within each country until either approval of the marketing application was obtained, or, in countries where marketing authorization was not sought for, patients transitioned into an Expanded Access Program.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LomitapidePercent Change in High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C)-12.5 Percent ChangeStandard Deviation 19.17
Secondary

Percent Change in High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C)

Percent change in High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C) from Baseline (Week 0 of Study 733-005/UP1002) to Week 270 (Week 192 in Study AEGR-733-012).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 270

Population: Safety Population - The number of patients in the Safety Population at time points after Week 126 decreased because the study remained active within each country until either approval of the marketing application was obtained, or, in countries where marketing authorization was not sought for, patients transitioned into an Expanded Access Program.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LomitapidePercent Change in High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C)-10.3 Percent ChangeStandard Deviation 27.68
Secondary

Percent Change in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C)

Percent change in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) from Baseline (Week 0 of Study 733-005/UP1002) to Week 294 (Week 216 in Study AEGR-733-012).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 294

Population: Safety Population - The number of patients in the Safety Population at time points after Week 126 decreased because the study remained active within each country until either approval of the marketing application was obtained, or, in countries where marketing authorization was not sought for, patients transitioned into an Expanded Access Program.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LomitapidePercent Change in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C)-51.1 Percent ChangeStandard Deviation 10.11
Secondary

Percent Change in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C)

Percent change in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) from Baseline (Week 0 of Study 733-005/UP1002) to Week 246 (Week 168 in Study AEGR-733-012).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 246

Population: Safety Population - The number of patients in the Safety Population at time points after Week 126 decreased because the study remained active within each country until either approval of the marketing application was obtained, or, in countries where marketing authorization was not sought for, patients transitioned into an Expanded Access Program.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LomitapidePercent Change in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C)-60.1 Percent ChangeStandard Deviation 18.51
Secondary

Percent Change in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C)

Percent change in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) from Baseline (Week 0 of Study 733-005/UP1002) to Week 222 (Week 144 in Study AEGR-733-012).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 222

Population: Safety Population - The number of patients in the Safety Population at time points after Week 126 decreased because the study remained active within each country until either approval of the marketing application was obtained, or, in countries where marketing authorization was not sought for, patients transitioned into an Expanded Access Program.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LomitapidePercent Change in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C)-58.5 Percent ChangeStandard Deviation 24.25
Secondary

Percent Change in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C)

Percent change in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) from Baseline (Week 0 of Study 733-005/UP1002) to Week 270 (Week 192 in Study AEGR-733-012).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 270

Population: Safety Population - The number of patients in the Safety Population at time points after Week 126 decreased because the study remained active within each country until either approval of the marketing application was obtained, or, in countries where marketing authorization was not sought for, patients transitioned into an Expanded Access Program.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LomitapidePercent Change in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C)-74.0 Percent ChangeStandard Deviation 19.1
Secondary

Percent Change in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C)

Percent change in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C) from Baseline (Week 0 of Study 733-005/UP1002) to Week 174 (Week 96 in Study AEGR-733-012).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 174

Population: Safety Population - The number of patients in the Safety Population at time points after Week 126 decreased because the study remained active within each country until either approval of the marketing application was obtained, or, in countries where marketing authorization was not sought for, patients transitioned into an Expanded Access Program.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LomitapidePercent Change in Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C)-51.0 Percent ChangeStandard Deviation 16.03
Secondary

Percent Change in Lp(a)

Percent change in Lp(a) from Baseline (Week 0 of Study 733-005/UP1002) to Week 294 (Week 216 in Study AEGR-733-012).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 294

Population: Safety Population - The number of patients in the Safety Population at time points after Week 126 decreased because the study remained active within each country until either approval of the marketing application was obtained, or, in countries where marketing authorization was not sought for, patients transitioned into an Expanded Access Program.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LomitapidePercent Change in Lp(a)-10.4 Percent ChangeStandard Deviation 35.64
Secondary

Percent Change in Lp(a)

Percent change in Lp(a) from Baseline (Week 0 of Study 733-005/UP1002) to Week 126 (Week 48 in Study AEGR-733-012).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 126

Population: Week 126 Completers Population

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LomitapidePercent Change in Lp(a)5.5 Percent ChangeStandard Deviation 43.62
Secondary

Percent Change in Lp(a)

Percent change in Lp(a) from Baseline (Week 0 of Study 733-005/UP1002) to Week 174 (Week 96 in Study AEGR-733-012).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 174

Population: Safety Population - The number of patients in the Safety Population at time points after Week 126 decreased because the study remained active within each country until either approval of the marketing application was obtained, or, in countries where marketing authorization was not sought for, patients transitioned into an Expanded Access Program.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LomitapidePercent Change in Lp(a)10.2 Percent ChangeStandard Deviation 60.64
Secondary

Percent Change in Lp(a)

Percent change in Lp(a) from Baseline (Week 0 of Study 733-005/UP1002) to Week 222 (Week 144 in Study AEGR-733-012).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 222

Population: Safety Population - The number of patients in the Safety Population at time points after Week 126 decreased because the study remained active within each country until either approval of the marketing application was obtained, or, in countries where marketing authorization was not sought for, patients transitioned into an Expanded Access Program.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LomitapidePercent Change in Lp(a)-12.8 Percent ChangeStandard Deviation 49
Secondary

Percent Change in Lp(a)

Percent change in Lp(a) from Baseline (Week 0 of Study 733-005/UP1002) to Week 246 (Week 168 in Study AEGR-733-012).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 246

Population: Safety Population - The number of patients in the Safety Population at time points after Week 126 decreased because the study remained active within each country until either approval of the marketing application was obtained, or, in countries where marketing authorization was not sought for, patients transitioned into an Expanded Access Program.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LomitapidePercent Change in Lp(a)3.4 Percent ChangeStandard Deviation 54.22
Secondary

Percent Change in Lp(a)

Percent change in Lp(a) from Baseline (Week 0 of Study 733-005/UP1002) to Week 270 (Week 192 in Study AEGR-733-012).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 270

Population: Safety Population - The number of patients in the Safety Population at time points after Week 126 decreased because the study remained active within each country until either approval of the marketing application was obtained, or, in countries where marketing authorization was not sought for, patients transitioned into an Expanded Access Program.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LomitapidePercent Change in Lp(a)-6.6 Percent ChangeStandard Deviation 48.99
Secondary

Percent Change in Non High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C)

Percent change in Non High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C) from Baseline (Week 0 of Study 733-005/UP1002) to Week 126 (Week 48 in Study AEGR-733-012).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 126

Population: Week 126 Completers Population

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LomitapidePercent Change in Non High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C)-47.1 Percent ChangeStandard Deviation 27.83
Secondary

Percent Change in Non High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C)

Percent change in Non High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C) from Baseline (Week 0 of Study 733-005/UP1002) to Week 174 (Week 96 in Study AEGR-733-012).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 174

Population: Safety Population - The number of patients in the Safety Population at time points after Week 126 decreased because the study remained active within each country until either approval of the marketing application was obtained, or, in countries where marketing authorization was not sought for, patients transitioned into an Expanded Access Program.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LomitapidePercent Change in Non High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C)-53.5 Percent ChangeStandard Deviation 16.42
Secondary

Percent Change in Non High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C)

Percent change in Non High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C) from Baseline (Week 0 of Study 733-005/UP1002) to Week 222 (Week 144 in Study AEGR-733-012).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 222

Population: Safety Population - The number of patients in the Safety Population at time points after Week 126 decreased because the study remained active within each country until either approval of the marketing application was obtained, or, in countries where marketing authorization was not sought for, patients transitioned into an Expanded Access Program.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LomitapidePercent Change in Non High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C)-57.0 Percent ChangeStandard Deviation 24.07
Secondary

Percent Change in Non High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C)

Percent change in Non High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C) from Baseline (Week 0 of Study 733-005/UP1002) to Week 246 (Week 168 in Study AEGR-733-012).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 246

Population: Safety Population - The number of patients in the Safety Population at time points after Week 126 decreased because the study remained active within each country until either approval of the marketing application was obtained, or, in countries where marketing authorization was not sought for, patients transitioned into an Expanded Access Program.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LomitapidePercent Change in Non High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C)-58.8 Percent ChangeStandard Deviation 17.73
Secondary

Percent Change in Non High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C)

Percent change in Non High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C) from Baseline (Week 0 of Study 733-005/UP1002) to Week 270 (Week 192 in Study AEGR-733-012).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 270

Population: Safety Population - The number of patients in the Safety Population at time points after Week 126 decreased because the study remained active within each country until either approval of the marketing application was obtained, or, in countries where marketing authorization was not sought for, patients transitioned into an Expanded Access Program.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LomitapidePercent Change in Non High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C)-71.5 Percent ChangeStandard Deviation 17.65
Secondary

Percent Change in Non High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C)

Percent change in Non High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C) from Baseline (Week 0 of Study 733-005/UP1002) to Week 294 (Week 216 in Study AEGR-733-012).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 294

Population: Safety Population - The number of patients in the Safety Population at time points after Week 126 decreased because the study remained active within each country until either approval of the marketing application was obtained, or, in countries where marketing authorization was not sought for, patients transitioned into an Expanded Access Program.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LomitapidePercent Change in Non High Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C)-46.6 Percent ChangeStandard Deviation 5.19
Secondary

Percent Change in Total Cholesterol

Percent change in Total Cholesterol from Baseline (Week 0 of Study 733-005/UP1002) to Week 126 (Week 48 in Study AEGR-733-012).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 126

Population: Week 126 Completers Population

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LomitapidePercent Change in Total Cholesterol-43.2 Percent ChangeStandard Deviation 25.35
Secondary

Percent Change in Total Cholesterol

Percent change in Total Cholesterol from Baseline (Week 0 of Study 733-005/UP1002) to Week 246 (Week 168 in Study AEGR-733-012).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 246

Population: Safety Population - The number of patients in the Safety Population at time points after Week 126 decreased because the study remained active within each country until either approval of the marketing application was obtained, or, in countries where marketing authorization was not sought for, patients transitioned into an Expanded Access Program.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LomitapidePercent Change in Total Cholesterol-54.1 Percent ChangeStandard Deviation 16.88
Secondary

Percent Change in Total Cholesterol

Percent change in Total Cholesterol from Baseline (Week 0 of Study 733-005/UP1002) to Week 270 (Week 192 in Study AEGR-733-012).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 270

Population: Safety Population - The number of patients in the Safety Population at time points after Week 126 decreased because the study remained active within each country until either approval of the marketing application was obtained, or, in countries where marketing authorization was not sought for, patients transitioned into an Expanded Access Program.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LomitapidePercent Change in Total Cholesterol-65.2 Percent ChangeStandard Deviation 15.97
Secondary

Percent Change in Total Cholesterol

Percent change in Total Cholesterol from Baseline (Week 0 of Study 733-005/UP1002) to Week 294 (Week 216 in Study AEGR-733-012).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 294

Population: Safety Population - The number of patients in the Safety Population at time points after Week 126 decreased because the study remained active within each country until either approval of the marketing application was obtained, or, in countries where marketing authorization was not sought for, patients transitioned into an Expanded Access Program.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LomitapidePercent Change in Total Cholesterol-43.9 Percent ChangeStandard Deviation 5.01
Secondary

Percent Change in Total Cholesterol

Percent change in Total Cholesterol from Baseline (Week 0 of Study 733-005/UP1002) to Week 174 (Week 96 in Study AEGR-733-012).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 174

Population: Safety Population - The number of patients in the Safety Population at time points after Week 126 decreased because the study remained active within each country until either approval of the marketing application was obtained, or, in countries where marketing authorization was not sought for, patients transitioned into an Expanded Access Program.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LomitapidePercent Change in Total Cholesterol-46.9 Percent ChangeStandard Deviation 15.21
Secondary

Percent Change in Total Cholesterol

Percent change in Total Cholesterol from Baseline (Week 0 of Study 733-005/UP1002) to Week 222 (Week 144 in Study AEGR-733-012).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 222

Population: Safety Population - The number of patients in the Safety Population at time points after Week 126 decreased because the study remained active within each country until either approval of the marketing application was obtained, or, in countries where marketing authorization was not sought for, patients transitioned into an Expanded Access Program.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LomitapidePercent Change in Total Cholesterol-51.0 Percent ChangeStandard Deviation 21.34
Secondary

Percent Change in Triglycerides

Percent change in Triglycerides from Baseline (Week 0 of Study 733-005/UP1002) to Week 126 (Week 48 in Study AEGR-733-012).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 126

Population: Week 126 Completers Population

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LomitapidePercent Change in Triglycerides-37.5 Percent ChangeStandard Deviation 42.52
Secondary

Percent Change in Triglycerides

Percent change in Triglycerides from Baseline (Week 0 of Study 733-005/UP1002) to Week 222 (Week 144 in Study AEGR-733-012).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 222

Population: Safety Population - The number of patients in the Safety Population at time points after Week 126 decreased because the study remained active within each country until either approval of the marketing application was obtained, or, in countries where marketing authorization was not sought for, patients transitioned into an Expanded Access Program.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LomitapidePercent Change in Triglycerides-27.6 Percent ChangeStandard Deviation 48.88
Secondary

Percent Change in Triglycerides

Percent change in Triglycerides from Baseline (Week 0 of Study 733-005/UP1002) to Week 246 (Week 168 in Study AEGR-733-012).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 246

Population: Safety Population - The number of patients in the Safety Population at time points after Week 126 decreased because the study remained active within each country until either approval of the marketing application was obtained, or, in countries where marketing authorization was not sought for, patients transitioned into an Expanded Access Program.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LomitapidePercent Change in Triglycerides-41.9 Percent ChangeStandard Deviation 33.16
Secondary

Percent Change in Triglycerides

Percent change in Triglycerides from Baseline (Week 0 of Study 733-005/UP1002) to Week 270 (Week 192 in Study AEGR-733-012).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 270

Population: Safety Population - The number of patients in the Safety Population at time points after Week 126 decreased because the study remained active within each country until either approval of the marketing application was obtained, or, in countries where marketing authorization was not sought for, patients transitioned into an Expanded Access Program.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LomitapidePercent Change in Triglycerides-48.5 Percent ChangeStandard Deviation 34.24
Secondary

Percent Change in Triglycerides

Percent change in Triglycerides from Baseline (Week 0 of Study 733-005/UP1002) to Week 294 (Week 216 in Study AEGR-733-012).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 294

Population: Safety Population - The number of patients in the Safety Population at time points after Week 126 decreased because the study remained active within each country until either approval of the marketing application was obtained, or, in countries where marketing authorization was not sought for, patients transitioned into an Expanded Access Program.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LomitapidePercent Change in Triglycerides29.2 Percent ChangeStandard Deviation 58.74
Secondary

Percent Change in Triglycerides

Percent change in Triglycerides from Baseline (Week 0 of Study 733-005/UP1002) to Week 174 (Week 96 in Study AEGR-733-012).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 174

Population: Safety Population - The number of patients in the Safety Population at time points after Week 126 decreased because the study remained active within each country until either approval of the marketing application was obtained, or, in countries where marketing authorization was not sought for, patients transitioned into an Expanded Access Program.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LomitapidePercent Change in Triglycerides-31.7 Percent ChangeStandard Deviation 37.09
Secondary

Percent Change in Very Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (VLDL-C)

Percent change in Very Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (VLDL-C) from Baseline (Week 0 of Study 733-005/UP1002) to Week 270 (Week 192 in Study AEGR-733-012).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 270

Population: Safety Population - The number of patients in the Safety Population at time points after Week 126 decreased because the study remained active within each country until either approval of the marketing application was obtained, or, in countries where marketing authorization was not sought for, patients transitioned into an Expanded Access Program.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LomitapidePercent Change in Very Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (VLDL-C)-48.7 Percent ChangeStandard Deviation 33.41
Secondary

Percent Change in Very Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (VLDL-C)

Percent change in Very Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (VLDL-C) from Baseline (Week 0 of Study 733-005/UP1002) to Week 246 (Week 168 in Study AEGR-733-012).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 246

Population: Safety Population - The number of patients in the Safety Population at time points after Week 126 decreased because the study remained active within each country until either approval of the marketing application was obtained, or, in countries where marketing authorization was not sought for, patients transitioned into an Expanded Access Program.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LomitapidePercent Change in Very Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (VLDL-C)-41.4 Percent ChangeStandard Deviation 34.2
Secondary

Percent Change in Very Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (VLDL-C)

Percent change in Very Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (VLDL-C) from Baseline (Week 0 of Study 733-005/UP1002) to Week 222 (Week 144 in Study AEGR-733-012).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 222

Population: Safety Population - The number of patients in the Safety Population at time points after Week 126 decreased because the study remained active within each country until either approval of the marketing application was obtained, or, in countries where marketing authorization was not sought for, patients transitioned into an Expanded Access Program.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LomitapidePercent Change in Very Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (VLDL-C)-26.3 Percent ChangeStandard Deviation 49.94
Secondary

Percent Change in Very Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (VLDL-C)

Percent change in Very Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (VLDL-C) from Baseline (Week 0 of Study 733-005/UP1002) to Week 174 (Week 96 in Study AEGR-733-012).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 174

Population: Safety Population - The number of patients in the Safety Population at time points after Week 126 decreased because the study remained active within each country until either approval of the marketing application was obtained, or, in countries where marketing authorization was not sought for, patients transitioned into an Expanded Access Program.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LomitapidePercent Change in Very Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (VLDL-C)-31.5 Percent ChangeStandard Deviation 36.32
Secondary

Percent Change in Very Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (VLDL-C)

Percent change in Very Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (VLDL-C) from Baseline (Week 0 of Study 733-005/UP1002) to Week 126 (Week 48 in Study AEGR-733-012).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 126

Population: Week 126 Completers Population

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LomitapidePercent Change in Very Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (VLDL-C)-36.8 Percent ChangeStandard Deviation 43.9
Secondary

Percent Change in Very Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (VLDL-C)

Percent change in Very Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (VLDL-C) from Baseline (Week 0 of Study 733-005/UP1002) to Week 294 (Week 216 in Study AEGR-733-012).

Time frame: Baseline and Week 294

Population: Safety Population - The number of patients in the Safety Population at time points after Week 126 decreased because the study remained active within each country until either approval of the marketing application was obtained, or, in countries where marketing authorization was not sought for, patients transitioned into an Expanded Access Program.

ArmMeasureValue (MEAN)Dispersion
LomitapidePercent Change in Very Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (VLDL-C)30.6 Percent ChangeStandard Deviation 59.94

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Data processed: Mar 6, 2026